تعداد نشریات | 12 |
تعداد شمارهها | 567 |
تعداد مقالات | 5,878 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,659,413 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,597,206 |
طراحی الگوی استقرار سازمان یادگیرنده با تاکید بر رهبری دانش و سطوح یادگیری در سازمان نوسازی، توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور با رویکرد آمیخته | ||
دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی | ||
مقاله 9، دوره 14، شماره 5 - شماره پیاپی 63، آذر و دی 1402، صفحه 152-135 اصل مقاله (1.02 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2023.29896.5971 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
رضا بیجاری1؛ علیرضا منظری توکلی* 2؛ سمانه مهدیزاده3؛ سنجر سلاجقه4 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری، رشته مدیریت دولتی گرایش رفتار سازمانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
2دانشیار ، گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران. | ||
3استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی ،واحد کرمان،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،کرمان،ایران. | ||
4دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی ،واحد کرمان،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،کرمان،ایران. | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 12 اردیبهشت 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 24 مرداد 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 29 مرداد 1401 | ||
چکیده | ||
پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی الگوی استقرار سازمان یادگیرنده با تاکید بر رهبری دانش و سطوح یادگیری در سازمان نوسازی، توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور با رویکرد آمیخته صورت گرفت. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نظر شیوة جمعآوری دادهها از نوع اکتشافی است که با رویکرد آمیخته (کیفی- کمی) مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته است. در مرحلة اول جهت شناسایی مولفههای الگو، از روش کیفی و مصاحبههای عمیق استفاده شد. مشارکتکنندگان در بخش کیفی، 15 نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی و مدیران ارشد سازمان نوسازی، توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور بودند که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند. جهت تحلیل دادههای بخش کیفی از روش تحلیل تم و با استفاده از نرم افزار مکسکیودا استفاده شد. در ادامه جهت برازش الگوی طراحی شده در بخش کیفی، از روش کمی با رویکرد مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. مشارکتکنندگان در این بخش شامل 340 نفر از مدیران و کارشناسان سازمان نوسازی، توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور بودند که به روش تصادفی طبقهای انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری دادهها در بخش کمی، پرسشنامه مبتنی بر یافتههای بخش کیفی بود که روایی و پایایی آن مورد تایید قرار گرفت. تحلیل دادههای بخش کمی به وسیله نرمافزار اموس انجام شد. نتایج بخش کیفی نشان داد عوامل مرتبط با یادگیری با سه مقوله اصلی ویژگیهای سازمان یادگیرنده، ابعاد سازمان یادگیرنده و عوامل محیطی شناسایی شد. سطوح یادگیری مشتمل بر سه مقوله اصلی فردی، گروهی و سازمانی است. رهبری دانش شامل سه مقوله اصلی رهبری، مشارکت و ادغام دانش و نوآوری است. در نهایت سازمان یادگیرنده دارای 5 مقوله اصلی قابلیتهای شخصی، آرمان مشترک، تفکر سیستمی، الگوهای ذهنی و یادگیری جمعی است. در بخش کمی مشخص شد مدل عوامل مرتبط با سازمان یادگیرنده مبتنی بر رهبری دانش و سطوح یادگیری در سازمان نوسازی، توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور از برازش خوبی برخوردار است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
سازمان یادگیرنده؛ رهبری دانش؛ سطوح یادگیری؛ سازمان نوسازی؛ توسعه و تجهیز مدارس کشور | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Designing a model for establishing a learning organization with an emphasis on knowledge leadership and learning levels in the organization of renovation, development and equipping of schools in the country with a mixed approach | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Rezabijari63@yahoo.com Rezabijari63@yahoo.com1؛ alireza manzaritavakoli2؛ Samaneh Mehdizadeh3؛ Sanjar Salajeghe4 | ||
1PhD Student, Department of Public Management, Organizational Behavior, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran. | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran. | ||
3Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran. | ||
4Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The present study was conducted with the aim of designing a model for the establishment of a learning organization with an emphasis on knowledge leadership and learning levels in the organization of renovation, development and equipping of schools in the country with a mixed approach. This research is an exploratory type in terms of applied purpose and in terms of data collection method, which has been analyzed with a mixed (qualitative-quantitative) approach. In the first stage, qualitative method and in-depth interviews were used to identify the components of the model. Participants in the quality section were 15 academic experts and senior managers of the Organization for Renovation, Development and Equipping of the country's schools who were purposefully selected. To analyze the data of the qualitative section, the theme analysis method was used using Maxiquida software. Then, in order to fit the designed model in the qualitative part, a quantitative method was used with the structural equation modeling approach. Participants in this section included 340 managers and experts of the Organization for Renovation, Development and Equipping of the country's schools who were selected by stratified random sampling method. The data collection tool in the quantitative section was a questionnaire based on the findings of the qualitative section, the validity and reliability of which were confirmed. Quantitative data analysis was performed by Amos software. The results of the qualitative section showed that learning-related factors were identified with three main categories of learning organization characteristics, learning organization dimensions and environmental factors. Learning levels consist of three main categories: individual, group and organizational. Knowledge leadership includes three main categories: leadership, participation, and the integration of knowledge and innovation. Finally, the learning organization has 5 main categories of personal capabilities, common aspirations, systems thinking, mental patterns and collective learning. In a small part, it was found that the model of factors related to the learning organization based on knowledge leadership and learning levels in the organization of renovation, development and equipment of schools in the country has a good fit. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Learning organization, knowledge leadership, learning levels, organization of renovation, development and equipping of schools in the country | ||
مراجع | ||
Afrouz, D., Namvar, Y., Sattari, S. (2018). The impact of school leadership competencies on deeper student learning. Journal of School Psychology, 7(1), 50-65. . ]in persian[Agheli, M., Ajorloo, F., & Rostami, A. (2019). Identification of Moral Barriers in Organizations with Mixed Approach. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 7(3), 45-62. . ]in persian[Albon, R. and Jewels, T. (2014), “Mutual performance monitoring: elaborating the development of a team learning theory”, Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 23, pp. 149-164Alerasoul, S. A., Afeltra, G., Hakala, H., Minelli, E., & Strozzi, F. (2021). Organisational learning, learning organisation, and learning orientation: An integrative review and framework. Human Resource Management Review, 100854.Alipour, F., & Karimi, R. (2018). Creating and Developing Learning Organization Dimensions in Educational Settings; Role of Human Resource Development Practitioners. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 5(4), 197-213. . ]in persian[Altınay, F., Dagli, G., & Altınay, Z. (2016). The role of information technology in becoming learning organization. Procedia Computer Science, 102, 663-667.Armstrong, A., & Foley, P. (2003). Foundations for a learning organization: organization learning mechanisms. The Learning Organization, 10(2), 74-82Asgari, M. H., Tavakolian, F., & Taleghani, M. (2012). Examination of relationships between the application of learning organization components and faculty members work life in the universities. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 18(2), 45-60. . ]in persian[Bui, Q. T. (2021). Building a Learning Organization in the Digital Era: A Proposed Model for Vietnamese Enterprises. International Review of Management and Marketing, 11(3), 42.Chaijeena, N. (2018). A Model of Learning Organization for Early Childhood Private Schools in Chiang Mai Province. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies (FORMER NAME SILPAKORN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, HUMANITIES, AND ARTS), 463-486.Chou, S. Y., & Ramser, C. (2019). A multilevel model of organizational learning: incorporating employee spontaneous workplace behaviors, leadership capital and knowledge management. Learning Organization, 26(2), 132-145.Gholami, B., Gholami, B., Bahrami, S. (2011). A Study of the Relationship between Learning Organization with Leadership Styles of Educational Department`s Chairpersons at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Health Information Management, 7(0), . ]in persian[Ghosh, V., Kabra, G., & Mukerjee, H. S. (2022). Influence of Knowledge Leadership on IT Project Performance and Quality Practices: Examining the Role of Leader Risk-Mitigation Efforts. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 18(1), 1-20.Gil, A. J., Carrrillo, F. J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Assessing a learning organization model: A teacher’s perspective. Management in Education, 33(1), 21–31.Gil, A.J. and Mataveli, M. (2017), "Learning opportunities for group learning: An empirical assessment from the learning organization perspective", Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-02-2016-0009Gil, Alfonso J.; Rodrigo-Moya, Beatriz; Morcillo-Bellido, Jesús (2018). The effect of leadership in the development of innovation capacity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, (), LODJ-12-2017-0399–. doi:10.1108/LODJ-12-2017-0399Ju, B., Lee, Y., Park, S., & Yoon, S. W. (2021). A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship Between Learning Organization and Organizational Performance and Employee Attitudes: Using the Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire. Human Resource Development Review, 20(2), 207-251.Kanaany, M., Hasani, R., mohamadi, M. (2021). A Systematic Review of Identifying Aspects and Indicators of Improving Learning Culture Model at Schools. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 12(3), 15-1.Marquardt, M. J. (2002). Building the learning organization: mastering the 5 elements for corporate learning (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Pub.Najafpour, A., Najafbeigi, R., daneshfard, K. (2021). Designing and explaining the organizational model in the employees of state banks in Iran Based on Grounded Theory. Journal of Human Capital Empowerment, 4(1), 1-12 . ]in persian[.Nasiri Valikboni, F., Ghanbari, S., Sarchahani, Z. (2017). Designing Conceptual Model of Principals Development in Elementary School of Fars province. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 7(28), 1-26. . ]in persian[Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J. and Boydell, T. (1991), The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development, McGraw-Hill, London.Peschl, M.F. (2022), "Learning from the future as a novel paradigm for integrating organizational learning and innovation", The Learning Organization, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.Popova-Nowak, I.V. and Cseh, M. (2015), “The meaning of organizational learning: a meta- paradigm perspective”, Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 299-331Rus, C. L., Chirică, S., Raţiu, L., & Băban, A. (2014). Learning organization and social responsibility in Romanian higher education institutions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 146-153.Salehi, S., and Mirsapasi, N., and Farhangi, A. (1393). Investigating how to create a learning organization in the Broadcasting Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Management Research, 20 (56), 59-78. ]in persian[Senaratne, Sepani; Malewana, Chinthaka (2011). Linking Individual, Team and Organizational Learning in Construction Project Team Settings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(1), 50–63. doi:10.3763/aedm.2010.0133Serban, I. D. (2021). From organisational learning and knowledge acquisition to the learning organisation: the case of the European Commission through DG DEVCO. European Politics and Society, 1-18.Serrat, O. (2017). Building a learning organization. In Knowledge solutions (pp. 57-67). Springer, Singapore.Sheng, Z., Watkins, S., Yoon, S.W. and Kim, J. (2021), "Examining schools as learning organizations: an integrative approach", The Learning Organization, 28(4): 383-396.Shokri Nodeh, A., Kavousy, E., Alishiri, B. (2019). Presenting a model for learner Organizntion in line with enhancing Human Resources Efficiency and Intellectual Capital in the office of Cultural Deputy of Islamic Azad University. The Journal of Productivity Management, 13(48), 181-201. . ]in persian[Yahya Zadeh Waqefi, M., Salehi, M., Saeedi, A., Fazl Elahi, S. (2019). learning organization, leadership, organizational culture, human resources. The Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 15(1), 52-70.Yang, L. R., Huang, C. F., & Hsu, T. J. (2014). Knowledge leadership to improve project and organizational performance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 40-53.Zahedipour, M., Oladian, M., Hosseini, S. (2021). Presenting the Model of Effective Schools Based on Learning Organization (Case study: Elementary Schools in Tehran). Iranian Journal of Educational Society, 14(2), 229-240. . ]in persian[Zhang, L. & Cheng, J. (2015). Effect of Knowledge Leadership on Knowledge Sharing in Engineering Project Design Teams: The Role of Social Capital. Project Management Journal, 46 (5), 111-124Zolfagharansab Hajizadeh, A. and Azami, M. (2016). A Study of the Relationship between Knowledge Leadership and Learning Organization in Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 7th | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 115 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 98 |