بررسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ‌واحد شیراز از لحاظ سازمان یادگیرنده از دیدگاه اعضای هیأت علمی

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 4، دوره 2، شماره 5، فروردین و اردیبهشت 1390، صفحه 71-94   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

محمد جمال‌زاده^{* 1}؛ حسن رهگذر²؛ فاطمه علوی³

¹استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شیراز

²عضو هئیت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شیراز

³کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی

تاریخ دریافت: 16 آذر 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 16 آذر 1394 

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر به منظور « بررسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌واحد شیراز از لحاظ سازمان یادگیرنده از دیدگاه اعضای هیأت علمی‌در سال تحصیلی 90-89» انجام شده است.روش تحقیق توصیفی، پیمایشی می‌باشد جامعه آماری شامل کلیه اعضای هیأت علمی‌دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌واحد شیراز که 271 نفر می‌باشند.بدین منظور، با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده، 160 نفر از اعضای هیأت علمی‌دانشگاه آزاد شیراز انتخاب شدند.ابزار مورد استفاده، پرسشنامه استاندارد سنجش سازمان یادگیرنده می‌باشد که در این پرسشنامه پنج ویژگی از سازمان یادگیرنده مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است که شامل بعد رهبری، بعد منابع انسانی، بعد طرح سازمانی، بعد فرهنگ سازمانی و بعد مأموریت/ استراتژی می‌باشد.برای تعیین روایی و قضاوت و نظرخواهی اساتید و کارشناسان و متخصصان گذارده شد.پایایی این پرسشنامه به وسیله روش آلفای کرونباخ مورد محاسبه قرار گرفت.در تجزیه و تحلیل آماری از آمار توصیفی (فراوانی و درصد فراوانی) و آمار استنباطی (t تک متغیره) استفاده گردید.نتایج تحقیق حاکی از این است که دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌واحد شیراز به عنوان سازمان یادگیرنده به بُعد ویژگی‌های رهبری با میانگین 5/3، بیشتر از سطح متوسط توجه دارد.از نظر بعد منابع انسانی با میانگین 06/3 در سطح متوسط توجه دارد و از نظر بعد طرح سازمانی با میانگین 85/2، کمتر از سطح متوسط توجه دارد.از نظر بعد فرهنگ سازمانی با میانگین 79/2، کمتر از سطح متوسط توجه دارد.از نظر بعد مأموریت/استراتژی با میانگین 76/2، کمتر از سطح متوسط توجه دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سازمان یادگیرنده؛ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌واحد شیراز؛ دیدگاه اساتید

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Survey of Shiraz Islamic Azad University with regard to Learning Organization from the Perspective of Faculty Membersof Teachers of Shiraz

نویسندگان [English]

Mohammad Jamalzadeh¹؛ H Rahgozar²؛ Fatemeh Alavi³

چکیده [English]

This survey addressed Shiraz Islamic Azad University with regard to learning organization from the perspective of its faculty members in the academic year 2010-2011. The target population involved all the faculty members at Shiraz Azad University (N=271). With this end in view, 160 respondents were selected using random sampling. The instrument used was the standard Learning Organization Measurement questionnaire which taps five characteristics of learning organizations such as leadership, human resources, organizational design, organizational culture, and organizational mission/ strategy dimensions. The reliability of this questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha and its validity was subjected to the judgment of professors and experts. A use was made of both descriptive (frequency & percentage) and inferential statistics (t-test). The results of the study indicated that Shiraz Islamic Azad University as a learning organization attended to dimensions of leadership characteristics (M=3.5) to an extent above the mean, human resources (M=3.06) around the mean, organizational design (M=2.85), and organizational culture (M=2.79), and strategy/ mission (M=2.76) below the mean. .
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

A Survey of Shiraz Islamic Azad University with regard to Learning Organization from the Perspective of Faculty Members

مراجع

Bazaregan A. (1998). An Introduction to the quatitative and

evaluation of in Iran hiqher Education: Challenges perspectives,

Translated by Davood Hatami Research and planning quarterly In

higher Education. Year 6 Vol. 15 and 16.

 

20 - Bensimon 21 - Watson 

Behroozi M., Farokh Nejad. K., MirAhmadi T. (2009). The survey of

Effective factors on the tendency of the members of Educational

cultural organizations for changing into learning organization in

Busher province. A new approach in Educational management. vol

2. NO 3.

Bensimon, E. (1989). “Making sense of Administrative Leadership”.

Higher Education. ERIC Digest.

Bui, H. and Baruch, Y. (2010), “Creating learning organizations in

higher education: applying a systems perspective”, The Learning

Organization, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 228-242.

Davis, Deborah. (2005). The learning organization and its dementias

as key factors in firm performance. (Phd). UMI Proques Digital

Dissertation. The university of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Dal- A

66/03, P.861.

Garvin, D (1993): Building learning organization, Harvard business

review. 71(July-August).

Goh, S (1998): Toward a learning organization: The strategic building

blocks, S.A.M. advanced Management journal, 63(2).

Goh, S., Richards, G. (1997); “Benchmarking the learning capabilities

of organizations”; European Management Journal; 15(5), (575-

583).

Goh, S.C., Ryan, P.J. (2002); “Learning capability, organizational

factors and firm performance”; Third European Conference on

Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabiltities; Athens,

Greece, April 5-6, (3-11).

