تحلیل محتوای مطالعات خارجی و داخلی تله‌ی توسعه‌نیافتگی در نواحی روستایی

فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

مقاله 2، دوره 13، شماره 49، اردیبهشت 1402، صفحه 17-36   

نوع مقاله: مقاله های برگرفته از پایان نامه

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jzpm.2021.27217.3842

نویسندگان

صدیقه کرمی نسب¹؛ وحید ریاحی^{* 2}؛ حسن افراخته³

¹دانشجوی دکتری رشتۀ جغرافیا و برنامهریزی روستایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

²دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

³استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 11 بهمن 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 19 خرداد 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 30 خرداد 1400 

چکیده

یکی از جلوه‌های عمده استمرار توسعه نیافتگی را می‌توان در پیوستگی و حتی تشدید شکاف درآمد و ثروت میان کشورهای فقیر و کشورهای غنی، در جهان امروز مشاهده کرد. به عبارت دیگر، در همه کشورها اعم از پیشرفته و عقب مانده مناطقی از جمله روستاها وجود دارد که از رشد و توسعه کمتری نسبت به سایر مناطق برخوردارند و مردم این مناطق به دلایلی که خارج از کنترل آنها بوده از سطح رفاه کمتری نسبت به بقیه بهره می برند. از سوی دیگر تجربیات تمامی نظریات توسعه نشان می‌دهد که دستیابی به توسعه در هر سطحی و با هر هدفی که باشد نیازمند برنامه ریزی اصولی، کارامد و اجرای دقیق آن است. اما مسئله اصلی این است چه دلیلی باعث این شده که بعضی از مناطق از جمله نواحی روستایی که دارای منابع مهم و برتری‌های جهت رشد و توسعه می‌باشند نه تنها هیچ پیشرفتی نداشته‌اند بلکه به عنوان یک منطقه توسعه‌نیافته نسبت به مناطق اطراف خود باقی مانده‌اند. هدف اصلی این پژوهش جمع‌یندی مطالعات مربوط به موانع، چالش‌ها و تله توسعه‌نیافتگی و یا همان تله فقر در توسعه روستایی با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا است. این پژوهش، در زمره پژوهشهای اسنادی و کتابخانه ای جای می‌گیرد. روش تحقیق توصیفی - تحلیلی بوده و رویکرد تحقیق کمی – کیفی با تأکید بر کیفی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه مقالات چاپ شده در ارتباط با موضوع پژوهش است که درنشریات داخلی و خارجی استفاده شده است. بر این اساس 95 مقاله انتخاب و مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج حاصل از پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که با توجه به تحلیل محتوای مطالعات صورت گرفته تله‌ی توسعه نیافتگی در نواحی روستایی در 4 معیار(تله‌های بهره وری، آسیب پذیری اجتماعی، نهادی و محیطی) مورد بررسی قرارگرفته‌شد، که بیشترین شاخصهای مربوط به تله‌های بهره‌وری، آسیب پذیری، نهادی و محیطی به ترتیب نوسان قیمت محصول، فقدان سرمایه و پس انداز، ضعف نهادها و فقدان زیرساخت و شبکه ارتباطی نسبت به سایر شاخصها می‌باشند. همچنین در مجموع تله‎ی آسیب پذیری اجتماعی و شاخصهای مربوط به آن بیشتر از سایر تله‌های توسعه نیافتگی در نواحی روستایی مورد توجه واقع شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تله‌ی توسعه نیافتگی؛ مطالعات روستایی؛ تحلیل محتوا

عنوان مقاله [English]

Content analysis of foreign and internal studies of underdevelopement traps in rural areas

نویسندگان [English]

sedigheh karaminasab¹؛ Vahid Riahi²؛ Hassan Afrakhteh³

¹PhD Student in Geography and Rural Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

²Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geography Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

