شناسایی عوامل موثر بر ایجاد سقف شیشه‌ای زنان شاغل در ستاد شرکت ملی پخش فرآورده های نفتی ایران بر اساس رویکرد تفسیری-ساختاری (ISM)

فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مقاله 7، دوره 9، شماره 34، شهریور 1397، صفحه 155-190   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

آرزو شفی¹؛ اکبر اعتباریان^{* 2}؛ رضا ابراهیم زاده دستجردی³

¹دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت، واحد خوراسگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.

²دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خوراسگان، اصفهان، ایران.

³استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خوراسگان، اصفهان، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت: 01 بهمن 1396،  تاریخ بازنگری: 15 مهر 1397،  تاریخ پذیرش: 07 شهریور 1397 

چکیده

    هدف این پژوهش با درک این موضوع از راه تحلیل تفسیری-ساختاری (ISM) در پی طراحی مدلی مبتنی بر دسته‌بندی و تفکیک عوامل موثر بر ایجاد سقف شیشه‌ای کارکنان زن شاغل در ستاد شرکت ملی پخش فراورده‌های نفتی ایران می‌باشد. این پژوهش در یک بازه زمانی یک‌ساله بین آذر ماه 1395 تا دی ماه 1396 انجام شد. روش‌شناسی پژوهش ترکیبی می‌باشد که در بخش کیفی مبتنی بر شناسایی عوامل موثر بر ایجاد سقف شیشه‌ای از راه بررسی مبانی نظری و تئوریک و انجام تحلیل دلفی با مشارکت 20 کارشناس به عنوان اعضای پانل می‌باشد و در بخش کمی نیز از راه تشکیل ماتریس خودتعاملی ساختاری در پی مدل‌سازی ساختاری و تفسیری می‌باشد که در این بخش تعداد 30 نفر از کارشناسان منابع انسانی (داخل و خارج از شرکت) مشارکت کردند. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهند که اساسی ترین عامل سقف شیشه‌ای زنان در ستاد شرکت ملی پخش فراورده‌های نفتی ایران بر اساس مدل طراحی شده، نبود قوانین حمایتی است که این شاخص مربوط به مولفه اصلی علل برون سازمانی و مولفه فرعی علل سیاسی و مقرراتی در نتایج دلفی بودند. هم‌چنین، در بالاترین سطح و در واقع کم اثرترین عامل بر ایجاد سقف شیشه‌ای، شاخص نبود جو مناسب برای کار زنان، از علل ساختاری مولفه اصلی درون سازمانی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سقف شیشه‌ای؛ علل درون سازمانی؛ علل برون سازمانی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying the Effect of Factors on the Creation of Glass Ceiling for Women Employed at the Headquarters of the National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company Based on the -Interpretative- Structural Approach (ISM)

نویسندگان [English]

A Shafi¹؛ A Etebariyan²؛ R Ebrahimzadeh Dsjerdi³

¹Ph.D. in Public Administration, Human Resource Trend, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran

²Associate Professor and Faculty Member of Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan, Isfahan

³Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

    Women are considered as one of the most valuable assets of any organization. If the obstacles like the glass ceiling are eliminated, one can expect their effectiveness in their respective areas of the responsibility assigned for the goals of the organizations. Therefore, this study, by understanding the subject through Interpretative-Structural Analysis (ISM), seeks to design a model based on categorizing and distinguishing factors affecting the creation of a glass ceiling of female employees employed by the National Iranian Oil Distribution Company. This research was conducted in a one-year period between December 2016 and January 2017. The combined methodology is a qualitative research based on identifying the factors influencing the creation of a glass ceiling by examining theoretical and theoretical foundations and conducting Delphi analysis with the participation of 20 specialist members as panel members, and in the quantitative part through the formation of a matrix Structural self-advancement follows structural and interpretive modeling, in which 30 human resource specialists (both inside and outside the company) participated. The results of the research show that the most basic factor of women's glass ceiling for the National Iranian Oil Distribution Company is based on the designed model, the lack of supportive laws, which is related to the main component of the external causes and the sub-component of the political causes and rules were in the Delphi results. Also, at the highest level and in fact the least effective factor in creating a glass ceiling, the lack of suitable barrier for women's work is one of the structural causes of the core component of the organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Glass Ceiling, Intraocular Causes, Outsourcing Causes

مراجع

- Abu Elanain, H. M. (2010). Testing the direct and indirect relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes in a non-Western context of the UAE. Journal of Management Development, 29(1): 5- 27.

