بررسی عوامل جامعه شناختی مؤثر بر میزان مزاحمت‌های خیابانی مورد مطالعه شهر کرمانشاه

فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مقاله 5، دوره 6، شماره 24، بهمن و اسفند 1394، صفحه 77-104   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

محسن صفاریان¹؛ گلمراد مرادی^{* 2}؛ مریم نریمانی³

¹مربی گروه جامعه شناسی دانشگاه پیام نور

²گروه جامعه شناسی، واحد اسلام آبادغرب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلام آبادغرب، ایران

³دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمانشاه

تاریخ دریافت: 13 بهمن 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 13 بهمن 1394 

چکیده

هدف این مطالعه بررسی عوامل جامعه شناختی مؤثر بر میزان مزاحمت­های خیابانی در شهر کرمانشاه است که با روش توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی انجام و داده­های مورد نیاز با استفاده از پرسشنامه جمع آوری و با نرم افزار SPSS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. جامعه آماری مورد مطالعه دختران و زنان 15 تا 49 سال شهر کرمانشاه که در زمان پژوهش به استناد آمار سال 1390 تعداد کل آنها 20325 نفر می­باشند. از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی خوشه­ای استفاده به عمل آمد. نتایج ضریب همبستگی نشان می­دهد که بین بی نظمی اجتماعی، محرومیت نسبی، میزان دینداری و میزان تأثیرگذاری دوستان رابطه معنادار وجود دارد. هم­چنین نتایج مقایسه میانگین­ها نشان می­دهد که پایگاه اقتصادی اجتماعی، وضعیت تأهل و همراه داشتن در رفتن به خیابان بر میزان مزاحمت­های خیابانی تأثیر معناداری دارد. نتایج رگرسیون چند متغیره نیز نشان می­دهد که چها متغیر میزان محرومیت نسبی (364/0Beta=)، تأثیرگذاری دوستان (272/0Beta=)، میزان دینداری (199/0-Beta=) و متغیر بی نظمی اجتماعی (168/0Beta=) به ترتیب میزان اهمیتی که در تبیین متغیر وابسته داشتند، وارد معادله شده و توانستند روی هم رفته 57 درصد از تغییرات درونی متغیر وابسته را تبیین نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مزاحمت خیابانی؛ زنان؛ محرومیت نسبی؛ دوستان؛ بی نظمی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Examining Sociological Factors Affecting the Level of Street Harassment (Case Study: Kermanshah City)

نویسندگان [English]

M. S¹؛ GH. M²؛ M. N³

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to examine sociological factors affecting the level of street harassment in the city of Kermanshah. Descriptive and survey method was conducted in the research. SPSS software analyzed the required data collected through a questionnaire. The population size consisted of 20325 individuals including all girls and women aged15 to 49 in Kermanshah according to the statistical information of 2010. Cluster random sampling was used. The result of correlation coefficient showed that there was a meaningful relationship between the religion and influence of friends. However, the result of comparing average indicated that socioeconomic status, material status and presence on the street had significant effect on street harassment. The result of multivariate regression showed that 4 variables including the relative deprivation (Beta=.36), influence of friends (Beta.27), the religion (Beta= -.19), and social disorganization (Beta=.17), in order of importance in explaining the dependent variable were entered and all together explained 57% of internal changes in dependent variable.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Street Harassment, Women, Relative Deprivation, FRIENDS, Disorganization

