مقایسه اثربخشی درمان مصاحبه انگیزشی و ماتریکس با رویکرد شناختی - رفتاری بر افسردگی و بهبود کیفیت زندگی در مصرف کنندگان ماری جوانا

فصلنامه علمی روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی

دوره 12، شماره 45، آبان 1400، صفحه 35-48   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jpmm.2021.26416.3227

نویسندگان

عبدالرسول کاویانی¹؛ حجت اله جاوید^{* 2}؛ حسین بقولى²؛ مجید برزگر²

¹دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی عمومی، گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران

²دکتری روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 08 آبان 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 18 شهریور 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 20 مهر 1400 

چکیده

مقدمه: اعتیاد به مواد مخدر با طیف گسترده ای از بیماری ها، اختلالات و ناتوانی ها در ارتباط است. هدف از انجام این پژوهش مقایسه اثربخشی درمان مصاحبه انگیزشی و ماتریکس با رویکرد شناختی - رفتاری بر افسردگی و بهبود کیفیت زندگی در مصرف کنندگان ماری جوانا بوده است.
روش: روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع آزمایشی با طرح پیش آزمون – پس آزمون با سه گروه (دو گروه آزمایش، یک گروه درمان مصاحبه انگیزشی، یک گروه درمان ماتریکس با رویکرد شناختی - رفتاری و یک گروه کنترل) بود .جامعه ی پژوهش حاضر کلیه افراد وابسته به ماری جوانا شهر شیراز بودند. نمونه آماری از افراد وابسته به ماری جوانا مراجعه کننده به بیمارستان محرری شهر شیراز انتخاب شدند. افراد به صورت تصادفی در سه گروه (هر گروه 15 نفر) جایگزین شدند. جهت گردآوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه های کیفیت زندگی ویر شربورن و افسردگی بک استفاده گردید.
یافته­ها: نتایج نشان داد که درمان ماتریکس و مصاحبه انگیزشی با گروه کنترل تفاوت معنادار داشتند، اما درمان ماتریکس با مصاحبه انگیزشی اثربخشی متفاوتی با هم نداشتند.
نتیجه­گیری: باتوجه به یافته­های پژوهش حاضر می­توان نتیجه گرفت که هر دو درمان را می توان به عنوان درمانهای مکمل داوریی در افراد وابسته به ماری جوانا به کار برد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

درمان مصاحبه انگیزشی؛ درمان ماتریکس با رویکرد شناختی - رفتاری؛ افسردگی؛ کیفیت زندگی؛ مصرف کنندگان ماری جوانا

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach on depression and quality of life in marijuana users

نویسندگان [English]

AbdolRasoul Kaviani¹؛ Hojjatullah Javid²؛ Hossein Baghooli²؛ Majid Barzegar²

¹Ph.D. Student in General Psychology, Department of Consulting, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

²Department of Consulting, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach on depression and quality of life in marijuana users. Experimental research method along with pretest-posttest design used with three groups (two experimental groups, a motivational interviewing group, a matrix treatment group and a control group). The statistical population was all marijuana addicts in Shiraz. Statistical samples were selected from marijuana addicts referred to Mehrari Hospital in Shiraz. Individuals were randomly assigned to three groups (15 people in each group). Weir Scherborn quality of life Scale and Beck Depression were used to collect data. The results showed that matrix treatment and motivational interviewing were significantly different from the control group, but matrix treatment with motivational interviewing were not different in effectiveness. Therefore, both therapies can be used as adjunctive therapies in marijuana addicts.
Keywords: motivational interviewing, matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach , depression, quality of life , marijuana users

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

motivational interviewing, matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach, depression, quality of life, marijuana users

مراجع

1. Ghanbari R, & Sumner S. Using Metabolomics to Investigate Biomarkers of Drug Addiction. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2018; 24(2): 197-205. DOI: 1016/j.molmed.2017.12.005
2. Karow A, Reimer J, Schäfer I, Krausz M, Haasen C, Verthein U. Quality of life under maintenance treatment with heroin versus methadone in patients with opioid dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2010; 112: 209–215. DOI: 1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.06.009
3. Douaihy A, Singh N. Factors affecting quality of life in patient with HIV infection, Aids reader.2001; 11(9): 622- 90. PMID: 11682918
4. Navidiyan A, & Pour Sharifi H. practical guide to motivational interviewing. Zahedan: sokhan gostar Pub.2012: 98-166.
5. Hser YI, Teruya C, Brown AH, Huang D, Evans E, Anglin MD. Impact of California's Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: treatment capacity and displacement. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):104-109. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.069336
6. Haghighi Z, & Namdar R. Analysis of Social Health Components and the Factors Affecting It: Ru-
   ral Households of Shiraz Township . Journal of Rural Research. 2021;12(1): 62-79, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.22059/jrur.2020.304993.1523
   7. Miller WR, Moyers TB. Motivational interviewing and the clinical science of Carl Rogers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(8):757-766. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000179. PMID: 28726479.

