« ارزیابی ساز و کار های مدیریت زمین در مناطق آزاد ، مطالعه موردی : چین، امارات متحده عربی و ایران»

فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

مقاله 1، دوره 9، شماره 36، بهمن 1398، صفحه 1-16   

نوع مقاله: مقاله های برگرفته از پایان نامه

نویسندگان

آرش صادقیان^{* 1}؛ ناصر برک بور²

¹پژوهشگر دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران

²استاد گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 14 مرداد 1397،  تاریخ بازنگری: 07 شهریور 1398،  تاریخ پذیرش: 26 مهر 1398 

چکیده

ا
         امروزه مناطق آزاد اقتصادی یکی از ابزارهای نظام نئولیبرالیسم برای تحقق راهبرد برون‌گرا در پارادایم جهانی شدن، بر بستر اقتصاد سیاسی فضا و از اصلی­ترین کانون‌های تمرکز حضور سرمایه گذاران محسوب می‌شود. حضور سرمایه در این مناطق منجر به توسعه کالبدی سریع­تر این مناطق و نواحی شهری آنها نسبت به دیگر حوزه‌ها گردیده است؛ که این امر ضرورت توجه به برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت کاربری زمین در توسعه مناطق آزاد را افزایش داده است. بر این اساس هدف تحقیق حاضر، ارزیابی ساز و کارهای مدیریت زمین در مناطق آزاد با توجه به سه نمونه چین، امارات متحده عربی و ایران می‌باشد. روش تحقیق توصیفی– تحلیلی و مبتنی بر مطالعات اسنادی و همچنین پیمایش است. جهت تفسیر از تحلیل محتوا و تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP)، استفاده شده است. نتایج تحلیل مقایسه‌ای در ایران و کشورهای امارات متحده عربی و چین نشان می‌دهد که اطمینان از کالبد زیستی، تحلیل تقاضای سرمایه‌گذاری و تأمین زیرساخت‌ها بر اساس طرح‌های بالادست از مهم­ترین اصول مؤثر بر مدیریت کاربری زمین می‌باشد. ویژگی اصلی نظام مدیریت کاربری زمین در مناطق آزاد، مدیریت پایدار و یکپارچه منابع زمین است. در این‌ راستا، ابعاد محیطی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی باید به دقت مورد ارزیابی قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مناطق آزاد؛ مدیریت کاربری زمین؛ مناطق آزاد ایران؛ مدیریت یکپارچه

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Land Management Process in Free Zones, Case Study: China, UAE and Iran

نویسندگان [English]

Arash Sadeghian¹؛ naser barakpor²

¹Urban Studies Department - Architecture & Urban Studies Faculty - Art University - Tehran - Iran

²Professor in Urban Studies, Architecture and Urban studies Campus, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

            Free economic zones are one of the tools of the neoliberalism system to realize the outsourcing strategy in the paradigm of globalization and one of the main focuses of investor presence.
The presence of capital in these areas has led to a more rapid physical development of these areas and their surrounding urban areas than other areas which has increased the necessity of noticing at the of planning and managing land use in the development of free zones. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate land management mechanisms in free zones according to three samples of China, UAE and Iran. The method of this research is descriptive - analytical and based on documentary studies as well as survey. In order to interpretation Content Analysis and Hierarchical Analysis Process (AHP) have been used.The results of a comparative analysis in Iran and the UAE and China show that being sure about providing infrastructure (rated above 80), investment demand analysis and physical environment (rated above 60%) are the most important principles affecting It is land use management. The main feature of land use management system in free zones are sustainable and integrated management of land resources. In Iran's Experience Contrary to the experiences of both China and the UAE, the transparency of land use regulations and executive regulations has not been addressed by the institutional framework of an integrated approach to land use planning and the mechanism of active involvement of local communities and investors in the preparation and implementation of land development plans. This reflects the need for more reflection and thinking in order to achieve the goals of the Free Zones.
 
Keywords: Free Zones, Land Use Management, Iranian Free Zones, Integrated Management.
 
