تحلیل عملکرد مدیریت شهری با تاکید بر شاخص‌های حکمروایی خوب از منظر شهروندان (مورد مطالعه: شهر ساری)

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مقاله 1، دوره 11، شماره 40، اردیبهشت 1399، صفحه 1-16   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

کرامت الله زیاری^{* 1}؛ هاجر یداله نیا²؛ حسین یداله نیا³

¹استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری/ دانشگاه تهران

²دانشگاه تهران دانشکده جغرافیا

³جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 05 دی 1396،  تاریخ بازنگری: 21 مرداد 1397،  تاریخ پذیرش: 06 مهر 1398 

چکیده

         رویکرد حکم­روایی منجر به نقش‌آفرینی فعال شهروندان در عرصه تصمیم‌گیری‌های شهری شده و این امکان را برای مدیران فراهم می­کند تا با به‌کارگیری ظرفیت کنشگران، مشکلات را به‌صورت مناسب­تر و بهینه­تر شناخته و رفع کنند. در این پژوهش شهر ساری با توجه به افزایش جمعیت سالانه شهری و اهمیت این شهر به لحاظ سیاسی (مرکز استان)، عملکرد مدیریت شهر آن با توجه به نظرات شهروندان موردبررسی قرارگرفته است. جامعه آماری شهروندان شهر ساری بوده و حجم نمونه بر اساس فرمول کوکران 384 نفر برآورد شده است. برای تحلیل علاوه بر آمار توصیفی (میانگین و انحراف معیار) از آزمون T تک نمونه­ای استفاده گردید. به همین منظور در این پژوهش سعی شده شاخص­هایی چون مشارکت، کارایی، شفافیت، عدالت محوری، پاسخگویی، مسئولیت‌پذیری، قانون‌مندی و توافق جمعی مورد بررسی قرار گیرد. برای سنجش هر یک از متغیرها در پرسشنامه، از طیف لیکرت 5 سطحی استفاده شد. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده نشان می­دهد، میانگین کل شاخص­های حکمروایی خوب از منظر شهروندان با مقدار 1.98 از 3 در وضعیت نامطلوبی قرار دارد. با توجه به نتایج، در بین شاخص­های بررسی‌شده شاخص کارایی و اثربخشی فعالیت مدیران و مسئولان شهری با میانگین 2.46 از 3 بیشترین میزان در بین شاخص­ها را داشته است ولی کمتر از میانگین استاندارد است که نشان‌دهنده مؤثر نبودن روش فعالیت مدیران در عرصه شهری است و شاخص مشارکت با مقدار 1.67 از 3 کمترین مقدار را داشته است درنتیجه برای افزایش مشارکت شهروندان در امور مدیریتی لازم است که مسئولان شهری زمینه مشارکت شهروندان را فراهم کنند. نتایج عدم رضایت شهروندان را بیان می­کند که در این رابطه مسئولان شهری باید با به‌کارگیری نظرات افراد در عرصه مدیریتی و سیاست­گذاری­ها، زمینه را برای افزایش رضایت از زندگی در شهر را فراهم نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عملکرد؛ مدیریت شهری؛ حکمروایی؛ شهروندان؛ ساری

عنوان مقاله [English]

Urban Management Performance Analysis with Emphasis on Good Governance Indicators from the Citizen's Perspective (Case Study: Sari City)

نویسندگان [English]

