پیامدها و دلایل ورود زنان به مشاغل مردانه(سخت)

فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مقاله 5، دوره 10، شماره 40، دی 1398، صفحه 127-154   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

نسرین چراغی^{* 1}؛ رفیق حسنی²

¹رییس اداره پژوهش وانتشارات بنیادشهیداستان کرمانشاه ومدرس دانشگاه علمی کاربردی

²دکتری مدیریت آموزشی ،استادیاردانشگاه علوم تربیتی وروانشناسی دانشگاه آزاداسلامی واحدسنندج

تاریخ دریافت: 28 اسفند 1397،  تاریخ بازنگری: 16 آبان 1398،  تاریخ پذیرش: 29 دی 1398 

چکیده

هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر بررسی پیامدها و دلایل ورود زنان به مشاغل مردانه (سخت) می­باشد. استفاده از نظریه زمینه‌ای برای رسیدن به این هدف در نظر گرفته شد. موضوع و هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر در زمره پژوهش‌های کیفی قرار می‌گیرد. ازاین‌رو، با اتخاذ یک طرح اکتشافی از نوع کیفی به اجرا درآمد. میدان تحقیق زنانی بودند که در مشاغل مردانه فعالیت داشتند. نمونه­گیری به شیوه­ی هدفمند و مشارکت­کنندگان به روش گلوله برفی و نظری انتخاب شدند. جهت گردآوری داده‌ها از یک منشور مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته با شش سؤال استفاده شد و برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از روش کد گذاری که شامل کدگذاری باز، محوری و گزینشی است، استفاده شد. بیشترین مشکلات آنان «ناهماهنگی انتظارات نقش­های خانوادگی شغلی و تبعیض جنسیتی» بوده است. پاسخ دهندگان، احترام گذاشتن، تشویق کردن، توجه بیشتر زنان به مشتری، بی­تفاوتی نسبت به زنان را مهم­ترین واکنش مشتریان نسبت به اولین برخورد با زنان و واکنش سایر هم صنفی­ها بیان کردند. زنان از بعد اجتماعی، مدیریت خوب و تصدی در پست­های اجرایی، قدرت، امنیت شغلی، بعد اقتصادی، بعد فرهنگی، بعد اجتماعی و نیاز به حضور در جامعه را از مزایای ورود زنان به مشاغل مردانه دانسته بودند. عوامل روحی و روانی، مسائل ارتباطی، دور بودن از خانواده، وقت ناکافی برای خانواده، آسیب­های فیزیکی، سوءاستفاده رفتاری را می­توان به عنوان آسیب­های ورود زنان به این مشاغل مطرح نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

زنان؛ مشاغل مردانه؛ تبعیض جنسیتی؛ امنیت شغلی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Consequences and causes of women's entry into men's (hard)works

نویسندگان [English]

nasrin cheraghi¹؛ rafigh hasani²

¹Head of the Research and Publishing Office of the Shahid Kermanshah Province, Teacher of Applied Scientific University

²Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Ph.D., Educational Management, Assistant Professor, University of Educational Sciences

چکیده [English]

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the consequences and reasons of women entering men's jobs. this study is qualitative research and The use of grounded theory was considered to achieve this goal. The field of research was women working in men's jobs. The sampling was Purposeful and participants were selected by theoretical snowball method. Semi-structured interview questionnaire with six questions was used for data collection and coding method including open, axial and selective coding was used for data analysis. Their most pressing problems were "dissonance with family role expectations and gender discrimination." Respondents, respecting, encouraging, paying more attention to women, indifference to women stated the most important customer response to first dealing with women, and the reaction of other co-workers. Women considered social benefits, good management and tenure in executive positions, power, job security, economic, cultural, social dimension and the need for presence in society to be the benefits of women entering men's jobs. Psychological factors, communication issues, being away from the family, inadequate time for the family, physical injuries, and abusive behaviors can be considered as injuries to women entering these jobs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

men's works, women's entry, consequences, causes

مراجع

-Ahmadi, M.H. (2008). Police Women's Challenges in Police Jobs. Journal of Police Knowledge, 37, 54 – 87.