 
 
 Extended Abstract
 Introduction:
           Today, Free Economic Zones are one of the tools of the neoliberalism system to realize the outsourcing strategy in the paradigm of globalization based on the political economy of space and one of the main centers of focus for investors. The presence of capital in these areas has led to a more rapid physical development of these areas and their surrounding urban areas than other areas which has  increased the necessity of noticing  at the of planning and managing land use in the development of free zones.So this study wants to do the comparative investigation on planning and management of land use in three free zones of Iran, United Arab Emirates and China and extract of efficient factors on current mechanism land use management by descriptive – analytical method and based on documental studies and survey. Based on it, the first question rises as what are the main effective factors on mechanism of urban land use management in free zones and how are they differenced? The second question is: what does optimization of land use management mechanism in physical development of these zones need to implement?
         In theoretical studies section it found that land use management has various goals. These goals have interaction and compare with each other. So planning and managing the whole land use is done in the shape of integrated activity. Integration should be in different levels and consider the whole factors (effects of issues such as land market, global change, economic comparativeness for space, environmental balance and different interpretations of emerging changes in land use and effects of them). On the other hand, free zones are a kind of new development paradigm with the goal of providing economic development and economic security, socio-spatial order for cities with the concept of capital accumulation. With regard to unique properties of economic zones, the mechanism of land use management function in free zones is complicated and affected by many factors that is the reason of their differences from the other cities.Based on theatrical studies, theatrical framework of this study is affected by Ding and Lichtenberg and eight measures are defined to measure the effective factors: consideration to demand analysis and investment in development plans (comprehensive plans) and land use, confidence to appropriate biophysics with regard to conservation principles for future, providing development infrastructure that is harmonious with upstream physical plans system, flexibility in physical development plans based on new theory policies, transparency in regulation of land use and implementation, institutional framework with confidence to integrated approach (economic, social and environmental) in land use planning, access to land use management document and mechanism of active participation of communities and investors in preparing and implementation of land development plans.
 Methodology:
       The study on free zones in china showed that the main property of these zones are presenting structural plans through flexible plans with maximum outer infrastructure to response to the demand and conservation of environment in all decisions. Implementation mechanism of these plans allows land use change by free zone’s official commission of that can determine and change the land use.
Results and discussion:
       In Emirates free zones, one of the main achievements is rapid industrial development. The authority of them can attract capital by infrastructure provision. However, each zone has separated authority and land use management is independent and zones lack integrated regional management.
 The experience of free zones in Iran show that land use management mechanism is in the way that organization of plan management or planning, prepare and implement the plans after approving by upstream organizations. This framework has many weak points such as lack of transparency in land use regulations, lack of harmony between short decisions and long term plans, lack of hierarchy in approving the plans. Studding the successful experiences of free zones in China and Emirates and comparing them to Iranian ones (by context analysis) to response to the first question (effective factors of land use management) showed that in all cases, there are consideration to demand analysis and investment in development plans (comprehensive plans) and land use, confidence to appropriate biophysics with regard to conservation principles for future, providing development infrastructure that is harmonious with upstream physical plans system, while unlike China and Emirates, in Iran there are no flexibility in physical development plans based on new theory policies, transparency in regulation of land use and implementation, institutional framework with confidence to integrated approach (economic, social and environmental) in land use planning, access to land use management document and mechanism of active participation of communities and investors in preparing and implementation of land development plans and it needs to think deeply about free zones to reach to success.In order to response to second question, we used experts’ opinions in Iran, the results based on AHP showed that confidence to biophysics and demand analysis and investment in development plans (comprehensive plans) and land use and providing infrastructure based on upstream plans are the most important effective factors that should be highlighted.
Conclusion:
         This study also showed that the main property in land use management system in free zones is sustainable and integrated land resource that encourage development. In this regard, environmental, social and economic issues should be analyzed carefully. In spite of regulations and official structure in integrated management of free zones, still there is no urban integrated management due to lack of accepting changes. The main point is the job opportunity. Efficiency of zones’ function based on encouraging private sector, participation like China and Emirates is necessary in public and infrastructure projects. In this case, private partners can help in planning, management and even infrastructure and services. So in order to realization of integrated and sustainable land use management in free zones of Iran, future studies are needed

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Free Zones, Land Use Management, Iranian Free Zones, Integrated Management

مراجع

1)      Secretariat of the Free and Special Zones Council, (2016), Strategic Document for Iran Free Zones ,Tehran.

