بررسی تأثیر مؤلفه‌های بستر فردی و اجتماعی بر دلبستگی مکانی (مطالعه موردی: شهر قائم‌شهر)

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مقاله 5، دوره 12، شماره 46، آذر 1400، صفحه 52-67   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jupm.2021.4014

نویسندگان

رحیم بردی آنامرادنژاد^{* 1}؛ محمود آروین²

¹دانشیار گروه جغرافیاوبرنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه مازندران،بابلسر، ایران

²دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا وبرنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکده جغرافیا دانشگاه تهران ، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 15 تیر 1398،  تاریخ بازنگری: 28 فروردین 1399،  تاریخ پذیرش: 29 فروردین 1399 

چکیده

دﻟﺒﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎن، راﺑﻄﻪ و ﻧﻘﻄﻪ اﺗﺼﺎل ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣـﺮدم و مکان‌هاست. اﻳﻦ دﻟﺒﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﺎی ﻧﺤﻮه ارﺗﺒﺎط و ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻋــﺎﻃﻔﻲ ﻣﺜﺒــﺖ اﻧﺴــﺎن ﺑــﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﺳــﺖ و به‌واسطه  ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎت ﻓﺮدی، ﺟﻤﻌﻲ، ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ و اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻳﺠﺎد می‌شود. دلبستگی به مکان و احساس تعلق به آن، در افراد این انگیزه را ایجاد می‌کند که به احیا و نوسازی همه‌جانبۀ محیط­های خانگی و محلی بپردازند. دلبستگی مکانی و حس تعلق می‌تواند زمینه مساعدی برای ایجاد دموکراسی مشارکتی فراهم سازد و اجرای برنامه‌های مختلف اقتصادی و اجتماعی را در اجتماع محلی با توفیق چشمگیر همراه کند و کیفیت زندگی و روند توسعه را بهبود بخشد. هدف این پژوهش، بررسی تأثیر مؤلفه‌های بستر فردی و اجتماعی بر دلبستگی مکانی در شهر قائم‌شهر می‌باشد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر گردآروش تحقیق، جز پژوهش‌های توصیفی- پیمایشی و به‌طور کامل مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری است. گردآوری داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه‌ای با 4 مؤلفه (دلبستگی مکانی، وابستگی مکانی، هویت مکانی، پیوند اجتماعی) و 40 گویه بر مبنای پاسخ‌های ساکنان شهر قائم‌شهر با حجم نمونه 384 نفر انجام شد. اطلاعات جمع‌آوری‌شده از طریق نرم‌افزارهای SPSS21 و Smart- PLS3 مورد تجزیه ‌وتحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر این است که در شهر قائم‌شهر میزان دلبستگی مکانی و مؤلفه‌های مؤثر بر آن در سطح پایینی قرار دارند و مؤلفه وابستگی مکانی و هویت مکانی از منظر بستر فردی و شاخص پیوند اجتماعی از منظر بستر اجتماعی بر میزان دلبستگی مکانی (دلبستگی عاطفی) تأثیر مثبت و معنی‌داری دارند؛ بنابراین تقویت هم‌زمان دو بستر فردی و اجتماعی سبب تقویت دلبستگی مکانی در شهر قائم‌شهر می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

دلبستگی مکانی؛ هویت مکانی؛ وابستگی مکانی؛ پیوند اجتماعی؛ شهر قائم‌شهر

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation effect components Individual and social context on place attachment (case study: Qaemshahr City)

نویسندگان [English]

Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad¹؛ Mahmoud Arvin²

¹Associate Professor of Geography & Urban Planning, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

