ارزیابی و تحلیل نحوه پراکنش گونه های مختلف مجتمع های مسکونی بر اساس معیار سازماندهی فضا؛ نمونه موردی: شهر شیراز

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مقاله 11، دوره 11، شماره 40، اردیبهشت 1399، صفحه 155-174   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

ملیحه تقی پور^*

استادیار گروه معماری، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 27 شهریور 1397،  تاریخ بازنگری: 17 فروردین 1398،  تاریخ پذیرش: 26 مهر 1398 

چکیده

ا
 افزایش جمعیت ساکن در شهرها و نیاز به فضاهای مسکونی در سال­های اخیر، ضرورت وجود آپارتمان­ها و مجتمع­های مسکونی را غیرقابل انکار نموده است. این امر پژوهشگران را به لزوم شناخت دقیق تر اینگونه از فضاها و بررسی مشکلات و راه حل های موجود وادار نموده است. وجود دسته بندی ها و گونه شناسی های مختلف مسکن می تواند در امر طراحی و پژوهش، جهت انتخاب نمونه موردی مناسب راهگشا باشد. هدف از این پژوهش شناخت سازماندهی فضایی موثر بر شکل‌گیری مجتمع‌های مسکونی شیراز است. روش تحقیق مورد استفاده در این پژوهش ترکیبی است که از مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و روش میدانی بهره‌برده است. برای این منظور کلیه مجتمع‌های مسکونی موجود در شهر شیراز که با شرایط این پژوهش سازگاری داشتند مورد مطالعه قرارگرفتند. با بررسی عکس هوایی، نقشه‌های ماهواره‌ای و جی ای اس، و بازدید میدانی انواع مجتمع‌های مسکونی از نظر مقیاس و ارتفاع دسته‌بندی شده و سپس طبق مطالعات انجام شده، انواع سازماندهی‌های موجوددر شهر شیراز تدوین گردیده است. در این میان پنج نوع سازماندهی در میان مجتمعهای شیراز شناسایی گردید که عبارتند از: منفرد، مرکزی، مجموعه‌ای، خطی و مختلط. در نهایت جداول مربوط به نحوه پراکنش بر اساس نوع سازماندهی، مقیاس و ارتفاع بدست امد. نتایج حاصل حاکی از آن است که سازماندهی حاکم بر ساخت مجتمع‌های مسکونی در شهر شیراز بصورت مجموعه‌ای می‌باشد که از این میان تمایل به ساخت مجموعه‌های نامنظم بیش از مجموعه‌های منظم است. پس از آن تمایل به ساخت مجموعه‌های خطی (نواری) بیش از دیگر گونه‌هاست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مجتمع مسکونی؛ سازماندهی فضایی؛ گونه‌شناسی؛ شیراز؛ spss

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of distribution method of residential complexes typologies by criterion of spatial organization in Shiraz

نویسندگان [English]

malihe Taghipour

Assistant proff Department of Architecture, Shiraz branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

چکیده [English]

