الگوی معادلات ساختاری در رابطه بین گرایش به طلاق با مهارت های ارتباطی و سلامت خانواده اصلی با نقش واسطه ای صمیمیت زناشویی

فصلنامه علمی روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی

مقاله 10، دوره 12، شماره 43، خرداد 1400، صفحه 131-143   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jpmm.2021.4728

نویسندگان

آناهیتا نبیئی¹؛ سعیده السادات حسینی^{* 2}؛ کیوان کاکابرایی³؛ حسن امیری²

¹دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی عمومی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران

²استادیار گروه روانشناسی و مشاوره، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران

³دانشیار گروه روان شناسی و مشاوره، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 24 آذر 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 21 اردیبهشت 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 27 تیر 1400 

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: جامعه ایران نیز در مسیر تحولات فزاینده ناشی از فروپاشی توافقی پیوندهای زناشویی و افزایش میزان طلاق های توافقی قرار گرفته است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه الگوی معادلات ساختاری در رابطه بین گرایش به طلاق با مهارت های ارتباطی و سلامت خانواده اصلی با نقش واسطه ای صمیمیت زناشویی شهر کرمانشاه انجام شد.
روش­: جامعه آماری این پژوهش، کلیه زوجین شهر کرمانشاه می باشد. روش نمونه گیری به صورت خوشه ای می باشد و از بین نواحی 8 گانه شهرداری، ناحیه 8 انتخاب و از بین زوجین 200 نفر به عنوان اعضای نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزار مورد استفاده در این پژوهش، پرسشنامه های صمیمیت زناشویی واکر و تامپسون(1993)، سلامت خانواده اصلی هاوستات و همکاران (1985)، مقیاس مهارت های ارتباطی کویین دام (2001)، مقیاس گرایش به طلاق روزولت و همکاران(1986) بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از نرم افزار IBM AMOS 24 استفاده شد. نتایج پس از برازش مدل ارائه گردید.
یافته­ها: یافته ها نشان داد سلامت خانواده اصلی از طریق صمیمیت زناشویی با گرایش به طلاق رابطه دارد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد مهارت های ارتباطی از طریق صمیمیت زناشویی با گرایش به طلاق رابطه دارد. همچنین صمیمیت زناشویی با گرایش به طلاق نیز به صورت مستقیم در ارتباط است.
نتیجه گیری: نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که توجه به متغیرهای زوجی و رضایت زناشویی از جهت سلامت فردی و سلامت عمومی جامعه در کاهش میزان طلاق بسیار حایز اهمیت می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سلامت خانواده اصلی؛ مهارت های ارتباطی؛ صمیمیت زناشویی؛ گرایش به طلاق

عنوان مقاله [English]

Pattern of Structural Equations in the Relationship Between Divorce Tendency With Communication Skills and Main Family Health With the Mediating Role of Marital Intimacy

نویسندگان [English]

anahita nabiei¹؛ saeedeh sadat hosseini²؛ keyvan kakabaraie³؛ hasan amiri²

¹PhD student of General Psychology, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah University, Kermanshah, Iran

²Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Counseling, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah University, Kermanshah, Iran

³Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Counseling, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah University, Kermanshah, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction and aim:Iranian society is also on the path of increasing changes due to the consensual collapse of marital ties and the increase in the number of consensual divorces. The aim of this study was to provide a model of structural equations in the relationship between the tendency to divorce with communication skills and the health of the main family with the mediating role of marital intimacy in Kermanshah.
Methods:The statistical population of this study is all couples in Kermanshah. The sampling method is cluster sampling and out of 8 municipal districts, District 8 was selected and 200 couples were selected as sample members. The instruments used in this study were Walker and Thompson (1993) Marital Intimacy Questionnaire, Hawstat et al.'s (1985) Main Family Health Questionnaire, Queen Dam (2001) Communication Skills Scale, Roosevelt et al.'s Divorce Tendency Scale (1986). IBM AMOS 24 software was used for data analysis. The results were presented after fitting the model.
Findings: Findings showed that the health of the main family is related to the tendency to divorce through marital intimacy. The results also showed that communication skills are related to the tendency to divorce through marital intimacy. Marital intimacy is also directly related to the tendency to divorce.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that attention to marital variables and marital satisfaction is very important in terms of individual health and public health in reducing the divorce rate.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Main family health, communication skills, marital intimacy, tendency to divorce

