مطالعه ارتباط حکمرانی خوب با تولید و بهره وری کل عوامل در گروهی از کشورهای در حال توسعه و OECD

فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

مقاله 24، دوره 12، شماره 47، آبان 1399، صفحه 289-318   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

آیدا آریابد¹؛ رضا مقدسی^{* 2}؛ سید یعقوب زراعت کیش³

¹گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی+دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات تهران

²دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات.

³استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات

تاریخ دریافت: 29 خرداد 1397،  تاریخ بازنگری: 11 مهر 1397،  تاریخ پذیرش: 10 تیر 1399 

چکیده

با توجه به نقش سیاست‌های دولت بر تولید و بهره‌وری کل عوامل تولید در بخش کشاورزی، در این پژوهش به بررسی مقایسه‌ای تأثیر شاخص‌های حکمرانی خوب یعنی حاکمیت قانون، کنترل فساد، کارایی و اثربخشی دولت، کیفیت قوانین، مسئولیت‌پذیری و ثبات سیاسی بر تولید و بهره‌وری کل عوامل تولید در بخش کشاورزی کشورهای منتخب در حال توسعه و OECD در دوره زمانی 2013-2000 با استفاده از الگوهای پانل و 3SLS پرداخته شد. نتایج نشان داد که شاخص‌های حکمرانی بر ارزش تولیدات بخش کشاورزی و بهره‌وری کل عوامل تولید کشورهای در حال توسعه تأثیر منفی و این اثر در گروه کشورهای OECD مثبت است. از بین شاخص‌های شش‌گانه حکمرانی خوب، کنترل فساد با مقدار کشش 079/0- در گروه کشورهای در حال توسعه و حاکمیت قانون با مقدار کشش 075/0 در گروه کشورهای OECD دارای بالاترین تأثیر بر ارزش تولیدات بخش کشاورزی بوده‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که عدم بکارگیری سیاست‌های مناسب و برنامه‌ریزی از سوی دولت منجر به کاهش ارزش تولید می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

شاخص‌های حکمرانی؛ کنترل فساد؛ الگوی پانل؛ حاکمیت قانون

عنوان مقاله [English]

Studying of good Governance connection with producing and utilization all factors in group of developing and OECD countries

نویسندگان [English]

aida ariabod¹؛ R. Moghaddasi²؛ S. Y. Zeraatkish³

¹Ph.D. Student of Agricultural Economics Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran.

²Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University.

³Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University.

چکیده [English]

According to government`s policies role on production and utilization of all production factors in agriculture section, it is performed compared study of good governance indexes effect in this research by panel algorithm and 3SLS which are rule of law, corruption control, Government Effectiveness, quality law, responsibility and policy stability on production and utilization of all production factors in chosen developing and OECD countries agriculture section in 2000-2013 period time. Effects show that governance index have negative effect on agriculture section productions value and utilization of all developing countries factors and this effect is positive for section countries. In among of good governance six-indexes, corruption control with limit of -0.079 in group of developing countries and rule of law with limit of 0.075 OECD countries have been highest effect on agriculture section production. Effects show that if no utilizing appropriate policies and programing happen to reduce production value by government.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Governance Index, Corruption Control, Panel Model, Rule of Law

مراجع

- Abolhassani, L., Eghbali, F., & Shahnoushi, N. (2015). The empacts of goverance on agricultural efficiency. International Conference of Agricultural Economics, 29th Milan Italy.

- Ahmad, K., & Chin Theng Heng, A. (2012). Determinants of agriculture productivity growth in Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 95: 163-172.

- Ajaz, T., & Ahmad, E. (2010). The effect of corruption and governance on tax revenues.  The Pakistan Development Review, 49(4): 405-417.

- Amir Teymouri, S., & Khalilian, S. (2010). The growth of total factor productivity in key sectors of the Iranian economy during the first, second and third development plans. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 18(71): 141-162. (In Persian)

- Azmat, F., & Coghill, K. (2005). Good governance and market-based reforms: a study of Bangladesh. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71: 625- 638.

- Bayyurt, N., Vildan, Z., & Arkan, F. E. (2015). Good goverance and agricultural efficiency. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 6(1): 14-23.

- Bird, A., & Stephan, A. (2015). Governance and taxes: Evidence from regression discontinuity. Journal of Economic Issues, 5(3): 12- 17.

- Boussaidi, A., & Hamed, M. S. (2015). The impact of governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: empirical evidence from Tunisian context. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 5(1): 1-12.

- Brownson, S., Vincent, I., Emmanuel, G., & Etim, D. (2012). Agricultural productivity and macro-economic variable flauctation in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(8): 114-125. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education.

