بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر کیفیت زندگی کاری اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه با میانجی‌گری محبوبیت اجتماعی (مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه لرستان)

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 5، دوره 9، شماره 35، آذر 1397، صفحه 91-108   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سعید فرح بخش^{* 1}؛ کبری یوسفوند²

¹دانشیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه لرستان

²دانشجو/ دانشگاه لرستان

تاریخ دریافت: 12 اردیبهشت 1395،  تاریخ بازنگری: 24 مهر 1395،  تاریخ پذیرش: 08 دی 1397 

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر عبارت از شناسایی رابطه بین سرمایه اجتماعی و کیفیت زندگی کاری با میانجی‌گری محبوبیت اجتماعی اساتید دانشگاه لرستان بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل تمامی اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه لرستان می باشد که تعداد آنها بالغ بر 254 بود. به منظور انتخاب نمونه آماری، تعداد 148 نفر که از طریق جدول کرجسی و مورگان برآورد شده بود؛ با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای نسبی انتخاب گردید. برای گردآوری داده های مورد نظر، از سه فرم پرسشنامه سرمایه اجتماعی، محبوبیت اجتماعی و کیفیت زندگی کاری که از روایی محتوی و پایایی قابل قبول برخوردار بودند؛ استفاده شد. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل فرضیه اساسی تحقیق که عبارت بود از "متغیر محبوبیت اجتماعی در رابطه با سرمایه اجتماعی اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه و کیفیت زندگی کاری آنان نقش تعدیل گر دارد"؛ آزمون معادلات ساختاری و با بهره گیری از نرم افزارهای SPSS و LISREL، مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج مبین آن بود که بین سرمایه اجتماعی اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه و کیفیت زندگی آنان رابطه مثبت وجود دارد؛ این رابطه با تعدیل گری متغیر محبوبیت اجتماعی آنان افزایش می یابد. به عبارت دیگر محبوبیت اجتماعی، علاوه بر آنکه موجب افزایش کیفیت زندگی کاری اساتید می شود؛ رابطه بین سرمایه اجتماعی و کیفیت زندگی کاری آنان را نیز قوی تر می کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

محبوبیت اجتماعی؛ کیفیت زندگی کاری؛ سرمایه اجتماعی؛ دانشگاه؛ اساتید

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of social capital on the quality of work life of faculty members with moderating of social popularity (case study: Lorestan University)

نویسندگان [English]

s f¹؛

¹دانشیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه لرستان

چکیده [English]

This study aims to identify the relationship between social capital and quality of work life with moderating of social popularity in faculty members of Lorestan University. The study population included all faculty members of Lorestan University that their number was over 254. In order to select the sample, 148 individuals through krejcie and Morgan table, using stratified sampling method was selected. To collect the data, the three forms of social capital questionnaire, social popularity and quality of work life that the validity and reliability were acceptable, were used. In order to analyze the basic hypothesis of the research, structural equation model using SPSS and LISREL, were analyzed. The results show that social capital between faculty members and their quality of work life is a positive relationship; this relationship has a moderator variable as social popularity. In other words, social popularity increasing the work life quality of faculty members and developed relationship between social capital and quality of their work life of faculty members as a moderator.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Social Capital, quality of work life, social popularity, faculty members, Lorestan University

مراجع

 

References

 