²PhD Student of Geography & Urban Planning, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Place attachment is the relationship between people and places. This attachment is the basis of communication and positive emotional engagement of humans in space that it can be created by individual, plural, cultural and social features. The attachment to the place and the sense of belonging to it, encourage individuals to revive their home and local atmosphere completely. The sense of belonging and participation can create collaborative democracy, thereby the performance of various social and economic programs in the local community can noticeably succeed and they can increase the quality of living.The purpose of this study was to investigate the effective factors on location attachment in Ghaemshahr city. The current research is applied in terms of purpose, and in terms of collecting data, except for descriptive-survey research and fully structural equation modeling. Data were collected by a questionnaire with 4 components (spatial attachment, spatial dependency, spatial identity, social bonding) and 40 items based on the responses of residents of Qaemshahr city with a sample size of 384 people. Data collected through SPSS21 and Smart-PLS3 software were analyzed. The results of this study indicate that in the city of Qaemshahr, spatial attachment and its components are at a low level. The component of spatial dependence and spatial identity from the perspective of individual context and social bond index from the perspective of social context have a positive and significant effect on the level of place attachment (emotional attachment). Therefore, simultaneous strengthening of both individual and social contexts strengthens place attachment in Qaemshahr city.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

place attachment, Place Dependence, place identity, social links, Qaemshahr city

مراجع

1. Amir Kafi, Mehdi Shokoofeh Fathi (2011) A Study of Factors Affecting Attachment to Residential Neighborhood (Case Study: Kerman City) Social Studies of Iran, 5 (1). 26-1.
2. Arvin, Mahmoud, Faraji, Amin, Bazrafkan, Shahram (2018) Spatial Analysis of Poverty Zones (Case Study: Ghaemshahr City), Urban Economics, Volume 3, Number 2, pp. 56-39.
3. Bastani, Susan, Nikzad, Salmeh (2014) Individual social networks and attachment to the neighborhood in Tehran: with emphasis on new means of communication, Social Studies and Research in Iran, 2, 193-219.
4. Charkhchian, Maryam (2013) A Study of Individual Characteristics on the Attachment of Users to Urban Spaces (Case Study: Khayyam Street in Qazvin), Journal of Geography and Planning, 18, pp. 69-55.
5. Christensen, N., & Burchfield, J. (2013). Place attachment for wildland recreation planning. In Place-Based Conservation (pp. 223-233). Springer, Dordrecht.
6.  Daneshpour, Sepehri Moghadam, Charkhchian, Maryam (2009) Explaining the model of attachment to place and examining its various elements and dimensions, Journal of Fine Arts, Architecture and Urban Planning, 38, 48-37.
7.  Davari, Ali; Rezazadeh, Arash (2016) Modeling Structural Equations with PLS Software, University Jihad Publisher, Third Edition.
8. Ghodsi, Ali Mohammad; Balali, Ismail; Afshar Kohan, Javad (2014) Attachment to the neighborhood and its components of social security, Quarterly Journal of Khuzestan Disciplinary Knowledge, Volume 3, Number 6, pp. 30-21.
9.  Hassan Nejad, Zamaneh, (2014) Factors Affecting the Growth of Mazandaran Textile Industries in the Pahlavi Era, Social and Economic History Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3 (1), 29-45.
10.  Karimi, Mehrdad (2010) Spatial Attachment to Conceptual and Functional Studies, Manzar, 12, 21-16.
11.  Moradian, Salman; Haidar, Ali Akbar (2016) "The effect of individual factors on the intensity of location attachment." International Conference on Architecture, Urban Planning, Civil Engineering, Art and the Environment of Future Horizons, Looking back, Tehran, Iran. Jihad University Art and Architecture Culture Research Institute. 10-1.
12. Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail‐trail users. Leisure sciences, 16(1), 17-31.
13. Nadi, Reyhaneh (2012) Identifying the effective factors in promoting the sense of place of the residents of Abkooh neighborhood, M.Sc. Thesis in Regional Design and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Center Branch, Supervisor "Atosa Modiri".
14.  Naqdi, Assadollah; Vahdat, Salman; Sajjadzadeh, Hassan (2016) The role of social capital in attachment to place in traditional neighborhoods (case study: neighborhoods of Hamadan), urban sociological studies (urban studies) 6 , (18), 52-32.
15. Part Architect and Urban Planning Consulting Engineers (2006), Ghaemshahr Detailed Plan, Spatial Planning Report, Mazandaran Province Housing and Urban Development Organization.
16. Pourjafar, Mohammad Reza, Khabiri, Samaneh (2015). Improving spatial attachment in the process of recreating ancient urban textures. ”Haft Shahr, 4 (46), 94-109.
17.  Pourjafar, Mohammad Reza; Izadi, Mohammad Saeed; Khabiri. Samaneh (2016). Spatial Attachment; Recognition of Concepts, Principles and Criteria. City Identity, 9 (24), 43-54.
18. Rezazadeh, Razieh (2006) A Psychological and Sociological Approach to Spatial Identity in New Cities, Proceedings of the International Conference on New Cities, May, Book II, New Cities Development Company.

4. Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure sciences, 22(4), 233-257.
5. Brocato, E.D. 2006. Place attachment: An investigation of environments and outcomes in a service context.Ph.D thesis, the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas.
6. Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(3), 259-271.

11.  Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.,(1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), (1981), 39-50.

13. Giuliani, M. V., & Feldman, R. (1993). Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of environmental psychology, 13, 267-267.
14. Graham, H., Mason, R., & Newman, A. (2009). Literature review: historic environment, sense of place, and social capital.Michigan, Administrative Theory & Praxis ,26, 362–82.
15. Hashemizadeh Motab; Leyla (2012) Comparison of place attachment, social identity, social self-esteem among residents of houses with modern and traditional architecture in Kerman, M.Sc. Thesis, Supervisor: Majid Saffarnia, Payame Noor University.
16. Hashemnezhad, H., S.A. Yazdanfar, A.A. Heidari and N. Behdadfar. 2013 b. Comparison the concepts of Sense of place and attachment to place in architectural studies. Malaysia Journal of Society and Space. Vol.9, issue 1 (107 - 117).
17. Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 273-281.

20. Livingston, M., N. Bailey and A. Kearns. 2003. People's Attachment to Place- the Influence of Neighborhood Deprivation. The Chartered Institute of Housing/ Joseph Rowntree Foundation, UK.
21. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment. In Place attachment (pp. 1-12). Springer US.

23. Mihaylov, N., & Perkins, D. D. (2014). Community place attachment and its role in social capital development. Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications, 61.

30. Perkins, D. D., & Long, D. A. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital. In Psychological sense of community(pp. 291-318). Springer, Boston, MA.
31. Ram, Y., Björk, P., & Weidenfeld, A. (2016). Authenticity and place attachment of major visitor attractions. Tourism Management, 52, 110-122.
32. Ramkissoon, H., & Mavondo, F. T. (2015). The satisfaction–place attachment relationship: Potential mediators and moderators. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2593-260.

34. Rubinstein, R. I., & Parmelee, P. A. (1992). Attachment to place and the representation of the life course by the elderly. In Place attachment (pp. 139-163). Springer US.
35. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 1-10.
36. Statistics Center of Iran (2016). Results of the General Population and Housing Census, Statistics Center of Iran, Tehran, Iran
37. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings [w:] J. Harvey (red.), Cognition, social behaviour, and the environment, 441–488.
38. Suntikul, W., & Jachna, T. (2016). The co-creation/place attachment nexus. Tourism Management, 52, 276-286.
39. Trentelman, C. K. (2009). Place attachment and community attachment: A primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Society and natural resources, 22(3), 191-210.
40. Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). Place Attachment and the Value of Place in the Life of the Users. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168(9), 373-380.
41. Loggerenberg, N.(2007). An investigation into place attachment in Newtown. MBA Thesis, University of Pretoria. Pretoria.
42. Wirth, T., Grêt-Regamey, A., Moser, C., & Stauffacher, M. (2016). Exploring the influence of perceived urban change on residents' place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 67-82.
43. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure sciences, 14(1), 29-46.
44. Yuksel, A., Yuksel, F., & Bilim, Y. (2010). Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty. Tourism Management, 31(2), 274-284.