بررسی رابطه بین سبک‌های حل تعارض، باورهای غیر منطقی و الگوهای ارتباطی با تعارضات زناشویی

فصلنامه علمی روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی

مقاله 1، دوره 15، شماره 55، اردیبهشت 1403، صفحه 20-1   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jpmm.2023.28979.3501

نویسندگان

عزیز بهرامیان¹؛ سلطانعلی کاظمی^{* 2}؛ حجت اله جاویدی³؛ مجید برزگر³

¹دانشجوی مقطع دکترا رشته روان‌شناسی، گروه روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.

²دانشیار گروه روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.

³استادیار گروه روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت: 05 مهر 1400،  تاریخ بازنگری: 04 مرداد 1401،  تاریخ پذیرش: 11 بهمن 1402 

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: تعارضات زناشویی از متغیرهای زیادی تأثیر می پذیرد و عوامل بسیاری می‌توانند زمینه‎ساز ایجاد تعارض شوند. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی رابطه ی بین سبک های حل تعارض، باورهای غیرمنطقی و الگوهای ارتباطی با تعارضات زناشویی انجام شد.
روش­: این پژوهش ، توصیفی تحلیلی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش تمامی زنان متاهل 25 تا 45 سال با حداقل 2 سال ازدواج مراجعه کننده به مراکز مشاوره شهرستان خرم بید در سال 1397 شامل490 نفر بود. از بین جامعه آماری به روش نمونه گیری تصادفی با استفاده از فرمول حجم نمونه کوکران 216 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شد. ابزار مورد استفاده در این پژوهش، سیاهه تعارض سازمانی رحیم، آزمون باورهای غیرمنطقی اهواز عبادی و معتمدین، پرسش‌نامه الگوهای ارتباطی کریستنسن و سالاوی و پرسش‌نامه تعارضات زناشویی ثنایی ذاکر و همکاران بود. برای بررسی فرضیه های مورد مطالعه از روش همبستگی استفاده شد.
یافته­ ها: نتایج نشان داد از بین سبک های حل تعارض (یکپارچگی، اجتنابی، مسلط، مصالحه و ملزم شده)، سبک یکپارچگی، سبک اجتنابی و سبک ملزم شده با تعارضات زناشویی رابطه معناداری دارند. بین باورهای غیرمنطقی و تعارضات زناشویی رابطه معناداری وجود دارد. از بین الگوهای ارتباطی (سازنده متقابل، اجتناب متقابل و توقع -کناره گیر)، الگوی ارتباطی سازنده متقابل با تعارضات زناشویی رابطه معناداری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سبک های حل تعارض؛ باورهای غیرمنطقی؛ الگوهای ارتباطی؛ تعارضات زناشویی

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship between Conflict Resolution Styles, Irrational Beliefs and Communication Patterns with Marital Conflicts

نویسندگان [English]

Aziz Bahramian¹؛ Soltanali Kazemi²؛ Hojjat Allah Javidi³؛ Majid Barzegar³

¹Ph.D. Student in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran.

²Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran.

³Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Background and purpose: Marital conflicts are affected by many variables and many factors can lead to conflict. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between conflict resolution styles, irrational beliefs and communication patterns with marital conflicts.
Methods: The present study was a descriptive-analytical and correlational study. The statistical population in this study included all married women aged 25 to 45 years with at least 2 years of marriage who referred to counseling centers in Khorrambid city in 1397, including 490 people. From the statistical population by random sampling using Cochran's sample size formula, 216 people were selected as the statistical sample. The tools used in this study were the Rahim Organistional Conflict Inventory, the Ebadi and Motamedin’s Ahwaz Irrational Beliefs Test, the Christensen and sullawey’s Communication Patterns Questionnaire, and the Sanai Zaker et al.’ Marital Conflicts Questionnaire. Correlation method was used to test the studied hypotheses.
Findings: Findings indicated that, among the conflict resolution styles (integration, avoidance, dominance, compromise and obligating), integration style, avoidance style and obligating style have a significant relationship with marital conflicts. There is a significant relationship between irrational beliefs and marital conflicts. Among the communication patterns (Mutual constructive, Mutual avoidance and expectation-withdrawal), there is a significant relationship between Mutual constructive communication pattern and marital conflicts

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Conflict Resolution Styles, Irrational Beliefs, Communication Patterns, Marital Conflict

مراجع

1. Allen M S, El-Cheikh S, Turner M J. A longitudinal investigation of irrational beliefs, hedonic balance and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 58, 41-45. 2017.

2. Babapour J. Study of Relationship Between Communicational Conflict Resolution Styles and Psychological Well- being Among University Students. Journal Management System. 2007, 1(4), 27-46.

