نقش ادراکات کلاسی درعملکرد تحصیلی با میانجی گری جهت گیری هدف و باورهای انگیزشی

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 12، دوره 12، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 49، مرداد و شهریور 1400، صفحه 187-202   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2021.16049.3506

نویسندگان

محمد محمدی پور^{* 1}؛ علی اصغر سرائی²؛ محمود جاجرمی³

¹گروه روان شناسی ،واحد قوچان،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قوچان،ایران

²دانشجوی دکترای روان شناسی تربیتی، واحد بجنورد،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد،ایران.

³گروه روان شناسی ،واحد بجنورد،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد،ایران.

تاریخ دریافت: 29 مهر 1396،  تاریخ بازنگری: 10 تیر 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 13 مرداد 1400 

چکیده

چکیده
مقدمه و هدف: هدف از  پژوهش حاضر ، بررسی نقش ادراکات کلاسی در پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان با نقش میانجی باورهای انگیزشی وجهت‌گیری هدف بود
روش شناسی: پژوهش حاضر از نوع توصیفی وطرح آن نیز همبستگی از نوع تحلیل مسیر بود. بدین منظور 403 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه فرهنگیان  مشهد با روش  نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند وجهت جمع آوری اطلاعات از سه پرسشنامه ادراکات کلاسی جنتری و دیگران(2002) ، جهت‌گیری هدف الیوت و مک گری گور (2001) و راهبردهای انگیزشی یادگیری پینتریچ و دیگران(1991)  استفاده گردید. ارتباط متغیر  ها از طریق مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری آزمون شد .  
یافته ها: نتایج نشان دادکه ادراکات کلاسی، پیش بینی کننده مثبت جهت‌گیری هدف، باورهای انگیزشی و عملکرد ‌تحصیلی دانشجویان بود. همچنین جهت‌گیری هدف و باورهای انگیزشی پیش بینی کننده مثبت عملکردتحصیلی بودند.
نتیجه گیری: نهایتا نتایج پژوهش تایید کننده نقش معنی دار میانجی جهت‌ گیری هدف و باورهای انگیزشی در رابطه ادراکات کلاسی و عملکرد تحصیلی بود .

کلیدواژه‌ها

ادراکات کلاسی؛ جهت ‌گیری هدف؛ باورهای انگیزشی؛ عملکرد تحصیلی و دانشجویان

عنوان مقاله [English]

The role of perceptions of class in academic performance by mediating different types of goal orientation and motivational beliefs In the students of Farhangian University of Mashhad

نویسندگان [English]

mohammad mohammaipour¹؛ saraei aliasghar²؛ mahmoud jajarmi³

¹Department of Psychology, Ghuchan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ghuchan, Iran.

²Ph.D student in Educational Psychology, Bojnourd unit, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran

³Department of Psychology, Bojnourd Unit, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of class perceptions in students' academic achievement with the mediating role of motivational beliefs and goal setting. Methodology: The present study was of descriptive type and its design was correlation of path analysis. For this purpose, 403 students of Farhangian University of Mashhad were selected by stratified random sampling method to collect information from three questionnaires of Gentry and Others classroom perceptions (2002), McGregor and Elliot oal orientation (2001) and motivational strategies of learning Pintrich and others ( 1991) was used. The relationship between the variables was tested by modeling structural equations. Results: The results showed that classroom perceptions were positive predictors of students' goal orientation, motivational beliefs and academic performance. Also, goal orientation and motivational beliefs were positive predictors of academic performance. Conclusion: Finally, the results of the study confirmed the significant role of mediator of goal orientation and motivational beliefs in the relationship between class perceptions and academic performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Goal orientation, motivational beliefs, perceptions of class, cademic performance and student

مراجع

1. Ames, C. (1990) motivation: what teachers need to know, teacher college record, 91, 409-421.
2. Ames C. (1992).classrooms: goals structures and student motivation. Journal of education psychology. 1992, 84 (3) , 261 – 271.
3. Ames, C. , & Archer, J. (1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of educational psychology, 80, 260-267.
4. Andermen, E. M. and Midgley, C. (1997).Changes in achievement goal orientations and perceived classroom goal structures across the transition to middle level schools. Contemporary educational psychology, 22, 269-298.
5. Arisoy Nazmye (2007). Examining of 8th Students Perception of learningthe Environment  scince Classroom in relation to Motivational belifes and Attitudes. A thesis presented to the Middle East Technical University
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
7. Barzegar,majid(2012) The Relationship between Goal Orientation and Academic Achievement- The Mediation Role of Self Regulated Learning Strategies- A Path Analysis. International Conference on Management, Humanity and Economics (ICMHE'2012) August 11-12, 2012 Phuket (Thailand).
8. Church,M. A. , Elliot, A. J. & Gable, S. (2001).Perception of classroom context, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of educational psychology, 93, 43 – 54.
9. Cleary, T., and Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). “A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: theoretical foundations and applications,” in Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, eds S. L. Christenson and W. Reschley (New York, NY: Springer Science), 237–257.
10. Desi, E,L, Koestner, R. & Ryan, R. M. (1999).meta analytic reviews of experiments examine the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bull ten, 125, 627-668.
11. Desi, E. l. , & ryan, R. M. (2008).Self-determination theory: a macro theory of human motivation, developmentand health. Canadian psychology, 49 (3) : 182-185.
12. Dupeyrat,.C., & Marine,. C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation,cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1),43-59.
13. Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
14. Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and acheivement goals. Education Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
15. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H.A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501- 519.
16. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal ofPersonality, 78(3), 865-906
17. Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
18. Elliot, A., McGregor, H.A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. 91,549-563.
19. A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 470-475.
20. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In: Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education, Springer Netherlands. 1191- 1239.
21. Gardner, H., & Moran, S. (2016). The science of multiple intelligences theory: A response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 4(4), 227–232
22. Greene, B.A., & Miller, R.B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192
23. Gentry, M. ,Gable, R. K. & Rizza , M. G. (2002).students perceptions of classroom activities. are there grade-level and gender differences. journal of educational psychology, 94, 539- 544
24. Gholamali Lavasani, Masoud, Elaheh Hejazi and Hayman Khezri Azar (2011). Model of prediction of mathematical progress: the role of the goals of the development of approaches to learning of effort. Journal of Psychology 15 (2) 178-163.
25. Ghodampour, Ezatollah and Saramd, Zohreh (2003). Conclusion of motivational beliefs in the role of helplessness and academic achievement of students. Journal of Psychology, 26(7) 129-112.
26. Hong, Eunsoo. Peng, yong. & Rowell, L, L. (2009).homework self-regulation; grade, gender, achievement-level differences. Journal of education psychology, 19 ( 2) 269- 276.
27. Hejazi, elaheh and naqgh, Zahra (2008). Structural model of the relationship between perception of class structure, goals of progress, self-efficacy and self-regulation in mathematical lessons, cognitive science, no. 3, 28-37.
28. Jokar, Bahram (2005). Targeting and Performance Attendance in Students of Different Degrees at Shiraz University. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities University of Shiraz. 22. 4, p. 71-56. .[in Persian]
29. Joker, Bahram; Delaware Pour, M. (2007). "The Relationship of Educational Attraction with the Goals of Progress". Journal of Modern Thinking Education, 3, 80-63.
30. Kasashkhi, Hossein, Kharrazi, Ali Naghi, Aega, Javad and Ghazi Tababaee (2009). Family Perceptions Perceptions, Motivational Beliefs and Academic Self-Regulatory: Testing an Ali Model, Journal of Psychology, No. 2, pp. 190-205.[in Persian]
31. Karshaki, Hossein, Salehi, Monireh (2011). Classical Classroom Self-Regulatory: Comparison of Students in the First and the End Years, Journal of R. Anthropology, Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, vol. 41, No. 1,.
32. Kajbaf, Mohammad Baqir, Molavi, Hussein and Shirazi Tehrani, Alireza (2003). The relation between motivational beliefs, self-regulation learning strategies and academic performance of high school students. Journal of Cognitive Sciences. 6 (1), 33-27. .[in Persian]
33. Kamali Zarch, Mahmoud, Kadivar, Parvin, Ghazi Tabatabai, Mahmoud, and Keyamanesh, Alireza (2006). The Power of Autoimmunity Data and Personal Intermediary Characteristics in Self-Efficacy and Mathematical Function, 184-167.
34. Linnenbrink-Garcia L, Maehr ML, Pintrich PR.(2015) Motivation and Achievement Menc Handbook of Research On Music Learning: Volume 1 Strategie
35. McCoach, D. B. & siegle,D. (2003).Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly. 47 (2) , 144-154.
36. McWhaw, Katherine., Abrami., and Philip C.(2001)Student Goal Orientation and Interest: Effects on Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology ,26, 311–329
37. McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2002).Achievement goals as predictors of achievement- processes prior to taskengagement. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 94, 381-395.
38. Moravoty, Zekrallah; Shahni yilagh, Manijeh; Mehrabizadeh Honarmand, Mahnaz and Kianpour Farkhahi, Fatemeh (2011)The relationship between the perceived constructive learning environment and the math function with mediating the internal orientation of the goal, the value of the subject, the attitude toward mathematics and the mathematical self-efficacy in high school male students in Ahwaz. Psychological Achievements (Educational and Psychological Sciences), 4 (1), 121-99
39. Mohammadi pour, Mohammad(2014) An Investigation of the influence of classroom perceptions, motivational beliefs, and goal orientation on the prediction of academic self-regulation learning in order to develop a structural model for the students of Islamic Azad university Qochan, Ph.D Thesis educational psychology Ph.D Thesis educational psychology.
40. Mohsenpour, Maryam, Hejazi, Elaheh, Keyamanesh, Alireza. (2007). Self-efficacy, achievement goals, learning strategies and sustainability in academic achievement in mathematics lessons in third year high school students (mathematics) in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, No. 16( 5) 35-9. .[in Persian]
41. -Pintrich, P. R., DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
    • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.
42. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie,W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching andLearning.
43. Pintrich, P. R. (2000).Multiple goals. Multiple path way: the role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 92, 544 - 555.
44. Poondej, Chanut & Lerdpornkulrat, Thanita (2016)Relationship between motivational goal orientations,perceptions of general education classroom learning environment, and deep approaches to learning . Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 37 (2016) 100e103
45. Rabbani, Zainab and Farideh Yousefi (2014) The relationship between motivational beliefs and educational progress by mediating different types of goal orientation and self-regulation learning strategies. Journal of Psychology 71( 8) 3.[in Persian].
46. rastegar a., seyf m., mazloomian s., talebi s., ghorban jahromi r. investigating the relationship of statistics achievement to achievement goals, statistics anxiety, statistics self-efficacy, and coping stylesjournal of new approach in educational administration summer 2015 , Volume 6 , Number 2 (22); Page(s) 123 To 146. .[in Persian].
47. Ramli , Nur Hidayahtuljamilah, Shamsidar Ahmad,Mohd Zafrullah Mohd Taib, Mawar Masri(2014) AMER International Conference on Quality of Life. 4-5 January 2014

Rezaei, Akbar, and Saif, Ali Akbar. (2004). The role of motivational beliefs, learning strategies and gender in academic performance. Quarterly Journal of Education, 21(4) 85-43. .[in Persian].