ارزیابی تابآوری شهری بر مبنای پایداری بوم محور در محله فیضآباد شهرکرمانشاه

فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مقاله 5، دوره 14، شماره 53، مرداد 1402، صفحه 65-84   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jupm.2023.31668.4318

نویسندگان

میرسالار حبیبی¹؛ سیدعلی نوری^{* 2}؛ سید جمال الدین دریاباری³

¹دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر، معماری و شهرسازی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

²استادیار گروه معماری، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

³دانشیارگروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 11 اسفند 1401،  تاریخ بازنگری: 13 اردیبهشت 1402،  تاریخ پذیرش: 16 اردیبهشت 1402 

چکیده

تاب‌آوری می‌تواند پایداری و مدیریت منسجم را برای نقاط شهری فراهم نماید و میزان آسیب‌پذیری آن‌ها را در زمان بحران کاهش دهد. در این زمینه یکی از موضوعات مهم، شناخت درست از وضعیت موجود شهر‌ها از نظر تاب‌آوری است. در این تحقیق هدف، ارزیابی تاب‌آوری شهری بر مبنای پایداری بوم محور در محله فیض آباد شهری کرمانشاه به عنوان یک بافت قدیمی و مرکزی است. روش تحقیق توصیفی–تحلیلی و مبتنی بر داده‌های میدانی است. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسش‌نامه بوده که در سطح جامعه آماری(4830 نفر) در محله فیض­آباد جمع‌آوری شده است. بر اساس فرمول کوکران حجم نمونه به تعداد 356 نفر تعیین شد. روایی ساختاری و محتوایی ابزار تأیید و همچنین پایایی نیز با آلفای کرونباخ بالای 70/0 تأیید شد. نتایج نشان داد که تاب‌آوری اجتماعی، اقتصادی، زیست محیطی، کالبدی-فضایی و نهادی در محله فیض آباد در سطح کمتر از 05/0 معنادار بوده که جهت معناداری نیز گویای این مطلب است که وضعیت تاب‌آوری محله نامناسب ارزیابی می‌شود؛ بهترین وضعیت در میان 18 شاخص تاب‌آوری، مربوط به شاخص تهدیدات زیست محیطی و مکانی با میانگین (201/3) است. دیگر شاخص‌های تاب‌آوری از جمله تعلق مکانی (130/2)؛ مشارکت اجتماعی(422/1)؛ آسیب‌پذیری اقتصادی (369/1)؛ حمایت اقتصادی (100/1)؛ بهداشت محیط(254/2)؛ زیرساخت‌های شهری(941/1)؛ کیفیت مسکن(831/2)؛ آمادگی مقابله با سوانح(569/1)؛ ظرفیت نهاد‌های خودجوش و مردمی (337/1) نامطلوب بوده‌اند. همچنین نتیجه آزمون کروسکال-والیس تأیید نمود که میان محدوده‌های مختلف محله فیض آباد(سبزه میدان، آبشوران، جلوخان، جلیلی و نوبتی)، تفاوت معناداری در سطح کمتر از 05/0 از لحاظ وضعیت تاب‌آوری مشاهده می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تابآوری شهری؛ پایداری بوم محور؛ محله فیضآباد کرمانشاه

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of urban resilience based on eco-oriented sustainability in Faiz-Abad neighborhood of Kermanshah city

نویسندگان [English]

Mirsalar Habibi¹؛ Seyedali Nouri²؛ Seyed jamalodin Daryabari³

¹Ph.D Candidate of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art, Architucture and Urban Planning, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

²Assistant Professor of Deparment of Architecture, North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

³Associate Professor of Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

In the face of various urban crises and their proper management, it is necessary to adopt coherent planning and forecasting in advance. This type of exposure and planning is rooted in the concept of resilience. Resilience can provide stability and coherent management for urban areas and reduce their vulnerability in times of crisis. In this context, one of the important issues is the correct understanding of the current situation of cities in terms of resilience. In this research, the goal is to evaluate urban resilience based on eco-oriented sustainability in Faiz Abad neighborhood of Kermanshah as an old and central context. The research method is descriptive-analytical and based on field data. The data collection tool was a questionnaire that was collected at the level of the statistical population (4830 people) in Faiz Abad neighborhood. Based on Cochran's formula, the sample size was determined to be 356 people. The structural and content validity of the verification tool as well as the reliability were confirmed with Cronbach's alpha above 0.70. The results showed that the social, economic, environmental, physical-spatial and institutional resilience in Faiz Abad neighborhood was significant at a level of less than 0.05, which also indicates that the resilience of the neighborhood is considered inadequate; The best situation among the 18 resilience indicators is related to the environmental and spatial threats index with an average of (3.201). Other indicators of resilience, including place belonging (2.130); social participation (1.422); economic vulnerability (1/369); economic support (1.100); environmental health (2/254); urban infrastructures (1.941); housing quality (2/831); preparedness to deal with accidents (1.569); The capacity of spontaneous and popular institutions (1.337) have been unfavorable. Also, the result of the Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed that there is a significant difference of less than 0.05 between the different areas of Faizabad neighborhood (Sabze Maidan, Abshouran, Jalokhan, Jalili and Nobti) in terms of resilience.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

urban resilience, eco-oriented sustainability, Faizabad neighborhood of Kermanshah