keramatollah ziari¹؛ Hajar Yadollahnia²؛ hossein yadollahnia³

¹pro

²University of Tehran. Faculty of Geography

³Human Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

         City of Sari Due to the increasing annual urban population and the importance of this city politically (provincial capital), its management has been studied according to citizens' views. The statistical population of the city is Sari and the sample size is estimated to be 384 by Cochran formula. In addition to descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), a single-sample t-test was used. For this purpose, in this research, we have tried to examine the indicators such as participation, efficiency, transparency, centrality justice, accountability, accountability, legality and collective agreement. To measure each of the variables in the questionnaire, a 5-level Likert scale was used. The results show that the average total of good governance indicators from the perspective of citizens is 1.98 out of 3 in an unfavorable situation. According to the results, among the indexes, the index of effectiveness and effectiveness of urban managers and managers with an average of 2.46 out of 3 was the highest among the indicators, but below the standard average, which indicates that the method is not effective The activities of managers in the urban area and the participation index with 1.67 of the 3 lowest values. Therefore, in order to increase citizens' participation in administrative affairs, urban authorities need to provide citizenship participation.
Extended abstract
Introduction:
         The rapid and unnecessary growth of the urban population has changed the functions and identity of the city, making urban management one of the most complex and central areas of relations between the people and the state. One of the most important, yet new, debates in the development literature since the 1980s is the subject of good governance. Comprehensive growth, coupled with serious challenges in the socio-physical, economic, cultural, and environmental contexts, has for years required experts' intellectual consensus to address urban life issues and the efficiency of urban management. The theme of good governance to achieve sustainable human development can only be achieved when the goals of democracy, equality in service and environmental protection are pursued through the formation of integrated urban management. Good governance involves cooperation and partnership between the three main pillars of government agencies, civil society and private sector organizations (Ghanaie & Musaikhani, 2012: 2; Taghawai & Tajdar, 2009: 46). Among the various approaches proposed in the field of urban management, good urban governance is one of the most discussed approaches. At the present time, this approach is the only way out of the impasse and poverty and underdevelopment of cities in international fora and expert circles, and urban management has no choice but to implement it (Movahed et al, 2014: 148).  
Methodology:
      This research is of a practical nature and can help municipality, city council and all governmental and non-governmental institutions improve urban management in the form of good urban governance. According to the research components in this research, the research method is descriptive-analytical. Data were collected by library studies and field. The statistical population of this research is the citizens of Sari city. Based on the latest census of the population of 309820, the sample size is 384 according to the Cochran formula. The collected data was analyzed by SPSS software using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (T-test). The aim of this study was to find out the goals of this study.
Results:
       Descriptive findings from 384 respondents to the questionnaire were 78.6% male and 21.4% female. In terms of educational level, the group is divided into the group with the highest percentage of respondents at the level of bachelor, with 28.6% and the lowest level of education in the guidance period. In terms of employment, 71.4% of the respondents were unemployed and 28.6% were unemployed. Based on theoretical foundations of  the research, good urban governance indicators are referred to 8 indicators, participation, transparency, consensus, efficiency and effectiveness, justice and equity, accountability, accountability and law-governedness. As a result, in order to strengthen good governance, the need to strengthen each indicator is required, which ultimately provides a constructive interaction between managers and citizens in order to increase the performance of urban management. The results show that because of the lack of involvement of urban managers, the lack of provision of participation, the lack of proper responsiveness of urban managers, poor managerial responsibility and lack of transparency in decision making and planning, Citizens and, in the end, reduced cooperation between urban executives and citizens. The descriptive information collected includes age, sex, education, and type of employment. The average of the respondents indicates that the citizens are dissatisfied with the urban managers. In the meanwhile, the efficiency and effectiveness index of managers and municipal officials with an average of 2.46 out of 3 was the highest and the participation index of 1.67 out of 3 was the lowest. Findings show that good governance in Sari city is in poor condition with respect to average (1.98). Out of the studied indices, the efficiency and effectiveness index of managers and officials was 2.46 out of 3, but it was lower than the standard average, indicating that the method of activity of managers in urban area was not effective, and the participation index. It had the lowest value of 1.67 out of 3.
Conclusion:
        The city of Sari faces some problems in implementing good governance: lack of centralized management to implement and enforce the governance approach, lack of citizens' trust in their participation, and ultimately inefficiency of urban management in employing citizens. It is a tangible city. Consequently, in order to strengthen good governance, the need to reinforce each of the indicators is needed, which ultimately provides a constructive interaction between managers and citizens to enhance urban management performance. The results show that due to lack of involvement of urban managers, lack of participation, lack of proper accountability of urban managers, poor accountability of urban managers and lack of transparency in decisions and planning, reduces citizens' trust. And ultimately, there has been a decline in cooperation between urban managers and citizens. Finally, the undesirable level of these factors has weakened the effectiveness and efficiency of urban management performance in the studied cities and the undesirable level of good urban governance. For this purpose, in order to strengthen the performance of urban management, in the planning and policy making of citizens as the main focus. This study found that it is not possible to form a good urban governance approach without considering the effective role of citizens, and this approach paves the way for developing and solving urban problems and ultimately enhancing the performance of urban management. Any major changes in the city and reduction of urban problems are subject to fundamental reforms in the approach and systems of urban planning and management.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Performance, Urban Management, Governance, Citizens, Sari

