پارادایم توسعه کیفی مراکز رشد دانشگاه های کشور

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 8، دوره 11، شماره 45، آذر و دی 1399، صفحه 187-210   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

مجتبی ملااحمدی^*

موسس و هیآت مدیره

تاریخ دریافت: 09 تیر 1398،  تاریخ بازنگری: 23 شهریور 1398،  تاریخ پذیرش: 08 دی 1399 

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف تعیین مدل توسعه کیفی مراکز رشد دانشگاه های کشور با استفاده از سنت پژوهش کیفی داده بنیاد و با رویکرد سیستماتیک اشتراوس وکوربین و با منطق پارادایمی انجام شد .حوزه این پژوهش مصاحبه های انجام شده با مدیران مراکز رشدکشور به تعداد 15مصاحبه باز بود. نمونه گیری ازطریق روش نظری و با توجه به نوع کدگذاری صورت گرفت که تحلیل داده ها برمبنای سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری انتخابی انجام شد. از تحلیل مصاحبه ها در مرحله کدگذاری از204 مفهوم، درمرحله کدگذاری محوری60 مقوله فرعی و در مرحله کدگذاری انتخابی23 مقوله اصلی دسته بندی شد. نتایج پژوشه نشان داد:  شرایط علّی پارادایمی توسعه کیفی مراکز رشد دانشگاه ها شامل 6 مؤلفه اصلی(بستر سازمانی،عوامل آموزشی، عوامل مالی، الگوهای ارتباطی، کار تیمی اثربخش، تحقیقات بازار) بوده است. شرایط زمینه ای شامل 3 مقوله اصلی(کارکرد، اقتصاد، قوانین). بستر و شرایط مداخله گر شامل4 مقوله اصلی(حمایت، توانمندسازی، نگرش،تحلیل رفتار متقابل)، راهبردهای پارادامی شامل5 مقوله های اصلی(تمایز، پاداش، جاذبه علمی، توسعه ایده پردازی، پشتیبانی مالی)، پیادمدهای پارادایم توسعه کیفی شامل 5 مقوله اصلی(اشتغال غنی و تقویت شده، رشد کارآفرینی، مدیریت استعداد، بازاریابی علمی) بود. در نهایت نظریه اولیه مدل توسعه کیفی مراکز رشد دانشگاه های کشور بر اساس مقوله های یاد شده به صورت الگوی مفهومی تدوین گردید.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

توسعه کیفی مراکزرشد؛ نظریه داده بنیاد؛ مدل پارادایمی؛ الگوی مفهومی

عنوان مقاله [English]

determining the qualitative development model of the universities' Incubators of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

mojtaba mollaahmadi

manager

چکیده [English]

Abstract
This research was conducted with the aim of determining the qualitative development model of the universities' Incubators of Iran, using the tradition of qualitative research based on Grounded theory , with Strauss and Corbin's approach and paradigmatic logic. This study conducted interviews with 15 managers of the Incubators in Iran . The sampling was carried out through theoretical method and according to the type of coding, the data analysis was based on three stages of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. From analysis of interviews in the coding phase of 204 concepts, in the pivotal coding step of 60 sub categories and in the selected coding stage, 23 categories were categorized. The results of Pajhwah showed: The causal conditions of the paradigm of qualitative development of the centers of growth of the universities consisted of 6 main components (organizational framework, educational factors, financial factors, communication patterns, effective teamwork, market research). Underlying conditions include three main categories (function, economy, rules). The Substance and intervention conditions include the four main categories (support, empowerment, attitude, interpersonal analysis), paradigm strategies including five main categories (distinction, reward, scientific attraction, development development, financial support), qualitative development paradigm implications including 5 main categories (Rich and reinforced employment, entrepreneurship growth, talent management, scientific marketing). Finally, the original theory of qualitative development model of the universities' Incubators of Iran was developed based on these categories as a conceptual model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Key Words: Qualitative Development, Grounded theory, Paradigm Model, Conceptual Model

مراجع

-       Ahonen, T., Reukenan, M ., Kunttu, S ., Hanski, J ., Välisalo, T. (2011).Customer needs and knowledge in product-service systems development,30.