مراجع

1. Ahmadzadeh Kermani, H., Aminzadeh Goharrizi, B. (2019). Evaluation of urban resilience dimensions using the method of the average sum of distances from the optimal limit (9th area of Mashhad), Journal of City identity, 14(4), 23-36.[ In Persian]
2. Aldrich, D. (2019): Black wave: how networks and governance shaped Japan’s 3/11. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Aldrich, D., Oum, S., Sawada, Y. (2015): Resilience and Recovery in Asian Disasters; Community Ties, Market Mechanisms, and overnance. Springer Press, New York
4. Amiri, F. (2017). Sustainable urban regeneration with a social capital approach (case example: Faizabad neighborhood of Kermanshah), master's thesis in the field of urban planning, faculty of art and architecture, University of Kurdistan. [ In Persian]
5. Bahrami, S., Kharazi, F. (2018). Re-creation of historical contexts with the approach of cultural tourism, a case example: Faizabad neighborhood of Kermanshah, Journal of Geography and Human Relations, 1(4), 125-136. [ In Persian]
6. Bastani, M., Haani, T. (2019). A comparative study of social resilience in line with the goals of urban regeneration (case example: neighborhoods in Iran, the Philippines and Malaysia), Journal of safe city, 3(9), 1-17.
7. Biswas, R., Jana,A., Arya, K., Ramamritham,K. (2019): A goodgovernance framework for urban management. Journal of Urban Management,8(2),225-236.
8. Bouchard, G. (2013). Neoliberalism in Québec: The Response of a Small Nation Under Pressure. In P. A. Hall & M. Lamont (Eds.), Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era (pp. 267–292). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chen, W., & Zhang, L. (2021): Resilience assessment of regional areas against earthquakes using multi-source information fusion. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215(2),215-2333.
10. Delshad, M., Tabibiyan, M.,  Habibi, M. (2021). Analyzing the concept of physical-spatial resilience against earthquakes, introducing and prioritizing its most important criteria using the Fuzzy-AHP model, case studies: the central fabric of Rasht city, Arman Shahr Architecture and Urbanism Journal, 36(2), 205-224. [ In Persian]
11. Eftekhari Rad, Z., Jabari, H. (2002) . Striving for a new life and recovery of the past, analytical report of the improvement and renovation project of the center of Kermanshah, Faiz-Abad neighborhood, Journal of City identity, 2 (4), 78-91. [ In Persian]
12. Feng, X., Xiu, C., Bai, L., Zhong, Y., & Wei, Y. (2020). Comprehensive evaluation of urban resilience based on the perspective of landscape pattern: A case study of Shenyang city. Cities, 104,102-123.
13. Hizbaron, D. R. Baiquni, M. Sartohadi, J.  & Rijanta, R. (2012). Urban Vulnerability in Bantul District, Indonesia—Towards Safer and Sustainable  Development, Sustainability, 4(1),pp. 2022-2037.
14. Hosseini, A., Yadullah Nia, H., Mohammadi, M.,  Shekari, S. (2019). Analysis of social resilience based on social capital indicators in Tehran, Journal of Sustainable City, 3(1), 34-54. [ In Persian]
15. Hosseinzadeh Delir, K., Mohammadian, M.,  Sardari, R. (2018). A review of the concept of urban resilience, Journal of Urban Studies and Urban Research, 2(3), 69-78. [ In Persian]
16. Kärrholm, M., Nylund, K., de la Fuente, P.P. (2014). Spatial resilience and urban plann.ing: Addressing the interdependence of urban retail areas, Cities, London, England, 36,121-130.
17. Ketabchi, E., resaeipour, M. (2017). Urban resilience: presenting a conceptual model of urban planning and management, Journal of Architecture, 1(1), 1-10. [ In Persian]
18. Kiss, Bernadett; cCormick, Kes and Christine Wamsler (2020) Resilience through nature-based solutions Governance and implementation. In: The Routledge Handbook of Urban Resilience, Edited by Michael A. Burayidi; Adriana Allen; John Twigg and Christine Wamsler, Routledge, New York.
19. Li, G., Jou,C., Wang,Y., Yang, H.(2020). System dynamics modelling for improving urban resilience in Beijing, China, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161(4), 76-91.
20. Li,W., Feng, T., Timmermans, H., Li, Z., Zhang, M., Li, B.(2020). Analysis of citizens' motivation and participation intention in urban planning, Journal of Cities , 106(4),54-68.
21. Maleki, S., Rezaei, S. (2019). Investigating and measuring the level of resilience in physical and social dimensions against earthquakes (case study of Izeh city), Geography and Environmental Studies, 8(31), 17-32. [ In Persian]
22. Movahed, S., & Tabibian, M. (2018). Analysis of Attitudes and Use of Urban Ecology Science In Urban Planning; with Concentration on National to Local Plans. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20(2), 169-189. [ In Persian]
