بررسی رویکرد موافق در مورد فناوری تراریخته در بخش کشاورزی ایران

فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

مقاله 12، دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 50، مرداد 1400، صفحه 235-258   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

یحیی صافی سیس^{* 1}؛ میلاد جودی دمیرچی²؛ نجیمه اسماعیلی³

¹دکتری ترویج کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

²کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

³کارشناسی ارشد آموزش کشاورزی پایدار و محیط زیست، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت: 29 خرداد 1398،  تاریخ بازنگری: 07 تیر 1399،  تاریخ پذیرش: 26 آذر 1399 

چکیده

    هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی رویکرد موافق در مورد فناوری تراریخته در بخش کشاورزی ایران است. بدین منظور با استفاده از تحلیل محتوا، رویکرد موافق در مورد فناوری تراریخته مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. برای گرد‏آوری داده‏ها، مصاحبه با 23 نفر از پژوهشگران انجام شد. یافته‏های پژوهش نشان داد چهار عامل «حفظ محیط‏زیست»، «بهبود سلامتی انسان»، «اجتناب ناپذیربودن توجه به نظام کشاورزی مبتنی بر مهندسی ژنتیک» و «عدم مقبولیت ادعاهای مخالفان» از دلایل موافقت با کشت و مصرف محصولات تراریخته از دیدگاه پژوهشگران می‏باشند. برای رسیدن به خودکفایی در شرایط تحریم کنونی و رفع نگرانی در مورد احتمال آلودگی بذور تراریخته وارداتی، در مرحله نخست انجام پژوهش‌های بیش‌تر بر روی ابعاد گوناگون محصولات تراریخته (سلامتی، محیط‏زیست، اقتصادی و غیره) و تقویت بخش پژوهش‌های بیوفناوری در عرصه کشاورزی و پزشکی پیشنهاد می‏شود و پس از رسیدن به توانایی لازم در زمینه تولید بذر و سایر نهاده‏های تراریخته و هم‌چنین، ارزیابی ایمنی این محصولات، تولید محصولات تراریخته با اهداف غیرخوراکی نظیر پنبه تراریخته و محصولات تراریخته به عنوان خوراک دام می‏تواند در دستور کار قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

افزایش بهره‏وری؛ حفظ محیط‏زیست؛ خودکفایی؛ سلامتی مردم

عنوان مقاله [English]

Survey of the Agreed Approach to Transgenic Technology in Iran's Agricultural Sector

نویسندگان [English]

yahya safisis¹؛ milad joody damirchi²؛ Najimeh Esmaili³

¹Ph.D. of Agricultural Extension, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Iran.

²M.Sc. of Agricultural Management, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Iran.

³M.Sc. of Sustainable Agricultural and Environmental Education, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the agreed approach to transgenic technology in Iran's agricultural sector. To this end, using content analysis, the agreed approach to transgenic technology was examined. To collect the data, 23 researchers were interviewed. The findings show that the four factors of "environmental protection", "improving human health", "inevitability of attention to the agricultural system based on genetic engineering" and "non-acceptance of the claims of the opposition" are the reasons for agreeing to cultivate and consume transgenic crops. To achieve self-sufficiency under current sanctions and to remove concerns about possible contamination of Imported transgenic seeds, In the first phase, further research on different aspects of transgenic crops (health, environment, economy, etc.) and strengthening of the biotechnology research sector in the field of agriculture and medicine is recommended and after reaching the necessary ability in seed production and other transgenic inputs, as well as assessing the safety of these crops, producing non-food transgenic products such as transgenic cotton and transgenic crops as feedstuffs can be on the agenda.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Increasing Productivity, Protecting the Environment, Self-sufficiency, People Health

مراجع

Aerni, P. (2013). Resistance to agricultural biotechnology: the importance of
    distinguishing between weak and strong public attitudes. Biotechnology Journal, 8,
    1129–1132.

Azadi, H., Samiee, A., Mahmoudi, H., Jouzi, Z., Rafiaani Khachak, P., De Maeyer, P.,
    & Witlox, F. (2016). Genetically modified crops and small-scale farmers: main
    opportunities and challenges. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 36(3), 434-446.

