تبیین پویایی‌ها و عدم تعادل‌های منطقه‌ای سکونتگاه‌های شهری استان زنجان

فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

مقاله 2، دوره 11، شماره 41، اردیبهشت 1400، صفحه 17-34   

نوع مقاله: مقاله های برگرفته از پایان نامه

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jzpm.2021.3938

نویسندگان

سمیه قزلباش^{* 1}؛ ژیلا سجادی²؛ مظفر صرافی³؛ محسن کلانتری⁴

¹دانش‌آموخته دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

²دانشیار گروه برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهری و منطقه‌ای، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

³دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

⁴دانشیار گروه جغرافیای انسانی و آمایش، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 06 مهر 1398،  تاریخ بازنگری: 06 دی 1398،  تاریخ پذیرش: 07 دی 1398 

چکیده

الگوی فضایی، دگرگونی و تکامل نظام‌های شهری جلوه‌ای از فرایندهای توسعه‌ی اجتماعی، اقتصادی است که نشان‌دهنده‌ی تغییر ساختار فضایی، اجتماعی و رفتاری جامعه‌ی بشری است. این تغییرات و الگوها اساس مطالعات توسعه‌ی پایدار است. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی پویایی‌ها و عدم تعادل‌های نظام شهری استان زنجان انجام گرفته است. روش تحقیق توصیفی، تحلیلی و روش گردآوری داده‌ها اسنادی است. در این پژوهش ویژگی‌های نظام شهری و تحولات آن در دو بخش تحلیل جمعیتی و کارکردی بررسی شده است. به‌منظور تحلیل جمعیتی نظام شهری استان و سنجش پویایی‌ها و عدم تعادل‌ها از شاخص‌ شتاب گسترش شهرنشینی، مدل جاذبه، مدل رتبه-اندازه، شاخص نخست شهری و سری‌های زمانی استفاده شده است. شتاب گسترش شهرنشینی در استان 53/2 است که از مقدار آن در کشور (81/1) بیشتر است. بیش‌ترین جاذبه‌ در میان شهرهای استان بین مرکز استان و دو شهر ابهر و خرمدره دیده می‌شود. شاخص نخست شهری در استان (61/0) همواره بیشتر از کشور (15/0) بوده است. همچنین مقدار شیب‌خط رتبه-اندازه در تمام دوره‌ها بیش از 1- بوده است که بیانگر غلبه نخست شهری است. اما مدل‌سازی تغییرات جمعیتی 6 شهر نخست نشان از وجود نوعی تعادل در جمعیت‌پذیری این شهرها دارد. برای تحلیل کارکردی این نظام از شاخص مرکزیت خدمات استفاده شد که نتایج آن بیانگر نقش مسلط شهر زنجان نسبت به دیگر نقاط سکونتگاهی است. به‌منظور بررسی جایگاه نقاط شهری در ارتباطات و جریان‌ها‌ از روش تاکسونومی استفاده شد و نتایج آن نشان داد شهر زنجان تنها سکونتگاهی است که از نظر قدرت جریانات مقداری بالاتر از حد بالای محاسبه شده دارد که فاصله زیاد شهر زنجان را از سایر سکونتگاه‌ها نشان می‌دهد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد شهر زنجان با اینکه در نظام سلسله‌مراتب شهری کشور جایگاه ضعیفی دارد اما در سطح استان نقطه‌ شهری مسلط بر سایر سکونتگاه‌هاست که جریان‌های مختلف جمعیت، درآمد، سرمایه، کالا و مسافر به‌صورت یک‌سویه از دیگر نقاط سکونتگاهی استان به این شهر سرازیر می‌شود. فاصله‌ی زیاد بین شهر زنجان به عنوان نخست شهر و سایر شهرها و روستاها سبب پیدایش گسست در نظام سکونتگاهی و عدم تعادل‌های منطقه‌ای شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عدم تعادل‌ منطقه‌ای؛ نظام شهری؛ استان زنجان

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explanation of the regional dynamics and imbalances of Zanjan urban settlements

نویسندگان [English]

Somaye Ghezelbash¹؛ Jila Sajadi²؛ Mozaffar Sarrafi³؛ Mohsen Kalantari⁴

¹Ph.D. of Geography & Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

²Associate Professor, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

³Associate Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Shahid Beheshti University,Tehran, Iran

