نقش عملکرد خانواده اصلی و روان‌رنجورخویی در باورهای ارتباطی زوجین متقاضی طلاق

فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مقاله 6، دوره 10، شماره 40، دی 1398، صفحه 155-174   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

رسول حشمتی^{* 1}؛ اصغر پوراسمعلی²؛ مریم پرنیان خوی³

¹هیئت علمی دانشگاه تبریز

²روان شناس

³دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان

تاریخ دریافت: 20 آذر 1395،  تاریخ بازنگری: 15 آبان 1398،  تاریخ پذیرش: 29 دی 1398 

چکیده

اهمیت باورها و الگوهای ارتباطی در شکل دادن و تعیین کیفیت روابط زوجین غیر قابل انکار است. این باورها نیز مانند هر متغیر دیگری نشأت گرفته از عوامل بسیاری نظیر فرآیندهای درونی و ویژگی شخصیتی هر فرد و نیز عوامل محیطی و بافت اجتماعی است. از این رو هدف پژوهش حاضر، نقش عملکرد خانواده­ی اصلی و روان‌رنجورخویی در باورهای ارتباطی زوجین متقاضی طلاق می­باشد. در مطالعه­ی حاضر که از نوع همبستگی می­باشد، از بین زوج­های متقاضی طلاق شهر اردبیل، 200 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده عبارت بودند از: خرده مقیاس روان‌رنجورخویی از پرسش­نامه­ی شخصیتی NEO-FFI (McCrae & Costa, 1985)، مقیاس خانواده­ی اصلی (Hovestadt et al, 1985) و پرسش­نامه­ی باورهای ارتباطی (Eidelson and Epstein, 1982). داده­ها با استفاده از روش­های ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون گام به گام تحلیل شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که باورهای ارتباطی زوجین با روان رنجورخویی، رابطه­ی مثبت و معنی داری دارد. از بین مؤلفه­های عملکرد خانواده­ی اصلی، مؤلفه­ی صراحت بیان، احترام و حل تعارض با باورهای ارتباطی زوجین رابطه­ی منفی و معنی­داری دارند. نتایج روش رگرسیون نیز نشان داد که روان رنجورخویی و مؤلفه­های صراحت بیان و اعتماد، بهترین پیش­بینی کننده­ی باورهای ارتباطی زوجین بوده­اند. البته در این میان، روان رنجورخویی سهم بیشتری در تبیین تغییرات باورهای ارتباطی زوجین نسبت به مؤلفه­های عملکرد خانواده­ی اصلی دارد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که سطح پایین روان رنجور خویی و کارکرد بهنجار خانواده‌ی اصلی قادر به پیش بینی باورهای کارآمد ارتباطی می­باشد که نتیجه­ی این امر، کاهش تعارضات زناشویی می­باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

روان رنجور خویی؛ عملکرد خانواده اصلی؛ باورهای ارتباطی؛ زوجین متقاضی طلاق

عنوان مقاله [English]

The role of family-of-origin function and neuroticism in relationship beliefs of divorce applicant couples

نویسندگان [English]

maryam parnian khooy³؛

³Azarbaijan shahid madani university

چکیده [English]

The importance of relationship beliefs and patterns in shaping and determining the quality of couple’s relationships is undeniable. This beliefs like any other variables derived from many factors such as internal processes and personality characteristics as well as environmental factors and social texture. The purpose of the present study is investigation the role of family-of-origin function and neuroticism in relationship beliefs of divorce applicant couples. In this research that is a correlation study, from the divorce applicant couples in Ardebil city, 200 person were selected using the purposive sampling method. The instruments used in this study were neuroticism subscale of the Personality Inventory (NEO-FFI) (McCrae and Costa, 1985), Family of origin Scale (Hovestadt and et al, 1985) and relationship Beliefs inventory (Eidelson and Epstein, 1982). Data were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficients and stepwise regression method. The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between couple’s beliefs and neuroticism. Among the components of the family-of-origin function, the components of expressiveness, respect and conflict resolution have a negative and significant relationship with couples' relationship beliefs. The results of regression analysis also showed that neuroticism and explicit expression and trust components were the best predictors of the relationship beliefs of couples. Of course, neuroticism has a greater role in explaining of that beliefs. The results of present study showed that low levels of neuroticism and family-of-origin’s normal function can predict effective relationship beliefs that the result of this issue is reduction of marital conflicts.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Neuroticism, Family-of-origin function, relationship beliefs, divorce applicant couples

مراجع

-Abdollahzadeh, B. (2008). Comparison of personality dimensions, problem-solving styles and the degree of experienced stress among people with substance use disorder and normal people. M.A thesis Psychology, Tabriz, University of Tabriz. (Persian)  

-Anisi, J., Majdian, M., Joshanloo, M., Gohari-Kamel, Z. (2012). Validity and reliability of NEO Five – Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) on university students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5 (4):351-355. (Persian)

-Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International universities press.

