بررسی رابطه شایستگیها و منزلت استادان زن با کیفیت تدریس آنان در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی

فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مقاله 7، دوره 8، شماره 31، آذر و دی 1396، صفحه 117-134   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

نیما شهیدی^{* 1}؛ سیروس حدادنیا²

¹استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نورآباد ممسنی، گروه علوم تربیتی، نورآباد ممسنی، ایران

²مربی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نورآباد ممسنی، گروه علوم تربیتی، نورآباد ممسنی، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 21 تیر 1393،  تاریخ بازنگری: 30 مهر 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 03 بهمن 1396 

چکیده

هدف عمده این پژوهش ،بررسی رابطه بین شایستگیها و منزلت استادان زن در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی با کیفیت تدریس آنان بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش اعضای هیئت علمی زن واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی منطقه یک بودند که از بین آنها با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی از نوع خوشه ای طبقه ای تعداد 136 نفر به عنوان اعضای نمونه انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. ابزارهای اندازه گیری پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه محقق ساخته کیفیت تدریس با 27 عبارت در مقیاس لیکرت و آلفای کرونباخ 861/0 ، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته ارزیابی منزلت استادان در دانشگاه با 6 عبارت و آلفای کرونباخ 824/0، و پرسشنامه محقق ساخته سنجش شایستگیهای استادان با 13 عبارت و ضریب آلفای کرونباخ 866/0 بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از محاسبه ضریب رگرسیون و همچنین برای مشخص کردن سهم عوامل شایستگیها و منزلت استادان بر کیفیت تدریس از رگرسیون چندگانه بهره گرفته شد. نتایج نشان دادند که منزلت استادان با ضریب 104/0 و شایستگیهای استادان با ضریب 262/0 بصورت مستقیم مثبت و معناداری با کیفیت تدریس رابطه دارند و از قدرت پیش بنی مناسبی برای کیفیت تدریس استادان برخوردار می باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

شایستگی‌ها؛ منزلت؛ کیفیت تدریس؛ اعضای هیئت علمی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Studying the Relationship between Competencies and Dignity of Female Professors and their Teaching Quality in Islamic Azad University

نویسندگان [English]

N Shahidi¹؛ S Hadadniya²

چکیده [English]

    The main purpose of this research was studying the relationship between competencies and dignity of female professors with their teaching quality in region 1 of Islamic Azad University. The population of this research included all female faculty members and 136 faculty members were chosen by random stratified cluster sampling method according to Krejcey and Morgan table. Shahidi’s questionnaire (2011) for assessing teaching quality with 27 statements (chronbach alpha= 0.861), a questionnaire for assessing the dignity of professors in universities with 6 statements (chronbach alpha = 0.824) and Shahidi’s questionnaire(2011) with 13 statements for assessing competencies (chronbach alpha = 0.866) of faculty members were used to conduct this research. Regression coefficient and multiple regressions were used to specify the portion of competencies and dignity in teaching quality. Results showed that competencies (coefficients= 0.262) and dignity of professors (coefficients=0.104) had a positive, direct and significant relationship with teaching quality and had the power to predict the teaching quality.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Competencies, Dignity, Teaching quality, faculty members

مراجع

- American Association of university professors, (2011). Professional rights of the faculty and staff, available at : www.aaup.org

-Anjos silva,E.M.V. (2010). Pedagogic Competency of the Brazilian University Professor,available at: http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/sil01089.htm

- Arreola, R. A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: a handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. Anker Pub. Co.

- Banisi,P. & Delfanazari,Gh. (2010). Influence Of Professors’ Evaluation On Quality T Eaching Improvement Of Faculty Members In Islamic Azad University Region 12, Social Research,Vol 3, No 6,pp 35-47

-Barrett, A., Ali, S., Clegg, J., Hinostroza, J. E., Lowe, J., Nikel, J., & Novelli, M., et al. (2008). Initiatives to improve the quality of teaching and learning: a review of recent literature. Unesco publication.

- Betters-Reed, B., Marlino, D., Chacko, J., & Novin, A. (2003). Assuranceof learning: Small school strategies. AACSB Continuous Improvement Symposium.

- Biggs ,J & Tang, C. ( 2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at university ,open university press

-Cunha, M. I. (1992). The good professor and your practice. Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, Papirus.

- Dalby, T. (2001). “Theory and Practice of Teaching in a University Mathematics Learning Centre”; International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 32, No. 5, P. 692.

- Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. NY: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future

- Darling- Hammond, L. et al. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification. Teach for America and teacher effectiveness, education policy analysis archive,13 ( 42)

-Davidovitch, N., & Soen, D. (2006). Using students’ assessments to improve instructors’ quality of teaching. Journal of further and higher education, 30(4), 351–376.

- Dest ,(2000). “Teachers In 21^st Century”; available  at:  http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/teachers_21st_century.htm

- Felder , R & Brent, R. (1999). How to improve teaching quality, available at: www.ncsu.edu/felder-public

- Fenstermacher ,G. & Richardson,V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in  teaching, teachers college records, 107(1), pp.186-213

- Gage, N. L. (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teaching. Professors College Press.

