ارزیابی و سنجش شاخص های شکوفایی شهری در شهر اردبیل

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مقاله 1، دوره 13، شماره 51، بهمن 1401، صفحه 1-18   

نوع مقاله: مقاله برگرفته از پایان نامه

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jupm.2021.27628.3840

نویسندگان

داریوش جهانی¹؛ حسین نظم فر^{* 2}؛ محمد تقی معصومی³؛ رسول صمدزاده⁴

¹دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران.

²استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

³استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران.

⁴دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت: 28 اسفند 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 16 آبان 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 30 شهریور 1400 

چکیده

گسترش شهرنشینی و مسائل و مشکلات خاص زندگی شهری، بیش از پیش ضرورت توجه همه جانبه به راهبردهای سودمند برای بهینه سازی زندگی ساکنان شهرها را لازم ساخته است. در این راستا مفهوم شکوفایی شهری به عنوان یک چارچوب مفهومی وسیع در زمینه سنجش توسعه و رفاه انسانی و اجتماعی مطرح شده است که شامل 5 بعد بهره وری، کیفیت زندگی، زیرساخت، عدالت اجتماعی و پایداری زیست محیطی می باشد. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر ارزیابی شکوفایی شهری در مناطق چهارگانه شهر اردبیل می باشد. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، نظری کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت و روش، توصیفی تحلیلی می باشد. برای رسیدن به هدف پژوهش، از 5 معیار اصلی شاخص شکوفایی شهری در قالب 55 زیر معیار استفاده شده است. اطلاعات و داده های مورد نیاز در این پژوهش، با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه ای و آمارنامه سال 1395 گردآوری شده است. جهت تحلیل، ابتدا داده‌ها استانداردسازی شده و سپس برای وزن دهی هر یک از شاخص ها از فرایند تحلیل شبکه ای (ANP) استفاده شده است. در نهایت با استفاده از مدل پرومته، شکوفایی شهری برای هر یک از مناطق چهارگانه شهر اردبیل امتیاز‌بندی شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می دهد مناطق 1 و 2 شهر اردبیل به لحاظ برخورداری از شاخص شکوفایی شهری در وضعیت نسبتا ضعیف و مناطق 3 و 4 در وضعیت ضعیف قرار دارند و با توجه به تمرکز امکانات در بخش های مرکزی شهر، از میزان شکوفایی شهری از مرکز شهر به طرف حاشیه در همه مناطق چهارگانه کاسته می شود. هم‌چنین، رتبه بندی مناطق نشان می دهد که منطقه یک و منطقه چهار به ترتیب با داشتن مقدار امتیاز برتری 50.20 و 49.77 دارای بیشترین و کمترین شکوفایی شهری هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

ارزیابی؛ شکوفایی شهری؛ مدل پرومته؛ اردبیل

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and measurement of urban prosperity indicators in Ardabil

نویسندگان [English]

dariuosh jahani¹؛ Hossein Nazmfar²؛ Mohammad tagi Masoomi³؛ Rasoul Samadzadeh⁴

¹PhD student in Geography and Urban Planning, Ardabil branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

²Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.

³Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

⁴Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The expansion of urbanization and the specific issues and problems of urban life, it is necessary to pay attention to the comprehensive and beneficial strategies for optimization the life of the inhabitants of the cities. In this regard, the concept of urban prosperity is considered as a broad conceptual framework in the field of human and social welfare development measurement, which includes 5 dimensions of productivity, quality of life, infrastructure, social justice and environmental sustainability. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate urban prosperity in the four regions of Ardabil. This research is applied theory in terms of purpose, and analytical description in terms of nature and method. To achieve the research goal, the 5 main criteria of urban prosperity index are used in the form of 55 sub-criteria. The information and data required in this research have been collected using library resources and statistics of 2016. For analysis, first the data is standardized and then the network analysis process (ANP) is used to weight each of the indicators. Finally, using the Prometheus model, urban prosperity has been scored for each of the four districts of Ardabil. Research results shows districts 1 and 2 of Ardabil city are relatively weak and districts 3 and 4 are weak in terms of having urban prosperity index. Also, due to the concentration of facilities in the central parts of the city, from the rate of urban prosperity decreases from the city center to the outskirts in all areas. the ranking of the regions shows that regions 1 and 4 have the highest and lowest urban prosperity by scores of 50.20 and 49.77, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Evaluation, Urban Prosperity, Prometheus Model, Ardabil