-Behrouz, B., Mohammadi F., Aliabadi, S., Kajbaf, M. B., Heidarizadeh, N., Behrouz, B. (2014). A comparison between personality traits and attribution styles of normal couples and divorce petitioners. Knowledge and research in applied psychology, 15 (1), 52-61. (Persian)

-Belyad, M.R., Nahidpoor, F., Azadi, S., Yadegari, H. (2014). The role of family of origin in differentiation of self and marital conflicts. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 2 (2), 81-91. (Persian)         

-Botha, A., Berg, HS., Venter, CA. (2009). The relationship between family of origin and marital satisfaction. Journal of interdisciplinary health science, 14 (1), 441-447.

-Bouchard, G., Lussire, Y., and Sabourin, S. (1999). Personality and marital adjustment: Utility of five – Factor model of personality. Journal of marriage and family, 61 (3), 651-660.

-Buboltz, W. C., Johnson, P., Woller, KM. (2003). Psychological reactance in college students: family-of-origin predictors. Journal of counseling and development, 81, 311-317.

-Busby, DM., Holman, TB., Walker, E. (2008). Pathways to relationship aggression adult partners. Family Relations, 57, 72-83.

-Carr, A. (2006). Family therapy; concepts, process and practice. New York: Wiley.

-Chatrmehr, R., Kafi, M. (2015). Comparative study of irrational and personality traits in infertile and fertile women. Journal of applied environmental and biological science, 5 (8), 335-340.

-Dmitrieva, J., Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Gil-Rivas, V. (2004). Family relationships and adolescent psychological outcomes: Converging findings from eastern and western cultures. Journal of research and adolescence, 14 (4), 425-447.

-Donnellan, BM., Conger, RD., Bryant, CH M. (2004). The big five and enduring marriages. Journal of research in personality, 38, 481-504.

-Eidelson, R. J., and Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional belief. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 50, 715-720.

-Ellis, A. (2003). The nature of disturbed marital interaction. Journal of Rational – Emotive and Cognitive behavior therapy, 21, 147-153. 

-Falcke, D., Wanger, A., Mosmann, CP. (2008). The relationship between family of origin and marital adjustment for couples in Brazil. Journal of family psychotherapy, 19(2), 170-186.

-Fazel, A., Haghshenas, H., Keshavarz, Z. (2011). Predictive power of personality traits and life satisfaction of women nurses in Shiraz Paired. Journal of sociology of women, 2 (3), 139-161. (Persian) 

-Gardner, BC., Busby, DM., Burr, BK., Lyon, SE. (2011). Getting to the root of relationship attribution: Family-of-origin perspectives on self and partner views. Contemporary family therapy, 33, 253-272.

-Garrousi Farshi, M. T. (2001). Personality evaluation. Tabriz: Jameh Pajooh Publication. (Persian)   

-Gorchoff, S. M., John, O. P., and Helson, R. (2008). Contextualizing change in marital satisfaction during middle – age: An 18-year longitudinal study. Psychological science, 19, 1194-1200. 

-Guttman, J. M. (1993). Divorce in Psychosocial perspective; Theory and research. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Inc., publishers.

-Halford, WK., Sanders, MR., Behrens, B. (2001). Can skills training prevent relationship problems in at risk couples? Four-year effects of a behavioral relationship education program. Journal of family psychology, 15, 750-768.

-Hamamci, Z. (2005). Dysfunctional relationship beliefs in marital satisfaction and adjustment. Journal of social behavior and marriage and personality, 33, 313-328.

-Heidari, M., Mazaheri, M. A., Poouretemad, H. R. (2006). Relationship beliefs and positive feelings toward spouse. Family research, 2 (1), 121-130. (Persian)  

-Hosseini, Z., Kholghi, z., Jaberi, S., Siddiqui, A., Salehi, V., Tafvizi, M., et al. (2013). Compare couples conflicting personality traits and personality questionnaires 5 ordinary using NEO factor. Journal of Forensic medicine, 4 (1), 165-173. (Persian) 

-Hovestadt, A. J., Anderson, W. T., Piercy, F. P., Cochran, S. W., & Fine, M. (1985). A family-of-origin scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 287-297.

-Hooman, H. A. (2005). Structural equation modeling with Lisrel application. Tehran: Samt Publication. (Persian)  

-James,S., Huntly, J., Hemsworth, D. (2002). Factor structure of relationship belief inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 729-755.