مراجع

1. Adinehvand, A, & Alian, M. (2016): "Good Urban Governance in Iran: Prioritizing Components and Tariffs", Strategic Quarterly, Volume 25, Number 81, 338-305.
2. Bordbar, Gh, Zarrabizadeh, Sh, Salehi, T (2015): "Presenting a God-Oriented Rule Model", Islamic Management Journal, Volume 23, Number 2.
3. Berkpour, N,. Asadi, I (2011): "Management and Urban Governance", Art University Press, Number of Pages: 272.
4. Burris, S., Hancock, T., Lin, V. & Herzog, A. (2007): Emerging Strategies for Healthy Urban Governance, Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84, 1, 154-163.
5. Edelenbos, J. & Meerkerk, I.V. (2017): Finding common ground in urban governance networks: what are its facilitating factors?, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1-17.
6. Eskandar sani, E., Moladzad, M, Pourdadash, A. (2017): "Evaluation of Citizens' Participation in Urban Management Based on the Model of Good Municipal Governance (Case Study: Aras Free Zone (Jolfa City))", Regional Planning Journal , Year 7, p. 168-159.
7. Esmaeilzadeh, H,. ؛ Hemmati, M. (2012): "Good Governance, the Solution to the Realization of a Good City", Political-Economic, No. 288.
8. Ghanaie, M; Musaikhani, M. (2013): "GIS, a Necessity for Good Urban Governance", University of Tehran Urban Management Site.
9. Hajinejad, A, Paydar, A., Arshad, H. (2016): "Analyzing the Status and Developing a Strategic Plan for Good Governance (Case Study: Zahedan City"), Geography and Sustainable Development, No. 42, pp. 82-63.
10. Hekmatnia, H؛ Maleki, M؛ Mousavi, M؛ Afshani, A. (2017): "Measuring the Achievement of Good Urban Governance in Iran (Case Study: Ilam)", Human Geography Research, Volume 49, No. 3, pp. 619-607.
11. Hekmatnia, H؛ Mousavi, M؛ Afshani, A؛ Maleki, M. (2017): "Investigation and Analysis of Good Urban Governance in Iran (Case Study: Ilam City)", Journal of Geographical Space Preparation, University Scientific Journal Golestan, Seventh Year, No. 24.
12. Hosseini, H. (2016): "Analysis of Good Urban Governance Indicators with Emphasis on Citizens and Managers' Views (Case Study: Torbat Heydariyeh)", Journal of Urban Studies, No. 20.
13. Iran Census Center (2016): "Population and Housing Census".
14. Lemanski, C. (2017): Unequal citizenship in unequal cities: participatory urban governance in contemporary South Africa, IDPR, 39 (1).
15. Martı´-Costa, M. & Toma`s, M. (2017): Urban governance in Spain: From democratic transition to austerity policies, Urban Studies 2017, 54(9), 2107–2122.
16. Mohammadi, J; Kamali Baghaghari, I. (2016): "Analysis of Good Urban Governance Indicators in line with Urban Development Strategy (Case Study: Kerman Textured Area)", Geography and Urban Planning , No. 21.
17. Movahed, A; Kaman Rudi, M; Sasanpour, F; Ghasemi Kafroodi, S. (2014): "Investigation of Good Urban Governance in Urban Neighborhoods (Case Study: District 19 of Tehran Municipality)", Journal of Planning Studies Urban, Second Year, No. 7, pp. 176-147.
18. Pourmohammadi, M.R., Ghattani, A؛ Teymouri, R, Ahmadi, E؛ Safdari, A. (2013): "Evaluation and Ranking of Factors Influencing Citizens' Participation in Urban Management Process (Case Study: District 2 of Tabriz Municipality)", Research Geography of Urban Planning, Volume One, Number One, p. 19-1.
19. Pourmohammadi, M.R; Hosseinzadeh Delir, K; Piri, I. (2010): "Favorable Urban Governance on the Basis of Social Capital: Testing the Institutional-Spatial Communication Order and Non-Economic Functionality (Case Study: Tabriz City)", Geographical Studies Dry Areas, First Year, Number One.