مراجع

• hadnejad, M, Hazeri, S, Meshkini, A. Piry, E, (2018), "Dentifying the key factors influencing the urban prosperity with future study approach: the case study of Tabriz Metropolis" Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 9(32), Pp. 15-30.
• Alavi, S, Nazmfar, Hossein, Eshgi, A, (2020), The Evaluation and Measurement of the City Prosperity Index (CPI) in Tehran Metropolis, Spatial planning Quarterly (Geography), Vol. 10, No. 3, Ser (38), Pp.77-97.‎
• Alizadeh afshar, A, Khazaee nejad, F, Prosperity of Cities, First Edition, Mashhad, Papli Pablications, (2019), Pp. 114-132.
• Arbab, P, (2017), City Prosperity Initiative Index: Using AHP Methid to Recalculatr the Weights of Dimensions and Sub-Dimensions in Reference to Tehran Metropolis. European Journal of Sustainable Development, Pp. 289-301.
• Arimah, B., (2016), Infrastructure as a Catalyst for the Prosperity of African Cities, Procedia Engineering, 198, Pp 245-266.
• Azimi, A, Abbasi, D, Yagobi,V, (2013), Urban productivity and implementation of optimal resource consumption pattern with the aim of creating an economic epic in municipalities, City Economics Quarterly, No. 17, Pp. 25-35.
• Barimani, F, Asgari lafjani, S, (2010), Determining the severity of environmental instability in rural settlements of Sistan using a multi-criteria evaluation model, Quarterly Journal of Geography and Development, 8(19), Pp. 127-144.
• Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1985), Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Management science, 31(6), Pp. 647-656.
• Buchani, M, Gaderi, A, (2018), Urban Prosperity, Tehran, University of Tehran Publishing Institute, Pp. 63-100.
• Caterino, N., Irvalino, I., Manfridi, G., Cosenza, E., (2008), A Comparative Analysis Of Decision Making Methods for the Seismic Retrofit Of Bulldings, The 14th  World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Octobr 12-17, Beijing, Chin   
• H, Saeidi rezvani. N, Bazrgar, M. (2018), Evaluation of eleven areas of Shiraz in terms of urban prosperity index using FAHP model, Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 9(33), Pp. 17-32.
• Ebrahimzadeh Asmin, H, Karbakhsh, H, (2017), Assess the quality of urban life in the district of Zahedan city, Quarterly of Geography (Regional Planning), 27(1), pp. 7-20.
• Federek, J., Perkins, P. & Luiz, J. (2008), Infrastructure Investment and Long-Run Economic Growth of South Africa. World Development, 34(6), Pp. 1037-1059.
• Galeenoei, M, Dehganzadeh, SH, (2013), Evaluation of physical qualities of urban spaces with sustainable development approach, case study: Shahreza National Garden neighborhood, Third International Conference on Sustainable Development and Urban Development, First issue Pp. 39-49.
• Gilliams, S., Raymaekers, D., Muys, B., (2005), Comparing multiple criteria decision methods to extend a geographical information sestem on afforestation, Computers & Electronics in Agricultur, Vol 49, Pp 142-158.
• Gorkhlo, M, Hoseini, H, (2006), Indicators of sustainable urban development, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 8(2), Pp. 157-177.
• Jones, S., Tefe, M., & Appiah - Opoku, S. (2015), Incorporating stakeholder input into transport project selection–A step towards urban prosperity in developing countries?. Habitat international, 45, Pp. 20-28.
• M., Lygerou, V., (2000), An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environments: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 123, Pp 606-613.
• Harvey, David (2000), social justice and the town, translation: F. Hsamyan, Mohammad Reza haeri and Monadizadeh, Volume II, published by the process of urban planning, Tehran.
