ارزیابی فرایند یادگیری گروهی در دانشجویان براساس مدل نَپ

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 4، دوره 2، شماره 7، مهر و آبان 1390، صفحه 57-88   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

امیرحسین محمد داودی^{* 1}؛ فائزه حجتی²

¹استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ساوه

²دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت اموزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ساوه

تاریخ دریافت: 10 آذر 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 10 آذر 1394 

چکیده

این مطالعه قصد دارد تا با ارزیابی مدل مفهومی یادگیری گروهی «نَپ» فرایندهای اجتماعی شناختی اثرگذار بر اثربخشی گروه و یادگیری گروهی دانشجویان را مورد بررسی و روش ارتباط این عوامل را آزمون نماید. در این مطالعه از روش پژوهش توصیفی- همبستگی استفاده شد. کلیه‌ی دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد واحد ساوه به عنوان جامعه‌ی آماری و نمونه‌ای به حجم 191 نفر با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند- قضاوتی انتخاب شدند. ابزار گرد‌آوری داده‌ها در این پژوهش پرسشنامه‌ی محقق‌ساخته شامل 5 متغیر اصلی ساختار و زمینه گروه، باورهای گروه، رفتارهای یادگیری گروهی، فراشناخت و اثربخشی گروه به همراه زیر مولفه‌های آن‌ها بود که آلفای کرونباخ هریک از این متغیرها به ترتیب عبارتند از: 72/0، 78/0، 70/0، 71/0، 72/0. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون وجود رابطه‌ی مثبت و معنی‌دار بین متغیرها را به‌صورت دو به دو تأیید و تجزیه و تحلیل رگرسیون چند متغیره وجود رابطه تعاملی بین متغیرها را به‌صورت جزئی مورد تأیید قرار داد. سپس برازش مدل با نرم افزار لیزرل ارزیابی شد که نتایج برازش کل مدل را تأیید نکرد. هم‌چنین، نتایج تحلیل مسیر یک مدل نوین را پیشنهاد کرد که نشان می‌دهد برای موفقیت یادگیری گروهی و اثربخشی گروه باید باورها و فراشناخت گروه مورد ملاحظه و توجه قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

یادگیری گروهی؛ فرایندهای فرا شناختی و اثربخشی گروه

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating Students’ Team Learning Process in Terms of Knapp’s Model

نویسندگان [English]

A.H Mohamad Davodi¹؛ F Hojati²

چکیده [English]

This study aimed to evaluate Knapp’s conceptual model in an attempt to explore socio-cognitive processes affecting students’ team effectiveness and team learning and their relationship. This study was a descriptive-correlational research. All students of Islamic Azad University of Saveh were the target population. The sample of the study consisted of 191 students selected using purposive sampling method. Research instrument was a questionnaire developed by the current researchers which tapped into five variables including team structure and context, team beliefs, metacognition, team learning behaviors, and team effectiveness. Cronbach’s alphas of the respective scales were 0.72, 0.78, 0.71, 0.70, and 0.72 respectively. Pearson Correlation, multiple regression and path analysis were employed at the level of inferential statistics. Results of regression analysis confirmed the positive and significant pairwise relationships between the variables and multiple regression analysis provided partial support for the interactive relationships among them. Then, the adequacy of the model was assessed by LISREL. Results indicated that the whole model did not fit the data. Path analysis suggested a new model indicating that in order to attain team learning and team effectiveness, team beliefs and metacognition need to be paid explicit attention.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Team Learning, Metacognitive Processes, Team Effectiveness

مراجع

Ansari, M. A, Ghazanfari, A., & Ansari, Sh. (2008). Employees' views about

factors influencing the effectiveness of surgical work teams The teaching

hospitals affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Health

Administration, 11(34), 35-42.

 Aramon, H., Sadeghi Arani, Z. & Saeida Ardekani, S. (2009). The Impact of

Team Work Skills on Educational and Research Performance of students

considering gender separation. Journal of Women Research, 3(1), 59-73.

 Atafar, A., & Bahrami Samani, M. (2009). The amount of Using the

Components of Learning Organization in Public and Azad Universities of

Shahrekord. Journal of Iranian Higher Education Association, 2(1), 161-179.

 Chalmers, Christina. (2009). Primary students' group metacognitive

processes in a computer supported collaborative learning environment.

Doctoral dissertation. Faculty of Education. Queensland University of

Technology. 

 Chang, Artemis and Duck, Julie and Bordia, Prashant. (2006). Understanding

the Multidimensionality of Group Development. Small Group Research, Vol.

37, N0.4, 327-350.

 Cohen, Susan G., and Bailey, Diane E. (1997). What Makes Team Work:

Group Effectiveness Research From The Shop Floor to Executive Suite.

Journal of management, 23(3), 239-290.

 Decuyper,Stefan, Dochy, Filip, Van den Bossche, Piet. (2010). Grasping the

dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team

learning in organizations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133.

