بررسی تاثیر رهبری‌هوشمند بر رفتارشهروندی سازمانی معلمان و کارکنان زن مدارس دخترانه دره شهر و آبدانان

فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مقاله 7، دوره 12، شماره 47، آبان 1400، صفحه 85-100   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jzvj.2021.24913.3238

نویسندگان

زهرا زینی وند^{* 1}؛ اردشیر شیری²؛ حیدر عباسپور³

¹دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام ، ایران

²دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام ، ایران

³دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام ، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 26 اردیبهشت 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 23 اردیبهشت 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 18 مهر 1400 

چکیده

چکیده
هدف از تحقیق حاضر، بررسی تاثیر رهبری­ هوشمند بر رفتارشهروندی­سازمانی معلمان و کارکنان زن مدارس دخترانه دره­شهر و آبدانان می­باشد. این تحقیق، باتوجه به هدف، کاربردی و به لحاظ گردآوری داده از نوع توصیفی-  پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل کلیه معلمان و کارکنان زن مدارس دخترانه دره­شهر و آبدانان است که در زمان انجام تحقیق 942 نفر می­باشند. در این تحقیق برای اندازه­گیری حجم نمونه از فرمول کوکران استفاده شد و حجم نمونه 273 نفر تعیین شد. ابزار اصلی گردآوری داده­ها پرسشنامه است که شامل پرسشنامه سیدانمانلاکا (2002) برای سنجش رهبری­هوشمند و پرسشنامه پودساکف و همکاران (1990) برای سنجش رفتارشهروندی­سازمانی می­باشد. تحلیل مدل ساختاری و آزمون فرضیه­ها ازطریق مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری با روش حداقل مربعات جزئی، با استفاده از نرم­افزار smart pls3  انجام شد.  نتایج آزمون فرضیه­های تحقیق، حاکی از آن است که رهبری­هوشمند بر رفتارشهروندی­سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. همچنین نتایج حاصل از فرضیه­­های تحقیق نشان داد که ابعاد رهبری­هوشمند شامل بعد عقلایی، بعد هیجانی و بعد معنوی نیز بر رفتارشهروندی­سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

رهبری‌هوشمند؛ رهبری‌عقلایی؛ رهبری‌هیجانی؛ رهبری‌معنوی؛ رفتارشهروندی‌سازمانی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating The Impact of Intelligent Leadership on Organizational citizenship Behavior of Teachers and Female Staffs of Dare Shahr and Abdanan Girls' Schools

نویسندگان [English]

zahra zeinivand¹؛ ardeshir shiri²؛ heidar abbaspour³

¹Master of Public Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Iran

²Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Iran

³M.Sc. in Business Administration, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Intelligent leadership on organizational citizenship behavior of teachers and female staffs of Dare Shahr and Abdanan Girls' Schools . The present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlational in terms of data collection. The statistical population of this study includes all female teachers and staff of girls' schools in Darshahr and Abdanan, which are 942 at the time of the study. In this study, Cochran's formula was used to measure the sample size and the sample size was 273. The main data collection tool is a questionnaire that includes the Sidanmanlaka Questionnaire (2002) for measuring intelligent leadership and the Podsakoff et al. (1990) questionnaire for measuring organizational citizenship behavior. Structural model analysis and hypothesis testing were performed by modeling structural equations using partial least squares method using smart pls3 software. The results of the research hypothesis test show that intelligent leadership has a positive and significant effect on organizational citizenship behavior. The results of the research hypotheses also showed that the dimensions of intelligent leadership, including the intellectual dimension, emotional dimension and spiritual dimension, have a positive and significant effect on organizational citizenship behavior.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

"Intelligent leadership", "Intellectual leadership", "emotional leadership", "spiritual leadership", "organizational citizenship behavior"

مراجع

1.       Ardalan, M. & Soltanzadeh, V.(2015). The impact of social entrepreneurship on smart leadership with the mediating role of organizational learning. Entrepreneurship Development, 8(3), 493-512.]Persian[

2.       Abbasian, H, Nejatihatamian, L. & GHaemipour, M. (2017). Meta-analysis of the relationship between school transformational leadership and teachers' organizational citizenship behavior. New educational ideas, 13(4), 121-143.[Persian]

3.       Albrecht.Karl(2002),Organizational Intelligence & Knowledge management, Executive White paper, 1-17.

4.       Appelbaum, S., Bartolomucci, N., Beaumier, E., Boulanger, J., Corrigan, R.,Dore, I., Girard, C. and Serroni, C.(2004). Organizational citizenship behavior: a case study of culture, leadership and trust. Management Decision, 42(1), 13-40.