• -Akdere, M. (2006). Improving Quality of Work Life Implications for Human Resources. In Business Review, vol.1, p.173.
• -Akhtar Mohaghaghi, M. (2006). Social capital. Tehran. (in Persian).
• -Alinezhad, A. (2009). The relationship between social capital and quality of working Life in the Training Center of Beast Shiraz.  M.A. Thesis, University Payame Noor. (in Persian).
• -Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Form of Capital, PP. 241-58 in J. G. Richardson (ed),  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, New York.
• -Casio, W.F. (2005). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits.
• -Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. (2001). "In good company: how social capital make organizations work"., In Vilanova & Josa (2003), Social capital as a managerial phenomenon, Working Paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Tamper University of Technology.
• -Esmeili, M. R, Vahdati, H. & Amraei, M. (2014). Investigating the effect of work life quality and social capital on the organizational.In Management Science Letters, 4 (8), pp. 1741-1750.
• -Fathinia, M. & HajMohammdyari, R. (2007). Social capital, the causes and results of its realization. Proceedings of the Congress of socio-cultural situation in Tehran, Center Cultural Studies in Tehran. (in Persian).
• -Filippo, E. B. (1998). Personal management. New York:  McGraw-Hill Publishing.
• -Fukuyama, F. (2006). Finally, social capital investigated and maintain it .translated by Ghulam Abbas Tavassoli, Tehran, center of academic publishing.
• -Ghaffari, G. & Omidi, R. (2009). Quality of life, social development index. Tehran, Shirazeh publication. (in Persian).
• -Hooman, H. A. (2008). LISREL or structural equation. Tehran, Publication Samt.
• -Khaki, G. (1999), research methodology with an approach to the dissertation. Tehran, Ministry of Culture and Higher Education, Publications Darayat, First Edition, pp. 498. (in Persian).
• -Khanh, H. L. P. (2011). The Role of Social Capital to Access Rural Credit: A case study at Dinh Cu and Van Quat Dong village in coastal of Thua Thien Hue province- Vietnam. Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural sciences,  M.A. Thesis, No 56.
• -Luthans, F. (1998). Organizational Behavior. New York:  McGraw-Hill.
• -Madandar Arani, A., Paryad, R. (2001). Investigate the relationship between students' evaluation of their popularity with faculty members at the University of Lorestan. Journal of Higher Education assembly, The Third year, NO 4, pp. 97 -116. (in Persian).
• -Marin,Garcia, J. & Zarate Martínez, E. (2003). A theoretical review of knowledge management and teamworking in the organizations. In International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 2(4), pp. 278–288.
• -Mashayekhi, S & Aghayi Fishani, T. (2016).The Effect of Quality of Work Life on Social Capital in Employees of Shahid Modarres Hospital. In International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research (IJBR), 7(2), pp405-415.
• -Mirkamali, S. M., & NarenjiThani, F. (2011). A Study on the quality of work life (QWL) among faculty members of University of Tehran and Sharif university of Technology. In International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology, (ICEEPSY 2011).
• -Mohebali, D. (1997). The Better Work Life: A Factor in Increasing Productivity. In Quarterly Journal of Management Studies, 13(14), p. 54.
• -Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. In Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp. 242- 266.
• -Paldam, M.(2000). Social Capital: One or many? Definition and Measurement. in Journal of  Economic Surveys, 14(5),pp. 629-653.
• -Putnam, R.(2000): Bowling alone: The Collapse and Revival of American community. New york simon and Schuster.
• -Radmacher, S. & Martin, D. (2001). Identifying significant predictors of student evaluations of faculty through herarchical regression analysis. In Journal of Psychology, No. 135.
• -Requena, F. (2003). Social capital, satisfaction and quality of life in the workplace. In Social Indicators Research, 61(3), p. 331.
• -Roslan, A. H., Russayani, I. & Nor Azam, A.R. (2010). The impact of social capital on quality of life: evidence from Malaysia. IJSD., 22(1), pp. 13-22.
• -Sabatini, F. ( 2005). Does Social Capital Improve Labor Productivity in Small and Medium Enterprises. In forthcoming International Journal of Management and Decision Making, December, 1-29.
• -Sarookhani, B. & AmaniLaryjani, A. (2007). Dimensions, views, and indices, URL. (www. Atalala.com/articiles1) (in Persian).

-        Shareef, R. (1990). QWL Programs Facilitate Change. Personnel Journal, No 69, pp. 50 - 67.

• -Sirgy, M., Joseph, D. E., Fraty, P. S. & Bond, J. L. (2006). A new measure of quality of work life based on need satisfaction and Spillover theories. In Social Indicators Research, 55, p. 247.
• -Soleimani, N. (2015). Dimension quality active life plenary faculty in the mirror research. Rahyafti no in Education Management Journal, The four year, No 3, pp. 191-171. (in Persian).
• -Stromgren, M., Eriksson, A., Bergman, D. & Dellve, L. (2016). Social capital among healthcare professionals: A prospective study of its importance for job satisfaction, work engagement and engagement in clinical improvements. International Journal of NursingStudies. No 53, PP. 116–125.
• -Taherian, M., Kamran, F. & Kaffashi, M. (2012). The effect of life work quality on social capital of the staff’s Raja company. Journal: social research, 4(13), pp 59-80.
• -Tajbakhsh, K. (2006). Social capital of evaluation: trust, democracy and development. Translator Khakbaz, A. & Poyan, H. Tehran: Shirazeh publication (in Persian).
• -Vargas, J. (2001). Improve teaching performance.  In D. Royse (ed.), Teaching tips for college and university instructors: A practical guide. Needham Heights, MA.: Allyn & Bacon.
• -Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of Work Life: What is it?. In Sloan Management Review Journal, 15(1), pp. 11-21.
• -YEE, J. (2015). Social Capital in Korea: Relational Capital,. Trust, and Transparency. International Journal of Japanese Sociology. No 24. pp.30 -47.
• -Yunker, P., Yunker, J., (2003), “Are student evaluations of teaching valid? Evidence from an analytical business core course”, Journal of Education for Business,  July/August.