بررسی تأثیر عوامل فردی بر خلاقیت مدیران مدارس متوسطه نواحی چهارگانه شهر شیراز

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 3، دوره 2، شماره 5، فروردین و اردیبهشت 1390، صفحه 51-70   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

زهرا سرچهانی^{* 1}؛ جعفر جهانی²

¹کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی،رئیس دبیرستان شبانه روزی معراج آباده طشک

²استادیار دانشگاه شیراز

تاریخ دریافت: 16 آذر 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 16 آذر 1394 

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیر عوامل فردی بر خلاقیت مدیران مدارس متوسطه شهر شیراز بود. روش تحقیق این پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود، جامعه آماری تمامی‌مدیران دبیرستانهای دولتی(195 نفر) بودند که در سال 1388 در شهر شیراز در مدارس متوسطه مشغول فعالیت بودند. نمونه شامل 130 نفر از افراد جامعه بود که به روش تصادفی خوشه‌ای سهمیه‌ای از جامعه انتخاب شد. حجم نمونه به‌وسیله فرمول کوکران برآورد گردید. ابزارهای به کارگرفته شده دراین پژوهش، پرسشنامه خلاقیت رندسیپ و پرسشنامه عوامل فردی مؤثر بر خلاقیت بود. قبل از اجرا روایی و پایایی ابزارهای پژوهش بررسی و اعتبار ابزارها محرز شد. به منظور بررسی سوالات پژوهش از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات نشان می‌دهد عوامل فردی بر خلاقیت مدیران مدارس مؤثر بوده و پیش‌بینی کننده‌ی معنی‌دار خلاقیت مدیران می‌باشند. ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، سبک شناختی، سبک تفکر و دانش، از جمله عوامل فردی مؤثر بر خلاقیت هستند. همچنین تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات حاصل نشان می‌دهد مدیران مدارس متوسطه شهر شیراز از خلاقیت نسبتاً پایینی برخوردار هستند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عوامل فردی؛ خلاقیت؛ مدیران مدارس

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Survey of Shiraz Islamic Azad University with regard to Learning Organization from the Perspective of Faculty Members

نویسندگان [English]

Z Sarchehani¹؛ J Jahani²

چکیده [English]

This survey addressed Shiraz Islamic Azad University with regard to learning organization from the perspective of its faculty members in the academic year 2010-2011. The target population involved all the faculty members at Shiraz Azad University (N=271). With this end in view, 160 respondents were selected using random sampling. The instrument used was the standard Learning Organization Measurement questionnaire which taps five characteristics of learning organizations such as leadership, human resources, organizational design, organizational culture, and organizational mission/ strategy dimensions. The reliability of this questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha and its validity was subjected to the judgment of professors and experts. A use was made of both descriptive (frequency & percentage) and inferential statistics (t-test). The results of the study indicated that Shiraz Islamic Azad University as a learning organization attended to dimensions of leadership characteristics (M=3.5) to an extent above the mean, human resources (M=3.06) around the mean, organizational design (M=2.85), and organizational culture (M=2.79), and strategy/ mission (M=2.76) below the mean.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Shiraz Islamic Azad University, learning organization, Professors’ stances

مراجع

Agahi, B.(2002). Relationship between cognitive style independence -

field dependence and creativity in middle school students in

Isfahan, , M.A. Unpublished Thesis, Isfahan University.

Amabile, T.M., (1988). A model of creativity and Innovation in

organization. In: Staw, B. M. And cumming, L. L., Editor,

(1988). Research in organizational Behavior vol. 10,JAI Press,

Greenwich, CT, pp. 123-167.

Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to Kill Creativity. Harvard, Business

Review Sept-Oct: 77-87.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: west view

Press: 67.

Baba Ali, F.(2005). Comparison of styles and its relationship with

creative thinking among students of humanities and art Tehran

universities, Al-Zahra (SA). Psychology and Education Sciences.

M.A Unpublished. Thesis, Al-Zahra University.

Barbara, k. and kamea, G. (2003). “Mea Suring Creativity in

research and practice”. Arizona state University.

Buckingham, M & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, Discover Your

Strengths. The Free Press.

Connelly C.E (2001), promoting Creativity in software development,

London,

Ontario Queen’s School of Business, Queen’s University.

 Csikszentmihalya, M., (1997). Creativity: Flow and psychology of

discovery and invention.,Harper Collins, New York.

