مدل یابی ساختاری بین باورهای ارتباطی با سازگاری زناشویی از طریق میانجیگری مهارگری زناشویی در زنان متاهل

فصلنامه علمی روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی

دوره 12، شماره 45، آبان 1400، صفحه 80-92   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jpmm.2021.27570.3343

نویسندگان

مهدی یوسف نیا پاشا¹؛ شهره قربان شیرودی^{* 2}؛ علیرضا همایونی³

¹دانشجوی دوره دکتری مشاوره، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران

²دکتری مشاوره، دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، تنکاین، ایران

³دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، استاد یار گروه روانشناسی، واحد بندر گز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندرگز، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 20 اسفند 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 10 شهریور 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 20 مهر 1400 

چکیده

مقدمه: یکی از مهمترین متغیرها در موضوع خانواده و روابط زوجین، سازگاری زناشویی است. بنابر این، پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش باورهای ارتباطی در پیش بینی سازگاری زناشویی با میانجیگری مهارگری زناشویی صورت گرفت.
روش: جامعه ی آماری پژوهش، شامل زنان متأهل شهرستان بابلسر بودند که حداقل 3 سال  سابقه زندگی مشترک داشته و میزان تحصیلات آنان حداقل تا پایان دبیرستان بود. در پژوهش حاضر، تعداد 305 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری غیر تصادفی در دسترس انتخاب شدند و به پرسشنامه ها پاسخ دادند. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه های سازگاری زناشویی، مهارگری زناشویی و باورهای ارتباطی استفاده شد. تجزیه وتحلیل اطلاعات به دست آمده در نرم افزار Amos   و با استفاده از مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری صورت پذیرفت.
یافته­ها: یافته های پژوهش نشان داد همبستگی مثبت و معنی داری بین متغیرهای باورهای ارتباطی کارآمد و مهارگری زناشویی با سازگاری زناشویی وجود دارد. همچنین همبستگی منفی معنی داری بین متغیرهای باورهای ارتباطی ناکارآمد (باوربه مخرب بودن مخالفت، باوربه تغییرناپذیری همسر، باور به ذهنخوانی، باور به کمال گرایی جنسی و باور به تفاوتهای جنسی) و مهارگری زناشویی (مهارگری هیجانی، مهارگری بی توجهی، مهارگری خشونت کلامی، مهارگری انزوا و مهارگری پنهانکاری) با سازگاری زناشویی درآزمودنی ها وجود دارد.
نتیجه­گیری: باتوجه به یافته­های پژوهش حاضر، می توان گفت هر دو متغیر باورهای ارتباطی و مهارگری زناشویی اثری مستقیم بر سازگاری زناشویی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

واژه های کلیدی: باورهای ارتباطی؛ مهارگری زناشویی؛ سازگاری زناشویی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural modeling between communication beliefs and marital adjustment through marital inhibition mediation in married women

نویسندگان [English]

mehdi yousofnia pasha¹؛ Shohreh Ghorban Shiroudi²؛ Alireza Homayouni³

¹hD Student in Counseling, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran

²PhD in Counseling, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran

³PhD in Educational Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Bandar-e-Gaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar-e-Gaz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

abstract
One of the most important variables in the subject of family and marital relations is marital adjustment. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the role of communication beliefs in predicting marital adjustment mediated by marital inhibition. The statistical population of the study included married women in Babolsar who had lived together for at least 3 years and their level of education was at least until the end of high school. In the present study, 305 people were selected using available non-random sampling method and answered the questionnaires. Questionnaires of marital adjustment, marital inhibition and communication beliefs were used to collect information. The data were analyzed in Amos software using structural equation modeling. Findings showed that there is a positive and significant correlation between the variables of effective communication beliefs and marital inhibition and marital compatibility. There was also a significant negative correlation between the variables of dysfunctional communication beliefs (belief in destructive opposition, belief in spouse immutability, belief in mind reading, belief in sexual perfectionism and belief in sexual differences) and marital inhibition (emotional inhibition, inattention inhibition, verbal violence inhibition, Isolation inhibition and concealment inhibition) There is marital compatibility in the subjects.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Keywords: Communication beliefs, marital inhibition, marital adjustment

مراجع

1.       Fallahzadeh, H, Kikha, F, & Sadat Sadeghi, M. (1398). The effectiveness of self-differentiation training based on Iranian culture on the totalitarianism of couples and the differentiation of women. Journal of Cultural Psychology, 3 (1), 125-107.

