ارزیابی تحقق‌پذیری آزادی آموزش و پژوهش در منشور حقوق شهروندی و قانون اساسی کشور ایران (مطالعه موردی: کلانشهر شیراز)

فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

مقاله 13، دوره 8، شماره 32، بهمن 1397، صفحه 141-152   

نوع مقاله: مقاله های برگرفته از پایان نامه

نویسندگان

مهدی شیخ موحد^{* 1}؛ حسین رحمت الهی²

¹دانشیار دانشکده علوم انسانی، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

²دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 28 دی 1397،  تاریخ بازنگری: 03 بهمن 1397،  تاریخ پذیرش: 07 بهمن 1397 

چکیده

قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران و منشور حقوق شهروندی دو رکن اساسی توسعه همه­جانبه و پایدار جوامع شهری و روستایی کشورمان هستند که با دربرگرفتن ماده­ها و تبصره­های متعدد، در راستای اعتلای دنیوی و اخروی همه اقشار کشورمان تدوین یافته­اند. یکی از موارد مورد تأکید در قانون اساسی و منشور حقوق شهروندی، آزادی آموزش و پژوهش است که بر آن تأکید ویژه­ای شده است. در راستای توسعه آموزش و پژوهش همه­جانبه و پایدار کشور، ارزیابی تحقق­پذیری این شاخص توسعه ضروری و مهم به نظر می­رسد. از این­رو پژوهش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی حاضر، با هدف ارزیابی تحقق­پذیری آزادی آموزش و پژوهش در منشور حقوق شهروندی و قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در کلانشهر شیراز، انجام گرفته است. ابزار اصلی گردآوری اطلاعات و داده­های مورد نیاز علاوه­بر بر مطالعات اسناد مربوطه، پرسشنامه محقق­ساخته است که با تکیه بر مفاد قانون اساسی و منشور حقوق شهروندی تدوین شده است و روایی و پایایی آن با رعایت اصول علمی روش تحقیق تأیید شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می­دهد میزان آگاهی شهرواندان از حقوق شهروندی با میانیگن 31/3، بالاتر از حد متوسط قرار دارد. نتایج در ارتباط با رضایت شهروندان از وضعیت متغیرهای آزادی آموزش و پژوهش نشان داد میانگین 37 متغیر مورد بررسی بالاتر از حد متوسط می­باشد و میانگین نهایی محاسبه شده برای تحقق­پذیری آزادی آموزش و پژوهش مورد تأکید در منشور حقوق شهروندی و قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی از دیدگاه شهروندان با میزان 69/3 در سطح 99 درصد اطمینان، بالاتر از حد متوسط ارزیابی شده است. در ادامه متناسب با نتایج به دست آمده، برای ارتقاء وضعیت متغیرهای آزادی آموزش و پژوهش مورد تأکید در منشور حقوق شهروندی و قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، با توجه به نقش نظارتی قوای سه گانه راهکارهایی ارائه شده است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران؛ منشور حقوق شهروندی؛ آزادی آموزش و پژوهش؛ شیراز

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the realization of the freedom of education and research in the Charter of Citizens' Rights and the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran with regard to the role of the three-member power control (case study: Shiraz metropolis)

نویسندگان [English]

mahdi sheykh movahhed¹؛ hosein rahmatolahi²

¹Head of Islamic Azad University Sepidan Branch

²Faculty Member of Farabi University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

The constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran and the citizens` bill of rights are considered as the two fundamental tenets in urban and rural sustainable and comprehensive development in our country. They have been produced in order to improve the worldly life and the one hereafter for all generations by including numerous articles and notes. One of the focused issues in the constitution and bill of rights is the freedom of education and research. In line with the comprehensive and sustainable development of education and research in Iran, the evaluation of its materialization seems to be essential. To this end, the present analytic and descriptive study has been conducted to evaluate the materialization of research and educational freedom in IRI constitution and citizens` bill of rights in the metropolis of Shiraz, Iran. The basic data collection instrument along with reviewing the related documents was a researcher-made questionnaire based on the constitution and bill of rights content; the validity and reliability of which was confirmed according to research principles. The findings show that the rate of citizens` awareness of their rights is above average with a mean of 3.31. The results of citizens` satisfaction of research and education variables showed the mean of 37 variables under investigation was above average and the overall mean for the materialization of education and research in constitution and rights charter based on citizens` viewpoints was above average level with the value of 3.69 with 99 percent of confidence degree. Finally, some guidelines based on the supervision role of the Iranian triple powers were offered in order to improve the status of education and research variables in the IRI constitution and Iranian citizen` bill of rights.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Islamic Republic of Iran Constitution, Citizens` Bill of Rights, Freedom of Education and Research, Shiraz

