مدل معادلات ساختاریِ ارتباط میان ساختار سازمانی و توانمندسازی روانشناختی کارکنان (شاهد تجربی: اداره آموزش و پرورش شهرستان بابلسر و بهنمیر)

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 8، دوره 6، شماره 21، خرداد و تیر 1394، صفحه 147-166   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

حسین صمدی میارکلائی^{* 1}؛ حسنعلی آقاجانی²؛ حمزه صمدی میارکلائی³

¹کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت دولتی، عضو باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان، قائمشهر، ایران

²دانشیار و عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

³دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت: 24 تیر 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 24 تیر 1394 

چکیده

توانمندسازی به معنای آماده کردن کارکنانی است که به اندازة کافی دارای استقلال باشند، و به آن­ها اجازه می­دهد تا بتوانند موقعیت­های مسئله­ای پیش­بینی نشده از قبیل شکایات را حل نمایند. توانمندسازی روانی یکی از عواملی است که بیش­ترین تاثیر را بر موفقیت، رشد اقتصادی و بهره­وری سازمان­ها و بنگاه­ها دارد، و از جهتی یکی از مولفه­های مهم در جهت توانمندسازی کارکنان در داخل سازمان، ساختار سازمانی مناسب است. هدف اصلی این تحقیق بررسی رابطه میان ساختار سازمانی و توانمندسازی روانی کارکنان است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، 113 نفر از کارکنان اداره آموزش و پرورش شهرستان بابلسر و بهنمیر می­باشند، که برای نمونه­گیری آن از روش سرشماری استفاده شد، هم­چنین برای جمع­آوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه بهره گرفته، و در نهایت 102 پرسشنامه پس از تکمیل و بازنگری مورد بررسی قرار گرفت، و تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها نیز بوسیله نرم­افزارهای SPSS و LISREL انجام شده است. یافته­­ها نشان می­دهد میان ساختار سازمانی و توانمندسازی رابطه منفی و معنی­داری وجود دارد. هم­چنین میان مولفه­های ساختار سازمانی و توانمندسازی، ارتباط منفی و معنی­داری وجود دارد. امروزه سازمان­ها برای بهبود عملکرد و اثربخشی نیازمند به کارکنان توانمند هستند تا به اهداف خود در جهت رشد و بهره­وری برسند، از این رو، وظایفة اصلی سازمان­ها باید حرکت و توجه بیش­تر به سمت توانمندسازی بیش­تر در کارکنان و ایجاد ساختاری مناسب برای توسعه آن باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

ساختار سازمانی؛ توانمندسازی روانی؛ اداره آموزش و پرورش

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural Equation Modeling of Relationship between Organizational Structure and Employees' Psychological Empowerment (An Empirical Evidence: Babolsar and Bahnamir City Education and Training Administration)

نویسندگان [English]

h. s¹؛ h. a²؛ h. s³

چکیده [English]

Empowerment means providing service employees with enough autonomy to allow them to handle unforeseen problem situations such as complaints. At first hand, psychological empowerment is one of factors that have most influence on organizations and firms' success, economic growth, and productivity. One the other hand, suitable organizational structure is one of important components to employees' empowerment within organization. The main purpose of present research is investigation of relationship between organizational structure and employees' psychological empowerment. Statistical population of present study includes 113 persons of babolsar and bahnamir cityeducation and training administrations' employees and the census method was used for sampling, they also used a questionnaire to collect information and finally, 102 completed questionnaires were analyzed and reviewed, and analyzing the data by SPSS and LISREL software is done. Results show that there is a significant and negative relationship between organizational structure and employees' empowerment. So there is a significant and negative relationship between organizational structure components and empowerment. Nowadays, in order to performance and effectiveness improvement, organizations need to empowered employees to accomplish their own goals towards growth and productivity. Thus, organizations should pay more attention to their employees’ empowerment and creation of suitable organizational structure for its development that is main duties of them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Organizational structure, Psychological Empowerment, Education and Training Administration

مراجع

Amichai, Y., Katelyn, H., & Samuel, A. (2008). Assessment of organisational involvement in implementing empowerment, Journal of computers in human behavior,14, 34-49.

Conger, J.A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The Empowerment Process :integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 471–482.

Conger, J.A. (1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others, The Academy of management Executive ,3(1). 17-24.

Conger, J.A., & Kanungo, R.N. (1985). The empowerment process:Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management Review, 13 (3). 471- 482.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometricka, 16, 297-334.

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.

Conca, F. J. et al. (2004). Development of a measure to assess quality management in ertified firms, European journal of operational research, 156, 683-697.

Child. J. (2008). Organization structure, environment, and performance: the role of strategic choice, Sociology, 6, 1-22.

Chigozirim, P., & Mazdarani, E. (2008). The impact of employee empowerment on service quality and customer satisfaction in service organizations.

Daft, R. L. (2004). Theory and Designee Structure. Parsaeian, A. Erabi, S. M. Tehran: Cultural Researchs Office Publication  (In Persian).