5.       Arianfar, KH, Navidineku, R. & Farahinejad, M. (2012). A study of distributive leadership style and its effects on organizational citizenship behavior and teachers 'sense of self-efficacy (Case study: Boys' primary schools in Tehran). Management Futurology, 23(1.2), 67-77.[Persian]

6.       Choi, J. N., & Sy, T. (2010). Group‐level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational behavior, 31(7), 1032-1054.

7.       Chen, Z. ,Eisenberger, R . Johnson, K. M., Sucharski, I. L. & Aselage J (2009)« Perceived organizational support and extra- role performance: Which leads to which?», Journal of SocialPsychology,Vol149,No1, Pp119-124.

8.       Castro c, Armario e, Ruiz M (2004). The influence of employee organizational citizenship behavior on customer loyality . International journal of service industry management vol 15 n 1 pp 27 - 53.

9.       Esmaeili, E, Sameri, M. & Hasani, M. (2020). The role of school organizational trust and self-efficacy in the professional development of female primary school teachers with the mediating role of leadership perception. Women and society, 11(41), 79-110.

10.    Erturk, (2007). Increasing organizational citizenship behaviors of Turkish academicians, Journal of Managerial psychology.

11.   Mohamadi, T., & Farahbakhsh, S.  (2014). Investigating the Relationship between Intelligent Leadership and Teachers' Mental Health with Job Stress Management Modulation in Khorramabad Secondary Schools. Career and organizational counseling, 6(21), 95-112.[Persian].

12.   Gardner H. (2000). “intelligence Reframed. Multiple intelligence for the 21 century”.

13.   Ghaffari ashtiani,P Kohan, A.(2009).organizational citizenship behavior: the paradigm of the 21st century organization. Journal of management.16:146.

14.   GHasemi, V. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling in Social Research Using Amose Graphics. Tehran: Sociologists Publications, First Edition.]Persian[

15.   Mandell, B., & Pherwani, S. (2003). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership style: A gender comparison. Journal of business and psychology, 17(3), 387-404.

16.   GHashghaeizadeh, N. (2016). The Effectiveness of Psychological Capital Education on Behavioral Behavior, Organized by Female Teachers in Behbahan. Women and Family Studies, 8(31), 151-133.]Persian[

17.   Hui, C., Lam, S. S., & Schaubroeck, J. (2001). Can good ci􀆟zens lead the way in providing quality servic Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5).

18.   Hadjali, H. & Salimian, M (2012). investigation on the effect of organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) toward customer-orientation: A case of Nursing home Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 57 ( 2012 ) 524 – 532.

19.   Hataminia, N. & Amirianzadeh, M (2018). The role of the mediator of spiritual intelligence with the behavior of citizenship, organization of secondary teachers in Jam city. Studies in Psychology and Educational Sciences, 4(1), 67-75.]Persian[

20.   Honary, h. (2003). Designing and explaining the information system and human resource efficiency system in the Physical Education Organization. Selected Sports Federations and the Olympic Committee, PhD Thesis in Sports Management, Tarbiat Modares University.]Persian[

21.   Hosseini, S. & KHosravi laghab, Z. (2017). Identifying the factors affecting the intentions of leadership and entrepreneurship of female students (Case study: Students majoring in public administration in Tehran).  Women and society, 8(2), 35-56.]Persian[

22.   Khalesi N, Ghaderi A, Khoshgam M, Borhani Nejad V, Toreski M. (2009). Relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and staff empowering in health centers. Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 42(13): 75-82. (In Persian).

23.   Kandlousi, N. S. A. E. , Ali, A. J. , & Abdollahi, A. (2010). Organizational citizenship behavior in concern of communication satisfaction: The role of the formal and informal communication. International Journal of Business and Management, 5 (10), 51.

24.   Kernodle, T. A. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of organizational citizenship behavior: A hierarchical linear modeling study (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).

25.   Keikha, A, Hoveida, R. & Yaghubi, N. (2017). Investigating the Effect of Smart Leadership on the Educational Performance of Faculty Members of Dohli Universities in Zahedan with the Mediating Role of Critical Thinking. General management research, 10(35), 61-83.]Persian[

26.   McKeown, A., & Bates,L. (2013). “Emotional intelligent leadership: Findings from a study of public library branch managers in Northern Ireland,,, Library Management, 34(6/7), pp462 – 485

27.   Mattone, J. (2013).intelligent leadership:what you need to know to unlock your full potential.American management association.

28.   Nielsen, T. M., Hrivnak, G. A., and Shaw, Megan. (2009). "Organizational citizenship behavior and performance", the journal of Small Group Research, Vol, 40

29.       -Nouralizadeh, R. & Hajivand, A. (2008). Smart Leadership (New Leadership Model for Smart Organizations). Two police monthly human development magazines, 5(19), 117-129.]Persian[

30.   Navabakhsh, M, GHafari ashtiani, P. & Kohan, A. (2009). Managing organizational behavior behavior in social roles. Insight Quarterly, 16(43), 55-79.