• Khaje shahkoohi, A. Hoseini, H. Toosi, R, (2014), Assessing the quality of life and its impact on citizen participation in urban affairs; Case study: Minoodasht city, Quarterly Journal of Geography and Urban-Regional Planning, 4(10). Pp. 73-86.
• Mohtashami, N, Mahdavinejad, M, Bemanian, M, (2016), Growth Factors and Barriers to City Prosperity, Second International Conference in New Research on Civil, Architectural & Urban Management, Pp. 1-13.
• Maleki, S, Modanlo Juybari, M, City Prosperity, First Edition, Tehran, (2016), Pp. 4-15.
• Nazmfar, H, Mohammadi, CH, (2018), Evaluate the quality of urban life in eleven localities in the Region 2 City of Ardabil, Environmental Planning Quarterly, 10(36), Pp. 69-92.
• Rahnamaee, M, Faraji, A, Hataminejhad, H, Azimi, A, (2012), An analysis of the concept of quality of urban life in Babolsar, Quarterly Journal of Geography and Urban-Regional Planning, 8(5), Pp. 49-76.
• Rahsepar toloee, GH, Habib,F, Zarabadi, Z, (2019), Assessing the quality of life in Narmak neighborhood of Tehran based on the developed model of urban prosperity index (CPI-QL), Journal of Environmental Studies Haft Hesar, 8(29), Pp. 65-76.
• Robati, M, (2015), Assessing the quality of the urban environment using the combined index model studied: Tehran metropolis, Journal of Land Management, 7(2), Pp. 255-275.
• Pourahmad, A, Zayari, K, Hataminejad, H, Parsa pashabadi, SH, (2018), Explanation of Concept and Features of a Smart City, Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 15(58), Pp. 5-26.
• Saaty, T. L. (2004), Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes.
• Safaeepour, M., Maleki, ,  Hataminejhad,  H.,  Modanlou, M., (2017),  Evaluation of City Prosperity Index in Iranian-Islamic Cities: A Case Study of Ahvaz Metropolis, Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, Vol  4, NO 5, Pp 1-21.
• Sarrafi, M, Hashemi,N, (2018), Review and Application of Urban Happiness Index (CPI) according to the characteristics of Iranian society (Case study: cities with more than 100,000 people in the northwestern region of the country), Journal of Human Geography Research, 50(3), Pp. 555-572.
• Saifoddini, F, PoUrahmad, A, Darish, R, Seyed ali, N, (2013), The Bases challenges of Urban smart growth policy implementation, Case study: Khorram abad Lorestan,  Journal of Geography and Urban Planing  of Zagros  Landscape, 6(19), Pp. 57-79.
• Seydaei, S, Hosseini, S, Yazdanbakhsh, B, (2018), Evaluation of the Environmental Sustainability of Isfahan with an Emphasis on Air Pollution, Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, Vol 29, No. 1, Ser No. (69) Spring, 7(22), Pp. 35-47.
• Shahraki, M, Ghaderi, S, (2015), The impact of Education and Health Infrastructures on Economic Growth of Iran, Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 5(19), Pp. 115-136.
• UN-Habitat. (2012): "State of the World's Cities Report 2012/2013: Prosperity Of Cities”, United Nations Humman Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), Nairobi.
• Un-Habitat. (2016): “The City Prosperity Initiative”, United Nations Human Settlements Programme, London: Earthscan.
• Wang, X., Woolley, H, Tang, Y, Liu, H, Luoa, Y, (2018), Young children's and adults' perceptions of natural play spaces: A case study of Chengdu, southwestern China, Cities, Vol 72, Pp. 173–180.
• Wei,Y., Huang, C., Lam, P.T.I., Sha, Y., Feng, Y. (2015), Using urban carrying capacity as a benchmark for sustainable urban development: an empirical study of Beijing, Sustainability,Vol 7, Pp. 3244–3268.
• Yarzadeh,S, Shamsollahi, B, (2016),The Role of Pablic spaces in Achieving Urban Prosperity and Sustainable Development, Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 3(6). Pp. 111-124.
• Yigitcanlar, T., Dur, F., Dizdaroglu, D., (2015), Towards Prosperous sustainable cities: A multiscalar urban sustainability assessment approach, Habitat International, Vol 45, Pp 36-46.
• Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365(9464), 1099-1104.‏
• Marmot, M. (2007). Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes. The Lancet, 370(9593), 1153-1163.
• McCartney, G., Collins, C., & Mackenzie, M. (2013). What (or who) causes health inequalities: theories, evidence and implications? Health Policy, 113(3), 221-227.‏
• McGaugh, M. (2009). The utility of Self-Organizing Maps in the analysis of social determinants of health. Oklahoma State University.
• McNeill, L. H., Kreuter, M. W., & Subramanian, S. V. (2006). Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. Social science & medicine, 63(4), 1011-1022.
• Mousavi, Seyed Meysam; Anjum Shoaa, Mina; Rajabi Vasuklaei, Qasem; Ezzati Asar, Mohammad; Vareh Razdi, Ramin; (2015), Evaluation of West Azarbaijan Province in the field of benefiting from the indicators of development of health services, Journal of the School of Nursing And Midwifery of Urmia, Volume 13, Number 3, pp. 234-245.(In Persian).
• Olabimpe, O. K. (2009). Analysis of equity in the pattern of health care utilization in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town).
• Pourrshano, Firooz; Mohammad, Shiva; Pourzamani, Hamidreza (2012), A Study and Comparison of the Developmental Degree of Health and Health Services in Iran's Provinces in 2008, Journal of Health System Research, Volume 8, Number 7, pp. 1330-1322. In Persian.
• Raphael, D. (2006). Social determinants of health: present status, unanswered questions, and future directions. International Journal of Health Services, 36(4), 651-677.
• Rezaei, Mohmmadreza, and Akbari, Mahmood (2018), Survey of Health Indicator Inequalities in the township of Fars, Journal of Regional Planning, Volume 8, Number 31, pp. 19-31. In Persian.
• Seidaei, Seyed Eskandar; Jamini, Davood; Jamshidi, Alireza (2014) Fourth year, first issue, (consecutive 12), pp. 64-43. (In Persian).
• Sepehrdost, Hamid (2010), The role of government in the distribution of health and medical facilities in Hamadan province, Quarterly Journal of Social Welfare, No. 37, pp. 307-326. In Persian.
• Sheikhi, Davood; Rezvani, Mohammad Reza; Mahdavi, Masoud (2012), Assessment and Analysis of Health Level in Rural Areas Based on the Healthy Village Approach: A Case Study of Khandab County, Markazi Province, Rural and Development Quarterly, Year 15, No. 2, Pp. 109-138. In Persian.
• Sun, S., Chen, J., Johannesson, M., Kind, P., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., & Burström, K. (2011). Regional differences in health status in China: Population health-related quality of life results from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Health & Place, 17(2), 671-680.‏
• Tahmasbi, Siamak; Gharghani, Masoumeh (2014), Evaluation of the country's rural health services, Proceedings of the National Conference on Sustainable Rural Development in the Sixth Development Plan.(In Persian).
• Tyrrell, O. C. (2017). Analysis of Social Determinants of Health in Justice-Involved Youth: Relevance in the Context of Poverty.
• Whitehead, M. (1991). The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health Promotion International, 6(3), 217-228.
• Zangiabadi, Ali; Bahari, Issa; Ghaderi, Reza (2013), Spatial Analysis and Leveling of Health-Medical Indicators Using GIS (Case Study: Cities of East Azarbaijan Province), Geographical Research, No. 108, pp. 75-106. (In Persian).
• Zarabi, Asghar; Sheikh Biglou, Rana (2011), Leveling of Health Development Indicators of Iranian Provinces, Social Welfare Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 42, pp. 128-107. (In Persian).
• Zatonski, W. (2007). The east-west health gap in Europe—what are the causes? The European Journal of Public Health, 17(2), 121-121.‏