بررسی عوامل مؤثر برتوان تصمیم‌گیری مدیران متوسطه به منظور ارایه مدل ارتقا توان تصمیم‌گیری (مورد مطالعه مقطع متوسطه اول استان خوزستان)

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 8، دوره 13، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 56، مهر و آبان 1401، صفحه 139-119   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2022.25501.5081

نویسندگان

سارا کوراوند¹؛ لیلا بهمئی^{* 2}؛ غلام حسین برکت³

¹دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران.

²استادیار، گروه آموزش ابتدایی، واحد امیدیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، امیدیه، ایران.

³دانشیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز ، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت: 31 تیر 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 12 دی 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 27 آذر 1401 

چکیده

هدف تحقیق حاضر ارائه مدلی برای توسعه توان تصمیم‌گیری مدیران و تعیین راه‌کارهای رسیدن از وضع موجود به وضع مطلوب بود. روش تحقیق حاضر آمیخته اکتشافی از نوع کیفی و کمی مبتنی بر گرندد تئوری بود. جامعه آماری مورد نظر در بخش کیفی را خبرگان حوزه آموزش و پرورش در سمت‌های مدیریتی تشکیل دادند که با روش هدفمند تا 15 نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه انتخاب شدند و با آن‌ها مصاحبه صورت پذیرفت. هم‌چنین در بخش کمی جامعه آماری شامل کلیه مدیران مقطع متوسطه اول در استان خوزستان بودند که به دلیل پراکندگی جغرافیایی و حجم زیاد جامعه آماری در این تحقیق با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای به صورت تصادفی که با تقسیم مدارس متوسطه به چهار بخش (شمال، جنوب، شرق و غرب) از مناطق (ایذه، دهدز باغملک اهواز ماهشهر دزفول ابادان خرمشهر) و فرمول کوکران حجم نمونه 326 نفر (176 نفر زن و 150 نفر مرد) نفر تعیین شد. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در این پژوهش پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بود که از بخش کیفی استخراج شد و روایی آن به نظرات خبرگان و پایایی با آلفای کرونباخ تایید شد. به‌منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از رویکردهای گرندد تئوری و معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزارهای MAXQDA و SPSS23 و SmartPLS استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که ابعاد اصلی مدل را عوامل علی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدها تشکیل می‌دهند و شامل 74 زیر مؤلفه هستند و نتایج مدل تحقیق نشان داد که مدل مورد استفاده تحقیق حاضر از برازش مناسبی برخوردار بود. نتایج نشان داد که در میان ابعاد اصلی مدل عوامل علی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدها می‌توانند در ارتقای توان تصمیم-گیری مدیران مؤثر باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تصمیم‌گیری؛ ارتقا توان؛ مدیران؛ عوامل سازمانی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the effective factors on the decision-making power of high school managers in order to present a model for improving decision-making power (a case study of the first high school in Khuzestan province)

نویسندگان [English]

sara kooravand¹؛ Leila Bahmaee²؛ Gholam Hossein Barekat³

¹Phd student, Department of Educational Administration, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

²Assistant Professor, Department of Primary Education, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh, Iran.

³Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to provide a model for developing managers' decision-making power and determining solutions to achieve the desired situation.
research methodology: The method of the present study was a qualitative and quantitative exploratory mixture based on grounded theory. In this study, according to the classification model with emphasis on qualitative data, a sequential integrated exploratory method was used to combine qualitative and quantitative data. The statistical population in the qualitative section consisted of 15 experts familiar with the subject of research. Also, in a small part of the statistical population, there are 2147 principals of first secondary schools in Khuzestan province, of which 326 (176 female and 150 male) were randomly divided into four sections using cluster sampling method (divided into four sections). North, south, east and west) were selected from regions (Izeh, Dehdez, Baghmalek, Ahvaz, Mahshahr, Dezful, Abadan and Khorramshahr). To collect data, two closed-ended and open-ended decision-making questionnaires were used to improve decision-making power. In order to analyze the data, grounded theory approaches and structural equations with MAXQDA, SPSS23 and SmartPLS software were used.
Findings: The results showed that the main dimensions of the model are organizational factors, managerial factors, individual factors and structural factors and include 74 sub-components.
Conclusion: The results of the research model show that the model used in the present study had a good fit. This means that the model of this research can be used to improve the decision-making power of managers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Decision making, capacity building, managers, organizational factors