20. Rakodi, C. (2003): Politics and performance: the implications of emerging governance arrangements for urban management approaches and information systems, Habitat International 27,523–547.
21. Rezaei, M.R; Moazen, S. (2017): "Evaluation of the Relationship of Neighborhood Management with Urban Governance in Tehran Metropolis (Case Study: Districts 1, 12 and 16 of Tehran City", Journal of Geography and Urban Planning, Volume 21 , No. 60, 142-119.
22. Sajjadi, Zh؛ Yarmaradi, K؛ Kanuni, R؛ Heidari, M. (2017): "The Role of Good Governance in Improving the Quality of Urban Environment from the Perspective of Residents (Case Study: Bagh Ferdows Neighborhood of One City of Tehran)" Urban Ecology Research, Eighth Year, Number One, p. 108-95.
23. Sarafi, M; Tavakkolinia, J., Mohammedian M; Jamei, H., Mosque, A. (2014): "New Thoughts in Urban Planning", Publication: Tehran Ghadiani.
24. Shahidul, M. & Swapan, H. (2016): Participatory Urban Governance in Bangladesh: A Study of the Gap between Promise and Realities, Environment and Urbanization ASIA 7(2), 196–213.
25. Shamaie, A., Adinehvand, A; Hajizadeh, M. (2012): "Evaluation of Municipalities Performance Based on Good Urban Governance (Case Study: Yasuj City)", Journal of Urban Management Studies, Fourth Year, No. 11 .
26. Soleimani, A; Aftab, A; Sadegh Kar, Sh. (2015): "Analysis and Evaluation of the Realization of Good Urban Governance in Urmia", Journal of Urban Management Studies, Seventh Year, No. 21.
27. Taghawai, A.A., Tajdar, R. (2009): "An Introduction to Good Urban Governance in an Analytical Approach 1 M, Journal of Urban Management, No. 23, pp. 58-45.
28. Tavaklenia, J. Eskandarpur, M., Baghmadi, M. (2012): "An Introduction to Good Urban Governance: The Needs, Implications, and Challenges of Its Research in Iran", New Research Quarterly In Human Geography, Fifth Year, Number One.
29. Tavaklinia, J; Shamspouya, M.K. (2017): "Towards Local Community Governance - An Attempt to Introduce Key Issues and Areas (Case Study: Darakeh District)", Environmental Statistics Quarterly, No. 37, pp. 216-195.
30. Tavakoli, H. Momeni, M. (2016): "Investigating the Achievement of Good Urban Governance Indicators with Emphasis on Urban Quality of Life, (Case Study: 1, 7 and 22 Tehran)", Journal of Urban Management Studies, Eighth Year, No. 26 .
31. Uzun, C.N. (2007): Globalization and urban governance in Istanbul, ORIGINAL PAPER, ORIGINAL PAPER, 127-138.
32. Wolfram, M. (2017): Grassroots niches in Urbancontexts: exploring Governance In Novations for sustainable development in Seoul, Urban Transitions Conference, Shanghai, Procedia  Engineering  198. 622–641.
33. Ya Peng Gharavi, B. M. (2012): "A Look at the Concept of Urban Governance: Its Goals, Models and Indicators", Political-Economic, No. 289, pp. 205-198.
34. Yadollahnia, H. (2016): "Analysis of Urban Management Performance with Emphasis on Good Urban Governance Approach (Case Study: Babol, Behshahr and Ramsar Cities)", Supervisors: Dr Hassan Esmaeilzadeh and Dr Jamila Tavakkolinia, Thesis M.Sc., Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
35. Yaghfouri, H; Eskandari Sani, M؛ Arshad, H. (2016): "Analysis of the Position of Good Urban Governance, and its Strategic Planning (Case Study: Birjand City)", Urban Planning Geography Research, Volume 4, Number 3 , P. 429-411.