شناسایی و اولویت ‏بندی مشکلات فرآیند مدیریت ادعا در پروژه ‏های عمرانی (مورد مطالعه: شهرداری شیراز)

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

دوره 15، شماره 56، خرداد 1403، صفحه 119-130   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jupm.2022.28594.3953

نویسندگان

افشین بهبودی^{* 1}؛ اردلان فیلی²

¹دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت ساخت، مؤسسه آموزش عالی آپادنا، شیراز، ایران

²استادیار گروه مدیریت، مؤسسه آموزش عالی آپادنا، شیراز، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 09 مرداد 1400،  تاریخ بازنگری: 18 دی 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 18 دی 1400 

چکیده

پروژه‌های عمرانی مهم‌ترین محرک توسعه زیربنایی جوامع هستند که پیشرفت و توسعه در جوامع بشری نیاز به ایجاد و بهره‌برداری از پروژه‌های عمرانی را روز افزون ساخته است. اجرای پروژه‏های عمرانی نیازمند صرف زمان، هزینه و سایر منابع از سوی عوامل ذیربط پروژه می‏باشد که صرف این منابع خود ایجاد حق و ادعا برای طرفین می‏نماید. در نتیجه موفقیت پروژه‌های عمرانی وابستگی شدیدی به حل موثر ادعاها دارد. هدف از انجام این پژوهش شناسایی مشکلات فرآیند مدیریت ادعا در پروژه‏های عمرانی و عوامل موثر بر آن و رتبه بندی این عوامل بر اساس تکنیک DANP می‌باشد. پژوهش حاضر در زمره تحقیقات کمی قرار می‌گیرد و از نظر هدف کاربردی و از منظر روش توصیفی است. به منظور جمع آوری داده‌های مورد نیاز از ابزار پرسش‌نامه و نظرات 8 خبره شاغل در پروژه‌های عمرانی شهر شیراز استفاده شده است. داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده توسط نرم افزار Excel مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. بر اساس نتایج حاصل از پژوهش، اسناد ادعا با وزن 216/0 به عنوان مهم‏ترین مرحله از فرآیند مدیریت ادعا شناسایی شد. همچنین عدم نگهداری اطلاعات به صورت مکتوب و سیستم ثبت ناکارآمد هر دو از مرحله اسناد ادعا به ترتیب با وزن 0464/0 و 0439/0 و زمان ناکافی برای تهیه اسناد مربوطه از مرحله اعلان ادعا با وزن 0438/0، به عنوان 3 مشکل اساسی فرآیند مدیریت ادعا شناسایی شدند. بنابر نتایج به دست آمده و مشخص شدن اهمیت مرحله اسناد ادعا و همچنین اهمیت مشکلات این مرحله از فرآیند مدیریت ادعا؛ می‏بایست توجه بیشتری به این مرحله از فرآیند مدیریت ادعا جهت حل مؤثر ادعاهای مطرح شده در پروژه‏های عمرانی داشته باشیم. در عین حال نزدیک بودن اوزان به دست آمده نشان از اهمیت سایر مراحل فرآیند مدیریت ادعا در حل ادعا دارد که نباید از آن غافل شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

ادعا؛ مدیریت ادعا؛ پروژه‏های عمرانی؛ تکنیک DANP

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification and prioritization of claims management process problems in construction projects (Case study: Shiraz Municipality).

نویسندگان [English]

afshin behboodi¹؛ ardalan feili²

¹Master student in Construction Management, Apadna Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz, Iran

²Assistant Professor of Managmen Department, Apadana Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Development projects are the most important driver of infrastructure development of communities, which progress and development in human societies has increased the need to create and operate development projects. Implementation of construction projects requires spending time, money and other resources by the relevant factors of the project, which alone creates rights and claims for the parties. As a result, the success of construction projects is highly dependent on the effective resolution of claims. The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of the claim management process in construction projects and the factors affecting it and to rank these factors based on the DANP technique. The present study is one of the few research in this field and is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of method. In order to collect the required data, a questionnaire and the opinions of 8 experts working in construction projects in Shiraz have been used. The collected data were analyzed by Excel software. Based on the results of the research, claim documents weighing 0.216 were identified as the most important stage of the claim management process. Also, lack of written information and inefficient registration system both from the stage of claim documents with a weight of 0.0464 and 0.0439, respectively, and insufficient time to prepare the relevant documents from the stage of claim declaration with a weight of 0.0438, are identified as the three main problems in the Claim management process. According to the obtained results and determining the importance of the claim documentation stage as well as the importance of the problems of this stage of the claim management process; We need to pay more attention to this stage of the claim management process to effectively resolve the claims raised in construction projects. At the same time, the proximity of the obtained weights shows the importance of other stages of the claim management process in resolving the claim, which should not be neglected.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Development projects are the most important driver of infrastructure development of communities, which progress and development in human societies has increased the need to create and operate development projects. Implementation of construction projects requires spending time, money and other resources by the relevant factors of the project, which alone creates rights and claims for the parties. As a result, the success of construction projects is highly dependent on the effective resolution of claims.
 