 Csikszentmihalya, M., (1999). Implications of a system

perspective for the study of Creativity. In: strenberg, R. J.,

Editor, (1999). Handbook of -Creativity, Cambridge University

Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 493-502. 

Ghahreman, Tabrizi, K. (2005) The relationship between

organizational culture and leadership style with innovative physical

education faculty members at universities. Teacher Training

University in Tehran. Faculty of Physical Education and Sport

Sciences, Ph.D Unpublished. Thesis Tehran University.

Grabner, I.(2007), Managing Organizational Creativity Motivational

aspects of management control systems for creative employees.

Wirtschafts universität Wien,Nordbergstrasse 15, A-1090 Wien,

Austria16th EDAMBA Summer Academy ,Soreze, France, July

2007.

 Isaksen, s. and lauer , K. (2001). Convergent validity of the

situational out look Questionnaire: discriminating levels of

perceived support for Creativity”. North American , Journal

of Psychology. Vol. 3, No. 1: 31.

khosravani ,S .(2005). the relationship between creativity and the five

factors of personality and mental health, M.A Unpublished. Thesis

Tehran University.

kirton, m.g .(1999) . manual: kirton adaptation – innovation

inventory,3rd ed.Hatfield,uk: occupational research centre.

Mackinnon, W. D. (1970). The personality correlates of creativity:

Astudy of American architects. In P.E. Vernon (Ed), creativity:

selected reading (pp.289-311). New York: penguin Books.

Moghimi, M. (2002) .Approach Manager Research Organization,

Tehran, Nashre terme.

Nelson, D. L. and Quick, J. G. (1994)."organizational

behaveour:Fundayions, realities,and challenges".New York:west

Publishing company:305-307.

Niknami, M. pour Zahir, A. T. Delavar. A. Ghaffari Majlj.

M.(2009). Design and evaluation of causal models of educational

administrators' innovation and Creativity in Tehran. Quarterly

Journal of New Approaches in Educational Adminastration, 

Marvdasht Islamic Azad University, vol. 2/ no. 5/ fall 2009, pages

1-28

Nokar, A.R. (2008), individual and organizational factors affecting

creativity presidential institution employees, M.A. Unpublished

Thesis, Tehran University.

Norouzy, Sadaf. (2007), cognitive styles. Journal Science Education

Compass, no. 184:84

Pandey ,S. (2009), Organizational Factors for Exploration and

Exploitation, J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2009, Vol 4, Issue 1.

Runco,M. A. (2007),Creativity,Research,Development,and practice.

Chapter 1,Cognative and creativity,pages 1-38,

Runco M. A. (2007), Creativity,Research,Development,and practice.

Chapter 10, Enhance ment and Fulfillment creativity,pages 319-

373

Sadeghi Mal Amiri. M. (2005). Design & Specify a model for provide

Context for creativity in the investigative institutions, PH.D

Unpublished Thesis, Tehran University.

Sadeghi Mal Amiri. M. (2007). Creativity a systemic approach,

Imam

Hossein University antsharat , Tehran

Samdani, M. (2006). Investigating the relationship between

personality characteristics of creativity in an area education

managers Kerman, Kerman University. Faculty of Literature and

Humanities . M.A. Unpublished Thesis Kerman University

Sam Khani, M. R. (2002); creativity and innovation in organization

and management education, nashre art Spand Tehran

Satton, R. I. (2001)".The weird rules of creativity".Harvard business

review:89-103. 

Shalley. C. & Gilson. L. (2004). What leaders need ti know: A

review of social and contextual factors that can foster or

hinder Creativity. Dupree college of Managment , Georgia

Institute of technology: 8-9

Shahraray. M. Madani Pour, R.(1996) Creative and Innovative

Organization Knowledge. Management Magazine, No. 33, 34,

Summer 1996

Siadat.S.A. et al, (2007), The exact nature of the relationship between

job creation of employees supervisors.in the guardians of Isfahan

Steel Plant. Journal of Administrative Sciences, Isfahan University

of Economy. Nineteenth year No. 2 of 2007;53-68

Standler, R. (1998). Creativity in science and engineering,

,Creativity,intelligence,and personality.annua review of

psychology,32:439-476.

Witkin ,H.A.& Cox .(1977).Field-dependent& field independent

cognitive styles &their educational implications. ReviewOf

educational Research, 1-64.

Woodman, R. W., sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993).

Toward a theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of

Management Review, 18, 293-321.