-Goe , L. (2007). The link between teacher quality and students outcome : A research synthesis, National comprehensive center for teacher quality, Washington DC.

- Hanushek , E. et al. (2005). The market for teacher quality,(working paper no:11154), Cambridge ,MA, National bureau of economic research.

- Howes, C., Burchinal, M. R., Pianta, R. C., Bryant, D., Early, D., & Clifford, R. et al. (2008). Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 27–50.

- Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages:An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534

- Meehan, M. (2001). Decision –making and organizational commitment : A comparision of faculty perceptions at unionized and un-unionized private colleges and universities,Ph.d Dissertation, Seton hall university.

- Michigan State University, (2011). University faculty rights and responsibilities, available at : hr.msu.edu

- OECD, (2009). Review on quality teaching in higher education,www.oecd.org

- Ogienko,O. (2011). Model of Professional Teachers Competences Formation: European Dimension, available at : www.htk.tlu.ee/tepe/wp-content

- Ohlson, M. (2009). A Study Of School Culture, Leadership, Teacher Quality And Student Outcomes Via A Performance Framework In Elementary Schools Participating In A School Reform Initiative, Phd dissertation ,University of florida

- Poch, R. (1994). Academic freedom in American higher education: rights ,responsibilities and limitations, George  Washington University, Available at  ERIC

- Porter, G & Magee, K. (2004). Teacher Quality, Controversy, and NCLB. The Clearing House, 78, 26-29.

-Qiuyan,T & Qin, H. (2009). Analysis on the Competency Model of the Lecturers in the Application Oriented University, available at : www.seiofbluemountain.com

- Ramsden , P. (2005). Learing to teaching higher education, newyork , Routledge publication

-Ramsden , P. (1998). Learing to lead in higher education, newyork , Routledge publication

- Ramsden, P. & Martin, F. (1996). Recognition of good university teaching: policies from an Australian study, Studies in higher education, No.21,pp 299-315

- Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator for quality in higher education: the Course Experience Questionnaire, Studies in Higher Education, 16: 129–49.

- Rice, J. (2003). Teacher Quality: Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher Attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

-Roelofs, E. & Sanders, P. (2003). Beoordeling van docentcompetenties. Wolters-Noordhoff, pp. 277-299.

-Ross, J. A., Hogaboom-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills and computer cognitions of Canadian students in grades k-3. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 141-156.

- Schmidt,M. (2010). Development and validation of a competency model for pre‐service teachers , Paper presented at the second meeting of the EARLI SIG18 Educational Effectiveness, Leuven, 25‐27August 2010 .

-Shahidi, N. (2011). Developing a model for assessing teaching quality in branches of Islamic Azad University, Phd  Thesis ,Unpublished,Science and research branch Islamic Azad University,Tehran

- Smeenk, Eisinga, S. R.N. Teelken, J.C. & Doorewaard, J.A.C.M. (2006). The Effects Of HRM Practices And Antecedents On Organizational Commitment Among University Employees ,Int. Journal Of Human Resource Management ,Vol.17,No.12, pp:35-50

- Stronge, J. Tucker, P. & Hindman, J. (2004). Handbook of qualities of effective teachers, Ascd publication.

-Talepasand, S. &Nazifi, M. & Bigdeli, A. (2009). Validation of the Iranian version of  student's evaluation of educational quality questionnaire ,Journal of behavioral sciences ,vol 3 , No 2, pp 127-134 

- Tamosaitis, W. L. (2006). The relationship between employee performance ratings and the three components of organizational commitment for technical personnel in a project environment. Dissertation Abstract Ph.D. The University of Alabama.

-Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999). “Relations between Teachers Approach to Teaching and Students Approaches to Learning”; Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 37. P. 59

- Unesco, (1997). Recommendation for academic freedom, available at : http://portal.unesco.org

- University of California Los Angeles, (2011). Faculty rights and responsibilities , available at : apo.ucla.edu

- Van Alstyne , W. (1970). The constitutional rights of teachers and profesors, Duke law journal , No 5.

- Vlasceanu, L, et al. (2004). "quality  asuurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions".  Available at : www.cepes.ro/publications/

- Virginia Commonwealth University. (2011). Academic rights and responsibilities, available at : www.provost.vcu.edu

- Wahlean. (2002). Teaching Skills and Academic Rewards. Journal of quality in higher education ,Vol,8, No. 1, pp. 81-78.

- Wangyi, D. (2006). The Structure Dimensions of the Competency of the CollegeTeachers. Exploration of the Higher education,vol 4, pp :89-92

- Winter, R. & Sarros, J. (2002). The academic work environment in australian universities: a motivation place to work, Higher education research an development , vol 21 , No 3 , pp:241-243

-Zhang Yiyuan，(2006). Researches on the Competency of the Teachers in the Higher Vocational Colleges,China Market,vol 9.pp:66-68