-Ahmad Taheri, N. (2005). Woman on the two ways home and market. Women's Social Culture Magazine, Family and Lifestyle, 160.

-Ajorlo, S. (2010). Women in false occupations,case study of  hand sales women in the subway. M. A level thesis. Faculty of Social Sciences. Tehran university.

-Bagheri, SH. , Shahmoradi Zavareh,R. S. (2016). Investigating the lives of women present in men's occupation case study women's firefighter and women taxi drivers in Tehran. women's research center. research institute for human sciences and cultural studies,2(7),19-44.

-Bergman, B, (2002). The Validation of the Women Workplace Culture Questionnaire: Gender Related Stress and Health for Swedish Working Women. Sex Roles A Journal of Research, 1 Sep. 2003, Sited in: http//www. Goliath/ecnext. Com.

-Bogatti, S. (2003). Introduction to Groundedd Theory. Retrived from http://www. analytictech. com/mb870/introtoGT. htm.

-Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

-Danesh, E . (2010). The study of needs, motivations and women's right occupations in government departments. Woman in development and politics.,29,211-236.

-Flick, E, (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Translation by Hadi Jalili, First edition, Tehran : Ney.

-Gardner, W. , (2007). War against Family, translation of Masoumeh Mohammadi. tehran, .Office of Women's Studies and Research.

-Hale, L.(2013). A Critical Analysis of Women in Manufacturing. Race, Gender & Class, 20(1/2)281-293.

-Henink, M. Hutter, I. & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. London. Sage Publication Ltd Martínez-Salgado C. Sampling in qualitative research: basic principles and some controversies. Ciencia &amp: Saude  Coletiva, 17 (3): 613-619.

-Heshmati, N. (2002). the study of barriers to female admissions in mid-level posts of education management from the perspective of highschool managers And undergraduate school of Mazandaran girls. humanities and social sciences research,2(5),13-34.

-Javaheri, F. & Daripour, Z. (2008). Job problems of women faculty members. In Development and Politics (Women's Research), 6 (2), 79-106.

-Johnson, R.B. and Christensen, L.B. (2008). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Inc., Lose Angeles.

-Kalantari, A. & Faghih Imani, F. (2011). A meta-analysis on gender inequality. Woman in Development and Politics, 12 (4), 507-523.

-Mohammadpour, A. (2011). Qualitative Research Method: (Practical Steps and Procedures in Qualitative Methodology) . Tehran. Sociologists' Pub Persian.

-Moradi, G. (2011). Using Female Students of Cosmetics and Effective Sociological Factors, Journal of Women in Development and Politics2, 88-93.

-Nowruzi, L. (2004). Gender differences in job structure. Woman in Development and Politics, 2 (1), 165-178.

-Rasekh ,K. & Saidi, N. (2011). Investigating women's presence and power in men's social settings. Journal of Women and Culture,13(4),19-30.

-Rosenbaum, H. (1997). Family as meaning of structure against society. translated by Mohammad Sadegh Mahdavi, First Edition,Tehran, University Publication Center.

-Shayegan, F, Kaldi, A & Askari Tabatabaei, Z. (2013). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Inclination of Women to Men's Occupation (Case Study: Female Students at the Police Department of the University of Police and Social Sciences Faculty, Allameh Tabatabaei University). Social Development Studies, 20, 43-56.

-Sheikhi, M.T. (2001.( Sociology of Women and Family. Tehran: Publishing Joint Stock Company.

-Stanny, B.(2007). Overcoming Underearning(R): A Five-Step Plan to a Richer Life. HarperBusiness.

-Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications, Inc.

-Zaferanchi, L.S. (2009). Women's employment (Proceedings and dialogues),Tehran, Center of women affairs and the repablic presidential family. Hooray, 33 .

-Zahedi, SH. (2006). Women's job position at university: tehran: Nashr Now.