- Duncan, R., & Pollard, S. (2002). A conceptual framework for designing a country poverty reduction strategy. In: Defining an Agenda for Poverty Reduction: Proceedings of the First Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty. 1: 91–107.

- Esmaeili, A., & Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. (2010). The effect of government size on labor productivity and capital productivity in agricultural and industrial sectors in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 2(1): 35-52. (In Persian)

- Fan, S., Jitsuchon, S., & Methakunnavut, N. (2004). The importance of public investment for reducing rural poverty in middle-income countries: the case of Thailand. DSGD Discussion Paper No. 7.

- FAO. (2017). FAO Statistical Yearbook. http://www.fao.org/statistics/ yearbook/vol_1_1/index.asp.

- Farajian, L., Maghadasi, R., & Moradi, M. (2012). Study of the effect of infrastructure investments and research and development on the growth of total factor productivity in Iran's agricultural sector. Second National Conference on Economic Development Strategies, Focusing on the Regional Planning Program, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, 9 and 10 Khordad.

- Faye, M.L., McArthur, J.W., Sachs, J.D., & Snow, T. (2004). The challenges facing landlocked developing countries. Journal of Human Development, 5: 31–68.

- Hatef, H., & Karbasi, A. (2013). The role of government in agricultural production and productivity (Case study of Asian Productivity Organization member countries). Agricultural Economics, 7(3): 1-25. (In Persian)

- Herrendorf, B., & Schoellman, T. (2015). Why is measured productivity so low in agriculture? Review of Economic Dynamics, 18(4): 1003-1022.

- Hosseini. S., Pakravan, M., Gilanpour, A., & Eteghaei, M. (2011). The effect of supportive policies on the productivity changes of agricultural sector in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development (Agricultural Science and Technology), 25(4): 507-516. (In Persian)

- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Lobaton, Z. P. (2003). Governance matters. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance matters IV: governance indicators for 1996–2004. Working Paper, World Bank.

- Law, S.H. & Saini, N.W. (2012). Institutional quality, governance, and financial development  Economics of Governance, 13(3): 217-236.

- Lio, M., & Liu, M. C. (2008). Governance and agricultural productivity: A cross-national analysis. Food Policy, 33: 504- 512.

- Meon, P. G., & Weill, L. (2005). Does better governance foster efficiency? An aggregate frontier analysis. Economics of Governance, 6: 75–90.

- Moazen Jamshidi, S. Moghimi, M., & Akbari, N. (2011). Analysis of the impact of government size on human development in OIC countries (Geographical Weighting Regression Approach). Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 3(8): 95-116. (In Persian)

- Mobarak, A., & Azarpeivand, Z. (2009). A look at good governance indicators from the point of view of Islam and its impact on economic growth. Islamic Economy, 9 (36): 180-208. (In Persian)

- Najafi, B. (2003). The role of agriculture in Iranian economic growth. Proceedings of the Conference on Agriculture and National Development. (In Persian)

- Naruei, M., & Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. (2015). The Effect of Government Support Policies on Agricultural Productivity in Iran (Panel Data Approach). Quarterly of Parliament and Strategy, 22(83): 101-122. (In Persian)

- Nayebi, H., Ebrahimi, R., & Azadegan, A. (2010). Evaluation and analysis of the factors influencing the growth of total factor productivity in the Iranian economy using Solow residual method. Iranian Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (IEJM), 10(1): 121-140. (In Persian)

- Roe, M., & Siegel, J. (2011). Political instability: Effects on financial development, roots in the severity of economic inequality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(3): 279-309.

- Rudra, P. P., & Sanyal, G.S.  (2011). Good governance and human development: evidence form Indian states. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 1(1): 1-8.

- Shahabadi, A., & Ganji, M. (2015). The impact of good governance on economic freedom of the selected MENA countries. Journal of Economics and Regional Development, 22(9): 264-288. (In Persian)

- Shahbazi, K., Sangin abadi, B., & Abdollah nezhad, C. (2013). The impact of governmental credit on total productivity of the factors of Iranian agricultural production. Agricultural Economics and Development, 21(84): 139-160. (In Persian)

- Shujat, A. (2012). The role of agricultural research in Indian productivity. Journal of Indian Economics, 21 (4): pp. 78-89.

- Weibe, K. (2003). Land quality and agricultural productivity. In Linking Land Quality, Agricultural Productivity, and Food Security. Agricultural Economic Report, 823: 19-27.

- World Bank. (2017). World development indicators on CD-ROM. World Bank, Washington, DC.