Javehri kamel, M., kosarneshan M., (2009): the survey of the

relationship between Leadership, Organizational culture. Learning

organizational activities and staff occupational satisfaction. Two

monthly police human Development vol 25.

James, C.R. (2003); “Designing learning organizations”,

Organizational Dynamics; 32(1), (46-61). 

Henry, Tc. And creswell, J. W. (1983). “The Levels of Decision

making in Multi- unit conlnunity college system”. Community

Junior college Quarterly of Research and practice. Vol. 7, n. 22.

Houston, D., Meyer, L.H. and Paewai, S. (2006), “Academic staff

workloads and job satisfaction and values in academe”, Journal of

Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 28No. 1, pp. 17-

30. Hosseni Nasab, D. (1993). "Introducing higher Education

Indexes. Research and Planning Quartely in Higher Education

vol2.

Khaligi M. (1997). "Ageneral out look to Higher Education Condition

in Iran, yesterday, today and tomorrow". The Collection of Essays

in the First seminar of Higher Education in Iran. Tehran: Allameeh

Tabatabai University.

Kang, Y. –J., Kim, S. –E and Chang, G.-W. (2008), “The impacts of

knowledge sharing on work performance: an empirical analysis of

the public employees’ perceptions in South Korea”, International

Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 31, pp. 1548-68.

Lin, Hsieny. (2004). A study of learning organization and faculty

development in higher education. Umipro. DAL-A 65102,

P430.Aug.

Molleman, E., Broekhuis, M. (2001). “Sociotechnical systems:

towards an organizational learning approach”; Journal of

Engineering and Technology Management; 18, (271-294).

Paya, A. (2000).The future of the University and the University of

Future. Rahyaft Quartely vol 23.

Pirkhayefi, A. (2003): The factors of Lattle atteation Creativity in the

Universities and the methods for their promotion. Islamic Azad

Univesity. Garamsar Branch.

Sanga, Peter (1990): the Fifth Command: the Creation of prevalent

organization. Tarjome- Hafez Kamale Hedayat and Mohammad

Roshan (1380). Tehran. The Organization of Industrial

Administration. The 3rd Version. 

Atafar. A. Bahrami Samani, M. (2009): The amount of using the

components of learning organization at state and Islamic Azad

University, Higher Education Quarterly. Vol5.

Alinejad, S. (2009). The Greation of Learning Organization in Higher

Education Doctoral Dissertation. Islamic Azad University Science

and Research Branch.

Fazeli, N. (2007). "The comparative survey Iran University culture

and Britain University culture". Anthropology Magazine. Vol3.

Qurbanizadeh. V. (2008). Organizational learning and leaning

organization with a perspective on management of knowledge.

Tehran. Publisher: Bastab.

Qurchian, N, Araste. H, Jafari. P. (2006). Higher Education

Encelopedia. Tehran. Publisher Bonyad Daneshname Bozorge

farsi.

Nobakht, M, B. Sadeqi, A, A. (2008): The survey of the functionality

of Islamic Azad University in socity and Economic development

of the country. Tehran. Islamic Azad University Research

assistanship. The office of the development of the production of

knowledge. Shadan publication.

Pazargadi. M. (1998). Validation in higher education. Tehran: Sabah,

Power. Joe. Waddelll. Di. (2004). The link between self- managed

work teams and learning organizations using performance

indicators. The Learning Organization, 11(3).

Prewitt, V. (2003); “Leadership development for learning

organizations”; Leadership & Organization Development Journal;

24(2), (58-61).

Senge, Peter M (1990): The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning

Organization, New York, Doubleday 

Sharman, Christopher call. (2005). Leadership and the learning

organization.UMI Proquest Digital Dissertation State university of

New York Empire state college.

Taylor; A. L and Koch, A. M. (1995). “The cultural context for

Effective strategy.” New Directions for higher Education. No 94.

Tharenou, P., Saks, A.M. and Moore, C. (2007), “A review and

critique of research on training and organizational- level

outcomes”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 17No. 3,

pp.251-73.

Tolbert, A.S., McLean, G.N., Myers, R.C. (2002); “Creating the

global learning organization”; International Journal of Intercultural

Relations; 26, (463-472).

Watson, D. (1995). “Quality Assurance in British aniversities: systems

and outcomes”. Higher Education Management. Vol. 7, n.1.

Woodfield, S. and Kennie, T. (2008), “Teamwork’ or ‘working as a

team’? The theory and practice of top team working in UK Higher

Education”, Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 397-

415. Yarmohammad zadeh, p. Rahimi H (2006). The survey of the

interrelationship implemetability of the components of the learning

organization based on the five ford prineiples of pefersariy with the

quality of occupational life of the academic staff of Isfahan

University.

Yaqubi, M,. karimi, S, Raisi A,R, Javadi M., Sherbafchi, N. (2010).

The survey of interrelationship of the organizational commitment

and the standards of implementability of learning organizational

components among the managers of Educational. Hospitals of

Isphahan Medical school management of information of Mealth

Quarterly, vol 14.

Zhuang. Lee and Et Al,(1999). “Innoration or liguidate- Are All

organizations convinced- Phased stady Into The Innovation”.

Management Decision, Vol 37, No1.