³Professor, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geography Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Today, one of the major manifestations of continued underdevelopment can be seen in the continuity and even widening of the income and wealth gap between rich and poor countries in the world. In other words, in all countries, both advanced and backward, there are areas that have less growth and development than other areas, and the people of these areas have a lower level of welfare than others for reasons beyond their control. On the other hand, the experiences of all development theories show that achieving development at any level and with any goal requires principled, efficient planning and exact implementation. But the main question is what is the reason that some areas, including rural areas, which have important resources and advantages for growth and development, not only have not made any progress, but also remain as an underdeveloped area compared to the surrounding areas. The main purpose of this study is to summarize studies on barriers, challenges and underdevelopment traps or known as poverty traps in rural development using content analysis method. This research is among the documentary and library researches. The research method is descriptive-analytical and the research approach is quantitative-qualitative with emphasis on qualitative. The statistical population of the study includes all published articles related to the research subject, used in Iranian and foreign publications. Based on the search in a valid database, 95 articles were selected and reviewed. The results of the research show that according to the content analysis of the studies, the underdevelopment trap in rural areas has been studied in 4 criteria (productivity trap, social vulnerability trap, institutional trap and environmental trap). The most indicators related to productivity trap, vulnerability trap, institutional trap and environmental trap are product price fluctuations, lack of capital and savings, weakness of institutions and lack of infrastructure and communication network compared to other indicators, respectively. Also, in general, social vulnerability traps and related indicators have received more attention than other underdeveloped traps in rural areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Underdevelopment Trap, Rural Studies, Content Analysis