 Delavar, A. (2009). Theoretical and practical foundations in Humanities and

Social Science. Tehran: Roshd. 7th Edition.

 Edmondson, Amy. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in

work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

 Edmondson, A.C., J.R. Dillon, and K.S. Roloff. (2007). Three perspectives

on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. The

Academy of Management Annals, 1, 1-61.

 Fahami, R., & Ezati, M. (2010). Study the Effect of Cooperative Learning

(Group Investigation) on the Development of Girl Students' Social Skills

Components in the fifth grade of elementary school in Isfahan region 5. The

Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, 1(2), 66-76.

 Haghparast Kuhpaieh, N. (2011). Factors Influencing Team Learning in the

Girl Students of High Schools in Tehran region 9. Unpublished Master's thesis.

Science and Research University. Tehran, Iran.

 Hooman, H. A. (2009). Structural Equation Modeling with Lisrel

Application. Tehran: Samt. 3rd Edition.

 Iran Nejad Parizi, M. (2008). Organizational behavior management. Tehran:

Modiran Press.

 Johnson, David W. and Johnson, Rojer T. (2009). An Educational

Psychological Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative

Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-370.

 Kayes, Anna B., Kayes, D. Christopher and Kolb, David A. (2005).

Experiential learning in teams. The Journal of Simulation & Gaming, 36, 330-

354.

 Knapp, Randall. (2010). Collective(Team) Learning Process Models: A

Conceptual Review. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 285–299.

 Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based

framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review,

26, 356-376.

 Masselli, John J.; Ricketts, Robert c. and Martindale, Bobbie c. (2001).

Methods, Topics and issues in Tax Education: A year 2001 Perspective.

American Taxation Association.Chapter 1. Retrieved from

http://aaahq.org/ata/publications/teaching_monograph,

 McCarty, Alma & Garvan, Thomas N. (2008). Team Learning and

Metacognition: A Neglected Area of HRD Research and Practice. Advances in

Developing Human Resourcees, 10, 509- 524.

 Nemati, M.A. (2006). Knowledge Management: Culture and Higher

Education. Journal of Roshd -e- Fanavari, 2(7), 28-35.

 Niaz Azari, K. (2003). Metacognition in The Process of Teaching and

Learning. Tehran: Andishe Metacognition Publication.

 Ortega, Aída; Sánchez-Manzanares, Miriam; Gil, Francisco & Rico, Ramón.

(2010). Team Learning and Effectiveness in Virtual Project Teams: The Role of

Beliefs about Interpersonal Context. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1),

267-276.

 Rezaian, A. (2007). Team-Building in the 21st Century (Advanced

Organizational behavior management). Tehran: Samt Press. 1st Editin.

 Rezaie, A., Khadivi, A. (2009). An Introduction to the Theoretical

foundations and Assessment of Metacognition. Tabriz: Shayesteh Press. 1st

Editin.

 Robbins, P. R. (2007). Organizational behavior: Concepts, Controversies,

Applications. (Translated into Persian by A. Parsayan & S. M. A'arabi, 2007).

Tehran: Cultural Research Bureau. 14th Edition.

 Saatchi, M. (2007). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Tehran:

Virayesh Press. 1st Editin.

 Schepers, Jeroen; Jong, Ad de; Wetzels, Martin & Ruyter, Ko de. (2008).

Psychological safety and social support in groupware adoption: A multi-level

assessment in education. Computers & Education, 51, 757–775.

 Scott-Ladd, Brenda., & Chan, Christopher C.A.(2008). Using action research

to teach students to manage team learning and improve teamwork satisfaction.

The Journal of Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 231–248.

 Share Pour, M., Fazeli, M., & Salehi, S. (2008). Investigating Indices of

Quality in Higher Education Based on Key Competencies Analysis. Journal of

Iranian Higher Education Association, 1(1), 33-56.

 Soleimani, N. (2008). The study of Indicators of team work in the The

University Departments. Journal of Educational Management and Leadership,

2(4), 53-74.

 Van den Bossche, Piet, Gijselaers, Wim H., Segers, Mien & Kirschner, Paul

A.(2006). "Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative

Learning Environments: Team Learning Beliefs and Behaviors. The Journal of

Small Group Research, 37(5), 490-521. 

 Van den Bossche, Piet, (2006). Minds in Teams: the influence of social and

Cognitive Factors on Team Learning .Doctoral dissertation. Dutch institute of

scientific research(NWO).

 Wageman, Ruth. (1995). Interdependence and Group Effectiveness.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.

 West, M.A., & Markiewicz, L. (2004). Building Team-Based Working: A

practical Guide to Organizational Transformation. (Translated into Persian by

E. Mardani Givi, 2008). Tehran: Industrial management Organization. 1st

Editin.

 Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2009). Team Building. (Translated into

Persian by B. O. Yazdani). Karaj: Institute of Management Research &

Education(IMRE). 2nd Editin.