مراجع

1. Mitchell AE, Castellani AM, Herrington RL, Joseph JI, Doss BD, Snyder DK. Predictors of intimacy in couples' discussions of relationship injuries: An observational study. Journal of Family Psychology. 2014;22(1):21.
2. van der Veek SM, Kraaij V, Garnefski N. Cognitive coping strategies and stress in parents of children with Down syndrome: A prospective study. Intellectual and developmental disabilities. 2019;47(4):295-306.
3. Saadatian E, Samani H, Parsani R, Pandey AV, Li J, Tejada L, et al. Mediating intimacy in long-distance relationships using kiss messaging. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2014;72(10-11):736-46.
4. Weiss JM. Marital preparation, experiences, and personal qualities in a qualitative study of individuals in great marriages: Utah State University; 2014.
5. Hirschberger G, Florian V, Mikulincer M. Strivings for romantic intimacy following partner complaint or partner criticism: A terror management perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2015;20(5):675-87.
6. Naseri H. Life Skills Training Guide (Instructor Handbook). Tehran: Publications of the Deputy Minister of Cultural Affairs and Prevention of the Welfare Organization. 2015.
7. Azazi S. Sociology of the family. Tehran: Enlightenment and Women's Studies. 2016.
8. 8.    Saroukhani B. Introduction to Family Sociology. Tehran: Soroush Publication. Persian; 2015.
9. Mohsen Zadeh F, Nazari A, Arefi M. father's family Experiences and perceptions of hostile marital conflicts. Counseling research. 2010;1(38):7-24.
10. Weisskirch RS, Delevi R. Attachment style and conflict resolution skills predicting technology use in relationship dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(6):2530-4.
11. Somohano VC. Mindfulness, attachment style and conflict resolution behaviors in romantic relationships: Humboldt State University; 2013.
12. Dildar S, Sitwat A, Yasin S. Intimate enemies: Marital conflicts and conflict resolution styles in dissatisfied married couples. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 2013;15(10):1433-9.
13. Muraru AA, Turliuc MN. Family-of-origin, romantic attachment, and marital adjustment: a path analysis model. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences. 2012;33:90-4.
14. Bahari F, Fatehizadeh M, Ahmadi A, Rumi H, Bahrami F. The effect of spouses' communication skills training on reducing marital conflicts in conflicting couples seeking divorce. Clinical Psychology Research and Counseling (Educational and Psychological Studies). 2011;1(1):70-59.
15. Zarei E, Mirzaei M, Sadeghifard M. Providing a model to determine the role of communication skills and problem solving skills in preventing from mental and social damages by mediated family conflicts. Counseling Culture and Psycotherapy. 2018;9(35):1-26.
16. Hosini SM, Nazari MA, Rasooli M, Shakarami M, Hosini SM. The relationship of main family health and marital intimacy: Evaluating the mediating role of constructive and non-constructive conflict resolution styles. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2017;9(32):67-76.
17. Rahmanifar R, Mohammadzadeh Ebrahimi A, Soleimanian A. The Effect of Intimate Communication Skills on Marital Adjustment. Armaghane Danesh Magazine Yasuj University of Medical Sciences. 2018;23(2):187-75.
18. Gordon L, Durana C. The PAIRS program. In R. Berger and M.T. Hannah (Eds.). Preventive approaches in couples therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel. 2014:217-36.
19. Waring EM, Chelune GJ. Marital intimacy and self‐disclosure. Journal of clinical psychology. 2015;39(2):183-90.
20. Rusbult CE, Johnson DJ, Morrow GD. Predicting satisfaction and commitment in adult romantic involvements: An assessment of the generalizability of the investment model. Social Psychology Quarterly. 1986;4(3):168-84.
21. Davodi Z, Etemadi O, Bahrami F. Solution-focused brief approach for decrease of desire to divorce in women and men prone to divorce. Social Welfare Scientific-Res Episode.  2008;11(43):121-34.
22. Jerabek I. Communication skills inventory revised. Body-Mind QueenDom. In: http://www.queendom.com/comunic.html, editor. 2004.
23. Hussein Chary M, Fadakar M. The Effect of University on Communication Skills Based on the Comparison Students. Behavior Daneshvar. 2005;12(15):21-32.
24. Yousefi F. The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Students' Communication Skills. Iranian Psychologists Quarterly. 2011;9(3):13-5.
25. Hovestadt AJ, Anderson WT, Piercy FP, Cochran SW, Fine M. A family‐of‐origin scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1985;11(3):287-97.
26. Karami A. The study of psychometric properties and standardization of family of origin scale. Journal of Counseling Research. 2011;10(38):103-18.
27. Sanaei Zakir B. The role of the main family in child marriage. . Quarterly Journal of Consulting News and Research, Scientific-Research Quarterly of the Iranian Consulting Association. 2000;1(2):21-46.
28. Khazaei S. The effect of differentiation teaching on the level of intimacy and differentiation of couples: MA Dissertation. Kharazmi Universityof Tehran; 2007.
29. Jaberi S, Etemadi A, Ahmadi S. Investigating the Relationship between Communication Skills and Conflict Resolution Styles with Marital Intimacy in Women in Isfahan. Journal of Women and Society. 2015;5(1):74-63.
30. Ghiasi P, Laden M, Rusta L. Investigating the social causes of divorce tendency among women referring to Shiraz family court. Women's Sociology Quarterly. 2013;3:104-77.
31. Riahi M, Aliverdinia A, BAHRAMI KS. A Sociological analysis of tendency towards divorce (A case study of Kermanshah city). 2006.
32. Nancy JS. Communication and Intimacy. www.nancy Jane Smith.com. 2017.
33. Barzegar A, Samani S. The mediating role of intimacy in the relationship between communication patterns and marital quality of life. . Number 2. Women and Society Quarterly Seventh year. 2016;2.