ارائه الگویی برای تسهیم دانش در سازمان

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 11، دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 47، فروردین و اردیبهشت 1400، صفحه 167-151   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2021.22892.4636

نویسندگان

علی امیدپناه¹؛ شهناز نایب زاده^{* 2}؛ حسن دهقان دهنوی²؛ حسین اسلامی³

¹دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یزد، یزد، ایران

²دانشیار گروه مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یزد، یزد، ایران

³استادیار گروه مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یزد، یزد، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 12 مهر 1398،  تاریخ بازنگری: 13 شهریور 1399،  تاریخ پذیرش: 27 خرداد 1400 

چکیده

هدف از اجرای این پژوهش تحلیل محتوای مقالات مربوطه در زمینه تسهیم دانش بود. این پژوهش به شیوه تحلیل محتوای کیفی با بهره گیری از تکنیک پژوهش کیفی داده بنیاد انجام شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش را مقالات مختلف علمی داخلی و خارجی از سال‌های 2000 میلادی و 1388 شمسی تاکنون در زمینه تسهیم دانش تشکیل می‌دادند. بدین منظور پس از تحلیل کسپ تعداد 61 مقاله که به صورت مستقیم موضوع تسهیم دانش را بررسی کرده بودند، وارد فرایند تحلیل شدند. بر مبنای تحلیل محتوای کیفی مقالات و با استفاده از نرم افزار مکس کیو دی‌ای، کدگذاری مقالات صورت پذیرفت. نهایتاً با بررسی‌های انجام شده 355 کد در این مقالات در رابطه با تسهیم دانش وجود داشته است که منجر به شناسایی 13 متغیر اصلی و 39 مؤلفه گردیدکه هر یک از این مؤلفه‌ها نیز دارای شاخص‌هایی هستند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد: مهم‌ترین عواملی که در مقالات تسهیم دانش به آن اشاره شده است شرایط سازمانی مبتنی بر بستر سازمان و هم چنین انگیزه‌های بیرونی و درونی افراد جهت تسهیم دانش می‌باشد.سرانجام بر اساس نظریه داده بنیاد، متغیرهای شناسایی شده در شش دسته کلی طبقه بندی و مدل نهایی ارائه گردید که تأمین کننده جریان فی مابین مؤلفه‌ها برای تسهیم دانش در سازمان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تسهیم دانش؛ دانش سازمانی؛ تحلیل کیفی داده بنیاد

عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a model for knowledge sharing in the organization

نویسندگان [English]

Ali Omidpanah¹؛ Shahnaz Nayebzadeh²؛ Hassan Dehghandehnavi²؛ Hossein Eslami³

¹PhD Student in Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd, Iran.

²Associate Professor, Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd, Iran.

³Assistant Professor, , Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of related articles in the field of knowledge sharing. This research was conducted in the form of qualitative content analysis by using Grounded Theory qualitative Technique. The statistical population was consisted of various internal and external scientific articles on knowledge sharing from 1388hijri and 2009AD. For this purpose, 61 articles that directly examined the topic of knowledge sharing , entered the process of analysis after analyzing the Casp.Coding the articles was performed based on qualitative content analysis of articles and using the MAXQDA software. Finally, with the studies performed, there were 355 codes in these articles related to knowledge sharing, which led to the identification of 13 main variables and 39 components, each had its own indicators. The results showed that the most important factors mentioned in Knowledge Sharing Articles are organizational circumstances related to the organizational context as well as external and internal motivations for knowledge sharing. Finally, based Grounded Theory Technique, the identified variables were catecorised in six general classification and final model which provide the connection between components in order to share knowledge in the organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

knowledge sharing, organizational knowledge, Grounded Theory Qualitative Analysis