Methodology
The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of the claim management process in construction projects and the factors affecting it and to rank these factors based on the DANP technique. The present study is one of the few research in this field and is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of method. In order to collect the required data, a questionnaire and the opinions of 8 experts working in construction projects in Shiraz have been used. The collected data were analyzed by Excel software.
 
Results and discussion
Based on the results of the research, claim documents weighing 0.216 were identified as the most important stage of the claim management process. Also, lack of written information and inefficient registration system both from the stage of claim documents with a weight of 0.0464 and s0.0439, respectively, and insufficient time to prepare the relevant documents from the stage of claim declaration with a weight of 0.0438, are identified as the three main problems in the Claim management process.
 
Conclusion
According to the obtained results and determining the importance of the claim documentation stage as well as the importance of the problems of this stage of the claim management process; We need to pay more attention to this stage of the claim management process to effectively resolve the claims raised in construction projects. At the same time, the proximity of the obtained weights shows the importance of other stages of the claim management process in resolving the claim, which should not be neglected.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Claim, Claim anagement, Construction Projects, Danp Approach

مراجع

1. Al-Qershi, M. T. & Kishore, R. (2017). Claim causes and types in Indian construction industry–contractor’s perspective. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture,s5(5), 196-203.
2. https://doi:10.12691/ajcea-5-5-3.
3. Amiri, Kiomars, Anvari Rostami, Ali Asghar, Ghanbari, Mehrdad, Jamshidi Navid, Babak. Identification and evaluation of components of the tax system Compatible with the economic development of the country using the Delphi combined method and multi-criteria decision making. Journal of Growth and Development Research Economic, 10 (37 :) 65-86.
   https://doi.org/10.30473/egdr.2019.47967.5328 [In Persian].
4. Armand, N., Hosseini Varamini, S. A. (2017). Investigating the causes of claims in construction projects and presenting proposals to reduce it. In: Fifth National Conference on Sustainable Development in Geography and Planning, Architecture and Urban Planning. Tehran: Center for Strategies for Achieving Sustainable Development Mehr Arvand Higher Education Institute. https://civilica.com/doc/647937 [in persian]
5. Azadeh, Z., Khanzadi, M., Chaleh Kai, A. (2015). Types of lawsuits in construction projects and solutions to reduce them. In: the second national conference on the development of civil engineering, architecture, electricity and mechanics in Iran. Gorgan. https://civilica.com/doc/432736 [in persian]
6. Bagherpour, M., Mousavi, S, A. (2019). Presenting an interpretive structural model for claim management in construction projects. Journal of Modiriyat-Farda, 17 (57), 153-170. http://noo.rs/ZhO1a [in persian]
7. Bakhary, N. A., Adnan, H., Ibrahim, A. (2015). A Study Of Construction Claim Management Problems In Malaysia, In: 2nd Global Conference On Business, Economics, Management And Tourism, Prague, Czech Republic: Procedia Economics and Finance,23: 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00327-5
8. Bramble, B.B. (1990), Avoiding and Resolving Construction Claims, 1st ed., RS Means Company, Kingston, MA. https://doi. 0876291809
9. Easton, G. R. (1989). Construction claims, technical report. [online] Loughborough: Department of Civil Engineering, Loughborough University.
10. Enshassi, A., Mohamed, S., El‐Ghandour, S. (2009). Problems associated with the process of claim management in Palestine: Contractors' perspective. Engineering, construction and architectural management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980910927895
11. Erzaij, K. R. (2020). Nature and Causes of claims in Iraqi turnkey projects. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 745, No. 1, p. 012181). IOP Publishing.
12. https:// DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012181
13. Farzaneh, M., Fili, A., Anvari, A., Sabet, A. (2020). Identifying and ranking the factors affecting the social responsibility of organizations with DANP approach (Case study: Shiraz Power Distribution Company), Bimonthly Journal of Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, 4 (6), 29-43. DOI:52547/jmis.7.1.19 [in persian]
14. Golabchi, M., Talkhabi, H., Parchami Jalal, M., Bemanian, M. (2015). The Development and Analysis of Claim Package Model in Iran Design–Build Projects. IQBQ, 18(4) :111-s137. https://doi 1001.1.2322200.1393.18.4.6.3 [in persian]