مراجع

1. Allport, G. W & Ross, M. J. Jr. (1967). “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 432-443.
2. Abazari. Y., Sadeghi-Fasaei. S. and Hamidi, N. (2009). Insecurity in women's experience of everyday life, Femail Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 75-103. (Persian).
3. Adamian, M., AzimiHashemi. M. and Sanatisharifi. N. (2013). The sociological analysis of women's clothing style, Journal of women and society, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 161-186. (Persian).
4. Ahmadi, M. and Kaldi, A. (2013). The survey of social security and social factors affecting women in Sanandaj, Journal of women and society, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 1-20.(Persian).
5. Alvani. S. M. and Danaeifard. H. (2006). Order in chaos theory and management, Tehran, Publishing of Arasbaran. (Persian).
6. Bowman, C. G. (1993).”Street harassment and the informal ghettoization of women”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 517-580.
7. Chalabi, M. (1996), “sociology of order: the explanation and interpretation of social order”, Tehran: NashreNai. (Persian).
8. Drew, P. E. (2004), Iran. In R.T. Francouer and R.J. Noonan (Eds.), the Continuum Complete: International Encyclopedia of Sexuality. The Kinsey Institute.
9. Fairchild, K. M. & L. A. Rudman (2008), "Everyday stranger harassment and women's objectification". Soc Just Rec, 21, pp.338-357. New York: Spring Science + Business Media.
10. Fairchild, K. M. & L. A. Rudman (2008).” Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification”. Soc Just Res, 21, pp. 338-357.
11. Fairchild, K. M. (2007), Everyday stranger harassment: Frequency and consequences. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctorof Philosophy, New Brunswick University of New Jersey.
12. Gardner, C. B. (1995), passing by: Gender and public harassment. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
13. Garrosi. S. (2006). Assess the impact of beliefs format based on gender inequality: The Case of Kerman and its surrounding villages, M.S Thesis, unpublished, Shiraz University. (Persian).
14. Giddens, A. (1999). Modernity and Self- Identity: Self and Society intheLate Modern Age. Trans: NaserMovafaghian, Tehran: Pub nei.
15. Giddens, A. (2002), sociology, Trans: ManocherSabouri, Nashrnai, vol 7. (Persian).
16. Bourdieu, P. (2002),"Rational choice theory and practical reasons for action",Trans: Mardiha, M. Tehran: Naghsh&neghar. [Persian]
17. Guarr, T. (2000). Why do people revolt? Translator Ali MORSHEDI birth, Tehran, Research Institute for Strategic Studies. (Persian).
18. Iman. M .T.,Yosefi. E. and Hoseinzadeh, M. (2012), Women, harassment and response: Review the experience of female students on the harassment street and respond to it, Journal of Sociology Iran, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 63-93. (Persian).
19. Kalantari. M., Ghezelbash. S. and HojiMalayeri. P. (2010). Spatial analysis and mapping urban crime Zanjan geographic information system using GIS (Case study: street crime interferes), Quarterly geographical landscape of the Zagros, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 133-147.
20. Kamran, F. and EbatatiNazarlo, S. (2009), “the survey of economical social factors on peace feeling and social safety of woman: M.A. Students sociology in Tehran University”, Social research magazine, 3 rd year, No 6. (Persian).
21. Kearl, Holly (2011), Street harassment of women: It's a bigger problem than you think.
22. Ketabi. M. (2005). Religion, social capital and socio-cultural development, Journal of Isfahan University, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 169-192. (Persian).
23. Lahsaeizadeh, A. &Yousefinejad, E. (2011). "Social aspects of women's experiences of sexual harassment in public places inIran". Sexuality and CultureVol. 14, No. 1, pp. 169-192.
24. Lahsaeizadeh. A. A. and Yosefi. E. (2011). The relationship between gender norms accepted and experienced street harassment: A case study of female students of Shiraz University,Journal of Sociology reconciliation in Ashtian, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 129-143. (Persian).
25. Lenton, R., M. D. Smith, J. Fox & N. Morra (1999), "Sexual harassment in public: Experiences of Canadian women".CRSA/RCSA, 36/4pp: 517-540.
26. MacMillan, R., A. Nierobisz& S. Welsh (2000), "Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perception of safety among women"Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, pp: 306-322.
27. Moeidfar. S. and Hamidi. N. (2008). Female-headed households, did not damage social pathology, Journal of Social Science, Vol. 2, No. 32, pp. 131-158. (Persian).
28. News Agency World News. (2007). Step increase of street harassment, http://jahannews.com/vdcbasb8arhbggp.uiur.html. (Persian).
29. Parish, W. L., A. Das & E. O. Laumann (2006). “Sexual harassment of women in urban China”, Arch Sex Behave,Vol. 2, No. 35, pp. 411-425.
30. Sahabi, J., Faizi. A. and Samadi. B. J. J. (2010). The effect of social factors on social security in Sanandaj, Bulletin of Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 155-182. (Persian).
31. Samani. S. and Folad Chang. M. (2007). Psychology of Adolescence, Shiraz: Publication MalekSoliman. (Persian).
32. Sigal, J. & H. Jacobsen (1999), "A cross-cultural exploration of factors affecting reactions to sexual harassment: Attitudes andpolicies". Psychology, Public policy, and Law, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 760-785.
33. Sigal, J. & H. Jacobsen (1999).”A cross-cultural exploration of factors affecting reactions to sexual harassment: Attitudes and policies”.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 760-785.
34. Yamawaki, Niwako(2007) Rape Perception and the Function of Ambivalent Sexism andGender-Role Traditionalist, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 22, No. 4, 406-423.
35. Zokaei. S. (2006). Sexual harassment of women in different environments, Archives of the National Youth Organization Tehran. (Persian).