- Acker, J. (2009). "From glass ceiling to inequality regimes", Sociologie du travail, 51, 199-217.

- Albert, R., Escot, L., & Fernández-Cornejo, J. A. (2011). A field experiment to study sex and age discrimination in the Madrid labour market. Int. J. Hum. Resou. Manag. 22(02), 351–375.

- Almasi, L., Layadi., Z., & Alipoor, V. (2015). The Glass Ceiling on the Replacement of Women in Management in Management Places, Journal of Leadership Research and Management Education, Volume 1, Issue 3, Spring, 91-118. [Persian]

- Azar, A., Tizro, A., Moghbel, A., & Anvari, A. (2010) "Contouring agility moVel of supply chain: Interpretive structural moVeling approach, Management Research in Iran, No. 14, pp. 1-25.

- Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2013). Investigating Soft Operations Structural Approaches, Tehran: Industrial Management Organization. [Persian]

- Bish, A. J , Bradley, L. M , & Sargent, L. D. (2004). Career development for going beyond the call of duty: is it perceived as fair? Journal: Career Development International, 9(4): 391-405.

- Burke, Ronald, J. (2002). “Organizational Values, Job Experiences, and Satisfactions among Managerial and Professional Women and Men: Advantage Men?” Women in Management Review 17(5):228–236.

- Burn, S. M., (2005). Women across Cultures: A Global Perspective, New York, McGraw Hill.

- Cailin, S. Stamarski., Leanne, S. Son, H. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism, Frontiers in Psychology, September, Volume, Article 1400, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400.

- Cailin, S. Stamarski., Leanne S. Son, H. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism, Frontiers in Psychology, September, Volume, Article 1400, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400.

- Cooper Jackson, J. (2001). “Women Middle Managers’ Perception of the Glass Ceiling.” Women in Management Review 16(1):30–41.

- Cortis, R. & Vincent, C. (2005). “Perceptions of and about Women as Managers: Investigating Job Involvement, Self-Esteem, and Attitudes.” Women in Management Review 20(3):149–164.

- Eagly A. H., & Chin J. L. (2010). Are memberships in race, ethinicity, and gender categories merely surface characteristics? The American Psychologist, 65 (9), 934-5.

- Eagly A. H., & Chin J. L. (2010). Are memberships in race, ethinicity, and gender categories merely surface characteristics? The American Psychologist, 65 (9), 934-5.

- Frank, Ellen J. (2001). “Chinese Students’ Perceptions of Women in Management: Will It Be Easier?” Women in Management Review 16(7):316–324.

- Huang, J. & Kisgen, D.J. (2013). “Gender and corporate finance: are male executives overconfident relative to female executives”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 108 No. 3, pp. 822-839.

- Jitesh Thakkar, S.G. Veshmukh, A.V. Gupta anV Ravi Shankar, (2017). “Vevelopment of a balanceV scorecarV An integrateV approach of Interpretive Structural MoVeling (ISM) anV Analytic Network Process (ANP)”, International Journal of ProVuctivity anV Performance Management , 56 ( 1), 25-59.

- Kelly, M.; Wilkinson, L; Pisciotta, M. & Williams, L.S. (2015). “When Working Hard Is Not Enough for Female and Racial/ Ethnic Minority Apprentices in the Highway Trades”, Sociological Forum, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 415-437.

- Kornberger, M., Carter, C. & Ross-Smith, A. (2010). “Changing gender domination in a big four accounting firm: flexibility, performance and client service in practice”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 775-791.

- Kottis, A. P. (1993). “Women in Management: the ‘Glass Ceiling’ and How to Break It.” Women in Management Review 8(4):9–15.