مراجع

• Afsheen, F. Rabia, I. Hina, S. & Sehar, Z. (2015) Knowledge sharing among Pakistani IT professionals: Examining the role of procedural justice, pay satisfaction and organizational commitment. Advanced Research Letters, 21(5), 1189–1192
• Akhavan Kharazian, M. Moghadasi, F. (2017). The Impact of Empowerment on Knowledge Sharing and Multilevel Model Design to Explain the Impact of Collaborative Organizational Culture on Knowledge Sharing. Organizational Culture Management. 15, 1: 207-223, [In Persian]
• Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. 2001. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems”: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, pp. 107- 132.
• Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2003). Knowledge management. cultivating knowledge professionals. USA: Chandos Publishing.
• Amini, A. Dolatshah, P. Fatahi, H R. (2017). Social Capital, Entrepreneurial Marketing and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Social Capital Management. 4: 547-569. [In Persian]
• Bazargan, Abbas (2014). Introduction to Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods, Tehran: Didar. [In Persian]
• Eskandari, F. Valvi,P. (2016). Investigating Barriers and Solutions for Knowledge Sharing in Science and Technology Parks Companies. Library and Information Science Studies. 20: 59-86. [In Persian]
• Fatemy Nassab, S A.Mahmoudzadeh, I. (2017). The Effect of Organizational Communication on Knowledge Sharing in the Islamic Republi of c Iran Railway Company. National Defense Strategic Management Studies. 1: 72-109. [In Persian]
• Ghorbani, M. Neyshabouri, VR. Erfanian Khanzadeh, H. Yaghoubi, M. (2016). Investigating the mediating role of organizational learning capability in the relationship between knowledge sharing and organizational innovation capability. Public Management Research: 138-168. [In Persian]
• Iman, Mohammad Taghi and Noshadi, Mahmoodreza (2011), Qualitative Content Analysis, Research, Third Year, Issue Second, pp. 15-44. [In Persian]
• Jun Liu, Zhinan Zhang, Richard Evans, Youbai Xie. (2019). Web services-based knowledge sharing, reuse and integration in the design evaluation of mechanical systems. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 57: 271-281
• Keshavarzi, AH.Safari, S.Hamidi Rad, J. (2015). The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Learning, Innovation and Organizational Performance. The Perspective of public Administration. 22: 103-128[In Persian].
• Krishnasamy, G. Paramesran, R. (2018). Multiview Laplacian semisupervised feature selection by leveraging shared knowledge among multiple tasks, Signal Processing: Image Communication.
• Lin, H.F. (2007), “Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study”, International Journal of Manpower, Vol28Nos 3/4, pp. 315-332.
• Llopis, O. & Foss, N. J. (2016). Understanding the climate-knowledge sharing relation: The moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and job autonomy. European Management Journal, 34, 135–144.
• Luu Trong Tuan. (2018). Coach humility and player creativity: The roles of knowledge sharing and group diversity. Sport Management Review.
• Mírian Oliveiraa, Carla Curadob, Paulo Lopes Henriquesb. (2019). Knowledge sharing among scientists: A causal configuration analysis. Journal of Business Research.
• Mirkamali, S M.Narengi Sani, F. Mostafavi, ZS. Aelami, F. (2017). Investigating the Factor Structure of Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Trust, and Creativity. Educational and school studies. Issue 16: 9-33. [In Persian]
• Motallebi Varkani, A. Mojaji, R. Ali Mohammadpour, A. (2018). The Impact of Leadership Style on Service Productivity Innovation and Processes Given the Moderating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Productivity Management. Issue Forty-Five: 93-113. [In Persian].
• Manfredi Latilla, V. Frattini, F. Messeni Petruzzelli, A. and Berner, M. (2018), “Knowledge management, knowledge transfer and organizational performance in the arts and crafts industry: a literature review”, Journal of Knowledge Management, available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0367.
• Martinez-Conesa, I. Soto-Acosta, P. and Carayannis, E.G. (2017), “On the path towards open innovation: assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 553-570.
