ارائه یک مدل برای ارتقای هماهنگی و رهبری آموزشی جهت بهبود مدرسه

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 13، دوره 14، شماره 6 - شماره پیاپی 64، بهمن و اسفند 1402، صفحه 248-260   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jedu.2024.30263.6056

نویسندگان

مهناز رحیمی¹؛ عزیزه پاشایی یوسف کندی^{* 1}؛ محمد حسنی²

¹دانشجوی دکتری، گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

²استاد، گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 21 فروردین 1401،  تاریخ بازنگری: 22 تیر 1401،  تاریخ پذیرش: 25 مرداد 1401 

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: بهبود مدرسه موجب افزایش ظرفیت معلمان و رهبران و در نهایت باعث بهبود نتایج یادگیری دانش­آموزان می­شود. هدف از این تحقیق ارائه یک مدل برای ارتقای هماهنگی و رهبری آموزشی جهت بهبود مدرسه است.
 روش شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و با توجه به نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی مبتنی بر مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری به روش تحلیل مسیر می­باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق حاضر شامل تمام معلمان مقطع ابتدایی ناحیه یک شهر ارومیه به تعداد 1113 نفر است که با استفاده از جدول کرجسی و مورگان تعداد 290 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری داده­ها از پرسشنامه استاندارد رهبری توزیع شده هولپیا و همکاران (Hulpia et al., 2009) استفاده شد که شامل 40 گویه است. پس از تایید روایی صوری و محتوایی ابزار پژوهش توسط تعدادی از خبرگان، بوسیله تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی پنج مولفه­ی، هماهنگی آموزشی، رهبری آموزشی، اهداف مشترک، کار مشترک و مشارکت در تصمیم­گیری استخراج شد و پایایی ابزار پژوهش با استفاده از روش آلفای کرونباخ مقدار 953/0 محاسبه شد. ارتباط متغیرها از طریق مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری با روش تحلیل مسیر مورد آزمون قرار گرفت.
یافته ­ها: نتایج نشان داد که رهبری آموزشی 20 درصد، کار مشترک 18 درصد، اهداف مشترک 41 درصد و مشارکت در تصمیم ­گیری 21 درصد از واریانس هماهنگی آموزشی را تبیین می­کنند.
بحث و نتیجه­ گیری: با توجه به روابط بین متغیرهای رهبری آموزشی، کار مشترک، اهداف مشترک و مشارکت در تصمیم ­گیری می­توان گفت که، مجموعه ­ی این مولفه­ ها باعث ایجاد هماهنگی در مدرسه می ­شوند که در نهایت باعث بهبود مدرسه و افزایش یادگیری دانش­ آموزان می­ شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

هماهنگی آموزشی؛ رهبری آموزشی؛ اهداف مشترک؛ کار مشترک؛ مشارکت در تصمیم‌گیری؛ بهبود مدرسه

عنوان مقاله [English]

Provide a model for promoting pedagogical coordination and educational leadership for school improvement

نویسندگان [English]

Mahnaz Rahimi¹؛ Azizeh pashaie yousef kandi¹؛ Mohammad Hassani²

¹Ph.D. Student, Department of Educational Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

²Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction and goal: Improving the school increases the capacity of teachers and leaders and ultimately improves students' learning outcomes. The purpose of this study is to provide a model for promoting pedagogical coordination and educational leadership for school improvement.
Research methodology: In terms of purpose, the present research is applied and according to the method of collecting descriptive-correlational information based on structural equation modeling using the path analysis method. The statistical population of this research includes all the primary school teachers of the first district of Urmia city in the number of 1113 people, using the Karjesi and Morgan table, 290 people were selected as a statistical sample by cluster sampling method. The standardized distributed leadership questionnaire of Hulpia et al. (2009) consisting of 40 items was used to collect data. After confirming the formal and content validity of the research tool by a number of experts, five components, educational coordination, educational leadership, common goals, joint work and participation in decision-making were extracted through exploratory factor analysis and the reliability of the research tool was calculated using Cronbach's alpha method as 0.953. The relationship between the variables was tested through structural equation modeling with the path analysis method.
Findings: The results showed that educational leadership explains 20%, joint work 18%, common goals 41% and participation in decision making 21% of the variance of educational coordination.
Conclusion: In this study, the relationships between the variables of educational leadership, joint work, common goals and participation in decision-making are confirmed, which together create coordination in the school, which ultimately improves the school and increases students' learning.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Pedagogical Coordination, educational leadership, common goals, joint work, participation in decision making, school improvement

مراجع

Abdollahi, B., Khabareh, K. & Shirzadegan, M. (2017). Exploratory analysis of the role of school principals in the formation and consolidation of professional development groups based on teacher cooperation. New Educational Thoughts, Volume 13, Number 3.

Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. (2017). Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full-range’ theory. International Journal of Management Reviews 19: 76–96.

Bjork, Lars G., & Joseph Blase. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability, Volume 21, pp. 195–208.

Boylan, M. (2018). Enabling adaptive system leadership: Teachers leading professional development. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Volume 46, pp. 86–106.

Burton, T. (2015). Exploring the Impact of Teacher Collaboration on Teacher Learning and Development. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3107.

De Neve, D., & Devos, G. (2017). How do professional learning communities aid and hamper professional learning of beginning teachers related to differentiated instruction?
Teachers and Teaching, Volume 23, pp. 262-283.

Deventer, V., & Kruger, A. G. (2003). An Educator’s Guide to School Management Skills. Pretoria: Van Schaik, pp. 201–19.

Díaz-Delgado, M., & Garcia-Martinez, I. (2019). Standards for School Principals in Mexico and Spain: A Comparative Study. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 27.

Fathalipour Ahangar, A. (2014). The Impact of Teachers' Professional Skills on the Academic Achievement of Primary School Students from the Perspective of Babol Teachers. The First National Conference on Sustainable Development in Educational Sciences and Psychology, Social and Cultural Studies. Tehran. https: // civilica.com / doc / 321095. [In Persian].

García Martínez, I., & Martín Romera, A. (2019). Promoting the pedagogical coordination through the middle leadership in secondary education. A systematic review. Bordon Revista de Pedagogia, Volume 71, pp. 55–70.

Griffiths, O., L. Roberts, and J. Price. (2019). Desirable Leadership Attributes are Preferentially Associated with Women: A Quantitative Study of Gender and Leadership Roles in the Australian Workforce. Australian Journal of Management, Volume 44 (1), pp. 32–49

Grootenboer, P. (2018). The Practices of School Middle Leadership. Leading Professional Learning. Singapore: Springer.

Hallinger, P., & Heck R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, Volume 30, pp. 95–110.

Hallinger, P., & R. H. Heck. (2011). Exploring the Journey of School Improvement: Classifying and Analyzing Patterns of Change in School Improvement Process and Learning Outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Volume 22 (1), pp. 1–27.

Hanuscin, D., Chen, Y., Rebello, C., Shina, S. & Muslu, N. (2014). The Affordances of Blogging as to Practice to Support Ninth-Grade Science Teachers' Identity Development as
Leaders. Journal of Teacher Education, Volume 65(3), pp. 207-222.

Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership different perspectives. University of London:
I nstitute of Education.

Harris, A., & Michelle J. (2017). Middle leaders’ matter: Reflections, recognition, and renaissance. School Leadership & Management, Volume 37, pp. 213–16.

Harris, Alma. (2014). Distributed Leadership Matters: Perspectives, Practicalities, and Potential. Thousand Oaks: Corwin, ISBN 9781-41298118-7.

Heng, M.A., & Marsh, C. (2009). Understanding middle leaders: A closer look at middle leadership in primary schools in Singapore. Educational Studies 35: 525–36.

Hickey, N., Flaherty, A., & Mannix McNamara, P. (2022). Distributed Leadership: A Scoping Review Mapping Current Empirical Research. Societies, volum 12(15).

Hitt, D. H., & P. D. Tucker. (2016). Systematic Review of key Leader Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement: a Unified Framework. Review of Educational Research, Volume 86 (2), pp. 531–569.

Hokka, P., & Etelapelto, A. (2014). Seeking New Perspectives on the Development of Teacher Education: A Study of the Finnish Context. Journal of Teacher Education, Volume 65, pp. 39–52.

Hulpia, H., Devos G., & Van Keer H. (2009). The Influence of Distributed Leadership on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment: A Multilevel Approach. The Journal of Educational Research, Volume 103, pp. 40–52.

Javadi, V., Bush T., & Ashley Ng. (2017). Middle leadership in international schools: evidence from Malaysia. School Leadership & Management, Volume 37, pp. 476–99.