- Maume, D. J.(2004). "Is the glass ceiling a unique form of glass ceiling a unique form of managerial attain"; Work and Occupations, Vol 31. No2. pp. 20,250-274.

- Moradi, M. (2015). Management style in organizations and the presence of women in management positions with an emphasis on communication tactics, Journal of Social Psychological Studies of Women, 13, No. 2, Summer, 2004-1141. [Persian]

- Morrison, A.M., R.P. White, & Velsor, E.V., (2002). Breaking The Glass Ceiling: Can Women Reach The Top Of America's Largest Corporations? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

- Nasiri Valik Bani, F., & Beheshti rad, R. (2015). Investigating the role of glass ceiling on reduction of perceived organizational justice, Journal of Social Studies, Psychology, Women, 12, No. 4, Winter, 149-172. [Persian]

- O’Sullivan, J. & Alison, Sh. (1999). “Ms Representations: Women, Management, and Popular Culture.” Women in Management Review 14(1):14–20.

- Rezayee pendari, A. & Ykeh Zare, M. (2016). Structural-Interpretative Modeling of Effective Technology Transfer Factors for Sustainable Development, Management Researches in Iran, Volume 20, Issue 1, Spring, 61-79. [Persian]

- Sayeedi, Z., Noorbala, F., & Hamzeyee Abedi, F. (2016). Gender Implications: Implicit Attitudes to Jobs and the Impact of Exposure to Non-Clustered Specimens, Journal of Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 10, Spring, 79-90. [Persian]

- Schlepphorst, S., & Moog, P. (2014). Left in the dark: Family successors’ requirement profiles in the family business succession process. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(4), 358–371.

- Singh, M.V., Shankar, R. & Narain, R. Agarwal, (2003). “An interpretive structural moVeling of knowleVge management in engineering inVustries”, Journal of AVvances in Management Research, 1, 28 – 40.

- Smith, P. (2012). “Connections between women’s glass ceiling belief’s, explanatory style, self –efficacy, career levels and subjective success”.

- Stier, H. & Yaish, M. (2014). Occupational segregation and gender inequality in job quality: a multi-level approach. Work, Employment & Society, 2(28): 225-246.

- Stockdale, M. & Nadler, J. (2013). Paradigmatic assumptions of disciplinary research on gender disparities: The case of occupational sex segregation. Sex Roles, 68(3-4):207-215.

- Tizro, A. (2010). Agile Supply Chain Model Designing a Structural Interpretative Modeling Approach, Zob Ahan Co., PhD, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran. [Persian]

- Tumaini, M. Nyamhanga & Gasto, F. (2014). Gender Context of Sexual Violence and HIV Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Married Women in Iringa Region, Tanzania, Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25346 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25346.

- United Nations Development Program (2014). Human development Report: 221-224.

- Watts, J.H. (2009). “Leaders of men: women “managing” in construction”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 512-530.

- Wellington, J. (2010). “Assessing the challenges and opportunities of women’s participation in the construction sector in Shire Endasllassie town. Gender mainstreaming policy dragon in Ethiopia”, Journal of International Business Management & Research, Vol. 1 No. 2.

- Wilbourn, M. Kee, D. (2010). Henry the nurse is a doctor too: Implicitly examining children’s gender stereotypes for male and female occupational roles. Sex Roles , 9(62):670-683.

- Wingfield, H. A. (2009). "Racializing the Glass Escalator: Reconsidering Men's Experiences with Women's Work". Gender & Society, 23, 5-26.

- Winn, Joan. 2004. “Entrepreneurship: Not an Easy Path to Top Management for Women.” Women in Management Review 19(3):143–153.

- Wirth, L. (2014). Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling: Women in Management; Geneva, ILO, 2(13); 1-12.

- Zarghami Fard, M., & Behboodi, M. (2014). The phenomenon of glass rock: An examination of the experiences and challenges of women in the leadership positions of the organization, Quarterly Journal of Organizational Culture Management, Volume 12, Issue 2, 191-211. [Persian]

- Zhang L , Nie T, & Luo Y. (2009). Matching organizational justice with employment modes: Strategic human resource management perspective. Journal of Technology Management ,4(2): 180-187.