ارزیابی وضعیت توسعه پایدار کشاورزی در استان یزد با استفاده از روش تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره

فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

مقاله 11، دوره 14، شماره 4، اسفند 1401، صفحه 159-177   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jae.2023.24811.2162

نویسندگان

مرضیه منافی ملایوسفی^{* 1}؛ باب اله حیاتی²

¹تبریز، دانشگاه تبریز، دانشکده کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی.

²عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تبریز

تاریخ دریافت: 13 اردیبهشت 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 27 فروردین 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 19 اسفند 1401 

چکیده

هدف این مطالعه ارزیابی روند توسعه پایدار کشاورزی در طول بازه زمانی 97-1380 در استان یزد است. وزن‌دهی شاخص‌های پایداری با استفاده از روش آنتروپی انجام شده است و روش تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره تاپسیس جهت ارزیابی پایداری استفاده شده است. نتایج مطالعه نشان می‌دهد که در فاصله زمانی 97-1380، در بعد زیست‌محیطی شاخص‌های مصرف سموم شیمیایی و حفاظت از منابع طبیعی، در بعد اجتماعی، حمل و نقل، ارتباطات تلفنی و نرخ رشد طبیعی جمعیت و در بعد اقتصادی، کارایی تولید گوشت قرمز و درآمد غیر کشاورزی نقش مهمی در توسعه پایدار کشاورزی استان یزد داشته‌اند. نتایج حاصل از رتبه‌بندی پایداری در سال‌های مختلف حاکی از کاهش روند توسعه پایدار در ابعاد اقتصادی و اجتماعی، به ویژه در سال‌های اخیر است. اما در بعد زیست‌محیطی شاهد توسعه آشکار بخش کشاورزی هستیم. با توجه به نتایج پیشنهاد می‌شود توسعه امکانات زیربنایی نظیر راه‌های ارتباطی مناسب و آسفالته، ارتباطات تلفنی، دسترسی به خدمات بهداشتی و برق در نواحی روستایی مورد توجه بیشتری قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

آنتروپی شانون؛ پایداری کشاورزی؛ تاپسیس؛ دوره زمانی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Agricultural Sustainable Development Status in Yazd Province Using the Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method

نویسندگان [English]

Marziyeh Manafi Mollayousefi¹؛ babollah Hayati²

¹Department of Agricultural Economics, Agriculture Faculty, Tabriz University, Tabriz.

²Department of Agricultural Economics, Agriculture Faculty, Tabriz University, Tabriz.

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the process of agricultural sustainable development in Yazd province. The weighting of sustainability indicators has been done using the entropy and TOPSIS method was used for evaluation of sustainability. The results of the study show that in the period between 2001-2018, in the environmental dimension, the consumption of pesticide and conservation of natural resources indicators, in the social dimension, transportation, telephone communications and Natural growth rate of population, and in the economic dimension, The efficiency of red meat production and non-agricultural income have played an important role in the sustainable development of agriculture in Yazd province. The results show a reduction in the growth of sustainable development in economic and social dimensions, especially in recent years. But, in the environmental dimension, we see an obvious development of the agricultural sector. According to the results, it is suggested that more attention is given to the development of infrastructure facilities such as appropriate and asphalted communication roads, telephone communications, and access to health and electricity services in rural areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Shannon Entropy, Agricultural Sustainability, TOPSIS, Period of Time

