پژوهش‌محوری چندلایه:ارائه مدل پارادایمی مدرسه پژوهش‌محور

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 45، آذر و دی 1399، صفحه 133-166   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

الهام چاوشی¹؛ بدری شاه طالبی^{* 1}؛ رضا ابراهیم زاده دستجردی²

¹گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

²استادیار گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 16 تیر 1398،  تاریخ بازنگری: 30 اردیبهشت 1399،  تاریخ پذیرش: 05 دی 1399 

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه­ی مدل پارادایمی مدرسه پژوهش­محور به روش کیفیِ از نوع نظریه زمینه­ای انجام شد. مشارکت­کنندگان پژوهش همه متخصصان و کارشناسان مدیریت آموزشی و برنامه­ریزی درسی در استان اصفهان تشکیل بود. بر مبنای روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند (گلوله­برفی) و نمونه­گیری نظری (به منظور رسیدن به اشباع نظری) و با تکنیک مصاحبه­ی نیمه­ساخت­یافته با ۲۴ نفر از کارشناسان و متخصصان مدیریت آموزشی و برنامه­ریزی درسی در استان اصفهان مصاحبه انجام شد. یافته­های پژوهش بیانگر این بود که ناکارآمدی ساختار آموزش­محور، نگرش توسعه‌گرایانه، الزام به پژوهش­محوری در سند تحول بنیادین، الزام به پژوهش­محوری در قانون  برنامه پنج­ساله ششم توسعه و توسعه تفکر آینده‌نگرانه به عنوان عوامل علی مطرح هستند که بر پژوهش­محوری تأثیر گذاشته و به نوعی ضرورت آن را توجیه می­کنند. تغییر سیاست­های یادگیری، بسترسازی چندوجهی و حمایت­گری نهادی نیز زمینه­ها و بسترهایی هستند که تحقق پژوهش­محوری را تسهیل می­کنند. همچنین، برخی عوامل کلان (اجتماعی – فرهنگی، تنازع نهادهای قدرت) و عوامل خرد (سرمایه روان‌شناختی اجتماعی، گفتمان نمایشی آموزش) بر راهبردهای تحقق پژوهش­محوری که شامل احیاء رسالت مدرسه و بازآرایی عناصر آموزشی تاثیر می­گذارند. در صورت تحقق پژوهش­محوری، می­توان شاهد پیامدهای مثبتی در دو سطح فردی (توسعه عمل‌گرایی فردی، پویایی ذهنی) و اجتماعی – سازمانی (توسعه دانایی­محوری اجتماعی، بهسازی سازمانی) بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مدرسه پژوهش‌محور؛ نظریه زمینه‌ای؛ نظام آموزشی؛ نهاد مدرسه

عنوان مقاله [English]

Multi-Layered Research Orientedness: Presenting a Research-Based School Paradigm Model

نویسندگان [English]

Elham Chavoshi¹؛ Badri Shahtalebi¹؛ Reza Ebrahimzadeh²

¹Department of Education, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

²Department of management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

The present study aimed to present a paradigmatic model of a research-based school using the qualitative method of grounded theory. The population comprised of all the experts and specialists in educational management and curriculum development in Isfahan province, from whom 24 experts and specialists in educational management and curriculum development were selected by purposive (snowball) sampling and a semi-structured interview was conducted to interview with these experts. Findings of the study showed that the deficiency of the course-based structure, the developmental attitude, the requirement for research orientation in the document of fundamental change, the requirement for research orientation in the law of the sixth five-year plan of development and the development of prospective thinking are the causal factors that directly influence research orientation and somehow justify its necessity. The change in learning policies, multimodal grounding, and institutional support are also the contexts that facilitate the realization of research orientation; furthermore, a number of macro factors (socio-cultural, conflict among the institutions of power) and micro factors (psychosocial capital, the demonstrative discourse of education) mediate these influences. To realize research orientation in schools, a number of strategies are needed among which we might refer to the revival of the school’s mission and the rearrangement of educational elements. If the research orientation is realized, positive effects can be observed both on the individual (development of individual pragmatism, mental dynamics), and socio-organizational (social knowledge-based development, organizational improvement) levels.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Research-Based School, Grounded theory, Educational System, School Institution

مراجع

 