⁴Associate Professor, Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The spatial pattern and transformation of urban systems is an important manifestation of social, economic development processes that reflect the spatial, social, and behavioral transformation of society. These changes and patterns are the basis of sustainable development research. The purpose of the study is to investigate the dynamics and imbalances of the urban system in Zanjan. The paper is descriptive, analytical research and the method of data collection is documentary. The characteristics of the urban system and its changes have investigated in two sections: demographic and functional. To analyze the demographical dynamics and imbalances, acceleration of urbanization index, gravity and rank-size model, and urban primacy index and time series have been used. The acceleration of urbanization in the province is 2.53, which is higher than in the country (1.81). The most attraction between the cities is found between the Zanjan, and Abhar and Khorramdareh. The urban primacy index in the province (0.61) has always been higher than the country (0.15). Also, the rank-size slope value was more than -1 in all periods, indicating urban primacy. But modeling the demographic changes of the first six cities shows some sort of balance. Also, we applied the service-centric index to analyze the functionality of this system, the results of which indicate the dominant role of Zanjan. Numerical taxonomy has been used to investigate the position of urban areas in communications and interconnections. The results showed that Zanjan is the only settlement that has a higher value of flow power than the upper limit, which indicates the long-distance of Zanjan from other settlements. Although Zanjan has a weak position in the urban hierarchy of Iran, it is the dominant settlement in the province and different flows of population, capital, goods, and travelers flow unilaterally from other parts to this city. The difference between Zanjan as the prime city and other areas has caused a gap in the settlement system and regional imbalances.
Extended Abstract
Introduction: The spatial pattern and transformation of urban systems is an important manifestation of social, economic development processes that reflect the spatial, social, and behavioral transformation of society. These changes and patterns are the basis of sustainable development research. Today, there is no independent demographic center, and all the transformations of human societies arise from belonging to the so-called 'geographical space', 'system' or 'network'. The urban system is not only confined to the physical set of urban settlements, but also to the flows and communications between these settlements. These streams include the flow of population, capital, and factors of production, ideas, information and innovation. The urban system of Zanjan province, consisting of 21 cities, is currently in a state of disruption and failure like the general trend of the country. The pattern of the network of urban settlements is a linear pattern with a northwest, southeast direction. The present study aims to explain how the urban system of the province has evolved over the past decades and also to evaluate the dynamics and spatial imbalances in the province's settlement system. Also. It seeks to answer the following questions: what was the trend of the Zanjan urban system in the past and what is the result of these changes in the present system? What are the functional and demographic characteristics of the province's urban system? What are the most important challenges and regional imbalances in Zanjan's urban system?
Methodology: The paper is descriptive, analytical research and the method of data collection is documentary. The characteristics of the urban system and its changes have investigated in two sections: demographic and functional. To analyze the demographic dynamics and imbalances, some indexes and models have been used, including: acceleration of urbanization index, gravity and rank-size model, and urban primacy index and time series (simple linear regression with least squares method). In this study, in order to analyze the functional features of this system, the service centricity index was used, which is one of the valid methods for determining the status of each city in terms of power and intensity of services or the degree of centralization of settlements. Also, numerical taxonomy has been used to study the position of urban settlements in the volume of communications and interconnections and their power.
Results and discussion: Zanjan province is located in the northwestern of the country with an area of more than 22,000 km². According to the latest political and administrative divisions in 2013, Zanjan province has 8 parishes and 21 cities. The proportion of urban population in the province is 65.2 percent and below the national average (74 percent). Study the urban population in 8 parishes of the province shows that Zanjan parish had the highest share of urban population (61%). The acceleration of urbanization in the province is 2.53, which is higher than in the country (1.81). In the last 30 years, this index was higher in Zanjan and Abhar parishes than other cities and even higher than in the country. This indicates the rapid growth of urbanization in these two parishes. The results of the gravity model between Zanjan as the center of the province with other settlements showed the most attractions is found between Zanjan and Abhar and Khorramdareh and the least amount between the Zanjan and Noorbahar and Nikpey. Analyzing the urban primacy index in the province and comparing it with the country showed that during the past 35 years, this index has always been higher than the country (0.61 in the province and 0.15 in the country in 2016). This indicates the greater distance of Zanjan from other settlements in the province. Also, the rank-size slope value was more than -1 in all periods, indicating urban primacy. The results of modeling the demographic changes of the first six cities by time series based on the population of year 1976 shows some sort of balance in these cities, which means, if the population of each city is compared to the situation of the same city, there is some balance in the process. But when these cities are compared in a hierarchical system, the imbalance in the urban system of the province becomes apparent. Also, we applied the service-centric index to analyze the functionality of this system, the results of which indicate the dominant role of Zanjan. Abhar and then Khorramdareh and Qeidar are next in line, with a considerable distance of Zanjan. Numerical taxonomy has been used to investigate the position of urban areas in communications and interconnections. The results by using 20 indexes showed that Zanjan is the only settlement that has a higher value of flow power than the upper limit, which indicates the long-distance of Zanjan from other settlements.
Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that although Zanjan has a weak position in the urban hierarchy of Iran, it is the dominant settlement in the province. Due to the political, administrative, economic, physical and infrastructural features of the city, different flows of population, capital, goods, and travelers flow unilaterally of other parts to this city. Irrespective of the significant volume of national and government funds spent in this city, a significant portion of the funds from other cities and villages are also used to attract Zanjan's goods and services. These conditions have made the city to have the highest attraction power in the province. The difference between Zanjan as the prime city and other settlements has caused a gap in the settlement system. However, in recent decades, the creation of small towns as new urban settlements has helped to some extent repair the rupture. The two cities of Abhar and Khorramdareh have been relatively successful in attracting capital and investment over the past years compared to other cities in the province. However, compared to Zanjan, there is still a lot of distance. The reasons for this success can be attributed to the location of the two cities near the dense growth axis of the province and the appropriate access to communication infrastructure and interaction with Tehran, Karaj and Qazvin metropolises.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Regional imbalance, urban system, Zanjan Province