مراجع

1. Akbari M, Badri SA, Shamanian M, Amini S. Objectives, motivations and barriers of organic agriculture development in Ravansar city. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. 2019, 7 (2): 63-76. https://ee.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_5603.html?lang=fa
2. Amirzadeh Moradabadi S, Ziaee S, Mehrabi Boshrabadi H, Keykha A. Agricultural sustainability assessment in Iran by using sustainability composite index. Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 2019, 49(4): 661-674. . https://ijaedr.ut.ac.ir/article_70340.html?lang=fa
3. Asghari Zadeh E, Nasrollahi M. Comparison of entropy and fuzzy weighting techniques in using the PROMETHEE method to determine the top part makers of Saipa. 4th International Management Conference. Ariana Research Group, Tehran, Iran, 29-30 Azar. 2006. https://en.civilica.com/doc/39939/
4. Asgharpour MJ. Multiple Criteria Decision ‏‏‏ Tehran University press. Tehran, Iran. 2014. https://press.ut.ac.ir/book_2372.html
5. Bagherzadeh A. A review of the electricity consumption in the agricultural sector. Ministry of Agriculture, Institute for Planning Research. Agriculture and Rural Development. 2017. https://www.assc.ir/upload/upload/iranassc_masrafbarqkeshavarzi.pdf
6. Bakhtyari S, Dehghani-zadeh M, Rayati Productive and non-productive entrepreneurship role in economic development. Journal of Planning and Budgeting. 2012, 17(3): 131-159. http://jpbud.ir/article-1-640-en.html
7. Bayat M. A cluster analysis of the development evaluation of the villages of Kavar district in Shiraz Township. Geography and Environmental Planning. 2009, 20(1): 113-131. https://gep.ui.ac.ir/article_18433.html
8. Ceyhan V. Assessing the agricultural sustainability of conventional farming systems in Samsun province of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010, 5(13): 1572-1583. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380877499_ceyhan.pdf
9. Charaghi M, Ghadiri Masom M, Rezvani MR. The role of non-agricultural incomes in food security of rural households. Food Technology & Nutrition. 2016, 13(4): 71-78. https://jftn.srbiau.ac.ir/article_9282.html?lang=fa
10. Davarpanah S, Hashemibonab S, Khodaverdizadeh M. Assessment of agricultural sustainability in Ardebil province using a hybrid approach AHP and TOPSIS. Journal of Agroecology. 2017, 7 (2): 17-30. https://www.sid.ir/paper/254760/en
11. Ding L, Shao Zh, Zhang H, Xu C, Wu D. A comprehensive evaluation of urban sustainable development in China based on the TOPSIS-Entropy method. Sustainability. 2016, 8(746): 1-23.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080746
12. Etaat J. Population and sustainable development in Iran. Social welfare journal. 2011, 11(42): 7-36.  http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-726-en.html
13. Fallahtabar N, Bahiraei H. Dependence of Kashan sustainable development on the water resources of the arid and desert region. Geography (Regional Planning). 2012, 2(2): 215-228. https://www.sid.ir/paper/224099/fa
14. Farsi N, Charmchian Langerodi M. Factors affecting the environmental behavior of rice cultivators in county of Sari in order to sustainability of paddy. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. 2020, 8 (2): 65-78. https://doi.org/10.30473/ee.2020.6564
15. Gasparatos A, Scolobig A. Choosing the appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecological Economics. 2012, 80: 1-7. 1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005
16. Haji L, Chizari M, choobchian Sh. Structural analysis of factors affecting the sustainable development of agricultural production cooperatives in rural areas Naghadeh Township. Journal of Rural Research. 2016, 7(1): 195-216. 22059/JRUR.2016.58392
17. Hardani Sh, Sheikh Davoodi MJ, Asakereh A. Evaluation of some sustainability indices in Khuzestan, agro-industries using multi-criteria decision making case study: maize, wheat and sugarcane. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 2018, 28(3): 97-113. https://sustainagriculture.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_8062.html?lang=en
18. Hoseinzadeh Kohsari M. Desertification and sustainable development. Second national conference on agricultural engineering and management, sustainable environment and natural resources, Tehran, Shahid Beheshti University. 2015, 11 March. https://civilica.com/doc/357677/
19. Izadi B, Hayati D. The situation analysis of rural house health status and villagers health insurance from the perspective of rural development. 1st national convenience on policies toward sustainable development, Tehran, Iran. 2013, 10 March. https://civilica.com/doc/197634/
20. Jihad-Agriculture organization of Yazd province. Statistical reports of Agriculture Jihad organization. Deputy of Planning and Economic Affairs, Tehran, Iran. 2020. https://yazd.maj.ir/page-yazdmain/FA/16/form/pId17396
21. Kalantari S, Sadeghi Deh-Cheshmeh S. Estimation and comparison of some demographic indices of Iran and some other developed and developing countries. Population Quarterly. 2006, 155&156: 129-147. URL: http://populationmag.ir/article-1-227-fa.html
22. Koocheki A, Nassiri Mahallati M, Moradi, R, Mansoori H. Assessing sustainable agriculture development status in Iran and offering of sustainability approaches. Agriculture Knowledge and Sustainable Production. 2013, 23(4): 179-197. https://sustainagriculture.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_800_en.html?lang=en
23. Li S, Gong Q, Yang Sh. A sustainable, regional agricultural development measurement system based on dissipative structure theory and the entropy weight method: a case study in Chengdu, China. Sustainability. 2019, 11(5313): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195313
