ارائه مدل معادلات ساختاری متغیرهای روانشناختی موثر بر کاهش سکوت سازمانی

فصلنامه علمی روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی

مقاله 1، دوره 8، شماره 28، مرداد و شهریور 1396، صفحه 1-18   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

عباس ثابت¹؛ سعید رازقی^{* 2}؛ علیرضا هاشمی³

¹دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

²استادیار گروه مدیریت، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران

³کارشناس ارشد مدیریت اجرایی، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 31 فروردین 1396،  تاریخ بازنگری: 29 مرداد 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 10 آبان 1396 

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر با هدف ارائه مدل معادلات ساختاری متغیرهای روانشناختی موثر بر کاهش سکوت سازمانی انجام گرفته است. مطالعه حاضر در زمره تحقیقات کاربردی و به لحاظ شیوه اجرای تحقیق، در زمره تحقیقات توصیفی- پیمایشی است و از حیث زمانی از نوع تحقیقات مقطعی به شمار می­آید. پایایی ابزار جمع­آوری داده­ها با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ ارزیابی شد و روایی آن با استفاده تکنیک تحلیل عاملی،  مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. جهت آزمون فرضیه­ها و ارزیابی شاخص­های نکویی  برازش از تکنیک مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم افزار لیزرل استفاده شد. نتایج آزمون فرضیه­ها نشان داد که  تمامی متغیر­های روانشناختی  اثر مستقیم و معنادار بر سکوت سازمانی دارند. در این میان متغیر وجدانی بودن با ضریب مسیر 28/ 0 -بیشترین تاثیر را بر سکوت سازمانی دارد و بعد از آن به ترتیب خودکارآمدی کارکنان با ضریب مسیر 22/0 -، برون­گرایی با ضریب مسیر 18/0 - و متغیر خوش بینی  با ضریب مسیر 15/0-  بیشترین تاثیر را را بر سکوت سازمانی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سکوت سازمانی؛ وظیفه شناسی؛ ‌‌ خودکارآمدی؛ خوش‌بینی؛ برون‌گرایی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural Equation Model of Psychological variables influencing the reduction of organizational silence

نویسندگان [English]

A sabet¹؛ s Razeghi²؛ A Hashemi³

چکیده [English]

This study aims to provide structural equation model of psychological variables affecting organizational silence was reduced. This study is among the applied research and in terms of methods, as research is descriptive and cross-sectional study is temporally type. To collect data reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and its validity, using confirmatory factor analysis technique, was approved. Then the model parameters are obtained and the research hypothesis significance test this technique is based on the results of structural equation modelling using LISREL software were discussed. The results of tests showed that all psychological variables direct and significant effect on organizational silence. The variable path coefficient -0/28 conscience with the greatest impact on organizational silence and then to track the efficacy of employees by a factor of -0/22, Extroversion and optimism path coefficient varies by a factor of -0/18 and- 0/15 path has the greatest impact on organizational silence.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

organizational silence, conscientiousness, self-efficacy, Optimism, extroversion

مراجع

-                   Afkhami  Ardakani, m. & Khalili Sadrabadi, A. (2010). Investigating the Relationship between Personality Factors and Silence of Knowledge Employees, Public Management Research, 5(18), 65-83.

-                   Ahgaz, A. & Tarighian, A. (2015). The effect of optimism mediator on the path of career progression in relation between individual-job fit and individual-organization appropriateness, Journal of Management Science of Iran, 10(37), 79-102.

-                   Alvani, S.M., Vaezi, R. & Honarmand, R. (2013). The role of positive organizational behavior in reducing organizational silence, Journal of Management Studies, 24(79), 1-26.

-                   Avery, D. R. & Quinones, M. A. (2002). ‘Disentangling the effects of voice: the incremental roles of opportunity, behaviour, and instrumentality in predicting procedural fairness’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 81–6.

-                   Avey, J. B, Luthans, F, & Jensen, S.M. (2009). Psycological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 48, No. 5, Pp. 677-693.

-                   Baker W. E. (1994). Networking smart: How to build relationships for personal and organizational success; McGraw-Hill, New York.

-                   Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice - Hall.

-                   Chan, K.Y., Uy M. A., Chernyshenko, O. S., Ringo Ho, M. H., & Sam, Y. L. (2015). Personality and entrepreneurial, professional and leadership motivations. Personality and individual differences, 77, 161–166.

-                   Chesnut, S. R. & Burley, H. (2015). Self - efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A Meta - analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1 – 16.

-                   Crant, J. M. (2000). ‘Proactive behaviour in organizations’. Journal of Management, 26, 435–62.

-                   Dagher, G. K., Chapa, O., & Junaid, N. (2015). The historical evolution of employee engagement and self – efficacy constructs. Journal of Management History, 21(2), 232 – 256.

-                   Danaei fard, H. & Panahi, B. (2008). The attitude of the employees of governmental organizations (Explaining the atmosphere of organizational silence and organizational behavior), Change management Research Papers, 2(3), 1-19.