• حسین­پور طولازدهی، شهره؛ زین­آبادی، حسن­رضا (1398). مدرسه پژوهش­محور: تدوین و آزمون یک الگوی علی به روش ترکیبی اکتشافی. خانواده و پژوهش. دوره 16. شماره 1: 48 – 27.
• عباسی اسفجیر، علی‌اصغر (1394). مدل‌سازی مدرسه پژوهش محور و آزمون تجربی آن با استفاده از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی در مدارس استان مازندران. مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی فرهنگی. دوره ۴. شماره 3: 182 – 157.
• Abu-Duhuo, I. (1999). School-Based Management. Fundamentals of Educational Planning Series, Number 62.
• Bahraini Boroujani, Majid. (2014). Analysis of the Thinking and Research in sixth grade elementary students based on the principles of curriculum elements. PhD thesis, University of Isfahan. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. [in Persian]
• Bauman, M. L. (2012). Your successful preschooler: Ten traits children need to become confident and socially engaged.
• Bauman, M. L. (2012). Your successful preschooler: Ten traits children need to become confident and socially engaged.
• Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 3-18.
• Brosky, D. (2011). Micropolitics in the School: Teacher Leaders' Use of Political Skill and Influence Tactics. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(1), n1.
• Caldwell, B. J. (2005). School-based management (Vol. 3). Perth, Australia: International Institute for Educational Planning.
• Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497-526.
• Cheng, Y. C. (2013). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Routledge.
• Corbin, J., Strauss, A., & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (pp. 146-166).
• Danesh pazhoh, Zahra & Farzad, Valiallah. (2006). Assessment of professional skills of elementary school teachers. New Approach Quarterly in Educational Management. 5 (18), 170-135. [in Persian]
• Deem, R., Hillyard, S., Reed, M., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford University Press.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
• Dimmock, C. (2011). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: Concepts, themes and impact. Routledge.
• Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert Shanker Institute.
• Eltanahy, M., & Forawi, S. (2019). Science Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of the Implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning Instruction in a Middle School in Dubai. Journal of Education, 199(1), 13-23.
• Enayati, Taraneh; Zameni, Farshideh & Ghorbani, Talat. (2012). A study of Research Barriers from the Viewpoint of Teachers in Behshahr. New Approach Quarterly in Educational Management. 3 (4), 205 - 189. [in Persian]
• Exline, J. (2004). What is inquiry-based learning? Retrieved August, 7, 2004.
• Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of educational research, 75(2), 159-210.
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 82(3), 300-329.
• Ghasemipour, Marzieh. (2009). Investigating the Methods of Extending and Strengthening Researchers' Spirituality among Secondary School Students in the Secondary High School of Noorabad Mamsani in 2009-2010. Master's Thesis. Allameh Tabatabaei University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. [in Persian]
• Godfrey, D. (2016). Leadership of schools as research-led organisations in the English educational environment: Cultivating a research-engaged school culture. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 301-321.
• Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British journal of educational studies, 47(2), 122-144.
• Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, 67-78.
• Hord, S. M. (2009). Professional learning communities. Journal of staff development, 30(1), 40-43.
• Hord, S. M. (2009). Professional learning communities. Journal of staff development, 30(1), 40-43.
• Hoseinpour Toolazdehi, Shohreh; Zaynabadi, Hassan Reza; Abdollahi, Bijan & Abbassian, Hossein. (2017). Research-Based Teaching and Learning within a Constructivist Framework: Designing a Phenomenologically-Based Model.  Quarterly Journal of Education (QJOE). Number 4, 9-30. [in Persian]
• Isaacs, B. (2014). Bringing the Montessori approach to your early years practice. Routledge.
• Isaacs, B. (2014). Bringing the Montessori approach to your early years practice. Routledge.
• Jones, G., & Sallis, E. (2013). Knowledge management in education: Enhancing learning & education. Routledge.
• Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Sammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in higher education: Reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 201-214.
• Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631-645.
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (2010). Guided inquiry: School libraries in the 21st century. School libraries worldwide, 16(1), 17-28.
• Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century: Learning in the 21st century. ABC-CLIO.
• LaBeouf, J. P. (2016). Based Student Learning at the Post-Secondary Level.: Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Sage publications.
• Nurtalina. (2013). The effect of using inquiry based learning strategyin the writing ability of the eighth grade students of smpnegeri 1prambananklaten in the academic year of 2012/2013. english education department faculty of languages and arts state university of yogyakart
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
• Rehorek, S. J. (2004). Inquiry-Based Teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 66(7), 493-500.
• Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.
• Santrock J. W., (2004). Educational Psychology (2nd& 3rd ed.), NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
• Santrock J. W., (2004). Educational Psychology (2nd& 3rd ed.), NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
• Sleeter, N., Schrum, K., Swan, A., & Broubalow, J. (2019). “Reflective of my best work”: Promoting inquiry-based learning in a hybrid graduate history course. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 1474022219833662.
• Snowman, J., & McCown, R. (2011). Psychology applied to teaching. Nelson Education.
• Snowman, J., & McCown, R. (2011). Psychology applied to teaching. Nelson Education.
• Susiani, T. S., Salimi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018). Research Based Learning (RBL): How to Improve Critical Thinking Skills?. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, p. 00042). EDP Sciences.
• Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework. In Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks. IGI Global. (pp. 43-57).
• Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework. In Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43-57). IGI Global.
• Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). Teachers’ adoption of inquiry-based learning activities: The importance of beliefs about education, the self, and the context. Journal of Teacher Education, 0022487117751399.
• Wilkins, R. (2011). Research Engagement for School Development. Institute of Education-London. 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK.
• Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge University Press, 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211 (paperback: ISBN-0-521-49880-5; hardback: ISBN-0-521-49528-8).
• Young, R. A., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of vocational behavior, 64(3), 373-388.
• Young, R. A., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of vocational behavior, 64(3), 373-388.
• Multi-Layered Research Orientation: Presenting a Research-Based School Paradigm Model