رابطه ی مولفه های سازمان یادگیرنده با خلاقیت و نوآوری دبیران دبیرستان ها و مراکز پیش دانشگاهی

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 1، دوره 3، شماره 12، آذر و دی 1391، صفحه 1-20   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

حمید احسانی قدس^{* 1}؛ میر محمد سید عباس زاده²

¹کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی و مدرس دانشگاه پیام نور

²استاد گروه تربیتی دانشگاه ترومیه

تاریخ دریافت: 08 آذر 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 08 آذر 1394 

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی رابطه بین مولفه های سازمان یادگیرنده (از دیدگاه پیتر سنگه) با خلاقیت و نوآوری دبیران دبیرستانها و مراکز پیش دانشگاهی شهر بیجار بود. روش این پژوهش، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، شامل210 نفر دبیر زن و مرد مدارس متوسطه و پیش دانشگاهی سطح شهر بیجار بوده، که با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای تعداد 135 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری داده ها از پرسش نامه‌های سازمان یادگیرنده با 28 گویه و پرسشنامه خلاقیت و نوآوری با 18 گویه استفاده شد. ضرایب پایایی این پرسش نامه ها با استفاده از روش آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه و به ترتیب 91/0 و 72/0 بدست آمده است. بررسی داده های گردآوری شده با استفاده از آزمون های همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه به روش گام به گام انجام شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که: (الف) بین سازمان یادگیرنده با خلاقیت و نوآوری دبیران در سطح اطمینان99/ 0رابطه مثبت و معنی‌دار وجود دارد. (ب) بین مولفه های سازمان یادگیرنده با خلاقیت و نوآوری دبیران همبستگی مثبت معنی دار وجود دارد. (ج) از بین مولفه های سازمان یادگیرنده، مولفه های یادگیری تیمی و قابلیت شخصی، توان پیش بینی متغیر خلاقیت و نوآوری را دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سازمان یادگیرنده؛ خلاقیت و نوآوری؛ مدارس متوسطه

عنوان مقاله [English]

On the Relationship between Learning Organization Components and High school teachers’ Creativity and Innovation

نویسندگان [English]

H Ehsani GHods¹؛ M.M Seyed abas zadeh²

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between a learning organization )from Peter Senge’s point of view) and creativity and innovation of high school teachers in Bijar. The population of this correlational study comprised 210 male and female high school teachers from which a sample of 135 teachers was selected through stratified random sampling. For the purpose of data collection, a use was made of the learning organization questionnaire with 28 items and the creativity and innovation questionnaire with 18 items. The Cronbach’s Alpha reliability indexes of the questionnaires were 0.91 and 0.72 respectively. The results of data analyses employing Pearson product moment correlation and stepwise multiple regression indicated that: a. there was a positive relationship between the learning organization and the creativity and innovation of high school teachers,b. there was a significantly positive relationship between the components of learning organization and creativity and innovation of high school teachers, c. it was also revealed that from among the learning organization components team learning and personal mastery could predict the variable of creativity and innovation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

learning organization, Creativity and Innovation, teachers, high school

مراجع

Aghaei Fishani, T. (1998). Creativity and innovation in humans &

organizations. Tehran: Termeh.(in Persian).

 Akhavan, P., & Jafari, M. (2006). Learning organization the necessity of

knowledge age. Tadbir, 169, 19-40. .(In Persian)

 Alagheband, A. (2007). Theoretical essentials and principles of

educational administration. Tehran: Ravan Publishing. (In Persian)

 Alvani, M. (2007). Public management. Tehran: Nay publishing. (In

Persian)

 Alberto, A.J., VAActor, G.J., Eulogio, C. (2007). Leadership and

organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: lessons from

Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 349–359.

Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M.(1996). Assessing the

work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal,39,1154–84.

Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review,

76, 77-89

Bartell, Sh.M. (2001). Training’s new role in learning organizations.

Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 4, 354-363.

Behroozi M., Farokh Nejad. K., MirAhmadi T. (2010). The survey of

effective factors on the willingness of the members of Cultural and

Educational Organizations for changing into learning organization in Busher

province. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational

Administration, Islamic Azad University Marvdasht Branch, Vol.1, 1, 19-36. (In

Persian)

Bowen, G.L., Rose, R.A. & Ware, W.B. (2006). The reliability and validity

of the school success profile learning organization measure. Evaluation and

program planning, 29, 97–104.

Carvalert, S. (1996). Managing in organization that learn. New York:

Black Well.

Chinowsky, P., & Carrillo, P. (2007). Knowledge management to learning

organization connection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 3, 122-130.

Crainer, S. (1998). Key Management ideas: thinkers that changed the

management world (management master class). New Jersey: Financial Times/

Prentice Hall.