2.       2.    AlBughbish, T, Khojasteh Mehr, R, & Abbaspour, Z. (1398). Predicting marital satisfaction based on welcoming motives and avoiding sacrifice and sacrificial behaviors in the cultural context of Ahvaz. Third Year, No. 2, 155-139.

3.       3.    Roshan Ravan, N. (1395). Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Self-Understanding and Spouse-Understanding Scales and Its Relationship with Marital Satisfaction of Married Students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Master Thesis. Chamran martyr of Ahwaz University. Faculty of Education and Psychology..

4.       Sadeghi, M, Fatehizadeh, M, Ahmadi, A, Bahrami, F& Etemadi, A. (1394). Developing a healthy family model based on the views of family experts (a qualitative research). Family Psychotherapy Counseling, 5 (16), 170-142.

5.       5.    Rios,C,M.(2010).the relationship between premarital advice , expectations and marital satisfaction.a thesis submitted in partial ful fillment of the requirement for the degree of science in marriage and family therapy, Utah state university.

6.       Merriam-Webster. (2017). Retrieved from domineering. Controlling: https:// www. Merriam- Webster.com/dictionary/domineering.

7.       7.    Bonior, A.(2015). 20signs Your partner is controlling. Retrieved from psychology today: www. Psychologe today.com.

8.       Amini, H, Kimiaei, A,& Asghari, M. (1397). Develop a measure of marital inhibition and reveal its psychometric properties. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Family Therapists, Volume 8, Number 2 (26), 67-47.

9.       Fontes, L. A. Invisible chains: Overcoming coercive control in your intimate relationship. New York: The Guilford Press. (2015). PP:34.

10.   Hartwell-Walker, M.(2017,February 15). Signs of a Controlling  Gtn. Retrieved from spychcenter : http:// psychcentral. Com/ lib/signs-of-a-controlling-guy.

11.   11.  Johnson, M. D, Lavner, J.A.W,Stanley, S. M,& Rhoades, G. K.(2020). Trajectories of relationship confidence in intimate partnerships. Journal of Family psychology, 34(1): 24-34.

12.   12.  Namani, A, Abbasi, F,& Zarei, A. (1394). Predicting marital commitment based on lovemaking style and communication beliefs. Social Welfare Quarterly, No. 16, 60-48.

13.   Zare Garizi, R., Ebrahimi Moghadam, H., Abolmaali Al-Husseini, K., 1399, Predicting marital commitment based on basic psychological needs and intimacy through the mediation of self-differentiation, Applied Psychology, 14 (1): pp. 55-76.

14.   14.  Gottman, J. M. & Gottman, J. S. (2015). 10 Principles for Doing Effective Couples Therapy ( Norton series on interpersonal Neurobiology). New York: Norton.

15.   15.  Khatibi, A., 2016, The effect of each of the components of adaptation on the cohesion of Hamedan ethnic families with a sociological approach, Iranian Journal of Sociology, 16th, 135, (2), pp. 169-180.

16.   16.  Jafari Roshan, M. (1394). Harmful social issues with a view to neighborhood-based prevention. Tehran: University Jihad Publishing Organization.

17.   17.  Giti, S,& Jafari Roshan, M. (1397). Comparison of irrational beliefs with communication skills and marital adjustment in three generations of women in Tehran. Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy Education, Volume 7, Pages 30-49.

18.   18.  Bernstein, H, & Bernstein, m. (1389). Marital therapy from a behavioral-communication perspective. (Poor Abedi Nabini, M and Munshi, translators). Tehran . Roshd Publications.

19.   19.  Baron, R.m,& KENNYM d.a.(1986). The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: cinceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology. 51(6), 1173-1180.