مراجع

1. Anders, Saeed, Razai, Karim, Shahi, Sakana (2015). His association was able and politically motivated to design and designate the choice of Dar Sazman. Somin Conference between the Mullahs, the districts of Chalha and Rahakkarha, Tehran. [In Persian]
2. Arnalldo, O. (2011). A discussion of rational and psychological decision making theories and models, the search for a cultural- ethical decision making model, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and organization Studies, vol. 12, Issue 6, 12-13.
3. Danaeifard, H. (2008). Challenges of public administration in Iran. Tehran: Spreads of Samat. [In Persian]
4. Ghejan, A. Gal, J. (2017). Delegation of responsibilities and decision-making authority in a low trust country. Bachelor thesis in Business Administration. School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University.
5. Graham, J. Harvey, C. Puri, M. (2011). Capital allocation and delegation of decision-making authority. National bureau of economic research. JEL No. G30,G32,G34,L20,L22.
6. Hasan, M. Majeedi, J. (2012). Tuwanmendazazi Rw‌shnakhty: Rahbardi, in the opinion of the elevation of the design, the participation and the refartement. De Mahnammeh Daneshkadeh Prestari and Mamaei Arumiyeh, 10 (6). 779-772. [In Persian]
7. P. Saha, S. (2017). Influence of Trust and Participation in Decision Making on Employee Attitudes in Indian Public Sector Undertakings. SAGE Open. DOI: 10. 1177/2158244017733030
8. Khanifar, H, Naderi Bani, N, Ebrahimi, S, Fayazi, M, Rahmati, M. H. (2020). Principals: Competence, knowledge, ability and skills and model presentation. Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, 11 (45), 1-30. . [In Persian]
9. Legzian, M., Nuori, R. (2015). Bursi Ahmet Rahbirdi delegated the selection of Bur Athbakhshi Dar Sazmanhai my country. Publications, Scientific - Poohshi Behbud, Md. 2 (3). 177-183. [In Persian]
10. M. Domingos, M. Almeida, R. (2017). Decision-making at the first management level: The interference of the organizational culture. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 19(3). doi:10. 1590/1678-6971/eRAMR180106
11. McKivor, L. (2016). A Study of the Relationships between Empowerment, Decision-Making Style and Job Satisfaction in Female Middle Managers within Ontario's University Registrarial Units. The University of Western Ontario. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository.
12. Mahboob, S.A, Iraqi, A, Khorshidi, A, Khosravi Babadi, A.A, Moradi, S. (2020). Management model of educational non-governmental organizations active in the field of school construction. Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, 11 (45), 31-56. [In Persian]
13. Mehr Alizadeh, Y. (2017). The book New Theories of Management (Theoretical and Experimental Foundations) by Dr. Yadolah Mehr Alizadeh, Editors: Sakineh Shahi, Adel Savadi, Shahid Chamran University Press, Ahvaz. [In Persian]
14. Mehrali Zadeh, Y., Sivasi, Hussain Achfshan, F. (2005). Its time and contraindications of the Karbist School. The axis of the Dar Iran School: reading of any place in Dibestan, this is the state of the month of Ahvaz - Astan Khuzestan. Journal of Pedagogical Sciences and Ruanasnasi. 12 (2). 1-22. [In Persian]
15. Nazari, R., Panahian, N.A. (2015). Modal opinions on the authority to delegate the selection of the directors of Bur Tuandend Sazi and the elevation of the human affairs of Sasmanhaihai and Warszai. Readings of the Directorate of Warszhi, 8 (39. 37-50. [In Persian]
16. Ramezanian, M.R, Sanei, M. (2009). Jaypah synthesizer, Dar Freind Design, Perry Sazmani. Hefetman Conference, between the Mullah Mudriette, Tehran. [In Persian]
17. Rezaian, A. (2016). Sazman Buildings and District. Tehran: Spreads of Samt. [In Persian]
18. Riaz, M. N, Haque, AU. (2012)«leadership styles as predictors of decision makingStyles»African Journal of business management‚vol. 6, (15), 5226-5233
19. Sagi, S. (2015). The Use of Power and Authority in Decision Making Process: A Cross Cultural Perspective. International Journal of Management and Humanities (IJMH). 1(7). 11-14.
20. Sarchaqaei, A. (2016). High school design, school director, Somin Conference, Milli Ruwanshani, Educational Sciences, Shadgan, Danshah, Azad, and Islamic One Shadban. [In Persian]
21. Shahshawari, T., Afrasiabi, R., Bahrami Zadeh, H.A. (2014). Link between Shih Hai, Design Manager, Managing Director, Salamat Sazmani, Ayinda Pohshi Director, 25 (1). 53-64. [In Persian]