مطالعه‌ی تطبیقی شاخص های زیست‌پذیری مناطق شهری اسلامشهر

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مقاله 11، دوره 11، شماره 43، بهمن 1399، صفحه 165-178   

نوع مقاله: مقاله برگرفته از پایان نامه

نویسندگان

سیده منور زینی^{* 1}؛ حسین مجتبی زاده²

¹دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

²استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 08 خرداد 1398،  تاریخ بازنگری: 26 آذر 1398،  تاریخ پذیرش: 26 آذر 1398 

چکیده

امروزه زیست­پذیری شهری گفتمانی نیرومند را در توسعه شهری و طراحی شهری بازتاب می‌دهد که در پیشینه‌ی برنامه‌ریزی شهری رواج پیداکرده است. چنین گفتمانی به وجود ارتباط مطلوب بین محیط شهری وزندگی اجتماعی اشاره می‌کند. زیست­پذیری در معنای اصلی و کلی خود به مفهوم دستیابی به قابلیت زندگی است و درواقع همان دست‌یابی به کیفیت برنامه‌ریزی خوب یا مکان پایدار است. در این امتداد هدف این پژوهش سنجش و ارزیابی زیست­پذیری شهری در مناطق شش گانه اسلامشهر است. پژوهش حاضر از لحاظ هدف­گذاری کاربردی و از لحاظ روش توصیفی – تحلیلی است. داده­ها با استفاده از پرسش­نامه محقق ساخته گردآوری و برای سنجش روایی آن از روش آلفای کرونباخ استفاده گردید که پایایی آن با میزان 940/ به تایید رسیده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش مناطق 6 گانه اسلامشهر و حجم نمونه بر اساس فرمول کوکران با سطح خطای 9 درصد 384 نفر برآورده شده است که مطابق تعداد جمعیت هر منطقه سهمیه اختصاص داده شد. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده­ها و اطلاعات به­دست آمده از آزمون­های کلموگروف اسمیرنوف، فریدمن، تحلیل مسیر و از روش­های آنتروپی شانون، تکنیک تصمیم­گیری چند معیاره واسپاس در محیط نرم­افزاری Smart Pls و Arc Gis استفاده شده است. نتایج به­دست آمده نشان داد شاخص اقتصادی (5/2)، بیشترین اهمیت و شاخص زیست محیطی (20/2)، کمترین اهمیت را در زیست­پذیری مناطق اسلامشهر دارند. همچنین یافته­های دیگر پژوهش نشانگر آن بود که مناطق 3، 2 و 1 به ترتیب با کسب میزان امتیاز واسپاس 2319/0، 17610/0 و 16530/0 از لحاظ برخورداری از شاخص­های زیست­پذیری در بین مناطق 6 گانه در رتبه­های اول تا سوم قرار دارند. در سوی دیگر منطقه 6 با کسب کمترین میزان واسپاس 0436/0 در جایگاه آخر قرارگرفته بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

"پایداری"؛ "شاخص‌های زیست‌پذیری"؛ "واسپاس"؛ "مناطق شهری"؛ "اسلامشهر"

عنوان مقاله [English]

A comparative study of the livability indices of urban areas of Islamshahr

نویسندگان [English]

Seyedeh Monavar Zeiny¹؛ Hossein Mojtabazadeh²

¹Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, Central Tehran Branch,Tehran,Iran