• Monavarian, A. Fazli, F. Yeganeh, K. (2014). Investigating Effective Strategies on the Knowledge Sharing Process (Promoting and Inhibiting Factors) in a Public Organization. Strategic Management Research. 55: 105-131. [In Persian].
• Nadi, & Shah Hosseini. (2018). The Structural Model of the Relationship between Organizational Trust and Organizational Commitment with Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Explaining the Mediated Contribution of Organizational Culture and Organizational Health to Teachers. New Approach in Educational Management, 9 (35), 291-310. [In Persian].
• Oluwafemi Oyemomia, Shaofeng Liub, Irina Neagac, Huilan Chenb, Franklin Nakpodiaa. (2019). How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research.
• Okah, J. Teye, V. and Shoniregun, C. (2011), “E-learning and knowledge management: bridging technological gaps can bridge knowledge gaps in ghanaian universities”, Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 173-184.
• Peter Sarka, Christine Ipsen. (2018). Knowledge sharing via social media in software development: a systematic literature review. Knowledge sharing via social media in software development: a systematic literature review10.
• Qi Hao, Weiguo Yang, Yijun Shi, (2018). Characterizing the relationship between conscientiousness and knowledge sharing behavior in virtual teams: an interactionist approach, Computers in Human Behavior.
• Rajaei Azarkhovrani, A.Rajaei Pour, S. Hoveyda, R. (2016). Investigating the Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Faculty Members of Selected Universities of Isfahan. Development of Education in Medical Sciences. 21: 37-46. [In Persian].
• Safa, N. S. & Solms, R. V. (2016). An information security knowledge sharing model in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 442–451.
• Safi Pour, M.Zaimdar, M. (2018). The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Social Networks on the Environment. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development. 1-7. [In Persian].
• Salavati,A.Zandi, R. (2014). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Pessimism and Knowledge Sharing. (Case Study: Islamic Azad University). Industrial Management Faculty of Humanities. Ninth year: 107-119. [In Persian].
• Salimi, Keshavarzi, & Heidari. (2014). An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Maturity of Knowledge Sharing Behavior of PhD Students in Shiraz University. New Approach in Educational Management, 5 (19), 1-22. [In Persian].
• Salsaly, M. Fakhr Movahedi, A. Cheraghi, M A. (2007) Grounded Theory Research in Medical Sciences Philosophy and Applied Principles. Human Publication, Tehran[In Persian].
• Syed Rahmatullah, S. & Mahmood, K. 2013. Knowledge-sharing behavior in dairy sector of Pakistan”, Library Philosophy and Practice (ejournal). 2013 Paper 917. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/917
• Shaemi Barzaki, A. Kianpour, M.Shakeri, F. (2017). The interpersonal process of participation in knowledge sharing. Management Studies. 88: 103-131. [In Persian].
• Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2011). Foundations of Qualitative Research, translated by Ebrahim Afshar, Tehran: Publishing Ney. [In Persian].
• Tabatabaei, M. Afrazeh, A. Seifi, A. (2019). A Game Theoretic Analysis of Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Academics: Bi-level Programming Application, Computers & Industrial Engineering. [In Persian].
• Tea Moon, K. (2015). The effects of organizational justice on the knowledge sharing and utilization in hotel firms. Journal oftourism research, 40(4), 41–59.
• Wang, Z. and Wang, N. (2012), “Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39 No. 10, pp. 8899-8908.
• Yousefi Amiri, M.Gholipour, A.Abbasi, D. Gharanloo, M. (2015). Investigating the Role of Personality Characteristics in Knowledge Sharing Case Study: University of Tehran Management School Students. Organizational Culture Management. 13, 3: 647-665. [In Persian]
• Yuen Lam Bavika, Pok Man Tangb, Ruodan Shaoc, Long Wai Lamd. (2019). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly.
• Zhen-Jiao Chena, Robert M. Davisonb, Ji-Ye Maoc, Zhao-Hua Wanga. (2018). When and how authoritarian leadership and leader renqing orientation influence tacit knowledge sharing intentions. Information & Management55: 840-849.