مراجع

1. Afrakhteh, H & Azizi, A & Mehr Ali Tabar Firoozjaei, M. (2013), The role of social capital on rural development of Chahardangeh rural district, Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, Volume 14, No 34, pp. 27- 45. [In Persian].
2. Aghaeipour,Y & Ramesht, M. (2020), Analysis of Geotourism Literature in Iran (Based on Quantitative Content Analysis of Geotourism Articles and Books during 2009-2018, Quantitative Geomorphological Research, Volume 9, No. 1, pp. 42-51. [In Persian].
3. Azkia, M. (2018), Sociology of Rural Development and Underdevelopment of Iran, Information, Tehran. [In Persian].
4. Barimani, F - Mehr Ali Tabar Firoozjaei, M. (2020)), Explaining the effectiveness of social capital on breaking the spatial poverty trap (Case study: rural settlements in Babol), Quarterly Journal of Rural and Sustainable Development of Space, Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 1-22. [In Persian].
5. Bakhtiari,A & Badavi, F & Fesharaki, M, & Nasiri, B. (2014), Thematic content analysis of scientific-research articles (Women and Family), Women's Research Journal, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Volume 5, No 2, pp. 1-22. [In Persian].
6. Bashiri, B & Khorasani, M. (2018), Content analysis of articles in the Quarterly Priodical of Rural Research between 1389 to 1394, Rural Research, Volume 8, No 1, pp. 138-151. [In Persian].
7. Behboodi,D, & Beheshti,M B & Mousavi, S. (2011), Human Development and Sustainable Development in Selected Oil Exporting Countries, Knowledge and Development, Volume 17, No 33, pp. 271-293. [In Persian].
8. Chambers, R. (1997), Rural Development Prioritizing the Poor. Translated by Mustafa Azkia. Publication of University Tehran: Tehran.
9. Deshingkar, p. (2010), Migration, remote rural areas and chronic poverty in India. Overseas Development Institute, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7JD, www. odi. org. uk.
10. Didari, C& Mohseni, R A and Bahrani, M H. (2019), Investigation the factors affecting the underdevelopment of Kurdistan province with emphasis on cultural development, Journal of Welfare Planning and Social Development, No. 37, pp. 191-226. [In Persian].
11. Fali,S & Sedighi, H & Pezeshki Rad, Gh & Mirzaei, A. (2011), Challenges of Rural Communities in Iran to Achieve Sustainable Development, Rural and Development Quarterly, No. 4, pp. 128-97. [In Persian].
12. Haidarpour,B & Daniali, T & Estelaji, AR. (2020), Study and explanation of the situation of villages in Islamshahr in terms of rural development challenges, Quarterly Journal - New Attitudes in Human Geography, Volume 12, No 3, pp. 129-148. [In Persian].
13. Haider, L. J. et al. (2017) Traps and Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Review, World Development, http: //dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. worlddev. 2017. 05. 038. PP, 1-12.
14. Hoff, k,, (2000): Beyond Rosenstein-Rodan: The Modern Theory of Underdevelopment Traps, Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, pp. 3-51.
15. Huafeng, Z,(2017): "Opportunity or new poverty trap: Rural-urban education disparity and internal migration in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 112-124.
16. Karim, M H. (2016), Rural Economy and Development, Noor Alam Publiction, Tehran. [In Persian].
17. Karimi Etemad, F& Yaghoubi, J. (2016), Meta-analysis of Rural Development Barriers in Iran, The First National Conference on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development in Central Zagros, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University. [In Persian].
18. Khorasani, MA & Matiei L & SH & M, M. (2020), A comparative approach to evaluattion and analyzing the content of scientific articles on rural poverty in Iran, Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, Volume 9, No 3 (33), pp. 113-140. [In Persian].
19. Kwasi Kutor, S. (2014), Development and Underdevelopment of African Continent: The Blame Game and the Way Forward, Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp 14-21.
20. Laird, J. , Mackie, J. (2014), Wider economic benefits of transport schemes in remote rural areas, Research in Transportation Economics, 47 (2014) 92 – 102
21. Mohammadi, S,(2013), Investigation the causes of underdevelopment of rural areas (case study of Golchidar village - Marivan city), the second national conference on geography and planning of modern architecture and urban planning.
22. Naeem,N& Yaghoubzadeh,O. (2018), Barriers to Iran's Development, Culture Notice Publishtion, Tehran. [In Persian].
23. Naqdi, A& Hessari, M J. (2013), Causes of underdevelopment in Iran (based on content analysis of published works in this field), Journal of Sociological Studies of Iran, Volume 2, No 4, pp. 1-23. [In Persian].
24. OECD(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), CAF(Development bank of Latin America), ECLAC(Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean), (2019), Latin American Economic Outlook DEVELOPMENT IN TRANSITION.
25. Otiman,PL & Toderoiu,F & Cecilia, A & Violeta,F & Camelia,G &, Iuliana,I & Elena, S, Tudor, M M,(2014): Sustainable Development Strategy for the Agri-food Sector and Rural Area – Horizon, Procedia Economic sand Finance 8. pp 510 – 517.
26. Raghfar, H& Kordbacheh,H& Pakniat, M. (2012), Poverty Traps in the Economy Based on Iran's Natural Resources, Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (Islamic-Iranian Approach), Volume 12, Number 45, pp. 143- 171. [In Persian].
27. Rezaei,H & Motiee Langroudi,SH & Faraji Sabkbar,HA & Darban Astaneh, A. (2020), Exploration analysis of economic needs of rural communities based on the opinion of key informants (Case study: Yazd province), Journal of Desert Geographical Exploration, Volume 7, No. 2, pp. 73-99. [In Persian].
28. Riahi,V & Azizpour, F & Nouri, A. (2016), Analysis of the level of environmental sustainability of rural settlements in Khorramdareh,Quarterly Journal of Rural Development Strategies, Volume 3, Number 2, pp. 153-13. [In Persian].
29. Nelson ,R. ,(1956), “A Theory of the Low – Level Equilibrium Trap”, American Economic Review, pp. 894-908.
30. Rokanuddin Eftekhari,A & Mahmoudi,S & Ghaffari,G & Portaheri,M. (2015), Explanation the spatial pattern of social capital in sustainable rural development (case: villages of Khorasan Razavi province),Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, Volume 4, No. 1, pp. 87-100. [In Persian].
31. Saei,A & Seifi, A. (2016), Political Economy: Underdevelopment of Third World Economic - Political Issues, Qoms Publication, Tehran. [In Persian].
32. Sadeghi, H & Seidaei, E & Ghobadi, Sh & Salehi, M. (2016). Performance Evaluation of Institutions and Organizations Related to Rural Sustainability (Case Study: Dehdez District in Izeh County), Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, Vol. No. 2, pp. 140-119. [In Persian].
33. Sheikhi, M & Amanian, A. (2012). Human skill and poverty A study of the relationship between effective individual action and economic poverty in marginalized immigrants of Tabriz metropolis, Journal of Welfare Planning and Social Development, Volume 1, Number 4, pp. 92-67. [In Persian].
34. Schell, C. , & Rath R. (1992), Meta-analysis: a tool for medical and scientific discoveries. Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate MedicineNo. 6(1),pp 27-32.
35. Taleb, M & Piri,S & Mohammadi, S. (2010), A meta-analysis of poverty studies in rural Iran, Rural Development, Volume 2, No 2, pp. 23-40. [In Persian].
36. Veselonska, L. (2017), Factors influencing countries on their path to sustainable development: implications for organizations, Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, PP474-485.
37. Vosoughi, M & Imani, A. (2011), The Future of Rural Development and Sustainability Challenges, Journal of Rural-Urban Local Development, Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 23-45. [In Persian].
38. Zali, N & Sajjadi Asl, SA. (2017), Recognition Key Factors Affecting Regional Underdevelopment (Case Study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces), Regional Planning Quarterly, No. 26, pp. 25-40. [In Persian].