23. Movahed, S., Tabibian, M. (2018): Investigating the changes of ecological network and its role in the ecological resilience of Mashhad city. Journal of Environmental Studies, 44(2), 373-394. [ In Persian]
24. Nabavi Razavi, H.S., Habibi, M.,  Tabibiyan, M. (2016). The role of city structure in its resilience against earthquakes, Journal of City identity, 35(12), 29-37. [ In Persian]
25. Pakru, N., Mousavi, M.S. (2022). Evaluation of urban resilience against earthquakes (case study: one area of Tabriz city), Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 23(68), 115-135.
26. Pourahmad, A., Hatem, A. (2022). Evaluating the level of resilience of the historical context of Kerman city against earthquakes and providing strategies for its improvement, Journal of Geography, 20(72), 37-59. [ In Persian]
27. Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K.,  Abdali, Y.,  Alah Qolipour, S. (2018). Analysis of resilience criteria in worn-out urban fabric against earthquakes with an emphasis on physical resilience (Case: District 10 of Tehran Municipality), Urban Research and Planning, 19(36), 1-21. [ In Persian]
28. Safaipour, Z. (2016). The role of urban management in achieving sustainable urban development (case study: Ilam city), Urban Development Studies, 1(2), 168-192. [ In Persian]
29. Saja, A.M. A., Goonetilleke, A., Teo, M., Ziyath,A. (2019): A critical review of social resilience assessment frameworks in disaster management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 35(2),1-18.
30. Saja, A.M. Aslam; Goonetilleke, Ashantha; Teo, Melissa and Abdul M. Ziyath (2019) A critical review of social resilience assessment frameworks in disaster management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 35(2),1-18.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101096.
31. Sajjad, M., Chan, J. C. L., & Chopra, S. S., 2021. Rethinking disaster resilience in high-density cities: Towards an urban resilience knowledge system. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102850. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102850.
32. Servi, M .(2004). Assessment of Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazards Using Spatial Multi Criteria Analysis: Odunpazari, Eskisehir Case Study, Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University
33. Shams, M., Malek Hosseini, O. (2002) Investigating the need to build a new city around Kermanshah, Journal of Human Geography, 2 (3), 45-60. [ In Persian]
34. Sharma, P. (2020): Opportunities and struggles of decentralized governance reform for urban municipalities in India. World Development Perspectives, 17)1),74-91.
35. Sina, D., Chang-Richards, A. Y., Wilkinson, S., & Potangaroa, R. (2019): What does the future hold for relocated communities post-disaster? Factors affecting livelihood resilience. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 34, 173-183.
36. Spencer, J. H., Finucane, M. L., Fox, J. M., Saksena, S., & Sultana, N. (2020). Emerging infectious disease, the household built environment characteristics, and urban planning: Evidence on avian influenza in Vietnam. Landscape and Urban Planning, 193(2),113-132.
37. Sun, H., Zhen, F., Xie, Z.(2020). Urban resilience assessment based on contradiction between supply and demand of the daily activity–environment system: A case study on Nanjing, China, Science of The Total Environment, 765(1),144-162.
38. Tebboth, M. G. L., Conway, D., Adger, W. N. (2019): Mobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systems. Global Environmental Change, 54(2), 172-183.
39. Therrien, M.-C., Usher, S., & Matyas, D., (2020). Enabling strategies and impeding factors to urban resilience implementation: A scoping review. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 28(1), 83-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12283.
40. Wang, C., Guo, J., Kuo,M.F. (2020): The building of social resilience in Sichuan after the Wenchuan earthquake: A perspective of the sociogovernment interactions. Safety Science, 126(2),26-43.
41. Wang,Q., Taylor, JE. (2016) Patterns and Limitations of Urban Human Mobility Resilience under the Influence of Multiple Types of Natural Disaster, 11(2), 218-232.
42. Zarghami, S., Taymuri, A.,  Mohammadian, H.,  Shamai, A. (2015). Measuring and evaluating the resilience of the urban neighborhoods against the studied earthquake: (central part of Zanjan city), urban research and planning, 7(27), 77-92. [ In Persian]
43. Ziyari, K., Kanuni, R. (2021). Structural analysis of social resilience in the framework of decent urban governance with a future research approach (case study: Ardabil city), Spatial Planning and Design Journal, 25(3), 60-91. [ In Persian]
44.