اثر شخصیت تاریک مدیران مدارس بر زیرآب زنی با میانجی‌گری منفعت طلبی شخصی

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 3، دوره 14، شماره 6 - شماره پیاپی 64، بهمن و اسفند 1402، صفحه 34-46   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2024.29671.5932

نویسندگان

محمد شیبک¹؛ ناصر ناستی زایی^{* 2}

¹دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی،گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

²دانشیار رشته مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

تاریخ دریافت: 08 دی 1400،  تاریخ بازنگری: 21 اردیبهشت 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 17 فروردین 1401 

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: با وجود تبعات مخرب رفتارهای انحرافی زیرآب زنی، منفعت طلبی شخصی، ماکیاول‌گرایی، خودشیفتگی و جامعه ستیزی تا کنون این رفتارها مورد غفلت واقع شده‌اند. مطالعه با هدف بررسی اثر شخصیت تاریک (ماکیاولیسم، خودشیفتگی و جامعه ستیزی) مدیران مدارس بر زیرآب زنی با میانجی‌گری منفعت طلبی شخصی انجام گرفت.
روش شناسی پژوهش: روش پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی مبتنی بر مدل معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری تمامی مدیران مدارس شهر زاهدان در سال تحصیلی 1401-1400 به حجم 380 نفر بود که به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی-طبقه‌ای تعداد 191 مدیر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه‌های زیرآب زنی (اقتباس از شول و همکاران، 1398)، سه گانه‌ی شخصیت تاریک (جوناسون و وبستر، 2010) و منفعت طلبی شخصی (اقتباس از هادوی نژاد و امیرخانلو، 1395) بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از مدل معادلات ساختاری با کمک نرم افزار اسمارت پی ال اس استفاده شد.
یافته­ ها: اثر مستقیم شخصیت تاریک بر زیرآب زنی (70/5, t=32/0β=) و منفعت طلبی شخصی (41/4, t=38/0β=)، اثر مستقیم منفعت طلبی شخصی بر زیرآب زنی (15/8, t=51/0β=) مثبت و معنادار بود. همچنین اثر غیرمستقیم شخصیت تاریک بر زیرآب زنی با میانجی‌گری منفعت طلبی شخصی (87/3, t=19/0β=) مثبت و معنادار بود.
بحث و نتیجه­ گیری: مدیران دارای شخصیت تاریک (ماکیاولیسم، خودشیفتگی و جامعه ستیزی) بیشتر به دنبال منفعت شخصی خود در سازمان بوده که این امر به نوبه خود موجب بروز رفتار زیرآب زنی می‌گردد. به مدیران عالی سازمان‌ها پیشنهاد می‌گردد که در انتخاب مدیران شخصیت و منفعت طلبی‌ آن‌ها را با کمک روانشناسان شخصیت شناسایی کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

شخصیت تاریک؛ ماکیاولیسم؛ خودشیفتگی؛ جامعه ستیزی؛ زیرآب زنی؛ منفعت طلبی

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of dark personality of scholl principals on backstabbing through mediation of self–interest

نویسندگان [English]

Mohammad Sheybak¹؛ naser nastiezaie²

¹Msc student of Educational Administration

²University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Despite the devastating consequences of deviant behaviors backstabbing, Machiavellianism, narcissism, anti-socialism and self–interest, these behaviors have so far been neglected. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dark personality (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and anti-socialism) of scholl principals on backstabbing through mediation of self –interest.
Research methodology: The research method was descriptive-correlation based on structural equation model. The statistical population was all school principals in Zahedan city in the academic year 2021-2022 (N=380). By stratified random sampling 191 school principals were studied through questionnaires of backstabbing (Adapted from Scholl et al., 2019), The Dark Third Personality (Jonason & Webster, 2010) and Personal Selfishness (Adapted from Hadavi Nejad & Amirkhanlou, 2016). Structural equation modeling with the help of Smart PLS software was used to analyze the data.
Findings: Direct effect of dark personality on backstabbing (β=0.32, t=5.70), and self –interest (β=0.38, t=4.41), direct effect of self –interest on backstabbing (β=0.51, t=8.15) was positive and significant. Also, the indirect effect of dark personality on backstabbing through mediation of self –interest (β=0.19, t=3.87) was positive and significant.
Conclusion: Principals who have dark personalities (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and anti-socialism) are more likely to self –interest in the organization, which in turn leads to backstabbing behavior. Thus recommended to senior managers of organizations in selecting of principals, identify their personality and self-interested with the help of personality psychologists.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Dark Third Personality, Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Anti-socialism, Backstabbing, Self- Interest

