تحلیل ساختاری مدیریت نوین(دهیاری ها) در توسعه روستایی مطالعه موردی(دهستان بران جنوبی)

فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

دوره 13، شماره 52، اسفند 1402، صفحه 319-332   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jzpm.2022.27616.3867

نویسنده

احمد حجاریان^*

دانشگاه اصفهان

تاریخ دریافت: 26 اسفند 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 28 آذر 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 28 آذر 1400 

چکیده

نتایج برنامه‌های اجرا شده در مناطق روستایی برای توسعه در بیشتر موارد نه تنها مفید نبوده بلکه باعث آشفته تر شدن وضعیت موجود روستاها شده است، این امر به دلیل عدم مدیریت مناسب در فرآیند برنامه‌ها می‌باشد، با مدیریت نوین، روستاییان می‌توانند در فرآیند برنامه ریزی و اجرای برنامه‌ها مشارکت داشته باشند. هدف این تحقیق ارزیابی مدیریت نوین روستایی، به صورت مطالعه موردی در دهستان برآن جنوبی، شهرستان اصفهان است. روش تحقیق بر مبنای هدف،کاربردی و بر اساس ماهیت توصیفی- تحلیلی است. جامعه ی آماری، کل خانوارها در روستاهای بالای 20 خانوار دهستان بران جنوبی است، که بر اساس آمار سال 1395 شامل 25 روستا، 1736خانوار و 6633 نفر است. شیوه نمونه گیری بر اساس روش تصادفی است، به این ترتیب که در مرحله ی اول از بین 25 روستای دهستان، پنج روستا با روش نمونه گیری طبقه بندی و انتخاب شدند و در مرحله ی دوم از بین جمعیت 15 تا 65 سال این روستاها براساس روش کوکران، 150 نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه نهایی مشخص شده و با روش تصادفی برگزیده شدند. نگارنده پرسشنامه را در اختیار تعدادی از متخصصان و صاحب نظران جهت ارزیابی اولیه قرار دادند و پس از اعمال نظر افراد و نظر نهایی متخصصین و مشاورین پرسشنامه نهایی تدوین شد.
نتایج نشان می‌دهد که اعتبار اندازه گیری شده هر پنج مدل اندازه گیری و نیز مدل پنج عاملی مرتبه دوم برای بررسی مدیریت روستایی قابل قبول می‌باشد. در نهایت ساختار تولید و خدمات (30/0)، اکوسیستم(18/0)، اجتماعی-فرهنگی(66/0) ، اقتصادی(46/0) و نهادی -سیاسی (22/0) از بارهای عاملی را تبیین می نماید .

کلیدواژه‌ها

ارزیابی؛ مدیریت نوین روستایی؛ توسعه روستایی؛ معادلات ساختاری؛ دهستان برآن جنوبی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural Analysis of Modern Management (Rural areas) in Rural development Case Study ( Baraan-e South Rural)

نویسندگان [English]

ahmad hajarian

isfahan

چکیده [English]

Abstract
The results of the programs implemented in rural areas for development in most cases are not only not useful but also cause more chaos in the existing situation of the villages, this is due to lack of proper management in the process of programs, with new management, villagers can Participate in the implementation of programs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the new rural management as a case study in Shian rural district, west of Islamabad. The research method is applied based on purpose and based on descriptive-analytical nature. The statistical population of the study was 1736 heads of households in the southern district of Baraan. Based on the Cochran's formula, the statistical sample in question was 314 heads of households. The results show that the measured validity of all five measurement models as well as the second-order five-factor model is acceptable for rural management. Finally, the structure of production and services (0.30), ecosystem (0.18), socio-cultural (0.66), economic (0.46) and institutional-political (0.22) explain the factor loads.
 