15. Gurkani, Ismail; Milad Mohammadi and Abbas Sabet. (2019). Identifying the effective factors in the occurrence of delays and cost increases in projects Case study of Mehr Housing, First National Conference on Management, Ethics and Business, Shiraz, Apadana Institute of Higher Education. [in persian]
16. Hassanzadeh Rangi, N., Allahyari, T., Khosravi, Y., Zarei, F., Saremi, M. (2012). Development of an Occupational Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (OCFQ): Evaluation validity and reliability. Ioh, 9 (1) :29-40. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:181246127 [in persian]
17. Hosseinzadeh Bahreini, Mehdi. (2016). Claim management in construction projects. In: Second National Conference on Construction and Project Management. Tehran: Ala Al-Dowleh Semnani Higher Education Institute. https://civilica.com/doc/461377 [in persian]
18. Izadi Taban, J. (2017). Investigating the Factors Affecting Claim Reduction in Contract Management Contracts in Construction Projects. Master Thesis. Ala Al-Dowleh Semnani Institute of Higher Education. [in persian]
19. Javidrozi, Mahyar; Valiullah Pourkramati and Kaveh Azimi. (2015). Standardization of cost management process in Iranian construction projects based on project management knowledge body standard, Annual Conference on Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban Planning and Sustainable Environment, Tehran, Vira Capital Institute of Managers. https://civilica.com/doc/422451 [in persian]
20. Kululanga, G. K., Kuotcha, W., McCaffer, R., & Edum-Fotwe, F. (2011). Construction contractors' claim process framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(4), 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(309)
21. Masoudi Ashtiani, M,. Ismaili Harisi, E. (2015). Claim Management in Construction Contracts, Facilities and Equipment Development Quarterly, 99 (46), 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2299527 [in persian]
22. Mitchell, R.S. (1998). Construction Contract Claims, Changes and Dispute Resolution. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784414293
23. Moghaddasi, A. and Aghababaei, Z. (2018). Preparation and review of reports of delays in projects. Tehran: Dibagaran Cultural and Artistic Institute of Tehran. https://book/68761 [in persian]
24. Mohammadnejad Shorkaei, H., Sobihieh, M. H., Arbabi, H. (2016). Problems related to the claim management process in Iran: From the perspective of contractors. In: 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management. Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/504469 [in persian]
25. Mohammad pour, M. (2019). Review and Prioritize of clients based sources on civil project contractor’s claim. Civil and Project Journal, 1(5): 23-37. [in persian]
26. Nasirzadeh, F., Carmichael, D. G., Jarban, M. J., Rostamnezhad, M. (2019). Hybrid fuzzy-system dynamics approach for quantification of the impacts of construction claims. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 26 No. 7, pp. 1261-1276. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2017-0150
27. Parchami Jalal, M., Darvish Rokanabadi, M. (2014). In: contracting claims and its legal basis. 8th National Congress of Civil Engineering. Babol: Noshirvani University of Technology. https://civilica.com/doc/296553 [in persian]
28. Rungtusanatham, M. (1998). Let’s not overlook content validity. Decision Line, 29(4), 10-13. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=741316
29. Sadeghian, B., Salami, S., Amid, A, N. (2018). Evaluation of International Contracts with the General Conditions of the Treaty from the Perspective of Claim Management. In: Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning of Islamic World Countries. Tabriz: Tabriz University - Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan - Tabriz Municipality University of Applied Sciences. https://civilica.com/doc/775483 [in persian]
30. Shakeri, I., Rezazadehgan, A. (2016). Identifying and prioritizing various types of contract contracts in construction projects and the reasons for their occurrence. In: the Second International Conference on New Research Findings in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Management. Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/499211 [in persian]
31. Sohrabi, B., Farzaneh, M., Reesi, I. (2010). An Applied Model for Evaluating the Quality of Digital Libraries Websites through A Fuzzy Inference System. Journal of Academic librarianship and Information Research, 44(4), 35-59. https://jlib.ut.ac.ir/article_28731_0 [in persian]
32. Talkhabi, Hadi, Parchami Jalal, Majid and Golabchi, Mahmoud (2013). Investigation and analysis of the reasons for creating contract claims for the design and construction contracts of the country's underground projects, tunnel engineering and underground spaces, 3 (1), 17-33. https://civilica.com/doc/334916 [in persian]