2)       Edward J. Kaiser, David R. Godschalk, and F. Stuart Chapin, Jr (2014), Urban Land Use Planning,Translated by: Farshad Razvan and Manouchehr Tabibian, University of Tehran, First Edition, Tehran

3)       Edward J. Kaiser, David R. Godschalk, and F. Stuart Chapin, Jr (2016), Urban Land Use Planning, Translated by: Nasser Barakpour et al., Tehran Center for Studies and Planning, Tehran.

4)      Meshkini, Abolfazl et al. (2015) Institutional Approach to Urban Land Management, Arad Publishers , First Edition, Tehran.

5)      Akinci.G and Crittle.G (2008) Special Economic Zones: Performance,Lessons Learned, and Implications for Zone Development, TheWorld Bank,Washington DC.

6)      Bach, J (2011.a) Shenzhen:City of Suspended Possibility,International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(2):414- 420.

7)      Bach, J (2011.b) Modernity and The Urban Imagination in Economic Zones, Theory Culture Society 28(2):98.

8)      Barbieri.E, and Pollio.C (2015) Industrial Development and Manufacturing in Chinese Territories: The Contribution of Special Economic Enclaves Policies,MET Working papers.

9)      Bhattacharya,A.K (2011) The Rise of Special Economic Zones in India,  http:// business. rediff.com/slide-show/2010/may/19/slide-show-1-the-rise-of-special-economic-zones-in-india.htm# contentTop .

10)  Böhmer,A and Farid,N (2010) Investment Policies and Promotion,working Paper, Amman.

11)  Chen, X and de’Medici,T (2009) The Instant City Coming of Age: China’s Shenzhen Special Economic Zone in Thirty Years,Center for Urban and Global Studies Trinity College, Hartford,Connecticut.

12)  Cross, J (2012) Dream Zones:Promise and Loss in India’s Economic Enclaves,Berghahn,New York.

13)  Ding, A and, Lichtenberg (2011) Land and Urban Economic Growth In China, Journal Of Regional Science, 51(2): 299–317.

14)  Dubai Municipality (2012) Dubai 2020 Urban Master plan Forward /https:// www. dm.gov .ae/wps/wcm/connect.

15)  Echenique, M, (1975) Urban Development Models: Fifteen Years of Experience in Urban Development Models, the Construction Press.

16)  Easterling,K (2008) Zone in Urban Transformation,Ruby Press,Berlin.

17)  Farole,T (2011) Special Economic Zones in Africa:Comparing Performance and Learning from Global Experiences,The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank /www.worldbank.

18)  Han,J (2009) More Deregulation Planned for Free Economic Zones,Korea Times.http:// www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/ news /biz /2009/11/123_20661.html

19)  Kim Ng, K and Tang (2014) The Role of Planning in the Development of Shenzhen, China: Rhetoric and Realities, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45(3):190-211.

20)  Norton. R (2017) Using Content Analysis to Evaluate Local Master Plans and Zoning Codes ,Land Use Policy,25:432–454.

21)  Shaw.B(2016) Land Use in Dubai, University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound, Law School International Immersion Program Papers,23.

22)  Williamson,I and Ting,L (2011) Land Administration and Cadastral Trends: A Framework for Re-engineering,Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,25(4–5): 339-366.

23)  Von Claus Knoth,E (2000) Special Economic Zones and Economic Transformation: the Case of the People's Republic of China,Konstanz University,PhD Thesis.

24)  Zeng, Douglas Zhihua (2015) Global Experiences with Special Economic Zones: Focus on China and Africa,World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7240. Washington, DC.