20.   20.  Edelson, R. S. &Epestein, N. O. (1982).Cognition and relationship maladjustment development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship believs.Journal of conseling and clinical psychology, 50, 715-720..

21.   21.  Heidari, M., Mazaheri, M., Pour-Etemad, H., (2005), The relationship between the husband and wife, Family Research Quarterly, 1 (2), Summer.

22.   22.  Amini, H, Kimiaei, A,& Asghari, M. (1397). Develop a measure of marital inhibition and reveal its psychometric properties. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Family Therapists, Volume 8, Number 2 (26), 67-47.

23.   23.  Locke HJ, Wallace KM. Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living. 1959; 21(3):251–255.

24.   Momenzadeh, F, Mazaheri, M, &  Heidari, M. (2005). The relationship between irrational thoughts and attachment pattern with marital adjustment. Family Research Quarterly, 1 (4), 378-369.

25.   25.  Khojasteh Mehr, R, Mohammadi, R, Sudani, M, & Abbaspour, Z. (1396). The biological experience of sacrifice in enduring marriages. Journal of Consulting Research, Volume 17, Number 57, 58-44.

26.   26.  Sedaghatkhah, A,& Behzadipour, S. (1396). Predicting the quality of marital relationships based on communication beliefs, mindfulness and psychological flexibility. Journal of Women and Society, Year 8, Issue 2, 41-28.

27.   27.  Deldadeh Moghadam, M,& Bagheri, N. (1396). Predicting marital conflicts of couples based on backward behaviors and interpretation of difficulties. Journal of Family Counseling and Enrichment Pathology, (consecutive 1 and 3), 52-40.

28.   28.  Seidi, S, Nazari, A, Ebrahimi, M. (1394). The role of communicative and spiritual beliefs in marital satisfaction, presenting a hypothetical model mediating relationship quality and age. Quarterly Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy Culture, Year 6, No. 24, 68-54.

29.   29.  Ismailpour, Kh., Khajeh, and, Mahdavi, N., (2013). Predicting marital satisfaction of spouses based on communication beliefs and communication skills. Family Research Quarterly, Year 9, No. 33, 46-32.

30.   30.  Dew,J.& Jackson, M. (2018) . Commitment and Relation ship Mainte nance Behaviors as marital protective Factors during Economice pressure. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 39(2): 191-204.

31.   31.  Hou , Y. Jiang, F.& Wang, X. (2019). Mrital commitment, communication and marital satisfaction:An analysis based on actor -partner interdependence modle.International Journal of Psychology, 54(3): 369-376.

32.   32.  Clyde, T. L, Hawkins , A. j , & Willoughby B . J. (2020). Revising premarital relationship interventions for the next generation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy: 46(1): 149-164.

33.   33.  Karney, B.R., McNulty, J.K., & Bradbury, T.N. (2001).Cognition and the development of close relationships. In G. J.O. Fletcher & M.S. Clark (Eds.), Interpersonal processes. (pp 32-59). Oxford: Blackwell.

34.   34.  Whisman, M. A., & Allan, L. E. (1996). Attachment and social cognition theories of romantic relationships: Convergent or complementary perspectives? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(2), 263–278.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596132006.

35.   35.  Ellis, A. (1978). Family therapy: A phenomenological and active directive approach. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, 43-50.

36.   36.  Hamilton. K.A.(2013). The effects of marital conflict and marital environment on change in marital status. These and dissertations-family sciences. Retrieved from http:// uknowledge-uky.edu/hes etds9.

37.   37.  Glaser, and. (2012). Therapeutic reality. (Translated by Ali Sahebi). Tehran: Saye Sokhan. (Published in the original language 2012.

38.   38.  Graham-Kevan. N.&Archer,j.(2005). Investigating three explations of womens relanations aggression. Psychology of women puarterly. 29(3). 270-277.

39.   39.  Abbasi Asil, P., 2014, Comparison of Controlling Behaviors and Sexual Function in Couples with Traditional and Modern Marriage in Couples Referred to Health Services Centers in Zahedan, Islamic Azad University - Islamic Azad University - Marvdasht Branch - Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology.

40.   40.  Glasser,w.(2004). Counseling with choice theory. New York. Harper Collins.