مطالعه نقش واسطهای اعتماد بین زوجین در تاثیرگذاری دخالت خویشاوندان بر شوهر آزاری(مورد مطالعه: مردان متاهل کلانشهر تبریز)

فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مقاله 2، دوره 6، شماره 24، بهمن و اسفند 1394، صفحه 19-40   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

محمد عباس زاده^{* 1}؛ پویان احیایی²؛ کمال کوهی³

¹دکترای جامعه‌شناسی، دانشیار دانشگاه تبریز

²دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد پژوهش علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تبریز

³دکترای جامعه‌شناسی، استادیار دانشگاه تبریز

تاریخ دریافت: 13 بهمن 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 13 بهمن 1394 

چکیده

خشونت خانگی از قدیم الایام، موضوع چالش برانگیزی در بین خانواده‌ها بوده است، آنچه که عمدتا بیشتر از گذشته مطمح نظر بوده، خشونت علیه زنان است، ولی واقعیت این است که شوهر آزاری نیز به مجموعه خشونت‌های خانگی اضافه شده است؛ چیزی که گهگاه نمود آن به نوعی در سپهر اجتماعی شهری مشهود است.‌ به همین خاطر این مقاله در نظر دارد ضمن سنجش میزان شوهر آزاری در بین مردان متاهل شهر تبریز، به برخی از عوامل موثر بر آن پرداخت نماید. روش تحقیق با رویکرد کمی نگاشته شده و از این حیث با اتکا به پارادایم پوزیتویستی تلاش داشته است‌ با کاربرد پرسشنامه، هدف یاد شده را در بین 270 نمونه آماری منتخب از شهر تبریز به روش نمونه‌گیری چند مرحله‌ای بررسی نماید. نتایج یافته‌ها حکایت از ‌وجود شوهر آزاری در جامعه آماری مورد بررسی (‌ولو متوسط به پایین) ‌داشته است.‌ هم­چنین در بین متغیرهای مهم تاثیر‌گذار ضمن اینکه متغیر ‌دخالت خویشاوندان بیش­ترین تاثیر را بر میزان شوهر‌آزاری داشته‌، متغیر‌ اعتماد اجتماعی بین زن و شوهر نیز با تاثیر‌پذیری‌ از متغیر یاد شده، اثر شایان توجهی را بر متغیر وابسته گذاشته است؛ طوری‌که در مجموع متغیرهای مورد استفاده توانسته‌اند 56 درصد از واریانس تغییرات ‌متغیر شوهر‌آزاری را تبیین کنند. این مورد می‌تواند زنگ خطر را برای متولیان امور فرهنگی و اجتماعی در ارتباط با احتمال ایجاد خدشه در ثبات خانوادگی به صدا در‌آورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

شوهر‌آزاری؛ اعتماد بین زوجین؛ دخالت خویشاوندان؛ مردان متاهل

عنوان مقاله [English]

Husband Abuse: Case Study of Married Men in Tabriz Metropolis

نویسندگان [English]

M. A¹؛ P. E²؛ K. K³

چکیده [English]

Since the ancient, family violence has been one of the most challenging issues in families, but the violence against women has been presented and considered more than before. However, the truth is that husband abuse has been added to the set of family violence, which sometimes can be observed in the cities. Therefore, the present study attempts to measure the degree of husband abuse among married men in the Metropolis of Tabriz and investigates some factors affecting it. The method employed in the present study is a quantitative one by relying on positivism; the paper investigates the mentioned aim among 270 participants selected as sample size from Tabriz City by using the multistage sample method and by employing the instrument of questionnaire. The results of findings indicate the existence of husband abuse in the investigated population (however low or moderate). Among the important effective variables, the variable of relatives’ intervention has had the most effect on the degree of husband abuse. The variable of social trust between wives and husbands influenced by the mentioned variable has had a significant effect on the dependent variable so that the total variables have been able to explain 56% of the variance of the variations of the variable of husband abuse. This issue can be an alarm for the authorities of social and cultural affairs regarding the probability of creating flaws in family stability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Husband abuse, Trust between spouses, Relatives’ intervention, Married men