          Organizing Space can regulate the pace of activities and strengthen relevant concepts as well as human relations, and ultimately, result in behaviors that are consistent with the environment. In spite of the customary practice adopted in Iran in recent years, construction of single buildings is not recommended in zoning of urban blocks since individual buildings disrupt the urban landscape. The preferred method is to construct several buildings together as a collective assembly or cluster. The individually constructed buildings create torn-apart spaces and separate houses where the residents and constructors use all their personal power, potential, and possibilities by way of laws and regulations in order to serve their own interests and provide better lighting and further distinction for their buildings against the urban environment. The purpose of this study is to understand space organization, its different schemes, and its effect on the formation of residential complexes. This study was based on typology since typology can influence the classification of various organization schemes and since many other studies are also based on typology. The combined approach was implemented using library resources and comparative methodology. For this purpose, those residential complexes in Shiraz which complied with the project requirements were studied. Various residential complexes were classified in terms of scale and height by studying their aerial photographs, satellite maps and GIS pictures. Field visits were also conducted for this purpose. Based on the conducted studies, it was observed that the following organization schemes were implemented in Shiraz: 1) individual, 2) centralized, 3) clustered, 4) linear, and 5) mixed. Ultimately, typology tables were presented based on the organization scheme used as well as the building scale and height. The results showed that the clustered organization scheme was the governing organization scheme used in Shiraz for residential complexes. Also, the following results were obtained: 1) The most prevalent tendency in Shiraz was towards constructing irregular clusters rather than regular ones. 2) The second most prevalent tendency was towards constructing linear building clusters. 3) The central scheme (which can be adapted to building around a central courtyard, the architectural form used in traditional Iranian houses) was not very popular, perhaps due to the hindrances associated with providing adequate light and ventilation or the problems related to overlooking from the neighboring properties in this type of building.
Extended Abstract
Introduction:
        Today, the relationship between man and space is reduced to a material pattern and the public spaces are reduced as a space for traffic and transport.The accuracy and review of the relationship between man and space can lead to strategies to improve the quality of this relationship.The emergence of residential complexes in Iran happened so fast that there was no opportunity to match the existing ideas in the traditional architecture of the Iranians with their architecture. This mismatch causes some problems between the residents of these complexes which include the cultural diversity, cultural conflicts, lack of proper social relationships, population density, social alienation, lack of cultural, educational and recreational spaces and lack of green spaces and etc. These problems are a reason to reduce the social interactions between residents (Samadifard et al 2013). Thus the recognition of residential complexes can reduce their qualitative problems.
Methodology:
         The research method used in this study is combined. The effective strategy is the use of library resources as the literature which helps the researcher to get familiar enough with the subject of typology and organization. A comparative study was conducted in the final stage of the research and the classification was made by SPSS software after collecting data through observation and field research and the use of GIS and satellite maps.
Result and discussion:
        The layout of residential complexes in Shiraz is based on a shape and epistemological approach. This study in which the classification criterion is the layout of blocks next to each other according to the different spatial combinations of plans in Shiraz five different types were found in the city, including the following ones: single, linear (strip), central (environmental) with two approaches having a central element and several central elements, a series with two regular and scattered approaches and finally a mixed types.
The research criteria and limitations have led to the selection of four main types of this category by removing the single group (because in this category there is no specific organization due to the presence of an element).Linear (strip) organization represents the direction due to their length and indicates the motion, continuity and growth (Ching 2003). This organization in complexes is mostly based on the urban arteries. Most of the complexes that were created with this type of organization are parallel or perpendicular to the surrounding streets. Linear organization creates street-like spaces due to their shape nature. In the central organization (environmental) that the residential complexes are formed around an open space, a central open space will result. According to the studies, two different types of this organization can be seen in Shiraz complexes. The first type of residential complexes has a large central element and the second type the central element is as multiple and the residential spaces are placed around several cores. These cores are not large and wide as the first type but have the ability to be placed in the category because of the special atmosphere of the organization. The third type is a collection of residential blocks put together as a complex. This type can have two approaches: regular or irregular. In the regular approach the blocks are placed under the laws of geometry, while in the second approach, the placement of blocks do not follow a particular approach. The fifth identified type does not comply with any of the organizations presented above and is mostly a mixture of two or more types and so is named as mixed.  
Conclusion:    
In the complex layout which has been highly received among other types, the advantage can be seen that there is the possibility of ventilation for the block through the four sides, while the made open space does not create any specific boundary for the residents and does not create a sense of ownership in them. Open space will be mostly public. The strip layout which was made of connecting the blocks provides the possibility of skylight and ventilation from two sides and the number of units is more in a block. The open space is mostly as regular streets and is not widespread. 
   The central layout (environmental) is in accordance with the principles of the traditional central courtyards in Iran. One of the advantages of this method is creating large communal areas such as basketball and football lands and the residents will be deprived of this advantage by dividing the land into smaller pieces. Also in this case, different spaces with different functions can be assigned to families by expanding the uses. One of its disadvantages is that these large spaces require increased costs for their maintenance; while the residents protect the separate lands especially when the buildings are in the use of the groups with their relatives, colleagues or friends. In the design of such areas for residential complexes it is better to use the both methods and obtain a combination of them. It means that the area is divided into a central space for shared activities and the space next to the building is considered for the specific activity of each building and also the neighborhood groups are very effective in the relationships inside the building that provides the semi-private realm for residents. But according to the results obtained in this study, this type is not well received so much. Further studies on the effectiveness of this type can better identify the degree of acceptance or non-acceptance of this type.
   In the primary types of Shiraz, two complexes with linear type are seen: one as central and another as mixed. Given that the primary types had a diverse range, it seems that a detailed study about their impacts on human relationships in the construction of residential complexes could help the officials to make decisions more easily. The study, which could be the basis for many subsequent studies attempted to provide an appropriate ground for achieving this goal in a variety of organizations used in the residential complexes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Residential Complex, spatial organization, typology, Shiraz, spss