مراجع

1. Ahmed, B., and R. Ahmed, (2012), Modeling Urban Land Cover Growth Dynamics Using Multi-Temporal Satellite Images: A case Study of Dhaka, Bangladesh. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, (1): 3-31.
2. Alnsour, J. A. (2016), Managing Urban Growth in the City of Amman, Jordan. Cities, 50, 93-99.
3. Alperovich, G. A. (1984), The Size Distribution of Cities: on the Empirical Validity of the Rank-size Rule, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 16.
4. Amir Yarahmadi, M., (2008), Movement towards humanism urbanization, Tehran: Processing and urban planning publication. [In Persian].‎
5. Azimi, N. (2002), Basics of Urban System and Urbanization Scan, Tehran: Nika Press. [In Persian].‎
6. Bagheri, A. (1996), The Role of Middle Cities in Regional Development, Doctoral Thesis in Geography and Urban Planning, Supervisor Professor Dr. Hossein Shokoui, Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian].‎
7. Barzegar, S., Sheikhazami, A., & Yazarloo, R. (2018), Analysis and Review of the urban hierarchical pattern in Mazandaran Province, Journal of Regional Planning, 8(30): 77-88. [In Persian].‎
8. Behrouz, F. (1992), A Theoretical-Experimental Analysis for Balancing the Spatial Distribution of Population in Iranian Urban Systems, Journal of Geographical Research, No. 28. [In Persian].‎
9. Beyers, W. B. (1989), The Producer Service and Economic Development in the United States: The Last Decade. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce.
10. Bretagnolle A., Pumain D., and C. Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, (2009), The Organization of Urban Systems, in Lane, Pumain, Van der Leeuw, West (eds), Complexity Perspective in Innovation and Social Change, pp. 197-220.
11. Catalan, B., Sauri, D., and P. Serra, (2008), Urban Sprawl in the Mediterranean? Patterns of Growth and Change in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region 1993-2000, Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 174-184.
12. Coffey, W. J. (1998), Urban Systems Research: An Overview, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, XXI: 3 (autumn 1998), 327-364.
13. Dadashpour, H. Moloudi, J. (2011), An Investigation and Analysis of Urban Hierarchy Structure in Ardabil Province, Journal of Geographical Space, 11(34), pp. 102 to 131. [In Persian].‎
14. Dadashpour, H., Afaghpour, A., & Rafieian, M. (2010), An Analysis on the Spatial Organization of the System of Cities in the Coastal Areas of Southern Iran, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 8(14), pp. 97-113. [In Persian].‎
15. Etemad, G., Hessamian, F., & Haerian, M. R. (1984), Urbanization in Iran, Tehran: Agah Press. ‎[In Persian].‎
16. Farajzadeh, M. (2007), Climatic Techniques, Tehran, SAMT Publications. [In Persian].‎
17. Farhoudi, R., Zanganeh Shahraki, S. & Saadmocheshi, R. (2009), Spatial Distribution of Population in the Iranian Urban System from 1335 to 2006, Journal of Human Geography Research, No. 68, pp. 55-68. [In Persian].‎
18. Friedman, J. (1986), The World City Hypothesis, Development and Change, Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 69–83
19. Ghadiri, M., & Shakeri, F. (2015), Comparative Analysis of Population Distribution Pattern in Urban System of the 10 Regions of Iran, Journal of Geography and Development, No. 40, pp. 43-85. [In Persian].‎
20. Guerin, P. F. (1995), Size Distribution and the Process of Urban Growth, Journal of Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 30.