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
Rural management, as one of the basic components for achieving rural development, is influenced by macro-national strategies as well as existing approaches in the field of management. Management approaches can be considered as follows: traditional approaches, human resources approaches, Quantitative approaches and systemic and contingency approaches. The contingency approach to management can be considered the culmination of management science; Because this approach broadens the field of action of managers and management leaders in organizations and increases their power of action, rural management is in fact the process of organizing and guiding the community and the rural environment through the formation of organizations and institutions. These organizations and institutions are the means of achieving the goals of rural society. Rural management is a multifaceted process that includes the three pillars of people, government and public institutions.
desertification is a public non-governmental organization established to manage rural affairs and as a liaison between the government and the people plays an important role in advancing the goals and policies of the government in rural areas. Since the establishment of systematic structural processes in rural areas, the concept of rural management has a special place in order to achieve rural development. Despite the extensive services provided by the government and revolutionary institutions in the villages, the gap between the existing realities and the goals of development is still very large, and there are many problems in the rural community, which are equivalent to removing those issues and problems. Elimination of deprivations in rural communities, therefore, creating the ground for development largely depends on the realization of efficient executive management in rural areas. The problems of rural areas are due to their infancy and the major management problems of the country. With the formation of rural areas, it has eliminated a large part of the problems of rural management, including continuous structural changes. Dehyaran, as a local symbol, is the link between government and popular institutions, the executive arm of Islamic councils in the modern rural management system, provides many services and public and welfare facilities, and strengthens the process of social and cultural development, etc., therefore In this research, an attempt has been made to evaluate and analyze the new management (rural areas) in rural development.
 
Methodology
The research method is descriptive-analytical. The required information was obtained through a questionnaire by consulting rural residents. The statistical population is the total number of households in the villages with more than 20 households in the southern rural areas, which according to the statistics of 2016 includes 14 villages, 1736 households and 6633 people. The number of samples according to Cochran's formula was 314 questionnaires. The author provided the questionnaire to a number of specialists and experts for initial evaluation, and after applying the opinions of individuals and the final opinion of experts and consultants, the final questionnaire was developed.
The questionnaire consists of two parts. The first part was related to the personal characteristics of the respondents including gender, age, level of education, occupation, number of households and income. The second part is related to the indicators of modern rural management, which was used in the form of a five-level Likert scale (very low = 1 to very high = 5). (Hafeznia, 1389: 74) Formal and content validity of the questionnaire with the corrective opinion of university professors and Experts of the University of Isfahan were approved in several stages after making the necessary corrections. In the present study, Cronbach's alpha method has been used to assess the validity of the measurement tool.
The structural equation model (AMOS) was used to measure the collected information. There are several fitness indicators to evaluate the fit of the structural equation model.
 
Results and Discussion
The strength of the relationship between the factor (hidden variable) and the observable variable is indicated by the factor load. The factor load is a value between zero and one. If the factor load is less than 0.3, a weak relationship is considered and ignored. A factor load of between 0.3 and 0.6 is acceptable, and if greater than 0.6 it is highly desirable. It can be seen that all the observed variables had positive and significant regression effect coefficients with their scales and the magnitude of these coefficients is relatively high for all cases, of all factor loads at the level of / 001. They are meaningful. As can be seen, in this table no significant level is reported for the factor loads or the standard regression coefficients of the five observed variables. This is because these variables are considered as reference or representative variables for the structure of production and services, ecosystem, socio-cultural, economic and institutional-political, respectively, so that these hidden variables are without scale and in other words without Eliminate their roots and units of measurement. That is why the initial path diagrams are considered on the arrows related to the paths between these observed variables with the hidden variable corresponding to the values ​​of 1, the AVE criterion represents the average variance shared between each structure with its own indicators. Simply put, AVE (average variance extracted) is used to validate convergence and shows a high correlation between the indices of one structure compared to the correlation of indices of other structures. The value of this coefficient is from zero to one variable that values ​​higher than 0.5 are accepted. Convergent validity or derived mean variance (AVE) for production and service structure index / 766. , Ecosystem index 0.711, socio-cultural index 0.799 and economic index 0.526 and institutional-political index 0.626, also the value of structural reliability coefficient or combined reliability (CR) is from zero to one variable with higher values. It is accepted from 0.7, which is / 755 for the index of production structure and services. The ecosystem index was 0.733, the socio-cultural index was 0.802, the economic index was 0.765 and the institutional-political index was 0.526, which indicates the appropriateness of these subscales.
 
