تأثیر ادراک شایستگی بر تاب‎آوری تحصیلی با میانجی گری انگیزش خودمختار

فصلنامه علمی روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی

مقاله 5، دوره 7، شماره 25، مهر و آبان 1395، صفحه 67-82   

نویسندگان

شراره میرزایی¹؛ علیرضا کیامنش^{* 2}؛ الهه حجازی³؛ شکوه السادات بنی جمالی⁴

¹دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

²استاد گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

³دانشیار دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

⁴دانشیار دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت: 13 دی 1395،  تاریخ پذیرش: 13 دی 1395 

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی رابطه ادراک شایستگی با تاب آوری تحصیلی با توجه به نقش واسطه‌ای انگیزش خودمختار است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را دانشجویان کارشناسی دانشکده‌های علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاههای دولتی تهران در سال تحصیلی 94-93 تشکیل می دادند. از این جامعه 438 نفرانتخاب شدند. شیوه نمونه گیری به گونه تصادفی خوشه‌ای انجام گرفت. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسش‌نامه انگیزش تحصیلی والرند (1989)، پرسش‌نامه ادراک شایستگی ویلیامز و دسی (1996) و پرسش‌نامه تاب‌آوری تحصیلی مارتین (2003) بودند. داده‌ها با استفاده از مدل‌سازی معادله ساختاری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که نه تنها تاب‌آوری یادگیرندگان به گونه مستقیم از راه ادراک شایستگی قابل پیش‌بینی است بلکه این رابطه از راه انگیزش خودمختار تحصیلی نیز میانجی گری می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تاب‌آوری تحصیلی؛ انگیزش خودمختار؛ ادراک شایستگی؛ تاب‌آوری؛ شایستگی؛ انگیزش

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Perceived Competence on Academic Resiliency with Mediation of Autonomous Motivation

نویسندگان [English]

Sh Mirzaee¹؛ A.R Kiamanesh²؛ E Hejazi³؛ Sh Banijamali⁴

چکیده [English]

 This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived competence and academic resiliency with respected to mediating role of autonomous motivation. The target population of the study comprised Tehran universities students who were studying at education and psychology faculties in the academic year of 1393-1394. The sample consisted of 438 students who were selected by random cluster sampling method. The instruments used in this study were: Academic motivation scale (Vallerand & colleagues, 1989), perceived competence scale (Williams & Deci, 1996) and academic resiliency questionnaire (Martin, 2003). The research method applied to this study was structural equation modeling. The results revealed that perceived competence had direct effect to predict academic resiliency. Furthermore, autonomous motivation mediated the relationship of perceived competence with academic resiliency.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

perceived competence, autonomous motivation, academic resiliency

مراجع

Author. (2016).

- Bahadormotlagh, E., Attari, Y., & Bahadormotlagh, G. (2012). The effectiveness of teaching cognitive strategy skills on perceived competence dimensions in students. Developmental Psychology:Iranian Psychologists, 33(9), 39-46.

- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134.

- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

- Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model contemporary. Educational Psychology, 20, 257-274.

- Ghasem, M., & Hosseinchari, M. (2012). Psychological resilience and intrinsic- extrinsic motivation: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 33(9), 61-71.

- Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890-898.

- Guay, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Social context, students motivation and academic achievement: Toward a process model. Social Psychology of Education, 1(3), 211-233.

- Hardre, P. L., Chen, C.-H., Huang, S.-H., Chiang, C.-T., Jen, F.-L., & Warden, L. (2006). Factors affecting high school students' academic motivation in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(2), 189-207.

- Hart, A., & Gagnon, E. (2014). Uniting resilience research with a social justice approach towards a fifth wave? Will be in proceeding from the second world. Congress on Resilience: From person to Society. Romania: Timisoara.

- Hashemi, Z. (2010). An explanatory model of educational resilience and emotional resilience. Shiraz University. Shiraz: unpublished doctoral dissertation.

- Hashemi, Z., & Jowkar, B. (2014). Academic and emotional resiliency prediction on the basis of psychological, familial and social factors:Compare profile prediction of the aspects of emotional and academic resiliency. Psychological Studies, 10(4), 137-162.

- Herman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. E., Jackson, B., & Yuen, T. (2011). What is resilience? In Review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(5), 258-265.

- Jowkar, B., Kojuri, J., Kohoulat, N., & Hayat, A. (2014). Academic resilience in education: The role of achievement goal orientation. Journal of Advances in Medical and Professionlism, 2(1), 33-38.

- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

- Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychology, 12(4), 857-885.

- Martin, A. J. (2002). Motivation and academic resilience: Developing a model for student enhancement. Australian Journal of Education, 46(1), 34-49.

- Martin, A. J. (2003). The student motivation scale: Further testing of an instrument that measures school students' motivation. Australian Journal of Education, 47, 88-106.

- Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2003). Academic resilience and the four Cs: Confidence, Control, Composure and Commitment. NZARE/AARE. Auckland: Australian Association for research in education.

- Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the schools, 43(3), 267-281.

- Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory,research and applications (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice hall.

- Reeve, J. M. (2005). Understanding motivation and emotion. New Jersey: Wiley.

- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. East Ssusex: psychology press.

- Vallerand, R. J., Plletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: Ameasure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological measurement, 52, 1003-1017.

- Waxman, H. C., Gray, J. P., & Padrón, Y. N. (2003). Review of research on educational resilience. Washington, DC: center for research on education,diversity & excellence.

- Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biosychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767-779.

- Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents' development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-reulatory skill. In F. Pajares, & T. C. Urdan, Self- efficacy beliefs in adolescents (pp. 45-69). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.