مدل ساختاری عوامل مرتبط با مدیریت دانایی

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 3، دوره 14، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 62، مهر و آبان 1402، صفحه 46-32   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2023.30689.6157

نویسندگان

مریم علیقلی زاده مقدم¹؛ سعید مذبوحی^{* 2}؛ صدرالدین ستاری³

¹دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران

²گروه آموزش و پرورش، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

³دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی اردبیل، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 15 تیر 1401،  تاریخ بازنگری: 13 آذر 1401،  تاریخ پذیرش: 14 آذر 1401 

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: در عصر اطلاعات و دانش محور ، مدیریت دانایی یکی از ویژگیهای بارز برای سازمان ها محسوب می شود مدیریت این منبع کمیاب باعث افزایش عملکرد  کسب و کار و مو فقیت سازمان در زمان فعلی و آینده می شود مدیریت  این منبع نا ملموس بقای  سازمانی را در محیط در حال تغییر بدنبال دارد . اساسی ترین مهارت برای مدیران سازمانهای دانش محور«مدیریت دانایی» است.هدف این پژوهش بررسی عناصر مدیریت دانایی محور و طراحی مدل  ساختاری این عناصر است.
روش شناسی پژوهش: در  پژوهش حاضر که با روش آمیخته انجام شده، در بخش کیفی از طریق نمونه گیری هدفمند  تعداد 15 نفراز خبرگان دانشگاهی ومتخصصان علوم تربیتی وزارت آموزش وپرورش تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری انتخاب شدند و مصاحبه انجام شد  . جامعه آماری در بخش کمی  شامل مدیران متوسطه مدارس دولتی در شهر تهران است که برای انتخاب نمونه از روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای تعداد400 نفر انتخاب شدند اطلاعات مورد نیاز در این بخش از جامعه آماری  با استفاده از ابزار پرسشنامه محقق ساخته جمع آوری گردید.. برای تجزیه وتحلیل دادهها در بخش کیفی  مولفه های مدیریت دانایی با روش دلفی فازی توسط خبرگان شناسایی و غربالگری شد و با استفاده از روش  سوآرا وزن دهی و الویت  بندی مولفه ها به ترتیب زیر حاصل شد. دانش آفرینی ،سازماندهی دانش ،نیاز به دانایی ،تسهیم دانش ، عملکرد دانایی محور ، خیره دانش و در بخش کمی برای مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری از تحلیل عاملی تاییدی وتی  تک نمونه استفاده شد
یافته ­ها: : نیاز به  دانایی،دانش آفرینی،سازمان دهی دانش ،ذخیره دانش،تسهیم دانش،،عملکرد دانایی محور
بحث و نتیجه­ گیری: مدیریت دانایی  از بزرگترین دستاوردهای عصر اطلاعات می‌ باشد لذا در دنیای به سرعت متغیر امروز، انسانها باید توانایی همراهی با تغییرات روز را داشته باشنددر این پژوهش عناصر مدیریت دانایی بررسی و مدل آن طراحی گردیده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مدل؛ مدیریت دانایی؛ دانش آفرینی؛ سازماندهی دانش؛ نیاز به دانایی؛ تسهیم دانش؛ عملکرد دانایی محور

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural model of factors related to knowledge management

نویسندگان [English]

maryam aligholizadehmoghadam¹؛ saeed mazboohi²؛ sadraddin sattari³

¹PhD student in educational management, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

²Departmentof Education, Allameh Tabataba'i University,Tehran,Iran.

³AssociateProfessor,Department of Educational Sciences,ArdabilBranch, Ardabil IslamicAzadUniversity,Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction: In the age of information and knowledge, knowledge management is considered one of the distinctive features for organizations. The management of this rare resource increases the business performance and success of the organization in the present and future. Looking for change. The most basic skill for managers of knowledge-based organizations is "knowledge management". The purpose of this research is to examine the elements of knowledge-based management and design the structural model of these elements.
 research methodology: In the present study, which was conducted with a mixed method, in the qualitative section, through targeted sampling, 15 university experts and educational science specialists of the Ministry of Education were selected until theoretical saturation was reached, and interviews were conducted. The statistical population in the quantitative part includes secondary school principals in the city of Tehran, and 400 people were selected for sample selection by cluster sampling method. The information needed in this part of the statistical population was collected using a researcher-made questionnaire tool.To analyze the data in the qualitative part, the components of knowledge management were identified and screened by experts using the fuzzy Delphi method, and using the Soara method, the components were weighted and prioritized in the following order. Knowledge creation, knowledge organization, need for knowledge, knowledge sharing, knowledge-oriented performance, knowledge storage, and in the quantitative part, confirmatory factor analysis was used to model structural equations.
Findings: need for knowledge, knowledge creation, knowledge organization, knowledge storage, knowledge sharing, knowledge-oriented performance.
Conclusion: Knowledge management is one of the greatest achievements of the information age, so in today's rapidly changing world, people must have the ability to keep up with the changes of the day.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Model, knowledge management, knowledge creation, knowledge organization, need for knowledge, knowledge sharing, knowledge-based performance

مراجع

1.Abtahi, H. and Salavatizadeh, A. Knowledge management in the organization. Tehran, Payvand Noo Publications, 2001(inPersian)

2.Adel.S.Gover.H (2017). Designing a fuzzy expert system for selecting knowledge management strategy. Journal of Information processing and Management, 30 (1), 91-119

3.Abbasi، Lotfollah ، Jamili Shabestari ، Hamidreza، Khorshidi، Shirzad Kebria، Baharak)2021). Providing a Knowledge Management Model for Primary School Principals (Mixed Performance). Journal of Islamic Life Style Centeredon Health, 2021:5(2):152-173(inPersian).