3. 3. Ben-Ari R, Hishberg I. Attachment Styles, Conflict Perception, and Adolescents' Strategies of Coping with Interpersonal Conflict. Negotiation Journal, 2009, 25(1), 59-82.
4. 4. Brucejoyce R, Weil M, Calhoun E. Models of teaching in the high school classroom. Boston, 513-517.
5. Buehler C. Interparental conflict styles and youth problem behavior: A two-sample replicationstudy. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 2014, 60(1) ,119-132.
6. Christensen A, Sullaway M. Communications patterns Questionnaire. Unpublished questionnaire. Los Angeles: University of California. 1984.
7. Darbani S A, Farrokhzad P, Lotfi Kashani F. The effectiveness of long-term strategic family therapy on short-term marital conflicts. Applied Family Therapy Quarterly, 2020, 1(1), 54-68.
8. Davies P T, Harold G T, Goeke-Morey M C, Cummings E M.(2002). Children’s emotional security and interparental conflict. Monographs of Society for Research in Child Development. 2007; 67(3), 1-127.
9. DeChurch L A, Marks M A. Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2001, 12(1), 4–22.

10. Dew J, Jackson M. Commitment and Relationship Maintenance Behaviors as Marital Protective Factors during economic pressure. 2018.

11. 11. Dildar S, Sitwat A, Yasin S. Intimate enemies: Marital conflicts and conflict resolution styles in dissatisfied married couples. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 2013, 15(10), 1433-1439.
12. 12. Ebadi G H, Motamedin M. Examining the factor structure of Jones' irrational beliefs test in Ahvaz city. Journal of Knowledge and Research in Psychology, 23, 73-92.
13. 13. Esmaeilzadeh M, Iravani M R, Ghojavand K. Study relationship between Conflict Management Styles and Marital Life Quality among Spouses, Parents of Elementary School Students of 3 District in Esfahan City. Advanced Social Humanities and Management, 2015, 2(1),88-93.
14. 14. Etemadi A, Jaberi S, Jazayeri R, Ahmadi S. Investigating the relationship between communication skills, communication patterns and conflict resolution styles with marital intimacy. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, 2014, 5(17), 63-74.
15. 15. Filipović S, Vukosavljević-Gvozden T, Opačić G. Irrational beliefs, dysfunctional emotions, and marital adjustment: A structural model. Journal of Family Issues, 2016, 37(16), 2333-2350.
16. 16. Gottman J M, Gottman J S. 10 Principles for Doing Effective Couples Therapy (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology). New York: Norton, 32-70.
17. 17. Greeff A P, De Bruyne T. Conflict management style and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 2000, 26(4), 321-334.
18. 18. Hamamci Z. Dysfunctional relationship beliefs in marital satisfaction and adjustment. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 2005, 33(4), 313-328.
19. 19. Heavy C L, Larson B M, Zumtoble O C, Christensen A. The communication patterns questionnaire: The reliability validity of a constructive communication subscale. Journal of marriage and family. 1996, 58, 796-800.
20. 20. Hewitt B, Churchill B. Convergence and difference: Marriage and family life from across-cultural perspective, during the marriage of couples. Family Research Quarterly, 2020, 15(58), 181-195. Cross-Cultural. Family Research and Practice, 57-102: Elsevier.
21. 21. Hibel L C, Mercado Marital conflict predicts mother‐ to‐ infant adrenocortical transmission. Child development, 2019, 90(1), 80-95.
22. 22. Hou Y, Jiang F, Wang Marital commitment, communication and marital satisfaction: An analysis based on actor–partner interdependence model. International Journal of Psychology, 2019, 54(3), 369-376.
23. 23. Kadkhodai M. Comparison of cognitive distortions and communication patterns of couples seeking divorce and normal in Shiraz. Master Thesis in Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Marvdasht Islamic Azad University.
24. 24. Kenneth T, Amber M J, Susan C S. Impulsivity, communication and marital satisfaction in newlywed couples. Personal Relationships, 2017, 24(2), 423-439.
25. 25. Labrague L J, McEnroe – Petitte D M. An integrative review on conflict management styles among nursing students: Implications for nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 2017, 59, 45-52.
26. 26. Li PF, Johnson L N. Couples’ depression and relationship satisfaction: examining the moderating effects of demand/withdraw communication patterns. Journal of Family Therapy, 40, 63-85. 2016.
27. 27. Lu W, Wang J. The influence of conflict management styles on relationship quality: The moderating effect of the level of task conflict. International Journal of Project Management, 2017, 35(8), 1483-1494.
28. Maleki Z. Comparison of marital conflicts and conflict resolution styles in couples with satisfaction and dissatisfaction with marriage. Islamic Azad University of

2015.