²Department of Geography,Faculty of Literature & amp; Humanities, ISIAMIC AZAAD UNIVERSITY, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Today, urban livability reflects a powerful discourse on urban development and urban design that has emerged in the urban planning history. Such a discourse points to the desirable relationship between the urban environment and social meaning. In the general sense,livability is the concept of achieving life capability and are in fact the quality of good planning or sustainable placement. The purpose of this study is to measure and evaluate urban livability in the six districts of Islamshahr. The present study is applied in terms of targeting and in terms of descriptive-analytical method. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess its livability with a reliability of 0.940. The statistical population of the study was 6 districts of Islamshahr and the sample size was estimated based on Cochran formula with %940 error rate of 384 persons which was allocated according to the population of each region. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Friedman tests, path analysis and Shannon entropy methods, WASPAS Multi-criteria decision making technique in Smart Pls and Arc Gis software environment. The results showed that economic index (2.5) was the most important and environmental index (2.20) had the least importance in the livability of Islamshahr. Other findings showed that zones 3, 2 and 1 had a score of 0.2319, 0.17610, and 0.16530, respectively, in terms of biodegradability indexes among the 6 zones. Ranks first to third. On the other hand, Zone 6 was in the last position with the lowest amount of 0.0436.
Introduction
livability is one of the greatest ideas of urban planning in the contemporary era, and creating livability among Third World cities is a worrying issue. Therefore, the importance of studying urban livability as one of the new tasks of urban planning is its responsibility to further enhance the quality of life. Studies show that, on the one hand, the necessity and importance of addressing urban livability in relation to new planning tasks in responding to the needs of post-industrialized society, which are also highly sought after for the amenities and facilities of today's urban life. There are two. So creating a livabil city is a big and complex undertaking, and urban planners need to support urban dwellers in terms of livability indicators.
Methodology
Due to the nature of the subject and the purpose of the research, the type of applied research and its method is "descriptive-analytical". Library and field documentary method was used for data collection according to the dimensions and indicators in question and the theoretical basics of the questionnaire designed for researchers and experts, some indicators and dimensions after passing the baseline questionnaire filter. The pre-test stage was used in the final questionnaire. The sample population of the population of Islamshahr (448129 population) is based on the Census of 2016. The sample size was first calculated based on Cochran sampling formula with 0.940 error level. Appropriate quotas were allocated to each study area based on population. Friedman tests and path analysis were used to analyze the data and the entropy methods were used in order to analyze VASPs in Smart Pls and Arc Gis. In this paper, using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the distribution of data is normalized to determine the status of parametric and non-parametric statistical methods. If the significance level of the test is higher than the error value of 0.05, the normality of the variable is supported. The result of this test showed that the research variables were normal (significance level less than 0.05). Therefore, parametric statistical methods can be used.
Results and discussion
The results of this study indicate that there is a significant difference between the average life expectancy of the inhabitants of Islamshahr in terms of economic, social, physical and environmental indices. So that the economic index is the most important and the environmental index is the least important in the viability of Islamshahr's six regions. These results suggest that the weight and impact of the economic dimension are the most important in promoting the livability of these areas and the least important environmental indicator. The findings of this section of the study are in line with the findings of Sasanpour et al. (2014), Ali Akbari and Akbari (1395), and Visi Nab et al. (1398). The results of simultaneous path analysis of the four indices on the dependent variable of livability confirm this.
Conclusion
The results show that the city of Islamshahr, due to its location on the communication points of Tehran province with the south of the country and attracting immigrants from many industries, has had unnecessary expansion due to economic conditions. It has been driven by a pattern of uneven physical development, insecurity, density, environmental issues, and ultimately a decline in viability and departure from the components of sustainable development in the city. With uninhibited urbanization and high population growth, today is one of the most important factors exacerbating the risks and livability of Islamshahr and its population growth due to the low cost of living compared to Tehran metropolis. And, as a result, the city's concentration, traffic, physical growth, and urbanization have created a perimeter of excitement and escalation of hazards such as the formation of heat islands, greenhouse gases, and so on. Increasing the livability and thus promoting the quality of life in Islamshahr is the human and fundamental axis of sustainable urban development. This is possible in the context of improving the urban environment, affordable housing and sustainable employment, personal and social security, balanced and efficient distribution of urban services and facilities, restoration and reconstruction of urban infrastructure and access to urban uses. Providing multiple options for existing public transport infrastructures (walking, biking and public transport that increase physical activity, protect the environment and reduce traffic), improve transport security Moving and increasing the number of public transport access points can each in turn have a significant impact on the viability of Islamshahr.
Key words: Sustainability, livability Indicators, WASPAS, Urban Areas, Islamshahr.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Sustainability, livability indicators, WASPAS, Urban Areas, Islamshahr

مراجع

Sources and references:

