بررسی و تحلیل علل عدم تحقق حکمروایی خوب شهری در ایران : (مطالعه موردی: شهر اراک)

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مقاله 10، دوره 14، شماره 52، اردیبهشت 1402، صفحه 157-170   

نوع مقاله: مقاله برگرفته از پایان نامه

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jupm.2021.27908.3873

نویسندگان

سید حمید موسوی^{* 1}؛ عباس ملک حسینی²

¹دانشجوی دکترای گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد ملایر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ملایر، ایران

²دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری واحد ملایر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ملایر، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 09 اردیبهشت 1400،  تاریخ بازنگری: 10 مرداد 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 11 مرداد 1400 

چکیده

رشد سریع شهرنشینی، برنامه ریزی متمرکز و عدم مشارکت مردم در تصمیم گیری ها، موجب بروز مشکلات متعدد در اداره شهرها شده است که این مشکلات را نمی توان با مدیریت سنتی برطرف نمود و تنها با به کارگیری روش های نوین مدیریتی می توان بر این مشکلات فائق آمد. شهر اراک، دارای مشکلاتی مختلفی نظیر حاشیه نشینی، آلودگی هوا، ترافیک، گرانی مسکن است که استفاده از الگوی حکمروایی خوب می تواند یکی از راهکارهای مناسب برای برون رفت از این مشکلات باشد. هدف از انجام این پژوهش، تعیین علل عدم تحقق حکمروایی خوب شهری در شهر اراک از طریق کارکردهای متأثر از عملکرد مدیریت شهری و میزان مشارکت نهادها و شهروندان در امور شهر می باشد. پژوهش انجام شده از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و به لحاظ روش اجرا کمی و از نوع توصیفی- تحلیلی می باشد. اطلاعات به دو شیوه اسنادی و پرسشنامه محقق ساخته با طیف لیکرت 5 گزینه ای جمع آوری شده است. روش نمونه گیری تحقیق خوشه ای است که 384 نفر از شهروندان با استفاده از فرمول کوکران انتخاب شده اند. نتایج تحقیق نشان می دهد که در شاخص های حکمروایی خوب پس از انجام آزمون T– test، میزان،sig به دست آمده برابر با 05/0بوده که حاکی از عدم تحقق حکمرانی خوب شهری در شهر اراک می باشد. نتایج بدست آمده از تحلیل اطلاعات در نرم افزار لیزرل نشان می دهد فرضیه‌ ها در سطح خطای 05/0 معنادار است در نتیجه فرضیه های تحقیق‌ پذیرفته و تایید می‌شود. بنا بر این می توان گفت که شهر اراک در جایگاه مناسبی از شاخص های حکمروایی مطلوب شهری قرار ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

حکمروایی خوب؛ شهر اراک؛ مدیریت شهری؛ مشارکت؛ نهادهای غیر دولتی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the causes of lack of good urban governance in Iran: (Case study: Arak city)

نویسندگان [English]

seaid hamid moosavi¹؛ abass malekhoseini²

¹PhD Student, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran.

²Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran

چکیده [English]

The rapid growth of urbanization, centralized planning and lack of participation of people in decision-making, has caused many problems in the management of cities that these problems can not be solved with traditional management and only by using new management methods can overcome these problems. The city of Arak has various problems such as marginalization, air pollution, traffic, expensive housing that using a good governance model can be one of the appropriate solution to overcome these problems. The purpose of this study was to determine the causes of lake of good urban governance in the city of Arak through functions affected by the performance of urban management and the level of participation of institutions and citizens in the affairs of the city. The research is applied in terms of implementation method. The information was collected through two methods of documentation and a researcher-made questionnaire with a Likert scale of 5 options. The sampling method is research that 384 citizens were selected using the Cochran’s formula. The results show that in the indicators of good governance after T-tese, the value of obtained is equal to 0.05, which indicates that the lack of good urban governance in the city of Arak. The results obtained from the data analysis in LISREL software show that the hypotheses are significant at the error level of 0.05, so the research hypotheses are accepted and confirmed. Therefore, it can be said that the city of Arak is not in a good position of the indicators of good urban governance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Good governance, Arak city, urban management, participation, non-governmental organizations

مراجع

-Adinehvand, Ali Asghar; Hajizadeh, Maryam; Ghadami, Mostafa. (2012). A Study of Municipal Performance in the Framework of Good Urban Governance (Case Study: Babolsar City), Quarterly Journal of Urban Management, 2012.

 

2-Arko-cobbah, Albert. (2005). Civil society and good governance: challenges for public libraries in South Africa، Civil society and good governance، The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available atwww.emeraldinsight.com/0024-2535.htm

 

3-Ali Beyk, Elham; Zarabi; Asghar; Taghvaei, Masoud. (2013). Citizenship Participation, A Step to Realize Urban Governance, Iran Shahr Saz Quarterly No. 4, 2013.

 

4-Askarizadeh Ardestani, Soheila; Zarabi, Asghar;Taghvaei, Masoud .(2016). A Survey of the Indicators of Good Urban Governance in Arak, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, Year 16, Issue 1, Spring and Summer 2016, Consecutive Issue 30.