Jong, L. Merinik, J., & Admiraal, W. (2019). School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, Volume 86, pp. 102-
925.

Lashvay, L. (2003). Distributed leadership. Clearinghouse on educational policy management, 1-7. Retrieved January 26, 2006 from Research Roundup.

Lee, M., & Louis, K. (2019) Mapping a strong school culture and linking it to sustainable school improvement. Teach. Teach. Educ, 81, 84–96.

Leith wood, K. (2016). Department-head leadership for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, Volume 15, pp. 117–40.

Leith wood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School leadership and   management, Volume 28(1), pp. 27-42.

Liu, S., Hallinger P., & Feng, D. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: does trust matter? Journal of Educational Administration, Volume 54, pp. 661–82.

Liu, S., Hallinger P., & Feng, D. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: does trust matter? Journal of Educational Administration, Volume 54, pp. 661–82.

Malloy, J., & Leith wood, K. (2017). Effects of Distributed Leadership on School Academic Press and Student Achievement. In How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success. Cham: Springer, pp. 69–91

Miranda, S. R. (2019). Preferred Leadership Styles by Gender. Journal of Management Development, Volume 38 (7), pp. 604–615.

Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership—Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management & Administration, Volume 31(4), pp. 437-448.

Nirumand, P., & Masjidian Jazi, S. (2005). Educational Management. Tehran: Peik Marva Publications. [in Persian].

Paranosic, N. y., & Riveros, A. (2017). The metaphorical department head: using metaphors as analytic tools to investigate the role of department head. International. journal of
leadership in education, Volume 20(4), pp. 432-450.

Piyaman, P., Hallinger, P., & Viseshsiri, P. )2017(. Addressing the achievement gap: Exploring principal leadership and teacher professional learning in urban and rural primary schools in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration 55: 717–34.

Pourrahim, M., Zahed Babalan, A., & Moeini Kia, M. (2020). The relationship between educational leadership and teacher self-efficacy with professional development of elementary teachers in District 2 of Ardabil. Scientific Journal of Applied Educational Leadership, Volume 1(3), pp. 76- 65

Rigby, J. (2015). Principals' sensemaking and enactment of teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Administration, Volume 53(3), pp. 374-392.

Sabouri, F., Abdollahi, B., & Safari, A. (2019). Cooperation between school teachers and improving the quality of the teaching-learning process. school management. volume 7(3).

Safari, A, Abdollahi, B, Naveh Ebrahim, A., & Zeinabadi, H. R. (2017). Investigating Barriers to Teachers' Professional Development in Schools: A Mixed Research, School Management, Volume 5 (1), pp. 49-23. [in Persian]

Safari, A. (2017). Designing a model for teachers, collaborative professional development in Tehran city education, Doctoral Thesis, Kharazmi University. [in Persian]

Seobi, Boitshepo A., & Lesley Wood. (2016). Improving the instructional leadership of heads of department in under-resourced schools: A collaborative action-learning approach. South African Journal of Education, Volume 36, pp. 1–14.

Stevenson, Michael, Hedberg John. G., O’Sullivan Kerry-Ann., & Howe Cathie. (2016). Leading learning: the role of school leaders in supporting continuous professional development. Professional Development in Education, Volume
42, pp. 818–35.

Wahlstrom, Kyla L.,  & Louis K. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, Volume 44, pp. 458–95.

Wales, K. (2009). Educational management and leadership (translated by Mohammad Ali Tusi). Tehran: Baztab.

Wingrave, Mary, & Margery McMahon. (2015). Professionalization through academicization: Valuing and developing the industry in Scotland early years. Professional Development in Education, Volume 42, pp. 710–31.

Woods, D., & T. Brighthouse. (2013). The A to Z of School Improvement. London: Bloomsbury Education.

Yousefi, A., Zahid Bablan, A., Moini Kia, M. (2021). The Relationship between Principals' Instructional Leadership and School Effectiveness with the Mediating Role of School Culture in Ardabil Province's Secondary Schools. New Approaches in Educational Administrations.12(2). Pp. 96-72. [in Persian].

Yukl, G. (2012). Efective Leadership Behavior: What we Know and What Questions Need More Attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, Volume 26, pp. 66–85.

Zeinabadi, H. (2010). Investigating the role of transformational leadership style on academic achievement of Tehran students. PhD thesis, Faculty of Educational Sciences: Tarbiat Moallem University. [in Persian].