Amin, L. Jahi, J. Nor, A. R. Osman, M & Mahadi, M. (2007). Attitude Towards
    Genetically Modified Soybean Amongst The Klang Valley Stakeholders. Malaysian
    Journal of Environmental Management, 8 (2007):141 – 155.

Acharya, T., Daar, AS., & Singer, PA. (2003). Biotechnology and the UNs millennium
    development goals. Nat Biotechnol, 21, 1434–6.

Azadi, H., Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Khachak, P. R., Taning, C. N., & Hajivand,
    R. Y., et al. (2015). Genetically modified crops: Towards agricultural growth,
    agricultural development or agricultural sustainability? Food Reviews International,
    31(3), 195–221.

Burns, N. & Grove, S.K. (2005). The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique
    & Utilization. Elsevier Saunders, St Louis.

Bennett, R., Morse, S., & Ismael, Y. (2005). The economic impact of genetically
    modified cotton on South African smallholders: Yield, profit and health effects. The
    Journal of Development Studies, 42(4), 662-667.

Bengtson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content
    analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2(6), 8-14.

Buah, J. (2011). Public perception of genetically modified food in Ghana JN Buah.
    American Journal ofFood Technology, 6(7), 541–554.

Chen, M. F., & Li, H. L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified
    foods in Taiwan. Food Quality & preference, 18(4), 662-674.

Cui, K., & Shoemaker, S. P. (2018). Public perception of genetically-modified (GM)
    food: A Nationwide Chinese Consumer Study. Science of Food, 2(10), 34-47.

Dewar, A.M., May, M., Woiwod, I., Haylock, L., Champion, G., Garner, B.H.,
    Sands, R.J.N., Qi, A., & Pidgeon, J. (2003). "A Novel Approach to the Use of
    Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant Crops for Environmental Benefit."
    Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 270(1513), 335-340.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of
    advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014).
    Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4(1),
    2158244014522633.

Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.
    African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93-99.

FAO,) 2009(. How to Feed the World in 2050. Discussion Paper, Highlevel Expert
    Forum. The Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Kitterlin, M., Jahangiry, S., Zarafshani, K., Van Passel,
    S., & Azadi, H. (2016). Attitudes of agricultural experts toward genetically modified
    crops: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 509-
    524.

Ghasemi, S., Karami, E., & Azadi, H. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral
    intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: A
    case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1201-1227.

Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., Alimirzaei, E., & Azadi, H. (2018).
    Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-
    stakeholder analysis. Environment Development Sustainable, 20(4), 233–253.

Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., & Azadi, H. (2017). Multi
    stakeholders’ attitudes toward Bt rice in Southwest, Iran: Application of TPB and
    multi attribute models. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1), 141-
    163.

Ghiasvand Ghiasi, F. Mirkzadeh, A. A. & Shiri, N. A. (2015). Factors Affecting
    Consumers' Attitudes Towards Transgenic Food Products (Case Study: Qazvin
    County), Iran, Economic Research and Agricultural Development, 46(3), 438-427.
    (In Persian)

Ghoochani, A., Ghanian, M., & Baradaran, M. (2016). Analysis of Factors Affecting the
    Attitudes of Experts Towards Iranian Transgenic Rice. Iranian Journal of
    Agricultural Extension and Education, 12(2), 53-72. (In Persian)

Harlander, S. K. (1991). Social, moral, and ethical issues in food biotechnology. Food
    Technology, 45(5), 152–160.

Hill, R., Stanisstreet, M., Boyes, E., & Sullivan, O. (1998) Reactions to a new
    technology: students’ ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Res Sci Technol
    Edu, 16(2), 203–216.

Izumi, S., Mori, H., Kusaba, S., Okada, T., Murayama, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2010).
    Japanese Attitudes toward Genetic Engineering: the Osaka, KITKyoto, Tokyo
    Metropolitan, and UT-Tokyo teams.

James, C. (2008) Global status of commercialised biotech/GM crops: 2008 ISAAA
    Brief No 39.

Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A metaanalysis of the impacts of genetically
    modified crops. PloS one, 9(11), e111629.