31.   Organ DW, Konovsky M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Appl Psychol. 1989;(74):157-64.

32.   Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks: SAG.

33.   Oguz ،E.(2010) .The relationship between the leadership styles of the school administrators and the organizational citizenship behaviours of teachers . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1188–1193.

34.   podsakoff, n. p., blume, b. d., whiting, s. w., & podsakoff, p .m (2009). individual and organizational - level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta- analysis, journal of Apllied psychology, 94 (1),pp 122 - 141.

35.   Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.

36.   Rutkauskas, V, & Stasytyte, V. (2013). “Leadership intelligence: how to get there?,,, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75,pp 52 – 61.

37.   Rastgar, A, Talebi, S, Nadi, Z. & seif, M.H. (2017). The Relationship between Genuine Leadership and Urban Behavior, Teachers' Organization: The Role of Intermediaries in Optimism, Education. Management and planning in educational systems, 10(18), 49-62. [Persian]

38.   Staskeviciute,I. (2009),Development of Intelligent Organization in the context of internal organizational Dimension Transformation, Summary of the Doctoral Dissertation, Management and Administration, Kaunas, Kaunas University of Technology.

39.   Senge, M. (1990). The Fight Discipline, the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Great Bertain, Century Business.

40.   Senobary,  M. (2005). OCB (concpts, definitions, dimentions and factors affecting it). Human development, police Journal,: 5(16): 79-99

41.   Ebrahiminejad, m. & Zarei, M. (2018). The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Improvement and Transformation Management Studies, 27(90), 141-160. [Persian]

42.   Sydänmaanlakka, P. (2002). An intelligent organization: Integrating performance, competence and knowledge management. Capstone.

43.   Sydänmaanlakka, P.(2003).Intelligent Ledership and Ledership Competences Developing a leadership framework for intelligent organizations. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy .Helsinki University of Technology.

44.   Sydänmaanlakka, P. (2005). Intelligent leadership. Leading people in intelligent organizations. Espoo: Pertec.

45.   Hejazi, A., & Nazarpoori, A. (2020). Investigating the effect of emotional intelligence dimensions on intelligent leadership in knowledge age organizations. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 11(45), 249-268.

46.   Najm, N. A., & Alfaqih, A. A. (2021). Organizational Intelligence and Market Expansion in Jordanian Pharmaceutical Companies. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 222-251.

47.   Soltani, I. (2009). Six Intelligence Smart Leadership Tools. Tadbir Quarterly, (210).]Persian[

48.   SHafiei, Z. & Fazlolahi ghoshi, S. (2019). The relationship between knowledge management and intelligent leadership with organizational learning. A new approach in educational sciences, 1(1), 20-31.]Persian[

49.   Shahbazi, M. & Nazem, F. (2017). Investigating the relationship between spiritual leadership and organizational climate with citizenship behavior in employees of education departments in Tehran. Family Quarterly and Research, (34), 69-88.]Persian[

50.   SHojaei, S, Sadeghi, M. & Salehirad, S. (2018). Investigating the Relationship between Patriarchal Leadership and Employee Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors with the Mediating Role of Trust among High School Boys High School Teachers in Kalaleh. Educational Management Research, 9(3), 61-82. ]Persian[

51.   Senobari, M. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior (concepts, definitions, dimensions and factors affecting it). Two police monthly human development magazines, 5(11), 79-99.]Persian[

52.   Tabarsa, GH. & Raminmehr, H. (2010). Provide a model of citizenship behavior. Quarterly Journal of Public Management Perspective, (3), 103-117.]Persian[

53.   Tavousi, A. & fazlelahi, S. (2014). The relationship between smart leadership and the components of the learning organization in terms of expertise of the officials of the General Department of Education of Qom Province. Master Thesis in Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch.]Persian[

54.   Tang, H.W., Yin, M., & Nelson, D. (2010). “The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership practices: A cross‐cultural study of academic leaders in Taiwan and the USA,,, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(8), pp899 – 926.

55.   Waldman, D.A. Ramirez, G.G. House, R.J. and Puranam, P. (2001), .Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and portability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty 3Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 134-143.

56.   Wetzels, M. G., Odekerken-Schroder, C. & Van, O. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.

57.   Zeinabadi, H.R. (2010). Transformational leadership and citizenship-organizational behavior in school: re-testing and changing a tested pattern in the industry. governmental management, 3(7), 63-80.[Persian]

58.   Zebardast, M.A, Azizi, S.K. & SHariati, O. (2019). Organizational climate as a mediator between servant leadership of school principals and organizational citizenship behavior. school management, 7(1), 63-40.[Persian]

59.   Ziaei, M, Nargesian, A. & Abaghi, S. (2008). The role of spiritual leadership in empowering the staff of the University of Tehran. Public Management Journal, 1(1), 67-86.]Persian[