بررسی نقش بهبود کارایی و توسعه مکانیزاسیون بر دستیابی به اهداف تولیدی جو (آبی و دیم) در طول برنامه پنج‌ساله ششم توسعه

فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

مقاله 6، دوره 14، شماره 4، اسفند 1401، صفحه 72-98   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jae.2023.25193.2173

نویسنده

علی شهنوازی^*

مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان آذربایجان شرقی

تاریخ دریافت: 27 خرداد 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 10 دی 1399،  تاریخ پذیرش: 17 اسفند 1401 

چکیده

در این پژوهش مقادیر کارایی فنی، تخصیصی، هزینه‌ای، درآمدی و سود در زراعت جو آبی و دیم در ۲۶ استان کشور با در نظر گرفتن نقش نهاده ثابت مکانیزاسیون با استفاده از روش تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها و اطلاعات منتشر شده وزارت جهاد کشاورزی بررسی و پتانسیل افزایش تولید به‌منظور دستیابی به اهداف برنامه ششم توسعه از طریق بهبود کارایی تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد که میانگین کارایی‌های فنی، تخصیصی و هزینه‌ای در زراعت جو آبی بیشتر از جو دیم بوده و مکانیزاسیون منجر به بهبود شاخص‌های مورد مطالعه شده است. پائین بودن کارایی هزینه‌ای در زراعت آبی به دلیل تخصیص نامناسب نهاده‌ها و در زراعت دیم به علت پائین بودن کارایی فنی است. میانگین کارایی هزینه‌ای در زراعت آبی جو بدون احتساب نقش مکانیزاسیون 79/0 می‌باشد که علت عمده آن تخصیص نامناسب نهاده‌های مورد استفاده است، با لحاظ مکانیزاسیون میانگین کارایی‌های فنی، تخصیصی و هزینه‌ای به ترتیب به 95/0، 88/ و 83/0 افزایش می‌یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پتانسیل تولید؛ تخصیص بهینه؛ اولویت‌بندی؛ ارزش‌افزوده؛ سودآوری

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Role of Improving Efficiency and Development of Mechanization on Achieving Barley Production Goals (Irrigated and Dry land) during the Sixth Five-Year Development Plan

چکیده [English]

In this study, the technical, allocative, cost, revenue and profit efficiency values of barley (irrigated and dry land) production in 26 provinces of the country considering the role of fixed input of mechanization input using the data envelopment analysis method and published data of the Ministry of Jihad Agriculture were examined to determine the potential increasing in production to achieve the goals of the Sixth Development Plan by improving efficiency. The results showed that the average technical, allocative and cost efficiency in irrigated barley cultivation was higher than dry land barley and mechanization improved the performance of the studied indicators. The low cost efficiency in irrigated barley was due to allocation inefficiency of inputs and in dry land barley due to the low technical efficiency. The average cost efficiency in irrigated barley, without taking into account the role of mechanization, was 0.79, which was mainly due to improper allocation of used inputs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Production potential, Optimal allocation, Prioritization, value Added, Profitability

مراجع

1. Official Newspaper. The law of the sixth five-year economic, social and cultural development plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2017-2021). 2017. 20995.

https://www.rrk.ir/Files/Laws

2. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. Crop production costs for agricultural year 2014-2015 (countrywide results). Deputy of Planning and Economic Affairs, Information and Communication Technology Center. 2017. https://amar.maj.ir/
3. Kazemi M, Nikkhah Farkhani Z. Application of data envelopment analysis in measuring analyzing relative efficiency of wheat cultivation: case of Khorasan Razavi. Agricultural Economics and Development. 2010;. 23: 87-94. [DOI:22067/jead2.v1388i2.2535]
4. Babaei M, Rastegaripour F, Sabouhi Sabooni M. A Survey on the efficiency of greenhouse cucumber: using the approach of using interval data envelopment analysis. Agricultural Economics and Development. 2012; 26: 117-125.