Kimenju, S. C., De Groote, H., Karugia, J., Mbogoh, S., & Poland, D. (2005).
    Consumer awareness and attitudes toward GM foods in Kenya. African Journal of
    Biotechnology, 4(10), 71-93.

Kim, Y. G. (2014). Ecological Concerns about Genetically Modified (GM) Food
    Consumption using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Procedia - Social and
    Behavioral Sciences, 159 (13), 677 – 681.

Martinez-Poveda, A., Molla-Bauza, M. B., Campo Gomis, F. J. D., & Martinez-
    Carrasco, M. L. (2009). Consumer-perceived risk model for the introduction of
    genetically modified food in Spain. Food Policy, 34(6), 519–528.

Mohapatra, A. K., Priyadarshini, D., & Biswas, A. (2010). Genetically Modified Food:
    Knowledge and Attitude of Teachers and Students. Journal of Science Education
    Technology, 19(7), 489–497.

Morse, J. M. (1994). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Sage
    Publications, London.

Naimi, A., Pezeshkirad, Gh M., & Qarayazi, B. (2010). Analysis of agricultural
    biotechnology development problems from the perspective of biotechnology experts
    in Tehran province. Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research.
    4(42), 45-56. (In Persian)

Naimi, A., Biglary, N., Abbasi, F. Pezeshkirad, Gh. R. & Chizari, M. (2011). The effect
    of breeders' personal and professional characteristics on their attitudes toward using
    participatory breeding. Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research.
    10 (4), 579-588. (In Persian)

Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., & Rosellini, D. (2014). An overview of the last 10
    years of genetically engineered crop safety research, Critical Reviews in
    Biotechnology, 34 (1) 77–88.

Onyango, B., Govindasamy, R., Hallman, W., Jang, H. M., & Puduri, V. S. (2004).
    Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods in Korea: factor and cluster
    analysis. Food policy institute working paper, 7 (11),1104-1115.

Pezeshkirad, Gh. M., & Naimi, A. (2010). Factor analysis of the attitude of
    biotechnologists in Tehran province towards the use of transgenic plants. Iranian
    Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 7(2), 31-52. (In Persian)

Prasad, B. D. (2008). Content analysis. Research methods for social work, 5, 1-20.

Qaim, M. (2009). The economics of genetically modified crops. Annual Review of
    Resource Economics , 1:665-694.

Raney, T. (2006). Economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries. Current
    Opinion in Biotechnology Volume 17, Issue 2, 17(2), 174-178.

Razzaqi Borkhani, F. (2009). Extension of the use of transgenic plants as an effective
    strategy for sustainable agricultural development. Regional Conference on Food and
    Biotechnology. Kermanshah, Islamic Azad University. (In Persian)

Rzymski, P., & Królczyk, A. (2016). Attitudes toward genetically modified organisms
    in Poland: to GMO or not to GMO? Food Security. 8(2), 689–697.

Sorgo, A., & Ambrozis-Dolinsek, J. (2009). The relationship among knowledge of
    attitudes toward and acceptance of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) among
    Slovenian teachers. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 12(4), 1-2.

Sturgis, P., Cooper, H., & Fife-Schaw, C. (2005). Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating
    the opinions of a better-informed public. New Genetics and Society, 24, 31–56.

UNDP. (2013). The millennium development goals. Available at: http:// www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home

Verma, S.R.) 2013). Genetically modified plants: public and scientific perceptions,
    ISRN Biotechnol.

Von Braun, J. (2007). The world food situtation: new driving forces and required
    actions. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.

Wong, A. Y., & Chan, A. W. (2016). Genetically modified foods in China and the
    United States: A primer of regulation and intellectual property protection. Food
    Science and Human Wellness, 5 (18) 124–140.

Zhang, M., Chen, C., Hu, W., Chen, L., & Zhan, J. (2016). Influence of source
    credibility on consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods in China.
    Sustainability, 8(9), 899-921.

Zhong, F., Marchant, M. A., Ding, Y., & Lu, K. (2002). GM foods: A Nanjing case
    study of Chineseconsumers’ awareness and potential attitudes. Agrobiotechnology
    Management & Economics, 5(4), 136–144.