29. 29. Masrat Mashhadi, Z., & Dolatshahi, B. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of marital adjustment on irrational beliefs. Psychological Development, 1(18), 69-84.
30. Mohammadi B, Heydarnia A, Abbasi H. Predicting marital commitment based on intimacy Marriage and forgiveness. Development of psychology, 2015, 3(16), 31-5.

31- Mousavi S F. Dimensions of during Economic Pressure. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2017, 39(2); 191-204.

32. 32. Nielsen D M, Horan J J. An attempt to improves Self-esteem by modifying specific irrational beliefs. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2006, 10(2), 137-149.
33. 33. Papp LM. Topics of marital conflict in the everyday lives of empty nest couples and their implications for conflict resolution. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 2018, 17(1), 7-24.
34. 34. Parvandi A, Arefi M, Moradi A. The role of family performance and couple communication patterns in predicting marital satisfaction. Pathology, Counseling and Family Enrichment, 2016, 2(1), 54-65.
35. 35. Proulx C M, Ermer A E, Kanter J B. Group‐based trajectory modeling of marital quality: A critical review. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2017, 9(3), 307–327. 
36. 36. Outar L, Turner MJ, Wood A G, Lowry R. I need to go to the gym: Exploring the use of rational emotive behaviors therapy upon exercise addiction, irrational and rational beliefs. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2018, 6(2), 82-93.
37. Rahim MA. A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict, Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26 (2), 368-376.
38. 38. Rahim MA. Empirical studies on managing conflict. The Journal of Conflict Management, 2000, 11(1), 5-8.
39. 39. Rahim MA. Functional and dysfunctional strategies for managing conflict. In IACM 23rd Annual Conference Paper.
40. 40. Rahim A, Kaufman S, Psennica A Model of the style of Handling conflict, marital satisfaction, and Instability. 2004.
41. Rajabi G, Abbasi Q, Sudani M, Aslani K. The effectiveness of premarital education in the way of election program and interpersonal selection on communication beliefs of single students. Journal of Family Psychotherapy and Counseling, 2015, 6(1), 79-97.
42. 42. Razavi S H, Jazayeri R A S, Ahmadi SA, Etamadi E. Comparison of the premarital preparation program based on the Olson model and the native premarital counseling package on problems, 2018.
43. 43. Ridley CA, Wilhelm M S, Surra CA. Married couples conflict responses and marital quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2001, 18(4), 517-534.
44. 44. Robbins A, Senzo D D. Fundamentals of management (6th ed.). (S. M. Arabi, M. A. Mohammad Rafiee, & B. Asrari Ershadi, translators). Tehran: Cultural Research Bureau. 2007.
45. 45. Sanagooi M, Jan Bozorgi M, Mahdavian A. The relationship between couple communication patterns and marital satisfaction. Quarterly Journal of Islamic Studies and Psychology, 2011, 5(9), 57-77.
46. 46. Sanai Zaker B, Barati T, Boostanipoor A. family and marriage measurement scales. Ba'ath publications. 2017.
47. 47. Schudlich T D, Papp L M, Cummings E M. (2011). Relations between spouses' depressive symptoms and marital conflict: A longitudinal investigation of the role of conflict resolution styles. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(4), 531 540.
48. 48. Shemshiri S, Deh Yadegari E. Investigating the Relationship between Irrational Beliefs and Marital Satisfaction of Married Female Students. Islamic Azad University of Sirjan. 6th Scientific Research Conference on Educational Sciences and Psychology, Social and Cultural Damages of Iran. Tehran, Association for the Development and Promotion of Fundamental Sciences and Techniques. 2018.

49. Shih H A, Susanto E. Conflict management styles, emotional intelligence, and job performance in public organizations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2010, 21(2), 147-168.

50. 50. Stackert RA, Bursik K. Why am I unsatisfied? Adult attachment style, gendered irrational relationship beliefs, and young adult romantic relationship satisfaction. Pers Individ Dif. 2003, 34(8),1419-1429.
51. 51. Strong B, Devault C, &Cohen The Marriage and Family Experience: Intimate Relationships in a Changing Society (11 ed.). USA: Wadsworth general learning. 2011.
52. Tariveh B, Karimi Q, Akbari M, Moradi O. Structural model of marital quality: Investigating the Predictors of marital interaction components and conflict resolution Styles. Biannual Journal of Applied Counseling, 2020, 7(1), 81-100. marital commitment based on marital communication beliefs, emotional involvement, and criticism in the family with mediating role of marital intimacy. Quarterly of Applied Psychology, 14(1): 139-158.
53. 53. Walsh F. Strengthening family resilience (Third). New York, NY: Guilford Press. 216.
54. 54. Waring EM. Enhancing marital intimacy through facilitating cognitive self-disclosure. British: Publisher Routledge.