Eskandari, M. (2002). The Design and Explanation of Management Empowerment Model. Doctoral Dissertation. Tehran, Tehran University, Management College (In Persian).

Fremont, E. (2005). Fandamentals of Organization Behavior, South- Westem college Publishing.

Gorelick, C. (2005). Organisational Learning vs the Learning Organisation: A Conversation with a Practicioner. In The Learning Organisation, 383–388.

Gresov, C., & Drazin, R. (2007). Equifinality: functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of management review, 403-428.

James, p. (1998). organization Structure, Pacific Sociological Review. 20, 2, April.

Katsikea, E., Theodosiou, M., Perdikis, N., & Kehagias, J. (2011) . The effects of organizational structure and job characteristics on export sales managers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of  World Business, 221–233.

Kasraei, A., & Alirahimi, M. M. (2009). Investigation of Relationship between Organizational structure and effectiveness  relevance in organization country pensioner to employs spectrum, Vision journal. 65-79  (In Persian).

Liao, Ch., Shu-Hui, Ch., & Pui-Lai, T. (2010). How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure.european management journal.

March, J., & Simon, H. (2009). Organizations, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 195-324.

Ma, R., Hechanova, R.A., Alampay, E., & France, P. (2006). Psychological Empowerment, Job Satisfaction and Performance among Filipino service workers, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 91-72.

Miri, A., Rangriz, H., & Sabzikaran, E. (2011). The Relationship Between organizational structure and Employees Empowerment in National Iranian Oil Product Distribution Company. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 68-51  (In Persian).

Moghli, A.R, Hasanpour, A., & Hasanpour, M. (2009). An Investigation of Relationship between Employee Empowerment with Organizational Commitment in Nineteen Areas of Education and Training Organization of Tehran City. Pub Admin Quart. 119-231  (In Persian).

Majidi, A., & Ghahremani, A., & Mahmoudabadi, A. (2008). An Investigation of Relationship between Employee Empowerment Dimensions with Job Security of Army Sciences University. Arm Scie Resea Quart, 134-154  (In Persian)..

Mihm, J., Loch, C. H., Wilkinson, D., & Huberman, B. A. (2010). Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Management science, 831-848.

Mirkamali, S. M., Hayat, A., Norozi, A., & Jarrrahi, N.(2009). Investigation of Relationship between Employee Empowerment with Organizational Commitment, job satisfaction in Tehran university. Daneshvare rafter. 15-30  (In Persian).

Nafari, N. & Omidfar, G. (2010). Investigation of effect Level Organizational structure in Employee psychological Empowerment. Management & Development Process. 82-63  (In Persian).

Powell, L. (2002). Shedding a tier: flattening organizational structures and employee empowerment. The international journal of educational management, 54-59.

Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of cronbach,s coefficient alpha. Journal of consumer research, 381-391.

Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G, M. (1997). The Road to Empowerment: seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamic.37-51

Robbins, S.P. (2009). Organizational behavior: concepts, controversies and applications. Translated by: Parsaeian A, A'rabi M. Vol 1, 14^th ed. Tehran: Cultural Researchs Office Publication  (In Persian).

Roy, Y., & Sheena, S. (2005). Empowerment through choice? a critical analysis of the effects of choice in organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviors. 41-79.

Saj, M. (2000). Shedding a tier: flattening organizational structures and employee empowerment, The international journal of educational management, 54-59.

Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A.,  & Nason, S. W. (1997). A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness Satisfaction, and Strain. Journal of Management, 679-704.

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 1442–1465.

Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management journal, 483-504.

Spreitzer, G. M., & Doneson, D. (2005). Musings on the past and future of employee empowerment, Forthcoming in the handbook of organizational development (Edited by tom cummings).

Thomas, K., & Velthouse, B. (1990). Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An interpretive Model of Intrinsic task Motivation. Academy of Management Review, 673-674.

Vazifedoust, H., Nasiri, M., & Norouzi, N. (2012). Analyzing the relationship between organizational structure and employee empowerment in Eastern Azerbaijan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 10- 24.

Vaezi, R, & Sabzikaran, E. (2010). Relationship between organizational structure and personnel empowerment in NIOPDC-Tehran area. Modiryat tahavol. 178-153  (In Persian).

Van de ven, A. & Ferry, D. (1979). Measuring and assessing organizations. John Wiley, New York.

Van Looy, B., Gemmel, G., & Van Dierdonck, R. (2003). Services management; an integrated approach. Great Britain: Pearson education limited. 2^nd edition.

Wallace, M., Storm, J. (2003). Organizational Change in a Regional Local council , Australian Journal of Business & Social inquiry, 51-60

Willem, A., & Buelens, M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: The impact of organizational structure dimensions, Journal of Information Management, 151–160.

Zahedi, S., Bodlaei, H., Sattarinasab, R., & Koshki, A. (2009). Investigation of Relationship between Employee Empowerment and Organizational Commitment. Park and grows center, 59-69  (In Persian).