 

7. Ruisoto P, & Contador I. The role of stress in drug addiction. An integrative review. Physiology & Behavior. 2019; 202: 62-68. DOI: 1016/j.physbeh.2019.01.022
8. Kaplan H, Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Synopsis of psychiatry. Trans: Porafkari N, Rezai F. 8th ed . Tehran: Arjmand. 1996.

9.       Sara LD, Rosemarie A, Martin D, & Rohsenow J. Self-efficacy for cocaine abstinence: Pretreatment correlates and relationship to outcomes. Addictive Behaviors. 2008; 33:675-688. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.12.001

10. Baumeister RF, & Nadal AC. Addiction: Motivation, action control, and habits of pleasure. Motivation Science. 2017; 3(3): 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000069
11. Engle JL, Mermelstein R, Baker TB, Smith SS, Schlam TR, Piper ME, & Cook JW. (2019). Effects of motivation phase intervention components on quit attempts in smokers unwilling to quit: A factorial experiment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2019; 197: 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.01.011
12. Chauchard E, Levin KH, Copersino ML, Heishman SJ, & Gorelick DA. Motivations to quit cannabis use in an adult non-treatment sample: Are they related to relapse? Addictive Behaviors. 2013; 38(9): 2422-2427. doi: 1016/j.addbeh.2013.04.002

13.   Shaul L, Blankers M, Koeter MWJ, Schippers GM, & Goudriaan AE. The Role of Motivation in Predicting Addiction Treatment Entry among Offenders With Substance Use Disorders Under Probation Supervision. International Journal of Of fender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, published online.2019. doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19849554

14. Navidian A, Kermansaravi F, Ebrahimi Tabas E, & Saeedinezhad F. Efficacy of Group Motivational Interviewing in the Degree of Drug Craving in the Addicts Under the Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) in South East of Iran. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2016; 30 :144–149.

15.   Dashti Dehkordi A, yousefi H, Maghsoudi J, Etemadifar M. The Effects of Motivational Interviewing on Depression of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Disease. IJPN. 2017; 4 (5) :29-35. URL: http://ijpn.ir/article-1-756-en.html

16.   Freira S, Lemos MS, Williams G, Ribeiro M, Pena F, Machado MD. Effect of  Motivational Interviewing on depression scale scores of adolescents with obesity and overweight. Psychiatry research. 2012; 12(252):340-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.020

17. Poursharifi H, Zamani R, Mehryar AH, Besharat MA, Rajab A. The effect of motivational interview and cognitive-behavioral group training on improving well-being, quality of life and self-care indicators in people with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Modern Psychological Research. 2011; 6 (23): 60-39.
18. Chen SM, Creedy D, Lin HS, Wollin J. Effects of motivational interviewing intervention onself-management, psychological and glycemic outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a randomaized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012; 49(6): 637–644. DOI: 1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.011
19. Sorsdahl K, Stein DJ, Corrigall J, Cuijpers P, Smits N, Naledi T, Myers B. The efficacy of a blended motivational interviewing and problem solving therapy intervention to reduce substance use among patients presenting for emergency services in South Africa: A randomized controlled trial. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy.2015; 10(46): 110-118.doi: 1186/s13011-015-0042-1
20. Hadadi R, Ghorbani M, Rostami R, Keshavarz Q, Farahani E. The Outcome of Matrix Model of Therapy on Quality of Life in Methamphetamine Abusers, Addiction research. 2016; 10 (39): 95 -108. URL: http://etiadpajohi.ir/article-1-943-en.html

21.   Kakakhani S. The effectiveness of addiction treatment matrix model on emotion regulation and quality of life of methamphetamine abusers, 4th International Conference on Recent Innovations in Psychology, Counseling and Behavioral Sciences, Tehran, Nikan University.2017.

22. Velasquez MM, Gaddy MG, Crouch K, and De Clemente C. Group therapy for substance abusers (treatment guide based on stages of change) Translated by Ali Akbar Ebrahimi and Mahmoud Mohammadzadeh, Isfahan: Kankash. 2011.
23. Massah O, Effatpanah M, Shishehgar S. Matrix Model for Methamphetamine Dependence Among Iranian Female Methadone Patients: The First Report From the Most Populated Persian Gulf Country. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2017; 15 (3) :193-198
    URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-768-en.html
24. Brobeck E, Bergh H,  Odencrants S,  Hildingh Primary healthcare nurses’ experiences with motivational interviewing in health promotion practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2011;20( 23-24): 3322-3330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702. 2011. 03874.x

25.   Dakof GA, Cohen JB, Henderson CE, Durante E. A randomizedpilot study of the Engaging Moms Program for family drug court. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 38: 263–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.002

Lisa R, Fortuna MD.  Motivational Interviewing in the Treatment of Psychological Problems.2008. doi.org/10.1176/ps.2008.59.9.1068a