تحلیل راهبردی تأمین مالی خرد و توان اشتغال‌زایی تعاونی‌های تولید استان فارس

فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

مقاله 9، دوره 9، شماره 34، مرداد و شهریور 1396، صفحه 193-224   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

زکریا فرج زاده^{* 1}؛ صمد زارعی²

¹استادیار بخش اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه شیراز

²دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد منابع طبیعی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مرودشت

تاریخ دریافت: 10 مهر 1395،  تاریخ بازنگری: 18 دی 1395،  تاریخ پذیرش: 31 مرداد 1396 

چکیده

ا
    این مطالعه با هدف ارزیابی نقاط قوت، ضعف، فرصت­ها و تهدیدهای مرتبط با فعالیت تعاونی‌های تولید کشاورزی و غیرکشاورزی جهت تأمین مالی خرد و ایجاد اشتغال در استان فارس انجام گرفت. داده­های مورد استفاده از راه تکمیل پرسش‌نامه در میان 40 نفر از مدیران عامل منتخب گرد­آوری و در تحلیل SWOT استفاده شد. اهمیت هر یک از عامل‌های اصلی و زیرعامل‌ها آن‌ها با استفاده از تحلیل سلسله مراتبی تعیین شد. نتایج ماتریس ارزیابی داخلی و خارجی نشان دادند که هم اکنون تعاونی­ها در تأمین دو هدف تأمین مالی خرد و ایجاد اشتغال در موقعیت میانه قرار دارند. بر اساس یافته­های مقایسه زوجی مشخص شد فرصت­ها با 37 درصد دارای بالاترین اهمیت و ضعف­ها با وزن 31 درصد در رتبه دوم قرار دارند. در حالی که اهمیت نقاط قوت تنها 9 درصد بدست آمد و تهدیدها نیز وزنی کم‌تر از یک چهارم دریافت کردند. پس از تعیین نمره نهایی زیرعامل‌ها، راهبردهای انتخاب شده اولویت­بندی و سهم هر یک از زیرعامل‌ها در دست­یابی به راهبردها (چهار راهبردها) ارزیابی شد. بر اساس نمره جذابیت بدست­ آمده تفاوت میان راهبردها بسیار محدود بود. در تمامی راهبردها بالاترین مساعدت به فرصت­ها تعلق گرفت و در پایین­ترین سطح، نقاط قوت قرار گرفتند. هم‌چنین، به گونه نسبی اهمیت نقاط ضعف بیش‌تر از تهدیدها ارزیابی شد. دو زیرعامل "نیروی انسانی با تجربه و تحصیل­کرده" و "حمایت دولت از فعالیت­های تعاونی و اشتغال­زا" از زیرعامل‌های فرصت­ها و هم‌چنین، "نوسان و پایین بودن قیمت محصول" به عنوان مهم‌ترین تهدید و "نبود مکانیزم گرد­آوری پس­انداز اعضاء" به عنوان بازدارنده­ترین ضعف ارزیابی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تأمین مالی خرد؛ اشتغال؛ تعاونی؛ استان فارس

عنوان مقاله [English]

Strategic Analysis of Production Cooperatives Contribution to Microfinance and Job-Creation in Fars Province

نویسندگان [English]

Z Farajzadeh¹؛ S Zarei²

چکیده [English]

 The Objective of the present study is to examine strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats concerned to Fars province agriculture and nonagricultural production cooperatives in providing goals of microfinance and job creation (employment). The data used for SWOT analysis comes from a survey of 40 cooperatives’ executive directors. Main and secondary factors were determined using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Internal and external factors evaluation matrix showed that cooperatives were in a moderate position in attaining the above mentioned goals. Pair-wise comparison revealed that opportunities with weight of 37 percent were the most important factors followed by weaknesses with weight of 31 percent. Strengths considered less important with weight of 9 percent and threats got weight of less than a quarter. Final scores obtained for secondary factors were used to determine strategy priorities and their contribution to strategy implementation. Based on the attractiveness score, an insignificant difference was found among strategies. Opportunities received the highest contribution to all strategies while the lowest contribution was assigned to strengths. It was also discovered that weaknesses were comparatively more important than threats. Among the opportunities’ “well-educated- experienced labor” and “government support for cooperatives and job creating activities” showed the highest contribution to strategies. The most significant factors of weaknesses and threats were “fluctuating and low output prices” and “lack of mechanism to accumulate cooperatives members’ saving”, respectively. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Microfinance, Employment, cooperative, Fars province

مراجع

- Ahlin, C. & Jiang, N. (2008). Can micro-credit bring development?, Journal of Development Economics, 86: 1–21.

