تاثیر تفویض اختیار بر بهره وری منابع انسانی منطقه یک دانشگاه آزاداسلامی

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی

مقاله 4، دوره 3، شماره 12، آذر و دی 1391، صفحه 51-65   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

حسین حاتمی

استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سروستان

تاریخ دریافت: 08 آذر 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 08 آذر 1394 

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی تاثیر تفویض اختیار بر بهره وری منابع انسانی منطقه یک دانشگاه آزاد با استفاده از مدل هرسی وگلد اسمیت بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی از نوع زمینه یابی بوده است. حجم جامعه مورد پژوهش 2720 نفر می باشد که از این تعداد 272 نفر به عنوان نمونه پژوهش از راه نمونه گیری طبقه ای تصادفی انتخاب شدند. از پرسشنامه هرسی وگلد اسمیت جهت جمع آوری داده‌ها استفاده شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها در دو سطح آمار توصیفی و آمار استنباطی صورت گرفته است، که نتایج بدست آمده نشان می‌دهد که بین تفویض اختیار با برخی ازمولفه‌های بهره وری شامل: توانایی, حمایت سازمان و اعتبار قوانین و تصمیمات سازمان رابطه مستقیم و معنی‌داری وجود دارد، و بر این اساس مشخص گردید که افزایش و کاهش مقدار تفویض اختیار منجر به افزایش و کاهش بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی می‌گردد .

کلیدواژه‌ها

تفویض اختیار؛ بهره وری؛ منابع انسانی؛ مدل هرسی وگلد اسمیت

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Study of the Effect of Delegation of Authority with Productivity of Human Resources in First Region of Islamic Azad University

نویسندگان [English]

H Hatami

چکیده [English]

The research was to examine the effect of delegation of authority on productivity of human resources with the Herssi and Goldsmith model in the first region of Islamic Azad University. Delegation of authority is an event inside organizations and is accomplished under certain conditions according to which parts of decision-making and executive authority is delegated to lower lines. Delegation of effective authority is the best tool that administrators use to improve productivity. Productivity is an efficient criterion for evaluating the performance of these activates and efforts in various economic, social and cultural parts. The research methodology was descriptive. The study population included 2720 persons. A sample of 272 individuals was randomly selected through stratified sampling. In order to gather the data of this research the questionnaire of Herrsi and Goldsmith was used. The analyses of data were conducted in two levels of descriptive and inferential statistic, the results of which are as follows: there was a significant relationship among ability, organization support, law validity and organization decision and delegation of authority. It was concluded that based on the increase and decrease of the amount of delegating authority the productivity of the human resources would increase or decrease.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Delegate authority, Productivity, Human Resources, Herssi and Goldsmith Model

مراجع

Brown .D.(1992).Why participative management. Management Review, P.42.

Bucle, Robert and Chrisrioancenk, j.(1995). Worker Rights promote

productivity. Growth,Challenge,39,8.

 

Dickinson, T.L. (1993). Attitude about performance appraisal. Hillsdale:

Erlbaun., PP. 141-162,

Fadavi, A. (2000), "Measuring productivity through added value. Approach,

Number 57.(in Persian).

Farahmand Faghihi, N. (1995). Productivity and quality in its evolution.

Journal of Management, No. 16, pp. 19-27. .(in Persian).

Fayyazi, A.. (1995). Productivity Concepts. Tehran Publication, No. 8, pp.

24. .(in Persian).

Froughinasab, R. Karimian, AR. (2002).Delegating authority: the advantages,

disadvantages, obstacles and limitations. Journal of Management Development. No.

38, pp. 1- 3 ..(in Persian).

Gholipour, M. (1998) "The relationship between patterns of strategic

decisions on labor productivity." M.Sc. thesis, Shahid Beheshti University. Faculty

of Administrative Sciences. .(in Persian).

Hadizadeh moghadam,A. (2000). Delegating authority: the forgotten

principle. Journal of Management, pp 4. .(in Persian).

Halls, Fayana and John Humphrey. (1997). Improving productivity and

benefit .Firouzeh Publishing, Tehran. .(in Persian).

Kermanshahi, M. (1999). Why and how to delegate authority. Journal of

research and education reform, No. 50, pp. 2-7. .(in Persian).

Khademi aval, M. (2005). Organizational empowerment and decentralization.

Support magazine, No. 12, p. 1. .(in Persian).

Khorshidi, S. (2003). The relationship between empowerment and

conscientious performance of work in the province and economic affairs and

finance units. MA thesis. Center for Public Management. .(in Persian).

Mirhosseini, M. (1998).Decentralization and empowerment of some

theoretical concepts and practical solutions". Cooperation, No. 79, pp 3 .(in

Persian).

Mirzakhany, A. (2007). Management. Resalat magazine. P 1. .(in Persian).

National Iranian Productivity Organization. (1996). The culture of

productivity, heavy industry, 27. .(in Persian).

Hatami, H.. Mirjafari,A ,S. Mojahedi Jahromi (2012).An Investigation into

the Relationship of Working Life Quality to Organizational Commitment and

Productivity in Jahrom Medical Science University. Quarterly Journal of New

Approaches in Educational Administration

Vol2 , No. 3, pp. 28.(in Persian)

Ritezky , K.M,(1994).work place Democracy. Personal . Vol73 , No6. 

 

Rodashti Rahnema, F. (1996). Social and economic discipline to enhance

national productivity. Tadbir, No. 67. (in Persian)

Rogers, M. (1996). Teamwork and Leadership. Remzi Bookshop, Istanbul.

Bass BM (1990). availabel in the www.academicjournals.org/err.(03,02,2012).

Shafiee, S.. (2001). Empowerment, Welfare, p 1.

Swart, J. C. (1985). Clerical Workers on Flextime, Personnel, 62,pp 4.

Valinia, A. (2005). Empowerment. Support, p 7.

Zare, A. (1999). Increasing productivity requires empathy. Journal of Sea

Message, No. 75, p 5. .(in Persian)

Zeighami M. (2010). Review of nursing administrators in hospitals and

clinics to entrusting the Social Security Branch.MS Thesis Management, Tehran:

Tehran University. .(in Persian)