مراجع

1. AzamAzadeh, M. and Dehghanfard, R. (2006). Violence against women in Tehran: The role of gender socialization,resources available to women and family relations. Women in Development (Women's Policy Research), No. 4‌, PP. 159-175 (Persian).
2. Abbaszadeh,M. Koohi,K. Ehyayi,P.(2015). Investigating Socioeconomic Factors Related to Women’s Violence against Their Husbands in Families (Case Study: Married Men in the City of Tabriz).International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) .Vol . 4. No.7.pp 5-11.
3. Abbaszadeh,M. Koohi,K. Ehyayi,P.(2015). The Study of the Interventional Role of the Type of Power Relations in Influencing of Status Inconsistency on wife abuse.International journal advances in social sciences and humanities . Vol.3. No.6. pp 1-9.
4. Chalabi, M. (1996). The sociology of order, Tehran: Nei (Persian).
5. Dallos. R. and Mclaughlin. E. (1994).Social Problems and the Family‌, London Sage publication.‌
6. Ezazi, Sh. (2001). Family violence against battered women.Tehran: Sali Publication (Persian).
7. Ezazi, Sh. (2004). The structure of the society and violence against women.Quarterly Journal of Social Welfare. Year 4, No.‌14, PP. 47-82 (Persian).
8. GhassemiRoshan, E. (2003). Husband abuse, abuse against husband's behaviors.Journal of Women Strategic Studies. No. 20, PP. 43-68 (Persian).
9. Giddens, A. (1996). Sociology.Translated by: M. Sabouri‌, Tehran: Nei (Persian).
10. Haarr, R. N.  (2007). Wife Abuse in Tajikisten.Feminist criminology. No. 2, PP. 245-261.
11. Habermas, J. (1998). Communicative action: an alternative to violence.Translated by: E. Soltani.Journal of  Kiyan. No.pp 45. (Persian).
12. Hadeed, L .baseel, N. (2007). Typologies of abuse among ‌afro-trinidadian women.Journal of interpersonal ‌violence. No. 5, PP. 479-497.
13. Kraj, Zh. (2002). Psychological diseases. Translated by: M. Mansour and P. Dadsetan‌. Tehran: Roshd Publication (Persian).
14. Kranz, G. Phuong, T.V.Larsson, V. Thi Bich Thuan, N. and Ringsberg, K.C. (2005). Intimate partner violence: forms, consequences and preparedness to act as percieved by healthcare staff and district and community leaders in a rural district in northern Vietnam.Journal of the Royal Institute of Public Health.‌Vol. 119, PP. 1048-1055.
15. Lisa, D. (1990). Brush‌.Violent Acts and Injurious Outcomes in Married Couples: Methodological Issues in the National Survey of Families and Households.Gender and SocietyJournal. Vol. 4, No. 1, PP. 56-67.
16. Mohseni Tabrizi, A. Kaldi, A. Javadianzadeh, M. (2013).The Study of Domestic Violence inMarrid Women Addmitted to Yazd Legal Medicine Organization and Welfare Organization.The Journal of Toloo-e-behdasht. Vol. 11, No. 3, PP. 11-24 (Persian).
17. Rahmati, M (2009). Sociology of sports violence.Tehran: Elmi and Farhangi Publication Co (Persian).
18. Riahi, M. E. et al. (2007).A sociological analysis of tendency towards divorce, case study of Kermanshah Township.Journal of Women’s Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, PP. 109-140  (Persian).
19. Sa’adati, M. (2011). Investigating the relationship between social capital on mental health and domestic violence. MA thesis, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Tabriz (Persian).
20. Safiri, Kh. And MirzaMohammadi, M. (2006).Trust in husbands, case study in Tehran, Iranian Journal of Social Studies.Year 1. No. 1. PP. 125-185 (Persian).
21. Samadi Rad, B., et al. (2007). Reporting a rare case of husband abuse.Journal of Forensic Medicine,‌ Year 13, No. 4, PP. 261-264 (Persian).
22. SeddighSarvestani, R. (2008). Sociology of deviance and social pathology, Tehran: SAMT (Persian).
23. Suzanne K. Steinmetz, Joseph, Lucca, S. (1988). Husband Battering, Handbook of Family Violence, PP. 233-246.

5.       Chanley, J. Thomas J. R, Wendy, M. R. (2000). The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis,‌ Public Opinion Quarterly, No. 64, PP. 239-256.

9.       Gelles, R. J. (1977). ‌The violent home a study of physical aggression between husbands and wives.Journal of marraiage and the family. Vol.39, No. 2, PP. 431-434.