5-Haus ،Klausen ،Michael ،janErling. )2013(. Urban Leadershipand Community Involvement: Ingredients for Good Governance? SAGE Publications، Urban Affairs Review 2011 47: 256 originally published online 1 December 2010

6-Hekmatnia, Hassan, Maleki, Mohammad, Mousavi, Mir Najaf, Afshani, Alireza. (2017). Investigation and analysis of good urban governance in Iran: Ilam city, Journal of Spatial Planning

7-Hooman, Haidar Ali;(2005). Structural equation modeling using LISREL software; Tehran; Publication of Samat, 2005.

 

8-https://fa.wikipedia.org

 

9-Kalantari, Khalil.(2009). Structural Equation Modeling in Socio-Economic Research (with LISREL and SIMPLIS programs), Second Edition, Farhang Saba Publishing, 2009

 

10-Kazemi, Haidar.(2020). Evaluating the extent of good urban governance for Iranian cities.

11-Kazemian, Gholamreza, Barari, Ehsan, Sharifzadeh, Fattah, Ghorbanizadeh ,Vajhollah. (2021). Proportional model of good urban governance for the country's metropolises and integrated analysis of the current situation studied: Mashhad, Scientific Quarterly of Urban Research and Planning, No. 44, 2021.

12-Lai, X. (2009). Segmentation Study on Enterprise Customers Based on Data Mining Technology. IEEE Chinese First International Workshop on Database Technology and Applications, 247-250.

13-Mc Cann, E. (2016). Governing urbanism: urban government studies 1,2 and beyond, Urban Studies, 54, 312-326.

14-Mirjam، de Koning) 2015،(Good Governance Training Field Manual For Co-management Committees of Hin Nam No National Protected Area، HNN NPA Good Governance Field Manual for Co-management committees.

15-Neena، Jindal) 2014،( GOOD GOVERNANCE: NEEDS AND CHALLENGES، Article in International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research.

 

16-Peter، Power. (2009). Building Good Governance through Development Cooperation Policy Orientations for Irish Aid Governance, Policy, Ireland

 

17- Rahnama, Mohammad Rahim; Mafi, Ezatullah; Asadi, Ruhollah.(2010). Analysis of the position of good urban governance in Mashhad with the SWOT model, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, No. 15, 2010.

 

18-Rahnamaei, Mohammad Taghi; Keshavarz, Mahnaz.(2010). A Study of Good Governance Model and the Role of Government in Managing Cities in Iran, Geography and Regional Planning (Bimonthly), First Year, First Issue, 2010.

 

19-Rezaei, Mohammad Reza.(2018). Assessing the Impact of Administrative Bureaucracy on the Process of Good Urban Governance Case Study: Shiraz Metropolis, Quarterly Journal of Urban Research and Planning, No. 32, 2018.

20-Roustaei, Shahrivar; Pour Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza; Ghanbari, Hakimeh.(2017). A Study of the Structural Role of Good Urban Governance in Creating Smart Cities (Case Study: Tabriz Municipality) Quarterly Journal of Urban Research and Planning, No. 31, 2017.

21-Sarrafi, Mozaffar; Abdollahi, Majid.(2008). Analysis of the concept of citizenship and evaluation of its place in the laws, regulations and urban management of the country, Geographical Research - No. 63, 2008.

22-Shokouhi, Mohammad Ejzaa; Momeni, Mitra.(2014). A Survey of Citizens' Awareness of Municipal Services and Its Impact on Participation in Hashemieh Neighborhood of Mashhad, First National Conference on Geography, Urban Planning and Sustainable Development, March 2014, Tehran.

23-Virtudes, A.(2016). ‘Good’Governance Principles in Spatial Planning at Local Scale Procedia engineering, 2016.

24-Ziari, Keramatollah; Ahmadpour, Ahmad; Hataminejad, Hossein.(2016). An Analysis of Sustainable Urban Development Based on the Characteristics of Social Capital and Public Trust (Case Study: Tehran Region 2) Quarterly Journal of Urban Research and Planning, No. 40, 2016.

25-Ziari, Keramatollah; Ahmadpour, Ahmad; Hataminejad, Hossein; Bastin, Ali.(2018). Measuring and evaluating the effects of good urban governance on the livability of cities (Case study: Bushehr) Scientific Quarterly Journal of Urban Research and Planning, No. 34, 2018

26-Ziari, Keramatollah; Beyk Mohammadi, Hassan; Rezaei Kochi, Mahmoud.(2019). A Study of the Role of Citizen Participation in Increasing the Success of Urban Management Case: Shiraz Metropolis, Quarterly Journal of Urban Research and Planning, No. 38, 2019.

27-Ziari, Keramatollah; Yadalhania, Hajar; Yadalhania, Hossein.(2018). analysis of urban management performance with emphasis on indicators of good governance from the perspective Citizens studied: Sari, Scientific Quarterly of Research and Urban Planning, No. 40, 2018.

28-www.amar.org.ir