مراجع

1. Agrawal, Tushar (2014), Educational inequality in rural and urban India, International Journal of Educational Development, Volume 34, pp: 11-19.
2. Ahmadi tabatabaee, S.M.R. (2009): Civil Rights based on Islamic Republic of Iran Constitution, Periodocal of Islamic Revolution Rahyaft, 3(8), pp: 3-18. [in Persian]
3. Amanpour, S. Esmaeeli, A. and Jowkar, S. (2011): Determining the degree of development in Khouzestan Province Counties based on educational factors employing the digital taxonomy, Amayesh Mohit, 17, pp: 41-61. [in Persian]
4. Azimi, M. (2014): Corresponding Investigation of Civil Rights in Mashroote Constitution and IRI Constitution, Master of Arts Thesis in General Law. Supervisor Dr. Kiamars Jahangir, School of Law, University of Tehran. [in Persian]
5. Baum, Donald R.,  Abdul-Hamid, Husein & H, Wesley, ugo T (2018), Inequality of educational opportunity: the relationship between access, affordability, and quality of private schools in Lagos, Nigeria, Oxford Review of Education, 44(4): 459-475.
6. Bighamat Kahriz, Y. (2018): Civil Rights in IRI Constitution and international documents, Journal of Law and Criminal Law, 8, pp: 13-26. [in Persian]
7. Civil Bill of Rrights (2016), available at: http://citizensrights.ir/. [in Persian].
8. Darban Astaneh, A. Tahmasebi S. and Rezaee P. (2016): Analyzing the non-equal pattern in Iranian Cities, Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 5 (9), pp: 31-50. [in Persian] 
9. Hall, P. & P. Ulrich (2000), Urban Future 21: A Global Agenda for Twenty-first Century Cities, The Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing of the Republic of Germany.
10. Jamini, D. Sajjadi, M. Shahbazi, Z. and Amraee, Iman (2015): Investigating the rate of development in counties of Isfahan Province in educational factors employing the Topsis Techniques, Cluster Analysis and GIS, Research Journal on educational technology, 9 (3), pp: 169-179. [in Persian]
11. Lees, N (2010), Inequality as an Obstacle to World Political Community and Global Social Justice, Oxford University, Paper to be Presented at the SGIR 7th Annual Conference on International Relations, Sweden.
12. Mohammadi Deh Cheshmeh, M. and Akrami, N. (2016): Corresponding Measurement of Development Factors in Bushehr Province, Bi-periodical of Educational Planning Studies, 5 (10), pp: 137-155 . [in Persian]
13. Moreno-Monroy, Ana I., Lovelace, Robin And R.Ramos, Frederico (2018), Public transport and school location impacts on educational inequalities: Insights from São Paulo, Journal of Transport Geography, Volume 67, pp: 110-118.
14. Nazmfar, H. Alibakhshi, A. (2014), Measuring the Contextual Non-equal Issues in Holding the Educational Factors Using the Topsis Method (Case Study of Khouzestan). Bi-periodical of Educational Planning Studies, 3 (6): 115-134. [in Persian]
15. Parliament Research Center^a(2018), Islamic Republic of Iran Constitution, available at: http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/print_version/91482. [in Persian]
16. 16.  Parliament Research Center^b (2018), The Law for Goals and Responsibilities for the Ministry of Education, available at: http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/91482.[in Persian]
17. Rahimi, M. Kakadezfouli, A. and Kakadezfouli, A. (2016): Measuring the Rate of Development of Iranian Provinces in Educational Factors by Employing Muti-Factor Decision Making Techniques, Bi-Periodical of Educational Planning, 6 (10), pp: 11-29. [in Persian]
18. Rahmati, S. and Hassani, F.S. (2011): Analysis the Relationship of Sanitary and Educational Factors with Pregnancy Rate in Country Provinces, Journal of Social Welfare, 12 (45), pp: 319-337. [in Persian]
19. Sasanpour, F. and Hatami, A. (2016): Analyzing the Educational Competitive Atmosphere in Country Provinces, Economy and Urban Management, 5 (19), pp: 45-61. [in Persian]
20. Sorkh, E. (2007): Non-equal Issues in Education and Non-equal Contexts in Tribal and Regional Scope (West Azerbaijan Primary Schools in 2000-2001), Nurture and Education, 91, pp: 103-124. [in Persian]
21. Tesema Tesfa, Melaku and Braeken, Johan (2018),   Regional inequalities and gender differences in academic achievement as a function of educational opportunities: Evidence from Ethiopia, International Journal of Educational Development, V 60, pp: 51-59.
22. UNDP (2010), Human Development Report: 40-year Trends Analysis Shows Poor Countries Making Faster Development Gains.
23. Veisi Naab, F. Babaee Aghdam, F. Alipour, K. and Niazi, Ch. (2016): Evaluation and Ranking the Level of Educational Development in Zagros Region by Using the Vikoover Multi-Standard Model, Bi-periodical of Educational Planning Studies, 5(9), pp:11-29. [in Persian]
24. Yu, Nannan., Yu, Bo., Jong, Martinde and Storm, Servaas (2015), Does inequality in educational attainment matter for China's economic growth?, International Journal of Educational Development, V 41, pp: 164-173.
25. Zare, A. (2016) Lawful Analysis of Article eight in IRI Constitution in line with Materialization of Civil Rights` Bill, Second Conference on Clarifying Civil Rights, Urmia, University Jihad, West Azerbaijanhttps://www.civilica.com/Paper-LAWCC02-LAWCC02_003.html. [in Persian]