21. Haggett, P. (2001), Geography; A Global Synthesis, 4th edition, Prentice Hall: England.
22. Heidari, A. (2014), Analysis of Physical-Spatial Dimensions of Centralism in the Urban System of Iran, Journal of Rural Housing and Environment, 33(147): P.83. [In Persian].‎
23. Hekmat nia, H. & Mousavi, M. (2006), The Application of the Model in Geography with an Emphasis on Urban and Regional Planning, Modern Science Publishing. [In Persian].‎
24. Hosseinzadeh Delir, K. (2007), Regional Planning, Tehran: SAMT Press. [In Persian].‎
25. Izadi, K. (1993), Study of the Network of Important Cities of Iran, National Iranian Physical Plan, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, No. 1. [In Persian].‎
26. Jefferson, M. (1939), The law of the Primate City, Geographical Review, Vol. 29, 226-232.
27. Kalantari, K. (2001), Planning and Regional Development (Theories and Techniques), Tehran: Khoshbin Press, First Edition. [In Persian].‎
28. Khosravi, M. R.; Shams, M., & Zaker Haghighi, K. (2017), A Comparative Study of the Rank-Size Rule and Urban Differential Model in Hamadan Urban Hierarchical System with Emphasis on the Role of Small Towns, Journal of Regional Planning, 7(28), pp. 65 to 80. [In Persian].‎
29. Krugman, P. (1996), Domestic Distortions and the Deindustrialization Hypothesis, NBER Working Papers 5473, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
30. Lin, X., Wang, Y., Wang, S., and D. Wang, (2015), Spatial Differences and Driving Forces of Land Urbanization in China, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(5), 545-558.
31. Lu, C., Wu, Y., Shen, Q., and H. Wang, (2013), Driving Force of Urban Growth and Regional Planning: A Case Study of China's Guangdong Province, Habitat International, 40, 35-41.
32. Marassousi, N., Hekmatnia, H., Pourmohammadi, M., R. & Nazimfar, H. (2011), Analysis of the Spatial Organization of the Urban System of East Azerbaijan Province, Journal of Urban Management Studies, 3(5): 88-107. [In Persian].‎
33. Mehta, S. K. (1964), Some Demographic and Economic Correlates of Primate Cities: A Case for Revolution, Demography, Vol.1, No. 1.
34. Momeni, M. (2008), Principles and methods of regional planning, Publication of Azad University branch of Najafabad. [In Persian].
35. Mondal, B., Das, D. N., and G. Dolui, (2015), Modeling Spatial Variation of Explanatory Factors of Urban Expansion of Kolkata: A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1(4), 1-13.
36. Moomaw, R. L. and M. A. Alwosabi, (2004), An Empirical Analysis of Competing Explanations of Urban Primacy Evidence From Asia and Americas, Annals of Regional Science, 38,149–171.
37. Nazarian, A. (1994), Hierarchical System of Iranian Cities, Journal of Geographical Research, No.32, pp. 66-91. [In Persian].‎
38. Nazarian, A. (1995), Urban geography of Iran, Tehran: Payame Noor University Press. ‎[In Persian].‎
39. Nazarian, A. (2010), The dynamics of urban systems of Iran, Tehran: Mobtakeran Press. ‎[In Persian].‎
40. Noyelle, T. J. & Stanback, T. M. (1984), The Economic Transformation of American Cities. Totawa: Rowman & Allanheld.
41. Omidvar, K., Beyranvandzadeh, M., & Rostam Gourani, E. (2009), Analysis of urban network and spatial distribution of population in the urban centers of Hormozgan Province, Geographical Journal Of Chashmandaz-e-Zagros, 1(2): 109-132. ‎[In Persian].‎