4.Asghari, Saeed and Akbarpour Shirazi, Mohsen. (2018). Presenting the future scenarios of the country's higher education using the fuzzy cognitive map method. Research and planning in higher education, 87, 1-26

5.Abdollahi, Mahboubeh. (2015) Investigating the role of organizational culture in establishing knowledge management in order to present a model, Ph.D. Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch(in Persian)

6.Ajmal Mian, Petri Helo and Tauno Keka: le, 2010

7.Aligoli, Mansoureh, Askari Masouleh, Saeed, Saeedi, Nima, Long live, Saeedeh. Investigating the role of knowledge management and intellectual capital on gaining competitive advantage (Case study of Saipa Company). Management Scientific Articles Database.2012(in Persian)

8.Ahmadpour Dariani, Mahmoud (2002), Entrepreneurship: Definitions, Theories, Patterns, Tehran: Author Publishing  (inPersian).

9.Carroll,J.M, Knowledge management support for tracher.

10.Costa, A. D. C. G., Strozzi, C. R. P., Forno, L. F. D., Sartori, R., Godina, R., & Matos, F. (2021). Knowledge management and the political–pedagogical project in Brazilian schools. Sustainability, 13(5), 2941

11.Davenport, Thomas H. (2000) Knowledge Management, Translation, Mohammad Hossein Rahman Seresht, Tehran; Sapco Publications, first edition.

12. Ghalizadeh Kalhor, Ahmad, 2017, A Study of Organizational Culture and Organizational Justice with Job Success of Primary School Principals in the City

13.Gómez-Marín, N., Cara-Jiménez, J., Bernardo-Sánchez, A., Álvarez-de-Prado, L., & Ortega-Fernández, F. (2022). Sustainable knowledge management in academia and research organizations in the innovation context. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(1), 100601.

.Hassanzadeh, Mohammad, (2007), "Knowledge Management: Concepts and Infrastructures", Tehran: Librarian Publications( in Persian) 14.

15.Hariharan, Arun. 2002, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: STRATEGIC TOOL. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE  MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

16.Jafari Moghadam, S. (1382). Knowledge management in school-based management system, Quarterly Journal of Education, No. 18(in Persian)

Karimi Moonaghi H, Rad M, Bakhshi M. Do the new methods of teaching in medical education 17.

have adequate efficacy? A systematic review. Strides in Development of Medical

Education.2013 ;( 2): 153-16  (in Persian)

18.Litvaj, I., Ponisciakova, O., Stancekova, D., Svobodova, J., & Mrazik, J. (2022). Decision-Making Procedures and Their Relation to Knowledge Management and Quality Management. Sustainability, 14(1), 572.

19 Mako, thesis for a master's degree in educational management(inPersian.

       20.Milton, N., Shadbolt , N., Cottman, H., Hammersley, M., 1999, “Towards a knowledge technology for knowledge management”, international JournalHuman-Computer Studies, 51, 615-41. 

 21.Mohammadpour, Ahmad. (2013) Qualitative research method against method - the first volume of logic and design in qualitative methodology. Published by sociologists(in Persian)

Nanda, Swagatika. (2016). Human resource management is the key elements in.22

 knowledge management. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(9), 114-116

23.Pourasdi, Mohammad, Angzi Quds, Ahadullah, & Hadavand, Mojtaba ,. (1395). Identifying and prioritizing the main factors of success in implementing knowledge management in the Ranger Training Center of the Third International Conference on Management and Economics, Torbat-e Heydarieh, Tarbiat Heydari University

(in Persian)

Prasertcharoensuk, T. Puttarakulwisan, B. (2014). Relationship between Organization Cultur.24

and Sufficiency School Management. Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 , 796 – 801

Roberts ,t & James, E. (2011).Characteristics of effective agriculture teachers. Journal of.25

agricultural.

26.Rafieyzadeh, R; Seyyed Ali Akbar Ahmadi & D. Vahdat. (2014). Assessing Organi-zational Readiness for Knowledge Management System Implementation (Case Study: Depart-ment Of Information Technology Development at the Ministry Of Industry, Mine and Trade). A Journal of Economics and Management. 3 (4). pp. 109-123(in Persian)

27.Rezaei, Nader, Panishte, Akbar and Farz Alizadeh, Akbar. (2016). Investigating the role of knowledge management in promoting creativity and innovation of employees in military organizations. Scientific and research quarterly of innovation and creativity in human sciences, 7(1), 17-48

28.Tootian Esfahani, Sedigheh, Mehrara, Assadollah, Hosseini, Ali Mohammad, 1397, The effect of organizational culture on organizational climate with respect to organizational change in the education system of Tehran, Special issue of research in educational systems, pp. 928-948( in Persian)