مراجع

Akbriyani, S., Nasr Isfahani, A., Shaemi Barzoki, A. (2020). Providing a Pattern for Character Assassination in Organization (Case Study: Governmental Organizations in Khorramabad). Journal of Public Administration, 11(4), 629-660. [In Persian]

Akram, U., Allen, S., Mccarty, K., & Akram, A. (2018). The Relationship Between Insomnia Symptoms and the Dark Triad Personality Traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 131(2018), 212-215.

Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J., Dietvorst, R. C., Belschak, F. D., van den Berg, W. E., & Rietdijk, W. J. (2013). Theory of mind and empathic explanations of Machiavellianism: A neuroscience perspective. Journal of management, 39(7), 1760-1798.

Beil, J. T. (2016). Measuring Pride in the Workplace: The Creation and Validation of a Workplace Pride Measure. Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.

Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S., & De Wilde, M. (2017). Perceived organizationalsupport and employees’ well-being: The mediating role of organizational dehumanization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 527-540.

Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. John Wiley & Sons.

Campbell, W. K., Bush, C. P., Brunell, A. B., & Shelton, J. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1358–1368.

D’Souza, M. F. & Lima, G. A. (2015). The dark side of power: The dark triad in opportunistic decision-making. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 8(2), 135-156.

Dianati Delami, Z., & Rezapour, R. (2015). Relation between Corporate Ethics, Social Responsibility, Machiavellianism and Tax Avoidance. Ethics in science and Technology, 9(4), 83-94. [In Persian]

Dinparast, F., Saeei, A. (2012). Methodological Reconstruction of Public Choice Theory. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4(2), 87-110. [In Persian]

Eimer, F., & Garkaz, M.  (2019). Investigating the Role of Self-consciousness Excitement (pride and shame) In Ethical decision-making in Accounting. Journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting, 3(6),165-197. [In Persian]

Eslami G, Rahimnia F, Mortazavi S, Khorakian A. (2018). Causes of Backstabbing Behaviors in Public Organizations. Management and Development Process Quarterly, 31 (3), 49-84. [In Persian]

Fattahi, F., Jahangirfard, M., & Mehdizadeh, A. (2020). Investigating the Effect of Managers Political Behaviors on Employees Deviant Behaviors. Order and Security Guards, 13(1), 197-224. [In Persian]

Greenbaum, R. L., Hill, A., Mawritz, M. B., & Quade, M. J. (2014). Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management, 43 (2), 585-609.

Ham. C., Lang, M., Seybert, N., & Wang. S. (2017). CFO narcissism and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1089–1135.

Harms, P., Spain, S., & Hannah, S. (2011).Leader development and the dark side of personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 495–509

Ilya, B., & Vassil, A. (2016). Psychological warfare analysis using Network Science approach. Procedia Computer Science, 80(2016), 1856-1864.

Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331-339.

Jay, S. J. (2019). Character Assassination as Tool in International politics (A Case Study of the United States-Russian Federation’s Relations). Theory and Methodology of International Ralations and Diplomacy, 1-183.

Jones D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 93–108.

Kazemi, F., Nazari, Y., Zare, A., & Ramazan, M. (2020). Machiavellian Leadership and Deviant Behavior of Employees: Explaining Mediating Role of Unethical Authoritarian Leadership and Organizational Cynicism. Ethics in science and Technology, 15(2),140-149. [In Persian]

Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015). The tango of two deadly sins: The socialfunctional relation of envy and pride. Journal of personality and social psychology, 109(3), 453.