Conclusion
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact on modern management in rural development with a structural equation modeling approach. Case study: Southern rural development, the impact of rural management on rural development by defining five socio-cultural, institutional and political, economic, ecosystem resources and production structure and Services were considered as a measure of rural management. Five models of confirmatory factor analysis, a first-order factor for measuring and validation of four scales and a second-order five-factor model for rural management analysis and related indicators were developed and implemented, finally the structure of production and services (0.30), Ecosystem (0.18), socio-cultural (0.66), economic (0.46) and institutional-political (0.22) explain the factor loads.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

: Evaluation, New Rural Management, Rural Development, Structural Equations, South Baraan rural distric

مراجع

References

1. Allahpanah M, Badri S A, Darban Astaneh A.(2015). The Assessment of Degree of Rural Settlers’ Satisfaction with Respect to Provision of Cooperative Village Councils’ Services – Case: Cooperative Council of Dashtesar. Space Economy & Rural Development , 4 (11) :15-35. URL: http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2236-fa.html. [In Persian]
2. Choobchian, S., Kalantari, K., & Shabanali Fami, H. (2018). Factors a ffecting the p erformance of Village Assistance Bureaus in Gilan p rovince of Iran. Village and Development, 10(2), 87-108. [In Persian].
3. Imani, B., mohammadi, A., & naderi, M. (2019). Evaluation of New Rural Management Based on Perspective of Sustainable Development (Case Study: Villages in the Central District of Semirom Province). Geographical Engineering of Territory, 3(5), 67-80.[In Persian]
4. Lee, A. H.I., Chen, W.C., & Chang, C.J(2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of ITdepartment in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
5. Mahdavi Hajiloui, M, Najafi Kani, A .A. (1384). Dehiaris, another experience in the management of Iranian villages (case example: Dehiaris of West Azarbaijan province). Geographical Research, 37(53), 21-39. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/384002/fa. [In Persian]
6. Menshizadeh, R. E, Rahmani, B, Maleki, Lotf, E. (2013). The performance of modern rural management in the economic sustainability of rural settlements (case study: villages around Ardabil). Geography, 12 (new period)(40), 133-146. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/150356/fa. [In Persian]
7. Naderi Mehdiee, K. (2015). Analyzing of barrier factors of new approach of rural management in Hamedan province. Journal of Rural Research, 6(1), 187-208. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2015.54237. [In Persian].
8. Nasiri lake, M., molaei, N., & pourramzan, E. (2022). Evaluation and Pathology of the new rural management system and rural development (Case Study: Central District of Guilan). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 17(3), 665-677. 20.1001.1.25385968.1401.17.3.10.4. [In Persian]
9. Olum, Y. (2004). Modern Management Theories And Practices, Being A Paper Presented At The 15th East African Central Banking Course, held on 12th July, at Kenya School of Monetary Studies, pp: 1-24. https://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/theories.pdf
10. Portahari, M, Hamdami Moghadam, Y, Ruknuddin Eftekhari, A. (2009), evaluation of the performance of Islamic councils in rural development, case example: Aladagh Bojnord village, Modares Journal of Humanities, Planning and Space Planning, 14(4), 23 -38. http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-۲۱-۵۶۳۲-fa.html. [In Persian]
11. Rashidpour Loghman, Farajallah Hosseini Seyed Jamal and Mirdamadi Seyed Mahdi(2011) , Local Community Based Management as a Good Governance Approach to Rural Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development in Iran, American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci, 10 (2) : 174-179.
12. Rezvani, M. R. (2013), Introduction to Rural Development Planning in Iran, first edition, Tehran, Qoms Publishing.
13. Seidaiy, S. E., Jamini, D., Jamshidi, A., & jamshidi, M. (2015). Analysis of the Performance of Rural New Managers (RNM) Towards Sustainable Rural Development (Case Study: Uramanat Region, Kermanshah Province). Spatial Planning, 4(4), 1-24. 20.1001.1.22287485.1393.4.4.1.1. [In Persian].
14. Saidali, M, Sadeghi, G and Zahra Mirzaei, Z. (2013). The place of management in advancing the goals of rural development, case study: Jawanmardi village in Lordegan city, Regional Planning Quarterly, 1(2), 79-91. [In Persian].
15. Tam, M.C.Y & Tummala, V.M.R(2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system, 29 ,171(182). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6
16. Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J. F., Lanoie, P., (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators, Journal of Ecological Indicators, Vol. 10, pp 407-418 .
17. Wang Wenchang. (2008). Rural management, The Way Out for Tibetan Rural Areas, CHINA TIBETOLOGY Number 1,pp 1-94.