 [DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v1391i2.15812]

5. Shaban M, Mahmoodi A, Shawkat Fadai M. A survey on technical efficiency, marketing and market structure of saffron crop. Iran. Journal of saffron agronomy and Technology. 2014; 1: 85-101. [https://doi.org/10.22048/jsat.2014.4819]
6. Behrouz A, Emami Meyboudi A. Measuring technical, allocative and economic efficiency and productivity of farming sub-sector of Iran with emphasis on irrigated watermelon. Journal of agricultural Economics Research. 2014; 23: 43-66. https://jae.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_564.html
7. Shahraki J, Akbari A, Jafari M. Water-use efficiency and factors influencing of performance greenhouse of Amanabad village based on approach of the slack based model (SBM). Agricultural Economics & Development. 2015; 1: 83-93. https://ruraleconomics.karaj.iau.ir/article_514092.html?lang=fa
8. Mardani M, Ziaee S. Determining the efficiency of irrigated wheat farms in Neyshabur county under uncertainty. Agricultural Economics & Development. 2016; 30: 136-147.

[DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v30i2.49099]

9. Ghaderzadeh H, Pirmohamadyani Z. Evaluation Efficiencies of Energy for Potato Production in Hamedan Province of Iran. Journal of agricultural Economics Research. 2019; 11: 167-202.

https://jae.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_3489.html?lang=fa

10. Abdeshahi A, Ghorbani MR. Estimating technical and scale efficiency of broiler chicken units in Khuzestan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 2019; 3: 299-311.

https://jead.um.ac.ir/article_35182.html?lang=fa

11. Hassan Y, Mahir bin Abdullah A, Mansor Ismail M, Mohamed Z. Technical efficiency of maize production in Nigeria: parametric and non-Parametric approach. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. 2014; 4: 281-291.

https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/198408/

12. Ommar MAE. Technical and economic efficiency for broiler farms in Egypt: application of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Global Veterinaria. 2014; 12: 588-593.

[DOI: 10.5829/idosi.gv.2014.12.05.82197]

13. Yu L, Yan-Min R, Yu-Chun P, Chao S. Evaluation of production efficiency of the county-level crop farming in He'nan based on GIS and DEA. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015; 7: 154-158.

http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.7.1284

14. Chepng’etich E, Bett EK, Nyamwaro SO, Kizito K. Analysis of technical efficiency of Sorghum production in Lower Eastern Kenya: a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 2014; 5: 58-65.

https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEDS/article/view/11260

15. Kočišová K. Application of the DEA on the measurement of efficiency in the EU countries. Agricultural Economics. 2015; 61: 51–62.

https://doi.org/10.17221/107/2014-AGRICECON

16. Li L, Jiang Y, Mu H, Yu Z. Efficiency evaluation and improvement potential for the Chinese agricultural sector at the provincial level based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). Energy. 2018; 164: 1145-1160.

[DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.150]

17. Pradhan KA. Measuring technical efficiency in rice productivity using data envelopment analysis: a study of Odisha. International Journal of Rural Management. 2018; 14: 1–21.

https://doi.org/10.1177/097300521775006

18. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. The level of harvest and the amount of crop production in the country during the years 2017-2018. Deputy of Planning and Economic Affairs, Information and Communication Technology Center. 2019.

https://amar.maj.ir/

19. Coelli TJ. A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Department of Econometrics. University of New England. Australia. 1996.

https://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~econ380/DEAP.PDF

20. Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O`Donnell CJ, Battese GE. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. (second edition). Springer Science & Business media, Inc. 2005.

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/b136381

21. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. Agricultural Statistics of 2014-2016. Deputy of Planning and Economic Affairs, Information and Communication Technology Center. 2016.

https://amar.maj.ir/

22. Abedi Parijani A, Motamed MK, Kavoosi Kalashami M, Shabanali Fami H. Investigation the technical, allocative and economic efficiency of Sericulturist in Mazandaran province. Agricultural Economics and Development. 2017; 25: 79-101.

[10.30490/aead.2017.59086]

23. Mohammadi H. Application of the data envelopment analysis approach to production efficiency in greenhouse product in Fars province. Agricultural Economics. 2012; 6: 205-226.

http://www.iranianjae.ir/article_9331.html?lang=fa