1. 1.       Ahtari, K., (2003). Assessing the Structural and Institutional Causes of Settlements in Iran, Collection of Settlements and Informal Settlement, Tehran. [In Persian]
2. 2.       Ali Akbari, E., Akbari, M., (2017). Interpretive Structural Modeling of Factors Affecting Tehran Metropolitan Biodiversity, Journal of Space Planning and Preparation, 21(1), 31-1. [In Persian]
3. 3.       Bandarabad, A., (2011). A Biodiversity City from Fundamentals to Meaning, Azarakhsh Publications, First Edition, Tehran, 2011. [In Persian]
4. 4.       Bloom, D.E., Craig, P.H , Malaney, P. N.(2001). The Quality of life in Rural Asia. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
5. 5.       Bricker, S. H., Banks, V. J., Galik, G., Tapete, D., & Jones, R,. (2017). Accounting For Groundwater In Future City Visions. Land Use Policy, 69, 618–630.
6. 6.       Church, M. C. (2011). The conceptual and operational definition of quality of life : a systematic of the literature Texas A&M University.
7. 7.       Detailed Plan of Islamshahr City (2014). Paikade Consulting Engineers. [In Persian]
8. 8.       Economist intelligence unit (2019), A summary of the livability ranking and overuiew, EIU.
9. 9.       Faramarzi, M., Jafari, M. H., Babaei, O., (2018). Investigating the Role of Islamic Political Economy on Urban Biodiversity (Case Study: Zanjan City), Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 9(35), 96-83. [In Persian]
10. 10.    Heydari, M. T., (2018). Typological Analysis of the Biodiversity Approach in Urban Decay Textures (Case Study: Decayed Texture of Central Zanjan City), Journal of Urban Social Geography, 5(1), 104-85. [In Persian]
11. 11.    Higgins, P., & Campanera, J. M. (2011). (Sustainable) quality of life in English city locations. Cities, 28(4), 290 – 299
12. 12.    Jacobs,A. & Appleyard, D., (1982). Toward An Urban Design Manifesto: University Of California,Berkelely.Institute Of Urban & Regional.
13. 13.    Kargar, B., Sarvar, R., (2011). City, Margin and Social Security. Emphasizing on the southern margin of Tehran and Islamshahr metropolitan area, Geographical Organization of the Armed Forces Publications, First Edition, Tehran Statistical Center of Iran (2016). Results of Islamshahr Population and Housing Census. [In Persian]
14. 14.    Kashef, M., (2016). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5, 239-253.
15. 15.    Khorasani, M. A., (2012). Explaining the Sustainability of Suburban Villages with Quality of Life Approach Case Study: Varamin City, Supervisor: Mohammad Reza Razvani, Advisor: Seyed Hassan Motiei Langroudi and Mojtaba Rafieian, Tehran University, Tehran. [In Persian]
16. 16.    Mashhadizadeh Dehagani, N., (2013). An Analysis of the Features of Urban Planning in Iran, Iran University of Science and Technology Publications, 11th Edition, Tehran. [In Persian]
17. 17.      Ouyang, W., Wang, B., Li, T., Niu, X., (2017). Spatial deprivation of urban public services in migrant enclaves under the context of a rapidly urbanizing China: An evaluation based on suburban Shanghai. Journal Cities, 60(8), 436–445.
18. 18.    Pandey et al ,R.U(2013), Understanding Qualitative Conceptions Of Livability: An Indian Perspective, Ijret: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308.
19. 19.     Pandey. Ru, Garg, Y. G, Bharat, A., (2013), Understanding Qualitative Conceptions of Livability: Indian Perspective, international, Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2 (12), 374-380.
20. 20.      Richards.R, , Oleary.B & Mutsonziwa. K., (2007). Measure Quality of life in informal settlements in South Africa. Social Indicators Research. 81, 375- 388.
21. 21.    Sasanpour F., Tavalei, S., Jafari Asadabadi, H., (2014). Feasibility of Cities for Sustainable Urban Development under Study of Tehran Metropolis, Quarterly Iranian Journal of Geography, 12(42), 74-59. [In Persian]
22. 22.    Sasanpour, F., Alizadeh, S., Arabi Moghaddam, H., (2018). Feasibility Study of Orumieh Urban Areas Using RALSPI Model, Journal of Geographical Sciences Applied Research, Eighteenth Year, No. 48, pp. 258-241. [In Persian]
23. 23.    Soleimani Mehranjani, M., Simin, T., Rafieian, M., Zanganeh, A., Khazaeinejad, F., (2016). "Urban Biodiversity: Concepts, Principles, Dimensions and Indicators", Journal of Geography and Urban Planning Research, 4(1), 27-50. [In Persian]
24. 24.      Song, Yang., (2011). Livable City Study in ChinaUsing Structural Equation Models, Department of Statistics, Uppsala University, 2(4), 2-9.
25. 25.      Srinivas, H., (2012). Viability of informal Credit to finance Low- Income Housing: Case Study Three Squatter Settlements in Bangalore.  
26. 26.    Stein, E .K., (2002). Communityand Quality Of Life, National Academy Press ,Washington, D.C.
27. 27.    Susanti, R., Soetomo, S., Buchori, I., & Brotosunaryo, P. M., (2016). Smart Growth, Smart City and Density: In Search of The Appropriate Indicator for Residential, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227(14),  194-201
28. 28.    Taleshi Anbohi, M., Aghaiezadeh, E., Jafari Mehrabadi, M., (2019). Structural Analysis of Urban Textures Permeability by Future Research Approach (Case Study: Urban Textures of Qazvin Area One), Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 10 (19). [In Persian]
29. 29.    Teng Chey, k., (2012) The CLC framework for livable and sustainable cities, Urban  olutions Journal, 1, 54-70.
30. 30.    Vissy Nab, B., Babaei Aghdam, F., Ghorban, R., (2019). Identifying and Prioritizing Factors Related to the Economic Dimension of Urban Biodiversity (Case Study: Tabriz Metropolitan Area), Journal of Urban Planning Geography Research, 7(1), 149-127. [In Persian]
31. 31.    Wheeler, S., (2014). Planning for Sustainability: Creating a Sustainable, Balanced and Ecological Society, Jomahi Poor and Ahmadi Translator, Social Science Publishing, Tehran. [In Persian]
32. 32.    Wiryomartono, B., (2020). Livability and Sustainability of Urbanism. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8972-6.
33. 33.    Zhang, W., & Gao, X., (2008). Spatial differentiations of traffic satisfaction and its policy implications in Beijing. Journal Habitat International, 32(4), 437–451.