Daft, R.l. (1998). Essentials of organizational theory and design.

Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

Eskildsen, J.K., Dahlgaard, J.J., & Norgaard, A. (1999). The impact of

creativity and learning on business excellence. Total Quality Management, 4&5,

523-530.

 

Ghanizadeh, S. (2008). The relationship between principals, particinative

style teachers,

creativity in Girls,

high schools of District one Urmia City.

unpublished MA thesis, Urmia University.

Garvin, D.A. (1993). Bulding a learning organization. Harvard Business

review, 78-91.

Giesecke, J., & Mcneil, B. (2004). Transitioning to the learning

organization. Library Trends, 1, 54–67.

Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership,

creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62,

461–473.

Hasani, M. (2006). A model for spreading innovation in the Iran education

system. Educational innovations Quarterly, 5, 52-58(In Persian).

 Isaac, N., & Bamburg, J. (1992). Can schools become learning

organizations?. Educational Leadership, 3, 42-44.

 Jamalzadeh, M., Rahgozar, H., & Alavi, F. (2011). A Survey of Shiraz

Islamic Azad University with regard to Learning Organization from the

Perspective of Faculty Membersof Teachers of Shiraz. Quarterly Journal of

New Approaches in Educational Administration, Islamic Azad University

Marvdasht Branch, Vol.2, 5, 71-94. (In Persian)

Kezar, A. (2005). What campuses need to know about organizational

learning and the learning organization. New Directions For Higher Education,

131, 7-22.

Khalili Shourini, S. (2003). Principles and essentials of educational

planning. Tehran: Yadvareh Ketab. (In Persian)

Kontoghiorghes, C., Awbrey, S.M., & Feurig, P.L., (2005). Examining the

relationship bentwee learning organization characteristics and change

adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance. Human Resource

Developme Quarterly, 2, 185-212.

 Liao, S., Fei, W. & Liu, C. (2008). Relationships knowledge inertia,

organization learning and organization innovation.Technovation, 28, 183-195.

 Maria, R.F.S. (2003). Innovation and organizational learning culture in

the malaysian public sector. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 205-

214.

Mets, T., & Torokoff, M. (2007). Patterns of learning organization in

estonian companies. Trames, 2, 139–154.

Martins, E.C., Terblanche, F. (2003). Builing organisational culture that

stimulates creativity and innovation. European jornal of management, 1, 64-74.

Moghimi, M., Rahbar, A.H., & Eslami , H. (2007). Organizational

spirituality and Its effects on creativity of employees (comparative approach).

Ethic in Science and Technology Quarterly, 3 & 4, 89 – 98. 

 

Mojtahedi, M. (2009). The relationships between a learning organization.

unpublished MA thesis, Urmia University.

Mola Hosseini, A., & Barkhordar, B. (2007). The survey of relationships

Between Self – Management and innovation of employees in organizations of

Kerman province. Bulletin of Humanities and Social Sciences (Special of

Management), 27, 97-113.

Nasr, A.R., Safi, A., & Nili, M.R. (2006). The necessity of change,

flexibility and innovation in the calendar of schools. Journal of Social Sciences

and Humanities of Shiraz University(Special of Educational Sciences), 4, 223-

245. (In Persian)

Niknami, M. pour Zahir, A. T. Delavar. A. Ghaffari Majlj. M.(2010).

Design and evaluation of causal models of educational administrators'

innovation and Creativity in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in

Educational Administration, Islamic Azad University Marvdasht Branch, Vol.1,

3, 1-28. (In Persian)

O’Connor, N., & Kotze, B. (2008). Learning organizations’: a clinician’s

primer. Australasian Psychiatry, 3, 178.

Pourhossaini, J. (2007). Learning organizations the necessity of vocations

and jobs today world. Management Quarterly, 121 & 122, 52-58. (In Persian)

Rahman Sersht, H. (2007). Theories of organization and management, from

modernism to post-modernisn. Tehran: Doran Publishing. (In Persian)

 Rezaeeyan, A. (2008). Fundmentals of organization and management.

Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)

 Robbins, S.P. (2003). Organizational bhavior. 10 Edition, New Jersey:

Prentice-Hall.

 Skyttner, L. (1998). The future of systems thinking. Systemic Practice and

Action Research, 2, 195-203.

Sun, P.T. (2006). A Method for assessing and developing features of the

learning organization. unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato.

Schermerhorn, Jr., J.R. (2002). Management and organizational behavior

essentials. New York: John Wiley.

Seied Abbaszadeh, M.M. (2008). Managing Oneself. Urmia: jahad

danshgahi Publishing, West Azarbaijan Unit. (In Persian)

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning

organization. New York: Random House.

Yaqubi, M. (2007). Organizational learning in learning organization.

Isfahan: Beautiful Arts Publishing. (In Persian)