• Abdollahzadeh, G. H., Hosseini, A., Sharifzadeh, M .Sh. (2014). Factors Affecting the Operationalization of Business Ideas: Trainees in the Rural Education Centers of Isfahan Province, Quarterly Journal of Rural Space and Rural Development Economics, 3 . 3( 9): 119-111 .(in Persian).
• Alavi, S. B .(2001). Market Research in Electronic Commerce. Tadbir Monthly, 117, 37-34  .(in Persian).
• Allahi, S. ,Baharifar, A., Salehi, A .(2005). Designing the structure of the documentary system of Organizational Organizational Experiences, Moderator's Curriculum in Humanities, Special Issue of Management, 52-23.. (in Persian).
• Allameh, S. F., Aghaei, A., Atashpour, S.H., Moshtaghi, M. (2014). The Effect of Group Training on Interactive Relationship Analysis on Happiness of Married Men Referring to Counseling Centers and Cultural Events, Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 4, 6 (1): 38-25 .(in Persian).
• Amirkhani, A. H., Hajizadeh, S. M. (2016). The Effect of Knowledge Management Infrastructure on Organizational Performance in Employees of the Educational Vice-Chancellor of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences,7, (1): 22-15 .
• Azar, K., Soleimani, T. (2017). Studying the status of the succession planning program of university administrators .(Case study: Islamic Azad University, Ardebil Branch). Journal of Medical Education Strategies, 10 (6): 525-516.
• Basseri, B.,Roshaniyasaghi, N. (2014). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Employment of Small Industries in Golestan Province, Journal of Economic Sciences, , 26, 131-113  .(in Persian).
• Botshekan, M. H., Sayfuddini, J .(2010). Business and Financial Resources Corresponding to them. Economic Magazine, Monthly Review of Economic Issues and Policies,9  (10): 116-87. (in Persian).
• Fazel, A., Kamalian A. R., Roshan S. A. (2017). Identifying the Dimensions and Components Affecting the Empowerment of Sanskrit Resources with Emphasis on Generation, Third, and Fourth Generation Universities Using the Fuzzy Delphi Approach: Presentation of a Conceptual Model, Strategies for Education in Medical Sciences, 10, ( 4): 468-455 . )in Persian(.
• Ghorbani Zadeh, V., Khaleghinia, Sh. (2009). The role of implicit knowledge transfer in employee empowerment, Quarterly Journal of Human Resources Management Researches at Imam Hossein University (AS), 1(2):105-85 . (in Persian).
• Habibi, R., Asghari, z., jafari, k. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing the factors affecting the development of university technology unit development centers,( Guilan University of Technology Development Center) , Quarterly Journal of Growth, 56(14): 1-9.
• Habibi Rezaei, M., Siah Mansouri, Y. (2012). The Realization of Third-Generation Universities through the Development of Academic Growth Centers.3(1):49-43. (in Persian).
• Iman, M. T.,  Mohammadian, M. (2008). Theory of Fundamental Theology, Methodology of the Humanities, 14(56):31-54 .
• Jamil, F., Ismail, K., Mahmood, N. (2015). A review of commercialization tools: University incubators and technology parks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1): 223-228.
• Kallaki, H .(2009). Fundamental Theory as a Method of Theorizing of the Cultural Research Letter, tenth year, 3( 6):140-119. (in Persian).
• Malekinia, E., Bazargan, A., Vaezi, M., Ahmadian, M. (2015). Identifying and Prioritizing Components of Sustainable University, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 20 (3):1-26. (in Persian).
• Mardani mahale, H., pour Sali, S., Dadashi, L., Safir, H. (2015). The Importance of Financial Management and its Impact on the Progress of Governmental and Private Organizations, International Management Conference, Economics and Humanities, Turkey, Istanbul, ILI Leadership Ideas. (in Persian).
• Maxwell, J. C. (2002). Leadership 101: What every leader needs to know. Thomas Nelson.
• McCarthy, I. P., Silvestre, B. S., von Nordenflycht, A., & Breznitz, S. M. (2018). A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 110-122
• Rahimnia, F., Mortazavi, S., Alavi, S. M. (2009). The Effect of Porter's Different Strategy on Organizational Performance through Packaging of Goods in Food Companies of Astan Quds Razavi, Journal of Business Management, 1( 3): 86-71. (in Persian) .
• Rasmussen, E., Moen, Q., Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promotecommercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4): 518-533.
• Rezaei, B., Abbaspour, A., Niknamami, M., Rahimian, H., Delaware, A. (2012). Examining ways to improve university entrepreneurship in the field of humanities and presenting a basic theory. Innovation and creativity in the humanities. 3(2):215-185.
• Sadr Sadat, S. A .(2016). Educational Education Development Dept.  rahavard tosea andishan, March,1,1.
• Sorkhpour ,B. (2003). The role of incubators in rural development, the conference on the use of information and communication technology in the village, the electronic research institute - Iran University of Science and Technology, Esfand Moon, 391-381.(in Persian).
• Taher, B. (2015). Investigating Factors Affecting Human Productivity. Social, Economic, Scientific and Cultural Monthly Work and Society, 190, 71-58 (in Persian).
• Tankovic, N. (2015). Applying Advancements in Cloud Computing to SME Software Design. In Conference Proceedings of the International Scientific.
• Zarifi,s . f., musa khani, M., Azar, A., Alvani, s . M,. (2017). Proposinga Model for Commercialization of Entrepreneurial Ideas in University Incubators, Public Management Research,  38, (10):63-88. 
• Zaki, M. A .(2006). Review and assess organizational support, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Isfahan, 3(18): 123-103 (in Persian).