42. Pacione, M. (2005), Urban Geography, Second Edition, Routledge Press.
43. Plan and Budget Organization (1985), Basic Plan for land use of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Plan and Budget Organization Press. [In Persian].‎
44. Planning Department of Governorship of Zanjan (2010), Zanjan Province land use Planning Studies, Volume 2: Social and Cultural Analysis. [In Persian].‎
45. Potter, R. & Lloyd-Evans, S. (2005), The City in the Developing World, Translated by Qumarsi Irandust, Mehdi Dehghan Manshadi, Mitra Ahmadi, Tehran: Publications of the Municipalities and Villages of The Country Organization. [In Persian].‎
46. Pourmohammadi, M. R., Ghorbani, R., Zali, N. & Samad Hekmati, F. (2009), An Analysis of the Urban System Characteristics of the Azerbaijani Region with Emphasis on the Impacts of Tabriz Metropolitan Economic Focus, Geography and Planning, 14(29), pp. 17-17. [In Persian].‎
47. Pumain, D. (2003), Scaling Laws and Urban Systems, SFI Working Paper, European Research Program ISCOM.
48. Pumain, D. (2006), Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences, Methodos Series, 3, Springer Netherlands.
49. Rafieian, M. (1996), Space Organization with Emphasis on Urban Systems, Case Study: Isfahan Province, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian].‎
    Rahnamaei, M. T., & Mohammadi Deh Cheshme, M. (2009), An Attitude to Social Instability in the Iranian City Ecosystem, Political-Economic Information, No. 259 and 260, pp. 284 to 297. [In Persian].‎
50. Rahemi, M. Mahkouee, H., Khadem Al-Husseini, A., & Shamsodini, A. (1979), A Study of the Political Organization of Space in the Country's Settlement Areas, Case Study: Kashan City, Journal of Regional Planning, 8(30), pp. 89- 102. [In Persian].‎
51. Sajjadi, J. (1996), A Geographical Approach to Development Concepts and Its Role in the Center-Surrounding Structure of the World Economy, Journal of Geographical Research, No. 41, pp. 96-115. [In Persian].‎
52. Sassen, S., (1991), The Global City, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
53. Seifeddini, F., Mansourian, H., Pour Ahmad, A., & Darvishzadeh, R. (2013), Spatial-temporal dynamics of Iranian urban system 1335-90, Journal of Geographical Researches on Urban Planning, 1(1), pp. 21 - 42. [In Persian].‎
54. Shokooei, H. (1974), Urban geography of Iran, Tabriz University Press. [In Persian].‎
55. Shokooei, H. (1994), New viewpoints of urban geography, vol.1, Tehran: SAMT publication. [In Persian].‎
56. Taghvaie, M., & Saberi, H. (2010): An Analysis of Iranian Urban Systems during the years 1335 to 2006, Journal of Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 2(5), pp. 55-76. [In Persian].‎
57. Talaminaie, A. (1974), An Analysis of Regional Characteristics in Iran, Based on Isfahan Sample Regional Studies, University of Tehran, Report No. 1680. [In Persian].‎
58. The Statistical Center of Iran (1956-2016), The findings of the National Population and Housing Census.  
59. Witherick, M., Ross, S. and J. Small, (2001), A Modern Dictionary of Geography, London, Arnold, Fourth Edition.
60. Zebardasht, E. (2007), A Study of the Urban Prime Developments in Iran, Journal Honar-ha-Ye-Ziba, No. 29, [In Persian].‎
61. Zebardasht, E. (2003), Evaluation of Hierarchy Processes and Settlement Classification Methods in Urban Practices Approach in Rural Development, Journal Honar-ha-Ye-Ziba, No. 13, pp. 52-63. [In Persian].‎