-                   Danaei fard, H., Fani, A. & Barati, E., (2009). Explaining the role of organizational culture in organizational silence in the public sector, The Perspective of Government Management, 2(8), 61-82.

-                   Desa, A., Yusooff, F., Ibrahim, N., Abd Kadir, N. B., & Ab Rahman, R. M. (2014). A study of the relationship and influence of personality on job stress among academic administrators at a university. Social and behavioral sciences, 114, 355 – 359.

-                   Duncan, r., and Weiss, A. (1979). Organizational learning: implication for organizational design. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 1: 75-123. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

-                   Dziuban, C. D., Tango, R. A., & Hynes, M. (1994). An assessment of the effect of vocational exploration on career decision making. Journal of Employment Counseling, 31(3), 127–136.

-                   Golparvar, M. & Mohsenzadeh, R. (2013). Prevention (compensatory) of deviant behaviors in relation to occupational stress with emotional exhaustion, Methods and models of psychology, 6 (22), 79-100.

-                   Haghshenas, H. (2004). Five-factor design of personality traits, Shiraz, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Publishers.

-                   Hasanzadeh, T. & Sefidkar, S. (2012). Investigating the relationship between organizational virtue and organizational citizenship behavior, Management Studies Quarterly 23(76), 141-155.

-                   Hughes, Marcia, Patterson. L. Bonita & Bradford Terrell, James. (2005), Emotional Intelligence in Action:Training and Coaching Activities for Leaders and Managers, an Imprint of Wiley. www.pfeiffer.com.

-                   Judge, T. A., Klinger, R., Simon, L. S., & Yang, I. W. F. (2008). The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology: Findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1982-2000.

-                   Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Second Edition, New York:  The Guilford Press.

-                   Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B.M. and Lester, S.W. (1997). ‘Beyond helping: do other-oriented values have broader implications in organizations? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 160–77.

-                   Luthans, F. (2002b). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 695-706.

-                   Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. New York: Oxford University Press.

-                   McCrae, R.R. , Costa. P.T.Jr. (1987).Validation of Five-Factor model of personality across instruments and observers.Journal of personality and social psychology,52,81-90

-                   McNabb, D.E. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative research methods of public administration and nonprofit organizations, Translation of Vaezi, Reza & Azmandian, Mohammad Sadegh, First volume, 1st edition, Autumn 2011, Saffar Publishing House, Tehran.

-                   Miller,J. G. (1972). Living systems: the organization, behavioral science, 17:1-82.

-                   Mirmohhamadi, Seyyed Mohhamad, (2014): “The Effect of Perceived Justice and Organizational Silence on Organizational Commitment”, International Review of Management and Business Research,pp 1773-1789.

-                   Morrison, E. and F. Milliken (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world, Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-25.

-                   Nasr esfahani, A., Radmehr, R., Hatampour, F. & Hatampour, E. (2012). Factors Affecting Organizational Silence of Employees, Health system research, 10(4), 830-838.

-                   Peng, C. (2012). Self-regulated Learning Behavior of College Students of Art and Their Academic Achievement, Physics  Procedia,  33  ;  1451  –  1455.

-                   Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44.

-                   Pinder, C. &. Harlos H. P (2001). “Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived in justice”. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 20, 331-369.

-                   Pinder, C. C. and Harlos, K. P. (2001). ‘Employee silence: quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice’. In Rowland, K. M. and Ferris, G. R. (Eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 20. New York: JAI Press, 331–69.

-                   Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. and Bachrach, D. G. (2000). ‘Organizational citizenship behaviours: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research’. Journal of Management, 26, 513–63.

-                   Rezaei, l., Ahadi, H. Asadzadeh, H. (2013). Provide a model for motivating progress based on self-efficacy-based learning model dimensions, Methods and models of psychology, 6 (20), 1-16.

-                   Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., and  Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130: 261–288.

-                   Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3–24.

-                   Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., and  Bridges, M. W. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and psychological well-being. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 189– 216).

-                   Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2004). The development of academic self - efficacy. In A.
Wigeld & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation: (16 – 31). San Diego: Academic Press.

-                   Sherley, B. (2014). Investigating the Relationship between A School Principal's Transformational Leadership Style and A Teacher's Sense of Sele – Efficacy. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Education, California State University, Fresno.

-                   Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organizational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27, 441-458.

-                   Vasile ,C.,  , Marhan, A.M., Singer, F.M. and Stoicescu, D.,(2011), Academic self-efficacy and cognitive load in students, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12 ; 478–482.

-                   Zarei matin, H., & Taheri, F. & Sayar, A. (2009). Organizational Silence: Concepts, Causes, and Outcomes, Journal of Management Sciences of Iran, 6(21), 77-104.

-                   Zebardast, M. & Naderian jahromi, M. (2013). Organizational silence forecasting through the personality brigade of Kerman Sports and Youth Department staff, Journal of Human Resource Management in Sports, 3(1), 45-54.

-                   Zheng, X., Diaz, I., and Tang, N., (2014).Job insecurity and job satisfaction: The interactively moderating effects of optimism and person-supervisor deep-level similarity, Career Development International, 19(4): 426 – 446.