- Akpalu, W., Alnaa, E. S. & Aglobitse, B. P. (2012). Access to microfinance and intra household business decision making Implication for efficiency of female owned enterprises in Ghana, The Center for Environmental Economics Research & Consultancy, (CEERAC) Working Papers No. 003.

- Augustine, D., Wheat, C.O., Jones, K. S., Baraldi, M. & Malgwi, C. A. (2016). Gender diversity within the workforce in themicrofinance industry in Africa: Economicperformance and sustainability. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1365.

- Bauchet, H. & Morduch, J. (2013). Is micro too small? Microcredit vs. SME finance. World Development, 43: 288–297.

- Chagwiza, C., Muradian, R. & Ruben, R. (2016). Cooperative membership and dairy performance among smallholders in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 59: 165–173.

- Chin, K.S., Chan, B.L. & Lam, P.K. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for competition strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4): 437-454.

- Deininger K. & Liu, Y. (2013). Economic and social impacts of aninnovative self-Help group model in India. World Development, 43: 149–163.

- Delbono, F. & Reggiani, C. (2013). Cooperative firms and the crisis: evidence from some Italian mixed oligopolies. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 84: 383-397.

- Develtere P., Pollett I. & Wanyama F. (2008).Renaissance of African Cooperatives in the21th Century–Lessons from the Field,Chapter 2 in Cooperating out of Poverty: TheRenaissance of the African CooperativeMovement, Governance and SocialDevelopment Resource Centre.

- Folsom, J. (2003). Measurement of cooperative impact in Minesota state. Research Report, Rural Cooperative, Washington, D. C. 

- Imai, K., Arun, T. & Annim, S. K. (2010). Microfinance and household poverty reduction: New evidence from India. World Development, 38: 1760–1774.

- Jia, X., Xiang, C. & Huang, J. (2013). Microfinance, self-employment, and entrepreneurs in less developed areas of rural China. China Economic Review, 27: 94–103.

- Karnani, A. (2007). Microfinance misses its mark. Stanford SocialInnovation Review, pp. 34–40.

- Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J. & Kajanis, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis- a hybrid method and its application to a forest certification case, Forest policy and Economics. 1: pp. 41-52.

- Lebovics, M., Hermes, N. & Hudon, M. (2015). Are financial and social efficiency mutuallyexclusive? A case study of Vietnamesemicrofinance institutions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87(1): 55-77.

- Ma, W. & Abdulai, A. (2016). Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from apple farmers in China. Food Policy, 58: 94–102.

- Mazumder, M. S. U. & Lu, W. (2015). What impact does microfinance have on rural livelihood? A comparison of governmental and non-governmental microfinance programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 68: 336–354.

- Montgomery, H. & Weiss, J. (2011) .Can commercially-oriented microfinance help meet the millennium development goals? Evidence from Pakistan. World Development, 39(1): 87–109.

- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

- Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process, RWS Publications, Pittsburg.

- Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS Publications, USA.

- Saaty, T. L. & Vargas, L. G. (2001). Models, methods, concepts and applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

- Ulgen, H. & Mirze, S. K. (2004). Strategic Management, Istanbul: Literature publication.

- Valmohammadi, C. (2010). Using the analytic network process in business strategy selection: a case study. Australian Journal of basic and applied sciences, 4(10): 5205-5213.

- Vigano, F. & Salustri, A. (2015). Matching profit and non-profit needs:how npos and cooperatives contribute togrowth in time of crisis: A quantitativeapproach. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(1): 157-178.

- Weber, O. & Ahmad, A. (2014). Empowerment through microfinance: Therelation between loan cycle and level of empowerment. World Development, 62: 75–87.

- World Bank UN, (2007). Cooperatives inSocial Development, Report of the ProvidingFinancial Services in Rural Areas: A FreshLook at Finance Cooperatives Washington,Governance and Social DevelopmentResourceCentre, Lesson Learned on Cooperatives.

- Yami, E. (2002). Agricultural Cooperatives in Europe and Asia,http:/www. Bc.fc. gov/ inc/indu.htm.

- Yunus, M. (1999). Banker to the Poor. New York: Public Affairs.

- Zarafshani, K., Rostamitabar, F., Hosseininnia,G.H., Akbari, M. & Azadi, H. (2010). Areagricultural production cooperativessuccessful? A case study in Western Iran,American – Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci.8(4): 482-486.