24. Malakouti MJ, Keshavarz P, Karimian NJ. Comprehensive method of detection and the proper use of fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Press of Tarbiat Modarres University. 2008, Tehran, Iran. https://pub.modares.ac.ir/
25. Manafi M. Evaluation of natural resource and agricultural sustainability using composite indicators in East Azerbaijan province. Ph. D. thesis of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz. 2017. https://libraryad.tabrizu.ac.ir/site/catalogue/203226
26. Manafi Mollayousefi M, Hayati B, Pishbahar E, Nematian J. Assessing of agricultural and natural resource sustainability using compromise programming method in counties of East Azerbaijan province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 2017, 31 (4): 279-289. 22067/JEAD2.V31I4.60005
27. Miri F, Torkamani J. Assessment of the degree of development in Sistan and Baluchestan province: Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Agricultural Economics. 2018, 12(1): 95-115. 22034/IAES.2018.31376
28. Momeni M. New topics in operations research, Moalef Publications, Tehran, Iran. 2014. https://telketab.com/book/%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%AB-%D9%86%D9%88%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%82%DB%8C%D9%82-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%AA/
29. Nastaran M, Abolhasani F, Izadi M. Application of TOPSIS method in analysis and prioritizing sustainable development of urban zones (case study: urban zones of Isfahan). Geography and Environmental planning. 2010, 21 (2): 83-100.  1001.1.20085362.1389.21.2.7.3
30. National Census of Population and Housing. Detailed Results of Iranian National Census of Population and Housing. Islamic Republic of Iran Plan and Budget Organization, Tehran, Iran. 2016. https://www.amar.org.ir/portals/0Files/fulltext/1395/n_ntsonvm_95-v2.pdf
31. Noroozi P. Agricultural sector and the necessity for sustainable development in Iran. Tehran chamber of Commerce Industries, Mines and Agriculture, Economic Research Department. Tehran, Iran. 2017. https://www.tccim.ir/download?file=/images/docs/444_1.pdf
32. Qian L, Xueping H. Assessment of the agricultural sustainability of Shaanxi province China. Journal of Ecological Economy. 2007, 3: 60-66. 1007/978-94-007-2789-2_11
33. Rahmani B, Shafiei Sabet N, Rahmani Fazli A, Soleiman Goli R. Analysis of the global position of communications and information in the field of sustainable development of agricultural products: the central part of Minoodasht city. Space Economy & Rural Development. 2017, 5 (18): 189-209. ‎18869/acadpub.serd.5.18.189
34. Rastgar Sh, Barani H, Darijani A, Berdi Sheikh V, Ghorbani J, Ghorbani M. Estimating direct economic value of soil conservation function of rangelands vegetation (case study: summer rangelands of Nour-Rud watershed basin). Watershed Management Research. 2016, 7(13): 254-262. 18869/acadpub.jwmr.7.13.262
35. Rezvani MR, Mahmoudi Chenari H, Talkhab A, Mahmoudi H. An analysis of the spatial distribution of expense and income of rural households in Iran. Journal of Research and Rural Planning. 2017, 6(3): 1-18. 22067/JRRP.V6I3.54484
36. Rostami M, Mohammadi H. An assessment of the sustainability of agricultural systems in Golestan province, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development. 2018, 8(1): 91-100. https://ijamad.rasht.iau.ir/article_538538.html
37. Sadeghi Ravesh MH. Analyzing the development levels of combating desertification operations using scalogram model (case studies: cities of Yazd province). Journal of sustainability, development & environment. 2019, 2(2): 15-27. 1001.1.24233846.1399.1.1.2.6
38. Saadi H, Jalilian S. Sustainable development, analyzing of wheat growers' attitudes and Perceptions. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. 2017, 5 (2): 9-23. 1001.1.23223057.1395.5.2.1.8
39. Salem J, Namazi A. Development of Yazd Province of Iran. Village and development journal. 2007, 10 (1): 33-40. http://rvt.agri-peri.ac.ir/article_59314.html?lang=en
40. Shabani S, Akbarinia M, Varamesh S, Behtari B. Forests and global challenge of sustainable development. Regional Conference on Agriculture, Growth and Development. Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch. 2008. https://www.sid.ir/paper/813969/fa
41. Sharifi O, Asadi A, Kalantarian Kh, Hosseini SM. The determinants of sustainability in greenhouse culture with emphasize on educational factors in the south of Kerman province. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. 2020, 8 (2): 153-174. https://doi.org/10.30473/ee.2020.6569
42. Shirzady S, Saboohi Sabooni M. Evaluation of stability and balance of aquifer: case study of Neishabur. Agricultural Economic Research. 2015, 6(24): 107-128. 1001.1.20086407.1393.6.24.7.3   
43. Soltani Gerdfaramarzy M, Mozafari Gh, Shafie Sh. Analysis of the effects of recent climatic droughts on the salinity of subterranean waters using geostatistical and GIS methods in Yazd- Ardakan Plain. Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 2018, 27(106): 179-199. 1001.1.25883860.1397.27.106.13.7
44. Yazd province Governor. Statistical Yearbook, Tehran, Iran. 2020. https://ostanyazd.ir/
45. Zahedi Mazandarani MJ. Functional necessities for the development of employment in the agricultural sector. Agricultural Economics and development. 2004, 12(45): 41-67. https://sid.ir/paper/24405/fa.
46. Zare Chahouki A, Barzegari F, Zare A. Effect of Yazd-Ardakan afforested Haloxylon aphyllum on groundwater resources. Desert Management. 2018, 10: 87-98. 22034/JDMAL.2018.30664
47. Zheng H, Si D, Wang W, Wang R. Quantitative entropy weight TOPSIS evaluation of sustainable Chinese wind power developments. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2018, pp: 1-12.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6965439