مراجع

1. Aiello A., Ardone R. G., Scopelliti M., 2010 Neighbourhood planning improvement: physical attributes, cognitive and affective evaluation and activities in two neighbourhoods in Rome. Evaluation and Program Planning 33:264-275.
2. Amole D., 2009 Residential satisfaction and levels of environment in students’ residence. Enviroment and Behavior 41(6):866-879.
3. Bonaiuto M., Fornara F., Bonnes M., 2003 Index of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments: a configuration study on the city of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning 65:41–52.
4. Brehm J. M., Eisenhauer B. W., Krannich R. S., 2006 Community attachments as predictors of local environment concern. American Behavioral Scientist 50:142-165.
5. Lefebvre H., 1991 The production of space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, London, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 42-56.

3. Behzadfar Q., Qazizadeh N., 2010 [Sense of satisfaction with residential open space]. Publication of Tehran University, Tehran, pp. 80-123. Available at: https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_24681_2488.html [in Persian].
4. Biddulph M., 2007 Introduction to Residential Layout. Amsterdam: Architectural Press, pp. 32-58.

7. Cambi E., Di Cristina B., Steiner M., 1980 Tipologie residenziali a schiera. BeMa Editrice, Milano, pp. 124-131 [in Italian].
8. Ching F. D. K., 2003 Architecture: form, space, order. New Jersey: John Wiley, pp. 46- 97. 
9. Eynifar A., 2005 [Residential complexes and continuity within the city: Tehran case study]. Anbuhsazan Journal 15(4):28-35 Available at: http://www.magiran.com/magtoc.asp?mgID=2735 [in Persian].
10. Eynifar A., Qazizadeh SN., 2010 Typology of residential complexes in Tehran with the criterion of open space. Arman Shahr Journal 5:35-46. Available at: http://www.sid.ir/fa/vewssid/j_pdf/1100021389503.pdf [in Persian].
11. Fokoohi N., 2004 Urban anthropology. Tehran: Ney Publication, pp. 83-91.
12. Fry G., Tveit M. S., Ode A., Velarde M. D., 2009  The ecology of visual landscapes: exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators 9:933-947.
13. Haeri Mazandarani M. R., 2009 House, culture, nature - a study on the historical and contemporary houses to develop the process and criteria for home design. Tehran: Center for Studies and Research Planning and Architecture, pp. 88-153.

15. Memarian, Gholamhossein. & Brown, Frank. (2006) The Shared Characteristic of Iranian and Arab Courtyard House .In Edwards, B. (Ed.) "Courtyard Housing: Past, Present and Future", Abingdon, Oxon; New York, Taylor & Francis.
16. Pfeifer G., Brauneck P., 2008 Courtyard Houses: A Housing Typology. Berlin: Springer.
17. Polyzodes S., Sherwood R., Tice J., 1992 Courtyard Housing in Los Angeles: A Typological Analysis. pp.243-297, Prinston: Architectural press.
18. Ramyar R., 2013 An introduction to the design of residential complexes area. First edition, Tehran: Samt, pp. 98-146.
19. Rapoport A., 1982 The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. The University of Arizona Press, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 110-134.
20. Samadifard Z., Movahed Kh., Jahanbakhsh H., 2013 Evaluation of common open spaces in residential complexes today as one of social factors in vernacular architecture to increase security in the city. Mashhad: Kharavan Higher Institute, pp 54-63.
21. Tavassoli M., Bonyadi N., 2007 [Design of urban spaces, urban spaces and their position in life and urban landscape]. Tehran: Shahidi Publication, pp. 63-94 [in Persian].
22. Waxman L. K., 2004 More than coffee: an examination of people, place, and community with implications for design. PhD The.