Lawrence, S. A. (2008). The case for emotion induced toxicity: Making sense of toxic emotions in the workplace. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to emotion in organizations (Pp. 73–89). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model. In MH. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiation in organizations (pp. 68–90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lu, Y., & Roto, V. (2016). Design for Pride in the Workplace. Psychology of Well-Being, 6(1), 1-18.

Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Namie, G. & Namie, R. (2009). Workplace bullying causes, consequences, and corrections. In P. Lutgen-Sandvik & B. Davenport-Sypher (Eds.), Destructive organizational communication: Processes, Consequences, and constructive ways of organizing. New York, NY: Routledge.

Malone, P., & Hayes, J. (2012). Backstabbing in Organizations: Employees’ Perceptions of Incidents, Motives and Communicative Responses. Communication Studies, 63(2), 194-219.

Michaeli Manee, F., Salehi, M., Ahmadi Khouie, S. (2017). The Dark Triad of Personality in Convicts and Non-convicts: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and Psychopathy. Clinical Psychology and Personality, 15(1), 113-126. [In Persian]

Mousavi, S., & Zare, F. (2018). Investigating the Role of Political Behaviors on the Hypocoristic Behaviors Regarding the Mediating Effect of Spirituality. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 161-187. [In Persian]

Murphy, P. R. (2012). Attitude, Machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(4), 242–259.

Nazemi, R., & Imani, H. (2018). The Relationship of the Moral Components of Selfism and Empathy with Academic Dishonesty. Ethics in science and Technology, 13(2), 61-68. [In Persian]

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (2013). Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-Blowing. In Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics (Pp. 153-172). Springer.

Neuman, J. H. & Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence Concerning Specific Forms, Potential Causes and Preferred Targets. Journal of Management, 24(3), 391-419.

Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(5), 893-899.

Ren, R. (2007). Quality of supervisor-subordinate relationship, cultural values, and organizational justice. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation in Management, Texas A & M University.

Richmond, K.A. (2001). Ethical reasoning, Machiavellian behavior, and gender: The impact on accounting students’ ethical decision making. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation In General Business with a major in Accounting, Virginia, Blacksburg University.

Rijsenbilt, A., & Commandeur, H. (2013). Narcissus enters the courtroom: CEO narcissism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 413-429.

Rohmer, R. (2013). The mediating role of pride between transformational leadership and organizational commitment.

Rousseau, M. B., & Duchon, D. (2015). Organizational narcissism: Scale development and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, 19(1), 159-175.

Shool, H., Damghanian, H., Rastgar, A., Danaee fard, H., Azar, A. (2019). Provide Pattern for Antecedents of Employees Deviant Behaviors in Organizations by Using Meta-Synthesis Method. Management Researches, 12(44), 5-30. [In Persian]

Smith, M., Wallace, C., & Jordan, P. (2016). When the dark ones become darker: How promotion focus moderates the effects of the dark triad on supervisor performance ratings. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 37(2), 236-254.

Smith, M., Wallace, J., & Jordan, P. (2016). When the dark ones become darker: How promotion focus moderates the effects of the dark triad on supervisor performance ratings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 236–254.

Treadway،D. C., Breland،J. W., Williams, L. M., Cho, J., Yang, J., & Gerald, R. F. (2013). Social influence and interpersonal power in organizations: Roles of performance and political skill in two studies. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1529- 1533.

Valentine S, Fleischman G. (2003). The impact of self-esteem, Machiavellianism, and social capital on attorneys' traditional gender outlook. Journal of Business Ethics; 43(4), 323-335.

Yammarino, F. J., Mumford, M. D., Serban, A., & Shirreffs, K. (3013). Assassination and Leadership: Traditional Approaches and Historiometric methods. The LeadershipQuarterly, 24(6), 822-841.