-Jasebi, M. (2005). Relationship between the level of family health and marital satisfaction of women in the education department of Karaj. M. A. Thesis Counseling. Tehran, Khatam University. (Persian)

-Johnson, K. D. (2015). Marital Expectation Fulfillment and its relationship to height of Marital Expectations, optimism and relationship self – efficacy among married Individuals. Ph.D. Thesis. Andrews University.

-Johnson, S. (2013). Factors relating to romantic relationship experiences for emerging adults. Master of science thesis. Brigham Young University. 

-Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34.

-Khalatbari, J., Ghorbanshiroudi, S., Mahdiuon, Z. (2009). Influence of instruction of preparation program for marriage on Couple’s communication beliefs. Quarterly Journal of educational psychology Islamic Azad University Tonekabon Branch, 1 (1), 32-45. (Persian)   

-Khojasteh Mehr, R. (2005). Personality characteristics, social skills, attachment styles and demographic characteristics as predictors of success and failure in marital relationship among divorce seeking and normal Couples in Ahvaz. Ph.D. Thesis Psychology. Ahvaz, Shahid Chamran University. (Persian)

-Levy, SY., Wamboldt, FS., Fiese, BH. (1997). Family-of-origin experiences and conflict resolution behaviors of young adult dating couples. Family Process, 36, 297-310.

-Lin, Y. C., Raghubir, P. (2005). Gender differences in unrealistic optimism about marriage and divorce: Are men more optimistic and women more realistic? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 31, 198-207.

-Markman, HJ., Rhoades, GK., Stanley, SM., Ragan, EP, Whitton, SW. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of family psychology, 24 (3), 289-298.

-Mazaheri, M. A., Pouretemad, H. R. (2003). Relationship beliefs scale. Tehran: Unprinted report from family research center, Shahid Beheshti University. (Persian)

-Najafi, A. (2016). The relationship between personality traits, irrational beliefs and couple burnout. International Academic Journal of social science, 3 (1), 1-7.   

-Narimani, M., Pouresmali, A., Hajloo, N., Mikaeili, N. (2015). Permanent diathesis and marital disaffection among applicant for divorce couples: Mediating role of stressful events. Family counseling and psychotherapy, 5 (2), 24-50. (Persian) 

-O^,leary, K.D. (1987). Assessment of marital discord. USA: Lawrence Erbium Associates inc.

-Pouresmali, A. (2015). Explaining of marital disaffection in applicant for divorce couples based on diathesis-stress model and adjustment among applicant for divorce couples. Ph.D. Thesis Psychology. Ardabil, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. (Persian)   

-Roberto-Forman, L. (2008). Transgenerational Couple therapy. In Burman, AS. (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4 th ed). New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 196-226.

-Sanayizaker, B., Alaghband, S., Falahati, S., Hooman, A. (2008). Family and marriage measures. Tehran: Be’sat Publication. (Persian)

-Schultz, D. P., and Schultz, S. E. (2016). Theories of personality. Cengage Learning.

-Shahrestany, M., Doustkam, M., Rahbardar, H., and Mashhadi, A. (2013). Predicting marital satisfaction over the relational belief and marital intimacy variables in normal and divorced women in Mashhad. Scientific research Quarterly of: Woman and culture, 4 (14), 19-42. (Persian) 

-Sholi, S., Beshlideh, K., Hashemi SheykhShabani, S. E., Arshadi, N. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between neuroticism, work-family conflict, role overload, procedural justice, distributive justice and job control with job burnout in employees of Ahvaz Gas Company. Journal of Psychology Achievements, 4 (1), 47-72. (Persian)    

-Starchet, R., and Bursik, K. (2003). Why am I unsatisfied? Adult attachment style, Genered irrational relationship beliefs and young adult romantic relationship satisfaction. Journal of personality and individual differences, 34 (8), 1419-11. 

-Story, LB., Karney, BR., Lawrence, E., Bradbury, TN. (2004). Interpersonal mediators in the intergenerational transmission of marital dysfunction. Journal of family psychology, 18 (3), 519-529.

-Whitton, S. W. (2008). Prospective associations from family-of-origin interactions to adult marital interactions and relationship adjustment. Journal of family psychology, 22(2), 274-286. 

-Worthington, E. L. (2005). Hope-focused marriage counseling recommendations for researchers, clinicians and church workers. Journal of psychology and technology, 31(3), 231-239.

-Xie, J., Zhou, Z. E., Gong, Y. (2018). Relationship between proactive personality and marital satisfaction: A spillover – crossover perspective. Personality and individual differences, 128, 75-80.