اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات12
تعداد شماره‌ها567
تعداد مقالات5,878
تعداد مشاهده مقاله8,659,650
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,597,287
Arshadi, Sajad, Dehghan, Mahbobeh. (1396). Comparison of Anthropometric Indices of 10-16 Years Old School Girls with the NCHS International Standard. دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی, 4(1), 9-19.
Sajad Arshadi; Mahbobeh Dehghan. "Comparison of Anthropometric Indices of 10-16 Years Old School Girls with the NCHS International Standard". دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی, 4, 1, 1396, 9-19.
Arshadi, Sajad, Dehghan, Mahbobeh. (1396). 'Comparison of Anthropometric Indices of 10-16 Years Old School Girls with the NCHS International Standard', دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی, 4(1), pp. 9-19.
Arshadi, Sajad, Dehghan, Mahbobeh. Comparison of Anthropometric Indices of 10-16 Years Old School Girls with the NCHS International Standard. دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی, 1396; 4(1): 9-19.

Comparison of Anthropometric Indices of 10-16 Years Old School Girls with the NCHS International Standard

Report of Health Care
مقاله 2، دوره 4، شماره 1، خرداد 2018، صفحه 9-19    اصل مقاله (638.25 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
نویسندگان
Sajad Arshadi* 1؛ Mahbobeh Dehghan2
1Department of Exercise Physiology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Exercise Physiology, Taft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Taft, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 14 مهر 1396،  تاریخ بازنگری: 01 بهمن 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 01 اسفند 1396 
چکیده
Introduction: One of the most important international indicators for assessing growth and physical health is measuring weight, height, BMI and other parameters of growth and development and comparing it with standard curves. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to compare anthropometric indices of 10- 16 years old school girls with the NCHS iternational standard. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 267 female students aged 10 to 16 year-old in Taft city were randomly selected through cluster sampling and the mean and standard deviation of their anthropometric indices in their age ranges with related methods were measured and compared to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) standard. Finally, the data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics including Kolmogrov- Smirnov and single sample t-test at a significance level of less than 0.05. Results: The results showed that weight, triceps skinfold thickness, subscapular skinfold thickness of students in all age ranges were significantly lower than NCHS standard (p ≤0.05). But the height, body mass index, mid arm circumference, waist circumference, upper leg length and upper arm length of students in some age groups were significantly lower than the NCHS standard (P ≤0.05), and in other age groups, there was no significant difference (P≥ 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the anthropometric characteristics of these students are less than international standards. Significant changes made in some of these anthropometric indices can be due to the geographical, climatic, nutritional and physical activity of students, which should be given more attention.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Anthropometric Indices؛ Female students؛ NCHS Standards
مراجع
  1. Dixie L, Thompson David B, Snead A. The utility of generalized girth and skin fold equations to predict body composition in women runners. Ame Hum Bio J. 2015; 3: 283- 290.
  2. Murata P. Sckinfold measurements may not be helpful in assessing obese children and adolescents. Med Sic Sport Exe. 2016; 38: 439- 444.
  3. Jung ED, Chung DS, Lee JY. The correlation between visceral fat distance measured by ultrasonography and visceral fat amount by computed tomography in type 2 diabetes. Kor Diab J. 2008; 325: 418- 427.
  4. Ricardo DR, Araujo CGS. Body mass index: a scientific evidences-based inquiry. Arq Bras Cordial J. 2012; 79: 70- 80.
  5. Nemati A, Naghizadeh A, Baghi A. Anthropometric Factors 19-7-year-old female students in Ardabil and compare it with the standard NCHS. Med Sci J. 2009; 2: 202- 208.
  6. Mahyar A, Nazari A, Bayat R. Height, weight and head circumference of children less than 5 years of Qazvin and compare it with standard NCHS. Qazvin Uni Med Sci J. 2011; (9): 61- 54.
  7. Mosavijam A, Rezaey A, Yosefi M. Analysis of height and weight of children 15-7 years in urban areas. Kurdistan Med Sci J. 2000; (2): 6- 14.
  8. Banner A. Kamal A. Growth pathern to Qatar school children and adolescent aged 6-18 years. Health Popul Ntur J. 2015; 23(3): 250- 258.
  9. Lorenzo A. Comparison of body weight, body height and body fatness children aged 6-12 years with american standard. Miner Pedia J. 2005; 49 (4): 101- 106.
  10. Montazerifar F, Karajibani M, Mohamadi M. Pattern of children growth under 6 years of Zahedan growth with NCHS. Zahedan Med Sci J. 2006; (7): 39- 47.
  11. Ahmadi A, Vahidi A. A survey of height and weight of children and adolescents in Kerman. Kerman Uni Med Sci J. 1999; (5): 86- 93.
  12. Jalalvand A. The relationship between anthropometric indices and somatic Fifth year. Moti Sports J. 2006; (1): 94- 83.
  13. Namakin K, Saadat Joo SA. The comparison of growth charts in 1-24 months old children of Birjand with NCHS reference nomograms. Birjand Univ Med Sci J. 2016; 9: 26- 32.
  14. Sabri NS, Kazil S, Zencir M. Correlation of abdominal fat accumulation and liver steateosis: importance of ultrasonographic anthropometric measurements. Euro Ultra  J. 2001; 14: 121- 128.
  15. Joshi N, Rikimanu P. Effect of economic status and education level on the height and weight of community adolescents in Nepal. Nutt Sei Vitamin J. 2005; 51 (4): 231- 238.
  16. Borghi E, de Onis M, Garza C, Van den Broeck J, Frongillo EA, Grummer-Strawn L, et al. Construction of the world health organization child growth standards: selection of methods for attained growth curves. Statis Med J. 2016; 25: 247- 265.
  17. De Onis M, Wijnhoven TMA, Onyango AW. World wide practices in child growth monitoring. Pedi J. 2014; 144: 461- 465.
  18. De Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG, Bhan MK, Norum KR. WHO multicentre growth reference study (MGRS): rationale, planning and implementation. Food Nutr Bull. 2014; 25 (1): 89.
  19. Garza C, de Onis M. WHO multicentre growth reference study group. rationale for developing a new international growth reference. Food Nutr Bull J. 2015; 25 (1): 14.
  20. Saha KK, Frongillo EA, Alam DS, Arifeen SE, Persson L, Rasmussen K. Use of the new world health organization child growth standards to describe longitudinal growth of breastfed rural bangladeshi infants and young children. Food Nutr Bull J. 2017; 30: 137- 144.
  21. Victora CG, Morris SS, Barros FC, de Onis M, Yip R. The NCHS reference and the growth of breast- and bottle-fed infants. Nutr J. 2017; 128: 1134- 1138
  22. Alasfoor D, Mohammed DJ. Implications of the use of the new WHO growth charts on the interpretation of malnutrition and obesity in infants and young children in Oman. East Med Health J. 2016; 15: 890- 898.
  23. Fenn B, Penny ME. Using the new world health organisation growth standards: differences from 3 countries. Ped Gastro Nutr J. 2017; 46: 316- 321.
  24. Bosman L, Herselman MG, Kruger HS, Labadarios D. Seccendary analysis of anthropometric data from a south africa national food consumption survey, using different growth reference standards. Mater Child Health J. 2010; 21: 130- 136.
  25. Nuruddin R, Lim MK, Hadden WC, Azam I. Comparison of estimates of under-nutrition for pre-school rural Pakistani children based on the WHO standard and the national center for health statistics (NCHS) reference. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 12: 716- 722.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 251
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 275


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب