طراحی و تبیین الگوی مدیریت ارزش ها در آموزش و پرورش

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 6، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 53، فروردین و اردیبهشت 1401، صفحه 91-78   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2022.25176.5010

نویسندگان

مریم ارمندیی¹؛ رمضان جهانیان^{* 2}؛ مهتاب سلیمی³

¹دانش‌ آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزشی ، گروه علوم تربیتی ، واحدکرج، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی،کرج ایران

²دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی،واحدکرج، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی،کرج،ایران

³استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی،واحدکرج، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی،کرج،ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 25 خرداد 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 17 آبان 1399،  تاریخ پذیرش: 18 آبان 1399 

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: هدف از پژوهش حاضر، طراحی و تبیین مؤلفه‌های ارزش‌ سازمانی در آموزش‌وپرورش استان البرز بود.
روش شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر، بر مبنای هدف، در ذیل پژوهش‌های کاربردی؛ بر مبنای ماهیت پژوهش، توصیفی- همبستگی است که به روش ترکیبی و طرح مثلث سازی انجام‌شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش در بخش کیفی شامل مدیران ستادی اداره کل آموزش‌وپرورش استان البرز و بخش کمی شامل کلیه مدیران و معلمان شاغل در آموزش‌وپرورش استان البرز بود که در بخش کیفی با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری ترکیبی (هدفمند و گلوله برفی) 12 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه آماری و در بخش کمی با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای 362 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از روش مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته و پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شد که روایی ابزارهای اندازه‌گیری در بخش کیفی با استفاده از روش توافق کدگذاران و در بخش کمی، از طریق روایی همگرا و روایی واگرا مورد تأیید واقع شد. همچنین؛ پایایی ابزارهای اندازه‌گیری بر اساس سه معیار ضرایب بارهای عاملی، آلفای کرونباخ(82/.) و پایایی ترکیبی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار PLS موردبررسی قرار گرفت. برای آزمون سؤال‌های پژوهش، از روش مدل معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار PLS استفاده شد.
یافته ­ها: نتایج بخش کیفی پژوهش، بیانگر 180مضمون پایه، 3 مضمون سازمان دهنده و 6 مضمون فراگیر بود. همچنین؛ نتایج بخش کمی پژوهش نشان داد که مؤلفه‌های اجتماعی و اقتصادی نقش مؤثرتری در تبیین ارزش‌های سازمانی مدیران و معلمان آموزش‌وپرورش البرز دارند
بحث و نتیجه ­گیری: این موضوع بیانگر این است که مؤلفه‌های زمینه ای نسبت به مؤلفه‌های فرایند ارجحیت دارد و ارزش‌های سازمانی مدیران و معلمان آموزش‌وپرورش البرز تحت تأثیر قرار می دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

ارزش؛ ارزش‌های سازمانی؛ آموزش‌وپرورش

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and explaining the components of organizational value in education in Alborz province

نویسندگان [English]

Maryam Armandehi¹؛ ramezan jahanian²؛ mahtab salimi³

¹PhD in Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Iran

²Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

³Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to Designing and explaining the components of organizational value in education in Alborz province.
research methodology: This research, based on the purpose, following the applied research and based on the nature of the research, is an explanation that has been done by the combined method and Triangulation' design. The population of the qualitative part of the research was all the Staff managers of Education Department of Alborz Province, that using Combined sampling method (purposive and snowball) 12 people were selected as participants. The statistical population of the quantitative part of the study included all Managers and teachers working in education in Alborz province. Using stratified Cluster sampling method, 362 people selected as the statistical sample. To collect the data, a semi-structured interview and a researcher-made questionnaire used. The validity of the measurement tool confirmed in the qualitative part using the coders' agreement method and in the quantitative part through convergent and divergent validity. In addition, the reliability of the researcher-made questionnaire evaluated based on three criteria: factor load coefficients, Cronbach's alpha (0.82) and combined reliability using PLS software.
Findings: To test the research questions, were used the structural equation modeling method and PLS software. The results of the qualitative part of the research showed 180 basic themes, 3 organizing themes and 6 comprehensive themes. In addition, the results of the quantitative part of the research showed that Social and Economic components have a more effective role in explaining the structural pattern of organizational values of education managers and teachers .
Conclusion: this indicates that Content Factors  are preferable of the process components and Affecting the organizational values of education managers and teachers in Alborz province

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Value, Organizational Value, Education

مراجع

1. Alizadeh, M. (2015). Introducing Excellence-Based Criteria and Values in Governmental Organizations (Case Study of Iranian Governmental Organizations). Quarterly Journal of Disciplinary Management Studies. 10 (1): 109-126. [In Persian]
2. Argabright, K. J. (2012). Assessing organizational values within the Ohio State University Extension system (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
3. Avard, D. (1999). What does it take to be healthy? Families Health, 1(March), 1-2.
4. Baharifar, A. Javaheri Kamel, M. (2010). Investigating the Consequences of Organizational Moral Values by Studying Organizational Justice, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Police Human Development, 28 (7): 95-118. [In Persian]
5. Beigi, A. Sardari, A. Ashouri, A. (2013). Relationship between individual and organizational values and organizational commitment of employees of Al-Mahdi Aluminum Company in Hormozgan province. Management Research in Iran, 7 (2). [In Persian]
6. Bourne, H. & Jenkins, M. (2013). Organizational Values: A Dynamic Perspective. Organization Studies, 34(4), 495-514.
7. Buchko, A. A. (2007). The effect of leadership on values-based management. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1),36-50.
8. Buethe, C. (1968). A curriculum of value. Educational Leadership, 26(1),31-33.
9. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1996). Building your company's vision. Harvard business review, 74(5), 65.
10. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1983). Culture: A new look through old lenses. The journal of applied behavioral science, 19(4), 498-505.
11. Enz, C. A. (1986).Power and Shared Values in the Corporate Culture. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.
12. Howell, A., & Kirk-Brown, A. (2005). This goes with that... Which value sets maxi mize organizational commitment? Paper presented at the 5th annual Hawaii International Conference on Business, Honolulu, HI.
13. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy: text & cases. Pearson education.
14. Keown, P., Parker, L., & Tiakiwai, S. (2005). Values in the New Zealand curriculum. Unpublished literature review prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Education. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1),543-557.
15. Lencioni, P. M. (2002). Make your values mean something. Harvard business review, 80(7),113-117.
16. Malbašić, I., Rey, C., & Potočan, V. (2015). Balanced organizational values: From theory to practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 437-446.
17. Martin, J. R. (2002). Writing history: Construing time and value in discourses of the past. Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power, 87-118.
18. Mayfield, J.; Mayfield, M. & Sharbrough W. (2015). Strategic Vision and Shoes in Top Leader's Communications: Motivating Language at a Higher Level International Journal of Business Communication, 53(1),97-121.
19. Mehdi Nejad, V. (2013). The position of individual and organizational values from the perspective of high school teachers and administrators. A New Approach to Educational Management, 3 (11). [In Persian]
20. Mehdinejad, V. (2012). Views of High School Administrators and Teachers on Individual and Organizational Values. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 3(11): 153-168. [In Persian]
21. Mobini Dehkordi, A. Rabbani, A. (2012). Strategic management based on value at the organizational level. Parliament and Strategy.19 (70): 119-63. [In Persian]
22. Mobini Dehkordi, A., Rabbani, A. (2012). Strategic value management at the organizational level. Parliament and Strategy.19 (70): 119-63. [In Persian]
23. Mousavi Davoodi, S. M. Presence, M. J. Carpentry, R. Rastegar, A. A. (2016). Designing and Explaining the Model of Organizational Values Based on the Teachings of Nahj al-Balaghah, Quarterly Journal of Public Organization Management, 5 (1). [In Persian]
24. Nairi, S. Golparvar, M. Mehrdad, A. (2019). The role of ethical values and ethical leadership on reducing job stress for employees. Ethics in Science and Technology.5 (4-3) .76-67. [In Persian]
25. Oke, A. E., & Aigbavboa, C. O. (2017). Sustainable value management for construction projects: Springer.
26. Posner, B., & Schmidt, W. (1993). Value congruence and differences between the inter-play of personal and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(5),341-348.
27. Rajaeipor, S., Lafata, S. (2010). The Relationship between Organizational Culture and the Components of Value-based Management and Providing a Model to Predict Management by Values. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 1(4): 125-148. [In Persian]
28. Rodríguez-Carvajal, R. Moreno-Jiménez, B. De Rivas, S. Bejarano, A. y Sanz-Vergel, A.I. (2010). Positive psychology at work: Mutual gains for individuals and organizations. Revisited Psicologíadel Trabajoydelas Organization's, 26, 235-253.
29. Sass, T. R. (2008). The Stability of Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality and Implications for Teacher Compensation Policy. Brief 4. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
30. Scerenko, L. (1997). Georgia department of education. Values and character education implementation guide. Office of policy and communications. Georgia department of education.
31. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4 ed.): John Wiley & Sons.
32. Scott, J. E., & Vessey, I. (2002). Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations. Communications of the ACM, 45(4),74-81.
33. Thomas, T. P. (2013). The effect of personal values, organizational values, and person-organization fit on ethical behaviors and organizational commitment outcomes among substance abuse counselors: A preliminary investigation.
34. Toor, S. Ofori, G. (2010). Psychological Capital as a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage for Organizations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 341.
35. Urde, M. (2003). Core value-based corporate brand building. European Journal of marketing, 37(7/8): 1017-1040.
36. Vveinhardt, J., Gulbovaite, E., & Streimikiene, D. (2016). Different Values Forms in Organization: is the Congruence Possible? Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(2), 117.
37. Yarmohammadian, M, H., Shafipour M. Farhad. F. & Maryam, F. (2013). The Relationship between Organizational Justice, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Trust and Organizational Commitment with Self-Assessment of Organizational Excellence in order to provide a predictive model (a case study of Islamic Azad University professors in the four countries). Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, 4 (13): 1-18. [In Persian]
38. Zidane, Y. J., Hussein, B. A., Gudmundsson, J. Ø., & Ekambaram, A. (2016). Categorization of organizational factors and their impact on project performance. Procedia-Social Freeman and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 162-169.